The functional origins of speech-related hand gestures.

Many theories of language posit its recent evolution, perhaps contemporaneous with the evolution of Homo sapiens. The embodied language theory, however, in proposing that language includes gestures, provides an avenue for tracing language origins to phylogenetically earlier ancestral species. Here, evidence is presented that the structure of functional hand movements (e.g., reaching for food, climbing a ladder, or crawling), in rats and humans is similar. The structure of these functional hand movements is then compared to speech-related hand gestures in humans. The sequence of language-related gestures are also found to be characteristic of functional hand movements. It is suggested that these findings show that the arm and hand gestures that accompany human speech are derived from the same neural substrates that produce functional movements. Additionally, evidence is reviewed that supports the idea that speech-related gestures resemble the movements elicited by long-train stimulation of the primate motor cortex. Together, this evidence suggests that speech-related hand gestures have their evolutionary origins in functional hand movements of ancestral non-primate and primate species and may be constrained by the neural substrate for those movements. These findings are further discussed in relation to the idea that speech-related gestures reflect forelimb motor cortex contributions to embodied language.

Hand shaping in the rat: conserved release and collection vs. flexible manipulation in overground walking, ladder rung walking, cylinder exploration, and skilled reaching.

Hand shaping in terrestrial mammals is adapted to many functions including walking, climbing, exploration, and skilled manipulation. Nevertheless, hand shaping is not well described in the rat (Rattus norvegicus) although the species is used to study the evolution of movement, the neural control of movement, and to model impairments that can result from brain injury. In the present study, rat hand movements were examined in standardized tests of overground walking, horizontal or inclined ladder rung walking, exploring a vertical wall of a cylinder, and skilled reaching for food. Behavior was filmed with high-speed (250-1000 f/s) video camera from which frame-by-frame behavioral and kinematic analyses (Peak Motus) were made. There were three hand actions common to all tasks. In release, the hand pushed off or was lifted from a substrate; in collection, the digits were closed and flexed though the midpoint of limb transport; and, in manipulation, the hand and digits were shaped to contact or grasp a target. The movements of release and collection, although variable in character, speed and duration, were very similar in the different tests. The movement of manipulation featured greater specialized digit use and varied sensory control (olfaction, vibrissae, and tactile senses) in different tasks. Conserved release and collection vs. the variability of manipulation is discussed in relation to the evolution, neural control, and neural commitment underlying hand movements.

Individual differences in skilled reaching for food related to increased number of gestures: evidence for goal and habit learning of skilled reaching.

Skilled reaching in rodents and primate is motorically similar, but success in reaching by rodents is distinctively variable. The source of this variability has not been examined previously. Long-Evans rats were videotaped as they reached for food in 2 different reaching tasks, and endpoint measures of performance were examined in relation to variables previously associated with individual differences, including testing procedures, rehabilitation, movement ability, general locomotor activity, and cortical anatomy. There were individual differences in performance, but these were not related to the dependent measures related to training, movement ability, locomotor activity, or anatomy (e.g., brain with cortical thickness, acetylcholinesterase and neuron density, pyramidal tract size). Success was negatively related to numbers of gestures (non-weight-bearing movements of the reaching limb) used on a reach, however. The results are discussed in relation to the idea that individual differences in response strategy bias some rats to use a more successful goal strategy and others to use a less successful habit strategy for skilled reaching.