Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is There a Tumor Size Limit?

BACKGROUND: The advent of tumor-size-based criteria (Milan and University of California, San Francisco [UCSF]) for the transplantation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) has facilitated tumor patients' access to transplantation. Recent success in transplanting patients with larger tumors (beyond UCSF) necessitates an understanding of the patient, the tumor, and biological criteria that determine successful outcomes for HCC transplantation across all size criteria. METHODS: We analyzed 11,928 patients who received OLT between 2002 and 2013 from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file. Clinical outcomes were compared by tumor size at transplant; Milan (n = 11,555), beyond Milan within UCSF (n = 291), and beyond both Milan and UCSF (n = 82). A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the factors impacting survival. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates between the 3 patient groups (within Milan 91.1%, 74.8%, and 60.3%; beyond Milan within UCSF, 92.7%, 71.1%, and 51.6%; and beyond Milan and UCSF 95.8%, 75.9%, and 58.1%). In a multivariate analysis, factors significantly affecting survival included, AA race, AFP >3000, and hepatitis C infection, while age, diabetes and largest tumor diameter had a more modest impact. Total tumor burden and time to transplantation were not significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, based on current clinical selection criteria, a small number of large tumors can be successfully treated by transplantation and points to the need to include markers of HCC biologic behavior beyond size and tumor burden to transplant criteria.

Treatment of Refractory Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Portal Hypertension: A Case Series and Treatment Algorithm.

In patients with portal hypertension, ectopic varices can develop at any site along the gastrointestinal tract outside the classically described gastroesophageal location. Like esophageal variceal hemorrhage, bleeding from ectopic varices can be life-threatening. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic varices can be challenging; to date, no effective treatment algorithm has been described. A systematic teamwork approach to diagnosing and treatment of ectopic varices is required to successfully manage hemorrhage from ectopic varices.

Graft-Infiltrating Macrophages Adopt an M2 Phenotype and Are Inhibited by Purinergic Receptor P2X7 Antagonist in Chronic Rejection.

Macrophages exhibit diverse phenotypes and functions; they are also a major cell type infiltrating chronically rejected allografts. The exact phenotypes and roles of macrophages in chronic graft loss remain poorly defined. In the present study, we used a mouse heart transplant model to examine macrophages in chronic allograft rejection. We found that treatment of C57BL/6 mice with CTLA4 immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA4-Ig) prevented acute rejection of a Balb/c heart allograft but allowed chronic rejection to develop over time, characterized by prominent neointima formation in the graft. There was extensive macrophage infiltration in the chronically rejected allografts, and the graft-infiltrating macrophages expressed markers associated with M2 cells but not M1 cells. In an in vitro system in which macrophages were polarized into either M1 or M2 cells, we screened phenotypic differences between M1 and M2 cells and identified purinergic receptor P2X7 (P2x7r), an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-gated ion channel protein that was preferentially expressed by M2 cells. We further showed that blocking the P2x7r using oxidized ATP (oATP) inhibited M2 induction in a dose-dependent fashion in vitro. Moreover, treatment of C57BL/6 recipients with the P2x7r antagonist oATP, in addition to CTLA4-Ig treatment, inhibited graft-infiltrating M2 cells, prevented transplant vasculopathy, and induced long-term heart allografts survival. These findings highlight the importance of the P2x7r-M2 axis in chronic rejection and establish P2x7r as a potential therapeutic target in suppression of chronic rejection.

Liver transplantation in an adult with adenomatosis and congenital absence of the portal vein: a case report.

Congenital absence of the portal vein (CAPV) is a rare congenital anomaly in which the superior mesenteric veins (SMV) and splenic veins converge and bypass the liver, effectively draining directly into the systemic venous circulation via the inferior vena cava (IVC), or alternatively the renal or iliac vein, creating a native portosystemic shunt. Portosystemic shunting results in clinical manifestations of hepatic encephalopathy as well as a predisposition to focal nodular hyperplasia and tumors, including adenomas, hepatoblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), by the disruption of enterohepatic blood flow. Historically, CAPV has been thought to be a rare condition found mainly at autopsy, however, in recent years due to advances in radiological techniques, CAPV detection has increased. Herein we describe a patient with known CAPV who initially underwent hepatic resection for HCC. During surveillance, additional masses were discovered and were identified as recurrent HCC. Unfortunately, this patient was not a candidate for further resection or locoregional therapy. We demonstrate that transplantation is a challenging but technically viable option for treatment of HCC complicating adenomatosis-associated CAPV.

Incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection in recipients undergoing adult living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may have better immunological outcomes compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after LDLT and DDLT. Data from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALL) retrospective cohort study on 593 liver transplants done between May 1998 and March 2004 were studied (380 LDLT; 213 DDLT). Median LDLT and DDLT follow-up was 778 and 713 days, respectively. Rates of clinically treated and biopsy-proven ACR were compared. There were 174 (46%) LDLT and 80 (38%) DDLT recipients with >/=1 clinically treated episodes of ACR, whereas 103 (27%) LDLT and 58 (27%) DDLT recipients had >/=1 biopsy-proven ACR episode. A higher proportion of LDLT recipients had clinically treated ACR (p = 0.052), but this difference was largely attributable to one center. There were similar proportions of biopsy-proven rejection (p = 0.97) and graft loss due to rejection (p = 0.16). Longer cold ischemia time was associated with a higher rate of ACR in both groups despite much shorter median cold ischemia time in LDLT. These data do not show an immunological advantage for LDLT, and therefore do not support the application of unique posttransplant immunosuppression protocols for LDLT recipients.

Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study.

Patients considering living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) need to know the risk and severity of complications compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). One aim of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) was to examine recipient complications following these procedures. Medical records of DDLT or LDLT recipients who had a living donor evaluated at the nine A2ALL centers between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. Among 384 LDLT and 216 DDLT, at least one complication occurred after 82.8% of LDLT and 78.2% of DDLT (p = 0.17). There was a median of two complications after DDLT and three after LDLT. Complications that occurred at a higher rate (p < 0.05) after LDLT included biliary leak (31.8% vs. 10.2%), unplanned reexploration (26.2% vs. 17.1%), hepatic artery thrombosis (6.5% vs. 2.3%) and portal vein thrombosis (2.9% vs. 0.0%). There were more complications leading to retransplantation or death (Clavien grade 4) after LDLT versus DDLT (15.9% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.023). Many complications occurred more commonly during early center experience; the odds of grade 4 complications were more than two-fold higher when centers had performed 40). In summary, complication rates were higher after LDLT versus DDLT, but declined with center experience to levels comparable to DDLT.

Antiviral prophylaxis and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a viable treatment option for patients with hepatitis B (HBV) and concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, cancer recurrence following transplantation approaches 20%. This study sought to identify the clinical and pathological factors associated with post-OLT survival. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analyses considered the following variables: combination viral prophylaxis, HBV recurrence, tumor stage, vascular invasion, distribution, nodularity, pre- and post-OLT tumor size, pre-OLT alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Milan and UCSF criteria, and Asian race. RESULTS: Cumulatively, HCC recurrence-free survival was 77%, 62%, and 53% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, and was significantly better in patients who were free of viral recurrence post-OLT. Similarly, patients treated with combination prophylaxis had a significantly lower mortality than those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate analysis revealed that AFP>500 ng/mL, presence of vascular invasion by explant, HBV recurrence, and combination prophylaxis were independent predictors of HCC recurrence-free survival.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and death following living and deceased donor liver transplantation.

We examined mortality and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among 106 transplant candidates with cirrhosis and HCC who had a potential living donor evaluated between January 1998 and February 2003 at the nine centers participating in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). Cox regression models were fitted to compare time from donor evaluation and time from transplant to death or HCC recurrence between 58 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Mean age and calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at transplant were similar between LDLT and DDLT recipients (age: 55 vs. 52 years, p = 0.21; MELD: 13 vs. 15, p = 0.08). Relative to DDLT recipients, LDLT recipients had a shorter time from listing to transplant (mean 160 vs. 469 days, p < 0.0001) and a higher rate of HCC recurrence within 3 years than DDLT recipients (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), but there was no difference in mortality or the combined outcome of mortality or recurrence. LDLT recipients had lower relative mortality risk than patients who did not undergo LDLT after the center had more experience (p = 0.03). Enthusiasm for LDLT as HCC treatment is dampened by higher HCC recurrence compared to DDLT.

Prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in moderate term survivors of liver transplantation.

The prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation are not well understood. Thus, we sought to identify independent risk factors for the development of diabetes after liver transplantation using currently accepted medical criteria. We studied the prevalence and risk factors in 253 adult recipients transplanted at UCLA between January 1998 and December 2002. Analysis of the retrospective data was performed using demographic, immunosuppression and liver disease variables. Factors found to be significant on a univariate analysis were further studied in a multivariate analysis. There were 158 men and 95 women in our study. The mean age was 51.4 +/- 11.0 years. The mean [+/- standard deviation (SD) pretransplant body mass index was 26.7 (+/-5.1). Most patients were transplanted for hepatitis C (HCV). The prevalence of diabetes after transplantation was 17.8%. In a multivariate analysis only gender [odds ratio (OR) = 0.37; p = 0.02] was independently predictive of the development of diabetes. This study in a large liver transplant recipient population identifies male gender as an independent risk factor for the development of diabetes. Follow-up studies are needed to assess the impact of diabetes, and its intervention on post-transplant morbidity and mortality.

