Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion with and without acetate-free dialysis solutions: effect on ESA requirement.

BACKGROUND: Hemofiltrate reinfusion (HFR) is a form of hemodiafiltration (HDF) in which replacement fluid is constituted by ultrafiltrate from the patient 'regenerated' through a cartridge containing hydrophobic styrene resin. Bicarbonate-based dialysis solutions (DS) used in routine hemodialysis and HDF contain small quantities of acetate (3-5 mM) as a stabilizing agent, one of the major causes of intradialytic hypotension. Acetate-free (AF) DS have recently been made available, substituting acetate with hydrochloric acid. The impact of AF DS during HFR on Hb levels and erythropoietic-stimulating agent (ESA) requirement in chronic dialysis patients was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, 30 uremic patients treated by standard bicarbonate dialysis (BHD, DS with acetate) were randomized to treatment in 3-month cycles: first AF HFR, followed by HFR with acetate, and again AF HFR. At the beginning and end of each period, Hb and ESA requirements were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant increase in the Hb level was observed throughout all periods of HFR versus BHD (from 11.1 to 11.86 g/dl; p = 0.04), with a significant decrease of ESA requirements from 29,500 to 25,033 IU/month (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Regardless of the presence or absence of acetate in DS, HFR per se allows a significant lowering of ESA dosage versus BHD, while at the same time increasing Hb levels. Taking for granted the clinical impact produced, HFR seems to provide a relevant decrease in end-stage renal disease patient costs.

Effect of on-line hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) on the calcium-phosphorus metabolism: medium-term effects.

AIM: The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) compared to hemodialysis (HD) on 28 uremic patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT) but positively selected for good and stable control of phosphatemia in order to evaluate the independent effects of dialysis treatments on bone turnover metabolism. METHODS: The study was divided into 3 periods of observation: a) HD for three months; b) HFR for three months; c) HFR for a further 3 months. We analysed the trend of: whole PTH, 1-84 PTH, 7-84 PTH, alkaline phosphatase and its bone isoenzyme, total and ionised calcium, phosphatemia, dose of phosphate binder agents, beta2-microglobulin, CRP. All the variations found were evaluated through mean values +/- SD, t-tests, multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We observed a deceleration in bone turnover characterized by a reduction of the total and bone alkaline phosphatase (IU/mL) from 92.3 +/- 82.8 and 35.8 +/- 49.8 at the end of HD to 63.4 +/- 23.9 and 16.0 +/- 8.7 at the end of HFR, respectively, and 1-84 PTH from 317.5 +/- 264.6 pg/mL at the end of HD to 287.5 +/- 258.9 pg/mL at the end of the 3rd month of HFR. Beta2-microglobulin was reduced from 32.9 +/- 16.1 mg/L at the end of HD to 26.4 +/- 8.1 mg/L already at the end of the first three months of HFR. CRP was reduced from 2.5 +/- 2.6 mg/dL at the beginning of the study to 1.3 +/- 1.7 mg/dL at the end of HFR. There were no differences with regard to: dialytic efficiency, nutritional status, calcemia, phosphatemia (maintained in the K-DOQI range for the entire duration of the study), also thanks to more careful use of phosphate chelating agents. CONCLUSION: We are of the opinion that HFR - essentially thanks to the use of ultrapure endogenous infusate - induces a deceleration in bone turnover due to 2PHT. In addition, phosphate subtraction in HFR is better compared to HD, thanks to the improvement of the anti-inflammatory conditions by removing the cytokines harmful to bone metabolism and excluding a priori the negative effects related to hyperphosphatemia.

Predilution haemofiltration--the Second Sardinian Multicentre Study: comparisons between haemofiltration and haemodialysis during identical Kt/V and session times in a long-term cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: The potential superiority of various renal replacement treatment modalities consisting largely of convective mass transfer as opposed to primarily diffusive mass transfer, is still a matter of debate. The objective of the present study was to evaluate acute and long-term clinical effects of varying degrees of convection and diffusion in a group of 24 clinically stable patients with end-stage renal disease. METHODS: The patients were prospectively assigned to three consecutive treatment schedules of 6 months each: phase I (HF1) (on-line predilution haemofiltration)-->phase II (HD) (high-flux haemodialysis)-->phase III (HF2; as phase I). We used the AK100/200 ULTRA monitor (Gambro), which prepares ultrapure dialysis fluid for HD and sterile, pyrogen-free substitution solution for HF. The membrane (polyamide), fluid composition, and treatment time were the same on HF and HD. The targeted equilibrated Kt/V was 1.2 for both treatment modes, creating a similar urea clearance. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, mean age 62.8+/-8.4 years, completed the study according to the above conditions. Urea kinetics, nutritional parameters, and dry weight were similar in the three periods. The frequency of intra-treatment episodes of hypotension/patient/month was significantly lower on HF1 (1.24) and HF2 (1.27) than on HD (1.80) (P<0.04). It decreased progressively on HF1, then increased on HD, and decreased again during HF2. Patients had fewer muscular cramps on HF than on HD (P<0.03) and required significantly less saline and plasma expander during HF than HD sessions. The prevalence of inter-treatment symptoms, including fatigue and hypotension, was lower on HF than on HD (score difference P=0.04). Quality of life, determined by the Laupacis method in all three periods, showed a tendency towards improvement during the study, reaching the best values during HF2. CONCLUSIONS: HF has a progressive stabilizing haemodynamic effect, producing a more physiological cardiovascular profile than HD. This long-term effect, observed in stable patients treated under strictly identical conditions, is probably due to the mechanism of convection, and is different from the acute effect observed mainly in unstable patients.

Adequacy in pre-dilution haemofiltration: Kt/V or infusion volume? The Sardinian Collaborative Study Group on Haemofiltration On-line.

Kt/V is the main index of adequacy for diffusive and diffusive convective methods of extracorporeal depuration, yet there exists no universally acceptable validation of an adequacy index for the solely convective methods such as haemofiltration (HF). The aim of the present study is to analyse which of the parameters of adequacy used in two multicentre HF studies, Kt/V for urea or infusion volume, correlate best with nutritional parameters and can therefore be utilized for the evaluation of treatment dose in on-line pre-dilution HF. Twenty-three clinically stable patients were enrolled in the first study [3 months of haemodialysis (HD)+ 3 months of HF]. In the second study, 24 stable patients were studied in three phases: 6 months in HF, 6 months in HD and a further 6 months in HF; in this study, a target of Kt/V= 1.2 in all three periods was preestablished: 15 patients completed the full study. In both studies, we utilized the same monitor (AK 100/200 Ultra, Gambro), the same membrane (polyamide) and the same on-line prepared ultrapure dialysis fluid and sterile infusion solution. In both studies, we ensured that HF fulfilled the following parameters of adequacy: urea kinetics, cardiovascular and blood pressure stability (better in HF than in HD), common haematochemical and nutritional parameters, reduction in beta2-microglobulin levels, a good intra- and extra-session clinical outcome, and a good quality of life with morbidity and mortality rates no different from those of HD. HF proved to be an efficacious method of ensuring adequate depuration and a good quality of life for uraemic patients. We have shown that in longer periods of HF, a notable correlation between Kt/V and normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and an equally good correlation between total ultrafiltration (UF)/dry weight ratio and nPCR could be achieved. In both studies, the patients showed a good level of epuration adequacy when total UF per session was at least 1.3 times the dry body weight. The total UF/body weight ratio thus seems to be an easy method in HF because of its greater ease of predictability and measurement, also when it is used independently of the Kt/V index.