Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Prog Orthod ; 7(2): 176-88, 2006.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17143345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between chronologic age the and individual skeletal maturity as assessed by means of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method during the circumpubertal period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluated sample of 600 subjects consisted of 100 subjects (50 males and 50 females) for each of 6 age groups, from 9 years through 14 years of age. Individual skeletal maturity for all subjects was determined by using the CVM method. The relationship between chronologic age and the most prevalent CVM stage at each age group was evaluated statistically by means of indicators of diagnostic test performance that specify the ability of a diagnostic test to identify a condition. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of chronologic age for the detection of the onset of the adolescent peak in skeletal maturation was very low both in males and in females. In male subjects, the chronologic age of 9 years +/- 6 months presented with strong diagnostic power for the identification of a pre-pubertal stage in skeletal maturation. In female subjects, the chronologic age of 14 years +/- 6 months corresponded with a strong probability of a postpubertal stage in skeletal maturation. CONCLUSIONS: In males, chronologic age can identify a pre-pubertal stage of skeletal development, and in females a post-pubertal stage. In both males and females, chronologic age cannot recognize the onset of the adolescent peak in skeletal maturation.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Development/physiology , Age Determination by Skeleton , Cervical Vertebrae/growth & development , Adolescent , Age Factors , Bone Development/physiology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Puberty/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Angle Orthod ; 73(3): 221-30, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12828429

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present investigation was to provide information about the long-term effects and optimal timing for class-II treatment with the Bionator appliance. Lateral cephalograms of 23 class-II patients treated with the Bionator were analyzed at three time periods: T1, start of treatment; T2, end of Bionator therapy; and T3, long-term observation (after completion of growth). T3 includes a phase with fixed appliances. The treated sample was divided into two groups according to their skeletal maturity as evaluated by the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method. The early-treated group (13 subjects) initiated treatment before the peak in mandibular growth, which occurred after completion of Bionator therapy. The late-treated group (10 subjects) received Bionator treatment during the peak. The T1-T2, T2-T3, and T1-T3 changes in the treated groups were compared with changes in control groups of untreated class-II subjects by nonparametric statistics (P < .05). The findings of the present study on Bionator therapy followed by fixed appliances indicate that this treatment protocol is more effective and stable when it is performed during the pubertal growth spurt. Optimal timing to start treatment with the Bionator is when a concavity appears at the lower borders of the second and the third cervical vertebrae (CVMS II). In the long-term, the amount of significant supplementary elongation of the mandible in subjects treated during the pubertal peak is 5.1 mm more than in the controls, and it is associated with a backward direction of condylar growth. Significant increments in mandibular ramus height also were recorded.


Subject(s)
Activator Appliances , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Age Determination by Skeleton , Case-Control Studies , Cephalometry , Cervical Vertebrae/growth & development , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mandible/growth & development , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/growth & development , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Maxilla/growth & development , Maxilla/pathology , Orthodontic Appliances , Puberty , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...