Gynecological bleeding in women with congenital bleeding disorders: A comprehensive cohort from Iran.

BACKGROUND: Gynecological bleeding including menorrhagia and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) face women's quality of life constantly with difficulties, especially those suffering from inherited bleeding disorders. In this study, we aim to evaluate gynecological bleeding particularly menorrhagia among Iranian women patients with inherited bleeding disorders admitted to the Iranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center (ICHCC). METHODS: This study was conducted on 156 females aged ≥ 12 diagnosed with an inherited bleeding disorder in ICHCC. Demographic and laboratory data were documented for all patients. Bleeding questionnaires (the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis bleeding assessment tool (ISTH-BAT), Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand disease (MCMDM-1), and Pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC)) were filled out for all patients. For comparing metric and categorical parameters, Mann-Whitney was performed. Spearman's rho test was used for analyzing correlation. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33. Von Willebrand disease (VWD), Factor (F) VII deficiency and combined factor deficiency were the most diagnosed disorders. The median of ISTH-BAT, MCMDM-1, and PBAC was 7,7, and 517, respectively. Menorrhagia was the most common reason for diagnosis. Menorrhagia and PPH domain scores ≥ 2 were recorded in 82 and 34 patients, respectively, and PBAC scores > 100 were seen in 118 patients. Significant positive correlations were observed between bleeding scores and menorrhagia and PPH scores. No significant correlations were recorded for VWF: Ag and VWF: RCo with menorrhagia and PPH scores; however, significant correlations were seen for VWF: Ag and VWF: RCo with bleeding score questionnaires. CONCLUSION: Menorrhagia is the most common problem in females affected by different types of inherited bleeding disorders, particularly VWD. Increased awareness among gynecologists and hematologists about bleeding disorders in cases with unexplained menorrhagia is an essential step for optimal management.

Associations of multiple genetic variations with plasma levels of Von Willebrand Factor and clinical phenotype in Iranian patients with Von Willebrand disease type 1.

BACKGROUND: Genetic variations influence the Von Willebrand Factor plasma level and function. This study aims to evaluate the frequency and clinical phenotype effects of eight single nucleotide polymorphism candidates in four genes (VWF, STXBP5, CLEC4M, and ABO) in Iranian patients with VWD type 1. METHOD: The study recruited 50 patients with VWD type 1 and 100 healthy individuals. The demographic data from all participants were collected, and the High-Resolution Melting technique was used to determine the frequency of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms. Bleeding scores were also obtained from all patients to assess how these genetic variations might affect the severity of their bleeding symptoms. RESULTS: The study found notable variations in the occurrence of certain SNPs (rs7853989 and rs8176743 for ABO gene and rs1063856 and rs1063857 for VWF gene) between the control group and the patients. Additionally, the study discovered that two SNPs (rs868875 for CLEC4M gene and rs9390459 for STXBP5 gene) were significantly linked to the severity of bleeding, and two others (rs868875 for CLEC4M gene and rs8176746 for ABO gene) were associated with reduced levels of VWF antigen in the patients. CONCLUSION: According to this study, the above-selected SNPs can cause variations in VWF plasma levels in patients with VWD type 1. Furthermore, the effects of SNPs on bleeding phenotype prove the role of these SNPs in the severity of bleeding manifestations in patients.

Bleeding disorder of unknown cause: Results from Iranian study.

BACKGROUND: Definite diagnosis of patients with mild to moderate bleeding is challenging. Some studies reported that even more than 50% of their patients remained undiagnosed which is classified as a Bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC). This study aims to document the clinical characteristics and proportion of patients with BDUC in the Iranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center (ICHCC) one of the referral centers for diagnosis of congenital bleeding disorder in Iran. METHODS: This study was conducted on 397 patients who were referred with a bleeding manifestation to ICHCC from 2019 to 2022. Demographic and laboratory data were documented for all patients. Bleeding questionnaires including ISTH-Bleeding Assessment tool (ISTH-BAT) and the Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 (MCMDM-1 (ISTH-BAT, MCMDM-1, and the Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart (PBLAC) were filled out for all patients. The data were analyzed by the statistical package for social science (SPSS version 22, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). RESULTS: BDUC was diagnosed in 200 patients and 197 patients reached the final diagnosis. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), factor (F) VII deficiency, and platelet functional disorders (PFDs) were confirmed in 54, 49, 34, and 15 of the patients, respectively. No significant difference was found in bleeding scores between patients with BDUC and those with confirmed disease. In contrast, after setting cut-off (ISTH-BAT for males ≥ 4 and females ≥ 6 and MCMDM-1 for males ≥ 3 and females ≥ 5) clinically significant difference was found. There was no association between having a positive consanguineous marriage and setting a diagnosis; however, significant associations were seen for having a positive family history of bleeding. Age (OR =0.977, 95% CI.965-0.989), gender (BDUC female, 151/200; final diagnosis female, 95/197) (OR=3.3, 95% CI 2.16-5.06), family history (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.99-5.11), and consanguineous marriage (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.03-2.45) were considered as a risk factor for categorizing the patients with BDUC or final diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The findings are mainly in line with previous studies about BDUC patients. The large number of patients with BDUC underlines the incompleteness of available routine laboratory tests and shows the necessity of progress in the development of reliable diagnostic tools to identify underlying bleeding disorders.