Split liver transplantation.

Seventy-five thousand Americans develop organ failure each year. Fifteen percent of those on the list for transplantation die while waiting. Several possible mechanisms to expand the organ pool are being pursued including the use of extended criteria donors, living donation, and split deceased donor transplants. Cadaveric organ splitting results from improved understanding of the surgical anatomy of the liver derived from Couinaud. Early efforts focused on reduced-liver transplantation (RLT) reported by both Bismuth and Broelsch in the mid-1980s. These techniques were soon modified to create both a left lateral segment graft appropriate for a pediatric recipient and a right trisegment for an appropriately sized adult. Techniques of split liver transplantation (SLT) were also modified to create living donor liver transplantation. Pichlmayr and Bismuth reported successful split liver transplantation in 1989 and Emond reported a larger series of nine split procedures in 1990. Broelsch and Busuttil described a technical modification in which the split was performed in situ at the donor institution with surgical division completed in the heart beating cadaveric donor. In situ splitting reduces cold ischemia, simplifies identification of biliary and vascular structures, and reduces reperfusion hemorrhage. However, in situ splits require specialized skills, prolonged operating room time, and increased logistical coordination at the donor institution. At UCLA over 120 in situ splits have been performed and this technique is the default when an optimal donor is available. Split liver transplantation now accounts for 10% of adult transplantations at UCLA and 40% of pediatric transplantations.

Donor MHC class I peptides in conjunction with self-epitopes induce donor-specific tolerance in a dose-dependent manner but unable to abrogate chronic rejection.

Understanding specific tolerance mechanisms is a primary goal of transplantation science. We have previously shown that hosts treated with MHC class I protein have donor sequences in the alpha1-helix of the alpha1 domain on a background of self-epitopes, resulting in the development of donor-specific tolerance. However, the nature of class I alloantigenic determinants that regulate the alloimmune response remains unclear. The alpha1-helical sequence of RT1.A,1 which shares RT1.A(u) sequences, was substituted in the RT1.A(a) molecule to produce the composite [alpha1h(l/u)]-RT1.A(a) MHC class I allochimeric molecule. Immunodominant epitopes were identified within the hypervariable region of the alpha1 domain of RT1.A(a) (ACI), RT1.Al (Lewis, LEW), and RT1.A(u) (Wistar Furth [WF]). To clarify the mechanisms of tolerance development through presentation of donor-type immunogenic epitopes and cryptic self-epitopes we used synthetic peptides corresponding to donor immunogenic determinants with peptides derived from recipient self-sequences (RT1.A(a)--aa 10 to 49 P1 and 91 to 120 P3; and P2 RT1.A(l/u) 50 to 90). ACI recipients of LEW and WF cardiac allografts were injected through the portal vein (PV) at day 0 with four doses (2, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg/rat) of three peptide mixtures in conjunction with subtherapeutic CsA (10 mg/kg for 3 days). Allograft survival was strongly dose-dependent. Only low-dose regimens were consistent in tolerance induction, but such therapy did not abrogate development of chronic rejection (CR), unlike allochimeric therapy with soluble MHC class I protein. Different effects of protein or synthetic peptide therapies on development of CR suggest that development of specific tolerance is an active immunologic process and it depends on the form of allogeneic epitopes presented.

Identification of early tolerance regulator genes induced by allochimeric therapy using microarray-based genomewide scan.

We have demonstrated that peri- or postoperative delivery of allochimeric [a1h(u)]-RT1.A(a) class I major histocompatibility complex molecules with donor-type (RT1A(u)) immunogenic epitopes presented in recipient-type (RT1A(a)) sequences induced donor-specific tolerance in ACI (RT1a) recipients of WF (RT1u) heart allografts. A genomic scan during the early posttransplant period was performed to elucidate the underlying operative mechanisms. A rat genome study after transplantation was carefully designed using Affymetrix Rat Genome 230 2.0 Array. The allochimeric treatment group is 3-day cyclosporine (CsA)-treated ACI recipients that accepted Wistar Furth RT1u cardiac allografts with postoperative dosage of allochimeric molecules, while the control is 3-day CsA-treated ACI recipients of WF cardiac allografts. All the samples were harvested 5 days after heart transplant as the early stage of tolerance detection. Following array data normalization and modeling, we compared the above two treatment groups and identified a total of 250 tolerance regulator genes induced by allochimeric molecules only.

