The diagnostic performance of a simulated "short" gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol is similar to that of a conventional protocol for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of standard and simulated short gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocols for the detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 67 patients (44 men (66%); mean age 65 ± 11 years old) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI during the initial work-up for colorectal cancer were included. Exams were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to clinical data in two reading sessions: (1) all acquired sequences (standard "long" protocol) and (2) only T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and hepatobiliary phase images (simulated "short" protocol). Readers characterized detected lesions using a 5-point scale (1-certainly benign to 5-certainly malignant). A lesion was considered a CRLM when the score was ≥ 3. The reference standard was histopathology or 12-month imaging follow-up. Chi-square, Student's t, and McNemar tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 486 lesions including 331 metastases (68%) were analyzed. The metastasis detection rate was 86.1% (95% CI 82-89.4)-86.7% (82.6-90) and 85.8% (81.6-89.2)-87% (82.9-90.2) with the short and long protocols, respectively (p > 0.99). Among detected lesions, 92.1% (89.1-94.4)-94.8% (92.2-96.6) and 84.6% (80.8-87.7)-88.8% (85.4-91.5) were correctly classified with the short and long protocols, respectively (p = 0.13 and p = 0.10). The results remained unchanged when lesions scored ≥ 4 were considered as CRLM. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of a simulated short gadoxetic enhanced-MR protocol including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and hepatobiliary phase appears similar to that of a standard long protocol including dynamic phase images. Since this protocol shortens the duration of MR examination, it could facilitate the evaluation of patients with colorectal liver metastases. KEY POINTS: • The detection rate of colorectal metastases with a simulated, short, MRI protocol was similar to that of a standard protocol. • The performance of both protocols for the differentiation of metastases and benign lesions appears to be similar. • A short MR imaging protocol could facilitate the evaluation of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Jugular venous reflux may mimic type I dural arterio-venous fistula on arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance images.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that arterial spin-labeling (ASL) has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). However, in case of jugular venous reflux (JVR), the labeled protons in the jugular vein may lead to a venous hypersignal in the jugular vein, sigmoid, and transverse sinus on ASL images and mimic DAVF. METHODS: To ascertain this hypothesis, two blinded senior neuroradiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed randomized ASL images and graded the likelihood of DAVF on a 5-point Likert scale in 2 groups of patients: (i) 13 patients with angiographically proven type I DAVF; and (ii) 11 patients with typical JVR diagnosed on the basis of clinical and MR imaging data, first using ASL alone, and second using ASL together with all of the sequences including 4D CE MRA. RESULT: A dural venous ASL signal was seen in 11 patients with type I DAVF and in all the 11 patients with JVR, with no distinctive pattern between the two. The mean Likert score was "very likely" in DAVF and JVR patients when using ASL alone (k = 0.71), and "very unlikely" for JVR versus "very likely" for DAVF when using all the sequences available (k = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that JVR can mimic DAVF on ASL images with potential implications for patient care. The detection of DAVFs should be based on additional MR sequences such as TOF-MRA and 4D CE MRA to exclude JVR and to avoid unnecessary DSAs.