Distal Tibia Fractures: is the Tibia First Technique a Rational Approach?

Introduction: In this retrospective case-series study we discuss the clinical and radiographic outcomes obtained following the "tibia-first concept" in the treatment of distal tibia fractures, both in patients with fibular comminution and in cases with a simple fibula fracture. Materials and methods: We analysed a consecutive series of 64 patients who presented at our emergency department with a distal articular tibial and fibular fracture from January 2015 to September 2020. A total of 22 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Clinical and radiographic examination were performed at each follow-up. To quantify pain and functional disability, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society's ankle-hindfoot scale (AOFAS) were applied. Results: The overall mean age was 52.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13.18 months. Multiple scales data from the FAOS were as follows: pain score 80.70; symptoms score 81.69; activities of daily living score 87.22; quality of life 76.05. The mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 74.36. Conclusions: Even though the principles of Rüedi and Allgöwer are still valid, in specific circumstances, the tibia-first concept could be considered as a valid option for the treatment of these demanding fractures. If a good reduction is obtained intra-operatively by ligamentotaxis, we recommend fixing the tibia first, avoiding surgical stress on tissues derived from a previous fibular fixation.

Distal Tibia Fractures: is the Tibia First Technique a Rational Approach?

@#Introduction: In this retrospective case-series study we discuss the clinical and radiographic outcomes obtained following the “tibia-first concept” in the treatment of distal tibia fractures, both in patients with fibular comminution and in cases with a simple fibula fracture. Materials and methods: We analysed a consecutive series of 64 patients who presented at our emergency department with a distal articular tibial and fibular fracture from January 2015 to September 2020. A total of 22 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Clinical and radiographic examination were performed at each follow-up. To quantify pain and functional disability, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society’s anklehindfoot scale (AOFAS) were applied. Results: The overall mean age was 52.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13.18 months. Multiple scales data from the FAOS were as follows: pain score 80.70; symptoms score 81.69; activities of daily living score 87.22; quality of life 76.05. The mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 74.36. Conclusions: Even though the principles of Rüedi and Allgöwer are still valid, in specific circumstances, the tibiafirst concept could be considered as a valid option for the treatment of these demanding fractures. If a good reduction is obtained intra-operatively by ligamentotaxis, we recommend fixing the tibia first, avoiding surgical stress on tissues derived from a previous fibular fixation.

Short-term clinical outcome of not-fixed posterolateral fragment for tibial plateau fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures pose multiple challenges to the surgeon given their frequent intra-articular involvement and the tendency to displace under axial load. The aim of this study is to de-scribe the clinical outcomes of a retrospective case series in which tibial plateau fractures were not treated with PL fragment osteosynthesis. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, we included patients treated for tibial plateau fracture with PL fragment in our department from January 2016 to January 2020. All patients were seen at the outpa-tient clinic 2 and 5 weeks after surgery, and at 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter at regular intervals, depending on the overall clinical status. Every patient included in this study was then contacted by phone to assess self-reported clinical outcomes. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaire was used to assess functional outcomes. Patients were divided in six groups depending on the three-column classification by Lou (groups A1-A6). Patients were also divided in four groups based on the whole area of the PL column and on the depression of the PL fragment (group B1-B4). One-way ANOVA was used to compare groups of patients. RESULTS: OKS scores, extension and step-off of the PL fragment were analyzed in groups A1 - A6. No significant differences between OKS scores and step-off were found, while statistical difference was found between surfaces of PL fragment. No significant difference was found between OKS scores in groups B1-B4. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the treatment outcome is influenced not only by the superficial involvement or collapse of PL fragments, but also by other variables, including BMI, pre-injury physi-cal health, and age.

A combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach for distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures in adults.

BACKGROUND: Distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal fractures of the hume-rus can be challenging. The success lies in achieving a stable fixation that could allow early functional recovery. Our aim is to combine dif-ferent approaches already reported, to obtain an ideal surgical strategy for treating these fracture patterns. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we present the clinical outco-me of a 12-patient cohort in which we used a combined paratricipital and triceps-splitting approach to the distal humerus. The mean age of the group was 50 years (range 17 - 88). Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and thereafter, depending on the necessity of a further control. Patients' range of motion (ROM) of the elbow was reported, and functional outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).The minimum follow-up was fixed at 12 months. RESULTS: Union was achieved in all fractures. After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 12-21), none of the patients complained of any limitation in daily activities. The ROM at the last follow-up was complete in eight patients. Instead, three patients had ROM limitations, but none of them mentioned limitations in the activities of daily living. We observed a single iatrogenic radial nerve palsy undergoing a full functional recovery at the final follow-up. No further complications occurred. CONCLUSION: We believe that the here presented modified approach could represent a solution that meets the modern demands for both ro-bust fixation and early mobilization, with minimal soft tissues damage around distal humeral fractures.

The Influence of Medial Comminution in the Treatment Choice of Radial Head Fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate the role of the medial side involvement in the treatment choice of radial head fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the databases of our institutions for the surgical procedures diagnosed as "fracture of the radial head" and for the procedures related to "prosthesis of the radial head" and "osteosynthesis of the radial head" in the period from May 2014 to October 2017. The fractures were first classified according to the Mason classification . We then allocated the patients into three study groups according to the site of the fracture, either the medial or lateral side of the radial head : Group A, with an isolated lateral fracture of the radius head; Group B1, with a medial fracture of the radius head with two medial fragments; and Group B2, with a medial fracture of the radius head with multiple medial fragments. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify statistically significant correlation between the pre-operative classifications of Mason and our study, the type of surgical procedure, and the clinical outcome. RESULTS: Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) scores determined at the final follow-up of the study (mean 16.6 months, range 12-26 months) was excellent in 17 patients (4 in Group A, 6 in Group B1 and 7 in Group B2), and good in 12 patients (3 in Group A, 7 in Group B1, and 2 in Group B2). One patient showed a poor result in MEP score probably because of an infection and implant removal. CONCLUSION: Regarding medial fractures of the radial head, our study showed satisfactory results with a radial head prosthesis for comminuted or multifragmentary radial head fractures. For surgeons with advanced elbow fracture expertise, osteosynthesis could be attempted in a fracture pattern that involved only two medial fragments.

The Influence of Medial Comminution in the Treatment Choice of Radial Head Fracture

@#Introduction: The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate the role of the medial side involvement in the treatment choice of radial head fractures. Materials and Methods: We searched the databases of our institutions for the surgical procedures diagnosed as "fracture of the radial head" and for the procedures related to "prosthesis of the radial head" and "osteosynthesis of the radial head" in the period from May 2014 to October 2017. The fractures were first classified according to the Mason classification . We then allocated the patients into three study groups according to the site of the fracture, either the medial or lateral side of the radial head : Group A, with an isolated lateral fracture of the radius head; Group B1, with a medial fracture of the radius head with two medial fragments; and Group B2, with a medial fracture of the radius head with multiple medial fragments. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify statistically significant correlation between the pre-operative classifications of Mason and our study, the type of surgical procedure, and the clinical outcome. Results: Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) scores determined at the final follow-up of the study (mean 16.6 months, range 12-26 months) was excellent in 17 patients (4 in Group A, 6 in Group B1 and 7 in Group B2), and good in 12 patients (3 in Group A, 7 in Group B1, and 2 in Group B2). One patient showed a poor result in MEP score probably because of an infection and implant removal. Conclusion: Regarding medial fractures of the radial head, our study showed satisfactory results with a radial head prosthesis for comminuted or multifragmentary radial head fractures. For surgeons with advanced elbow fracture expertise, osteosynthesis could be attempted in a fracture pattern that involved only two medial fragments.