Allochimeric therapy induces unique regulatory T cells that mitigate chronic rejection.

Induction of tolerance to an allogeneic graft without the need for nonspecific immunosuppression is a major goal of transplantation therapy. We have shown that treatment with molecularly engineered, allochimeric [alpha(1h)(1/u)]-RT1.Aa class I MHC antigens bearing donor-type Wistar-Furth (WF, RT1.A(u)) or Lewis (LEW, RT1A(1)) amino acid substitutions for host-type ACI (RTI.A(a)) sequences in the alpha(1)-helical region induces donor-specific tolerance to cardiac allografts in rat recipients. The mechanisms involved in the establishment and maintenance of specific allograft tolerance are still not fully understood. It is now clear that acquisition of transplantation tolerance is an active, highly regulated, multistep process. According to the pool size model of allograft tolerance, the allograft outcome, rejection, or tolerance often depend on the balance between cytopathic and regulatory T cells (T-regs). This study examined mechanisms of chronic rejection (CR) development on a model of cardiac transplant tolerance after adoptive transfer of T-regs followed by allochimeric therapy. Generation of T-regs was demonstrated in vitro by MLR coculture and confirmed by adoptive transfer of T cells from primary recipients to secondary hosts. To confirm the true nature of regulatory cells, we performed a second transfer into tertiary recipients. Unlike T-regs from tolerant hosts, T cells from naive rats did not prolong graft survival. Histological evaluation of T-regs-transfected groups showed absence of visible CR. In contrast, T-regs generated in recipients after high-dose cyclosporine treatment failed to inhibit CR in transferred singeneic recipients. Allochimeric therapy triggers generation of unique regulatory lymphocytes that mitigate development of chronic rejection through regulation of anti-inflammatory mechanisms and down-regulation of alloantibody response.

Treatment for recurrent hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become the leading cause for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) worldwide. OLT for HCV has been associated with good survival outcomes. HCV recurrence has been universally documented in allograft recipients within the 1st year post-transplantation. Slow but steady progression of recurrent disease has resulted in allograft failure in a small number of patients in the short-term and may cause allograft destruction in a larger number of patients in the long-term. A pressing need has therefore developed to identify antiviral regimens to treat or prevent recurrent disease. Unfortunately, current antiviral therapy has limited efficacy and is associated with multiple adverse events. Therefore, a concerted effort has been directed toward identification of the patient populations who are most susceptible to the deleterious effects of recurrent disease or those who are most likely to benefit from antiviral treatment. These patient populations may therefore be selected for antiviral therapeutic intervention. Unsuccessful antiviral therapy or the development of allograft may be an indication for retransplantation (re-OLT), a procedure that is not widely accepted since it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the appropriate and timely utilization of re-OLT may achieve good results in selected patients. This chapter will outline the current understanding and the results of medical and surgical therapeutic options for recurrent HCV following OLT.

Biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation.

We evaluated the causes and outcomes of biliary complications occurring after adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) in a large patient cohort. Among 46 patients who underwent ALDLT at two different centers early bile duct complications occurred in 11 recipients (23.9%), consisting of leakage from the anastomotic site or from the cut surface of the liver. T-tube-associated biliary complications occurred in four patients. Late complications, primarily anastomotic strictures, occurred in 15 patients (32.6%) at 6.7+/-3.5 months after transplantation. Surgical intervention was generally required for early biliary complications but rarely necessary for late complications. No graft loss was caused by biliary complications. Thus, ALDLT is accompanied by a high rate of biliary complications, which in our series have been of low severity. However, long-term effects on graft function are not yet known.

Liver transplantation for cholangiocellular carcinoma: analysis of a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) is a biliary malignancy that frequently presents in advanced unresectable stages. The role of liver transplantation (LT) as a surgical modality is unclear. The goal of this study is to evaluate outcomes of patients with CCC undergoing LT. A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing LT was undertaken. Only those patients with the pathological diagnosis of CCC were included on the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on primary tumor location: extrahepatic (EH)-CCC and intrahepatic (IH)-CCC. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall and recurrence-free survival. Log-rank analysis was used to determine the significance of prognostic variables. Twenty-five patients were identified: 9 patients with EH-CCC (5 patients, Klatskin-type; 2 patients, the middle third; and 2 patients, the distal third) and 16 patients with IH-CCC. Mean age was 47.1 +/- 10.6 years. There were 14 men and 11 women. Tumor stage was local (stages I and II; n = 9) or advanced (stages III and IV; n = 16). Overall and disease-free survival rates were 71% and 67% at 1 year and 35% and 32% at 3 years, respectively. Analysis of variables showed statistically significant improved outcomes (P < .05) for the absence of contiguous organ invasion at LT, small tumor size, and single tumor foci. This study indicates that early survival after LT for CCC is acceptable. Three-year disease-free survival is achieved in approximately 30% of patients. These outcomes can be improved by applying strict selection criteria based on prognostic variables identified in this study.

