ABSTRACT
Introduction. The ever-expanding indications for total hip arthroplasty are leading to more implants being placed in younger as well as in older patients with high functional demand. Also, prolonged life expectancy is contributing to an overall increment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. The Vancouver classification has been the most used for guiding the surgeon choice since its proposal in 1995. Fractures occurring over a hip femoral implant can be divided into intra-operative and post-operative PFFs, and their treatment depends on factors that may severely affect the outcome: level of fracture, implant stability, quality of bone stock, patients' functional demand, age and comorbidities, and surgeon expertise. There are many different treatment techniques available which include osteosynthesis and revision surgery or a combination of both. The goals of surgical treatment are patients' early mobilization, restoration of anatomical alignment and length with a stable prosthesis and maintenance of bone stock. Significance. The aim of this review is to describe the state-of-the-art treatment and outcomes in the management of PFFs. We performed a systematic literature review of studies reporting on the management of PFFs around hip stems and inter-prosthetic fractures identifying 45 manuscripts eligible for the analysis. Conclusions. PFFs present peculiar characteristic that must be considered and special features that must be addressed. Their management is complex due to the extreme variability of stem designs, the possibility of having cemented or uncemented stems, the difficulty in identifying the "real" level of the fracture and the actual stability of the stem. As a result, the definition of a standardized treatment is unlikely, thereby high expertise is fundamental for the surgical management of PPFs, so this kind of fractures should be treated only in specialized centres with both high volume of revision joint arthroplasty and trauma surgery.
ABSTRACT
Aim To compare a medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior stabilized (PS) TKA designs from a subjective, clinical and biomechanical point of view, in a single-centre, single-surgeon, case-control non-randomized trial. Methods Sixteen patients were randomly picked up from case series into each group. Subjective outcome was assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score Questionnaire (FJSQ). Clinical evaluation included range of motion (ROM). All patients underwent gait analysis by a treadmill with force-measuring plaques and videorecording device; data were recorded for 30 seconds and included cadence, step length, stance time and walking speed. A blinded qualitative analysis of the pattern of gait was defined as biphasic or non-biphasic. Descriptive statistics for the continuous study variables and statistical significance were calculated for all parameters with independent-samples t-test and χ2 test to analyse difference in pattern of gait between groups. Results Mean FJSQ in the MP group was 91.87 (CI 95%: 88.12- 95.46) and 75.31 (CI 95%: 67.97-81.56) in the PS group (p=0.029). Mean post-operative ROM was 117° (CI 95%: 113°-122°) in the MP group and 112° (CI 95%: 108°-117°) in the PS group (p=0.14). No statistical difference was found between groups regarding all gait analysis parameters which have been recorded. Conclusion MP TKA design showed better subjective results using the FJSQ, but it did not improve significantly clinical and functional outcomes compared to PS TKA design, at a short-term follow-up.
