[Role of retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the current treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. / Locul nefroureterectomiei laparoscopice retroperitoneale in tratamentul actual al carcinomului urotelial de cai urinare superioare.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, the standard treatment for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma is open nephroureterectomy, by double lumbar and iliac approach, with peri-meat bladder cuff excision. Since the first laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed, several surgical teams were interested by this approach for the treatment of the upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To plead for retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy and to assess the surgical indications. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Were analyzed the results of the recent published series on nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Were included studies on conventional, laparoscopic and retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy, with at least 10 cases, published after 2000. RESULTS: The advantages of retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy are: minimum blood loss, reduced analgesic intake, a shorter hospital stay and a faster return to previous activities, lower rate of intra- or postoperative complications compared with trans-peritoneal laparoscopy or conventional surgery. With a proper case selection the oncologic safety of the retro-peritoneoscopy is equivalent with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: On short term, retro-peritoneoscopic approach shows similar oncological outcome with other techniques. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is a viable alternative to conventional or trans-peritoneoscopic procedure, with clear cut benefits for the patient. Retro-peritoneoscopy is associated with a low morbidity.

[Advantages of ilio-inguinal extraction of the kidney after retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy]. / Avantajele extragerii ilio-inghinale a rinichiului în nefroureterectomia retroperitoneoscopica.

INTRODUCTION: The manner to extract the specimen after retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy varies to different surgical teams. The aim of the surgeon is to extract the specimen with minimum parietal injuries, according with oncologic principles. The objective of our study was to evaluate the ilio-inguinal approach to extract the specimen after retro-peritoneoscopic nephroureterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Evaluation and follow-up of 71 patients with retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer (65 pelvic urothelial carcinoma and 6 urothelial carcinoma of the ureter). Ilio-inguinal incision was used for 68 patients to extract the specimen. RESULTS: The operating time was 110 +/- 47 min. Blood lost 101 +/- 57 ml. Retroperitoneoscopic approach 10 +/- 4 min. Ilio-inguinal approach 25 +/- 10 min. The weight of the specimen was 601 +/- 127g. Tumor dimension was 5.9 +/- 1.9 cm. No conversion to open surgery was made. No late post surgery complications were registered ( follow-up at 2 and 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The enlarged nephroureterectomy can be performed using retroperitoneoscopic approach and the specimen can be extracted through an incision at iliac fossa. This approach can be used to extract large specimens preserving the esthetic laparoscopic benefit as well as the oncologic salty and reducing the risk of post-operative eventration.

Retro-peritoneoscopic assisted cryoablation for small renal tumors: the first cases treated in Romania.

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective alternative to radical nephrectomy for selected cases. Retro-peritoneoscopic cryoablation (RCA), combine the benefits of minimal invasiveness of the laparoscopy with the advantage of preserving renal function of the nephron sparing surgery. The aim of our study was to assess the initial results with RCA of small renal tumors. Since Jan 2007, twelve consecutive patients, with small renal tumors (mean tumor size 3.89 cm) underwent RCA at our institution. The patients were assessed using: clinical exam, lab exam, ultrasound, contrast enhanced CT scan. For cryoablation, we used the Galil Medical SeedNet with 17 Gauge cryoprobes, under combined retro-peritoneoscopic and ultrasound guidance. Protocol follow-up design includes clinical exam, lab exam and contrast enhanced CT scan at 3,6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Mean surgical time was 145.42 min. and mean blood loss was 179.17 ml. Two patients presented: bleeding at the extraction of the cryoprobes and urinary fistula which healed with surgical treatment. Histological examination of the core biopsy revealed clear cell carcinoma in 8 patients, papillary carcinoma in 3 patients and angiomyolipoma in 1 patient. Cryosurgical ablation of small renal tumors using multiple ultrathin 17 Gauge cryoprobes is a feasible treatment option. Retro-peritoneoscopic approach allows optimal access to the kidney and endoscopic real-time ultrasound control of the freezing process.

Technical difficulties in retro-peritoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Is tumor location important?

UNLABELLED: Tumor location on the posterior aspect of the kidney or close to the renal hilum could increase the difficulty of the retro-peritoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. The aim of our study was to assess how tumor location influences the difficulty of the retro-peritoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed a nonrandomized prospective study in 116 patients with localized renal cell carcinoma who underwent RRN, between Jan. 2000 and Jan. 2005. Twenty-nine patients with a tumor located close to the renal hilum or on the posterior aspect of the kidney (Gr.A) were compared with 87 patients with a tumor at a distance from the renal hilum (Gr.B) in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and difficulty of the dissection. The difficulty of the dissection was subjectively estimated by the main surgeon using a three degree scale (G1-easy, G2-medium, and G3-difficult). All the operations were finalized by retro-peritoneoscopy and G4-very difficult degree--was not recorded. In the Gr. A, the operative time was longer (117.28 min vs. 94.63 min, p < 0.001) and blood loss was higher (291.86 ml vs. 199.54 ml, p < 0.001). The dissection of the renal pedicle was also more difficult in the Gr. A either for artery dissection (G3 27.59% vs. 11.49%, p = 0.0202) or for vein dissection (G3 20.69% vs. 8.05%, p = 0.0321), while peri-fascial dissection was less frequently difficult (G3 10.34% vs. 28.74%, p = 0.0237). Tumor location close to the renal hilum or on the posterior aspect of the kidney increases the difficulty of renal pedicle dissection.

[Hypospadias surgery--etiology of complications]. / Etiologia complicatiilor în chirurgia hipospadiasului.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVE: Hypospadias surgery carries a hole list of precocious and late complications which may occur even years later after surgery such as a very late fistula or a recurrent chordee. The aim of this article was to investigate the reasons, why a significant number of patients with different types of hypospadias presents the same kind of postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 51 boys who underwent surgery for different types of hypospadias were reviewed. Primary repair was performed in 41 patients. 12 (29.4%) of them had postoperative complications. 10 boys had previously between 1 to 7 repairs. The complications were those mentioned in the literature (fistulas, stenoses, megalo-urethra and relapse of the ventral curvature). The etiology of the complications was evaluated according to the type of hypospadias, the surgical technique used for the initial corrective surgery and postoperative care. RESULTS: The original malformation had been miss-classified in 10% of the cases; technical mistakes occurred in 70% of the cases; complications derived from the complexity of the repair procedure were documented in 10% of the cases, and in 10% of the cases the cause was complex: technical and postoperative care mistakes. CONCLUSIONS: Complications after hypospadias surgery appears due to five main reasons which usually coexist. In order to prevent complications, an accurate classification must be made, the surgical procedure has to be chosen accordingly, the surgical technique must be perfect and the postoperative care adequate.