Early graft function after pediatric liver transplantation: comparison between in situ split liver grafts and living-related liver grafts.

BACKGROUND: The systematic application of living-related and cadaveric, in situ split-liver transplantation has helped to alleviate the critical shortage of suitable-sized, pediatric donors. Undoubtedly, both techniques are beneficial and advantageous; however, the superiority of either graft source has not been demonstrated directly. Because of the potential living-donor risks, we reserve the living donor as the last graft option for pediatric recipients awaiting liver transplantation. Inasmuch as no direct comparison between these two graft types has been performed, we sought to perform a comparative analysis of the functional outcomes of left lateral segmental grafts procured from these donor sources to determine whether differences do exist. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all liver transplants performed at a single institution between February 1984 and January 1999 was undertaken. Only pediatric (<18 years) recipients of left lateral segmental grafts procured from either living-related (LRD) or cadaveric, in situ split-liver (SLD) donors were included. A detailed analysis of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables was undertaken. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison of variables between groups was undertaken using the t test of Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the preoperative variables between the 39 recipients of SLD grafts and 34 recipients of LRD grafts. The donors did differ significantly in mean age, ABO blood group matching, and preoperative liver function testing. Postoperative liver function testing revealed significant early differences in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, prothrombin time, and alkaline phosphatase, with grafts from LRD performing better than those from SLD. SLD grafts also had significantly longer ischemia times and a higher incidence of graft loss owing to primary nonfunction and technical complications (9 vs. 2, P<0.05). However, six of these graft losses in the SLD group were because of technical or immunologic causes, which, theoretically, should not differ between the two groups. Furthermore, these graft losses did not negatively impact early patient survival as most patients were successfully rescued with retransplantation (30-day actuarial survival, 97.1% SLD vs. 94.1% LRD, P=0.745). In the surviving grafts, the early differences in liver function variables normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Inherent differences in both donor sources exist and account for differences seen in preoperative and intraoperative variables. Segmental grafts from LRD clearly performed better in the first week after transplantation as demonstrated by lower liver function variables and less graft loss to primary nonfunction. However, the intermediate function (7-30 days) of both grafts did not differ, and the early graft losses did not translate into patient death. Although minimal living-donor morbidity was seen in this series, the use of this donor type still carries a finite risk. We therefore will continue to use SLD as the primary graft source for pediatric patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Allochimeric class I MHC molecules prevent chronic rejection and attenuate alloantibody responses.

BACKGROUND: We have shown that treatment with molecularly engineered, allochimeric [alpha1 hl/u]-RT1.Aa class I MHC antigens bearing donor-type Wistar-Furth (WF, RT1.Au) amino acid substitutions for host-type ACI (RTI.Aa) sequences in the alpha1-helical region induces donor-specific tolerance to cardiac allografts in rat recipients. This study examined the effect of allochimeric molecules on the development of chronic rejection. METHODS: Allochimeric [alpha1 hl/u]-RT1.Aa class I MHC antigenic extracts (1 mg) were administered via the portal vein into ACI recipients of WF hearts on the day of transplantation in conjunction with subtherapeutic oral cyclosporine (CsA, 10 mg/kg/day, days 0-2). Control groups included recipients of syngeneic grafts and ACI recipients of WF heart allografts treated with high-dose CsA (10 mg/kg/day, days 0-6). RESULTS: WF hearts in ACI rats receiving 7 days of CsA exhibited myocardial fibrosis, perivascular inflammation, and intimal hyperplasia at day 80. At day 120, these grafts displayed severe chronic rejection with global architectural disorganization, ventricular fibrosis, intimal hyperplasia, and progressive luminal narrowing. In contrast, WF hearts in rats treated with [alpha1 hl/u]-RT1.Aa molecules revealed only mild perivascular fibrosis, minimal intimal thickening, and preserved myocardial architecture. Alloantibody analysis demonstrated no IgM alloantibodies in all groups. An attenuated, but detectable, anti-WF IgG response was present in recipients receiving allochimeric molecules, with IgG1 and IgG2a subclasses predominating. Immunohistochemical analysis of allografts demonstrated minimal T cell infiltration and IgG binding to vascular endothelium. CONCLUSION: Treatment with allochimeric molecules prevents the development of chronic rejection. Such effect may be in part caused by deviation of host alloantibody responses.