Determining Thermodynamic and Material Properties of Biomolecular Condensates by Confocal Microscopy and Optical Tweezers.

While the roles of biomolecular condensates in health and disease are being intensely studied, it is equally important that their physical properties are characterized in order to achieve mechanistic understanding. Here we share some of the protocols developed in our lab for measuring thermodynamic and materials properties of condensates. These include a simple method for determining the droplet-phase concentrations of condensate components on a confocal microscope, and a method for determining the viscoelasticity of condensates by optical tweezers. These protocols are either generally applicable to biomolecular condensates or are unique for their characterization.

Shear relaxation governs fusion dynamics of biomolecular condensates.

Phase-separated biomolecular condensates must respond agilely to biochemical and environmental cues in performing their wide-ranging cellular functions, but our understanding of condensate dynamics is lagging. Ample evidence now indicates biomolecular condensates as viscoelastic fluids, where shear stress relaxes at a finite rate, not instantaneously as in viscous liquids. Yet the fusion dynamics of condensate droplets has only been modeled based on viscous liquids, with fusion time given by the viscocapillary ratio (viscosity over interfacial tension). Here we used optically trapped polystyrene beads to measure the viscous and elastic moduli and the interfacial tensions of four types of droplets. Our results challenge the viscocapillary model, and reveal that the relaxation of shear stress governs fusion dynamics. These findings likely have implications for other dynamic processes such as multiphase organization, assembly and disassembly, and aging.

Determinants for Fusion Speed of Biomolecular Droplets.

Biomolecular droplets formed through phase separation have a tendency to fuse. The speed with which fusion occurs is a direct indicator of condensate liquidity, which is key to both cellular functions and diseases. Using a dual-trap optical tweezers setup, we found the fusion speeds of four types of droplets to differ by two orders of magnitude. The order of fusion speed correlates with the fluorescence of thioflavin T, which in turn reflects the macromolecular packing density inside droplets. Unstructured protein or polymer chains pack loosely and readily rearrange, leading to fast fusion. In contrast, structured protein domains pack more closely and have to break extensive contacts before rearrangement, corresponding to slower fusion. This molecular interpretation for disparate fusion speeds provides mechanistic insight into the assembly and aging of biomolecular droplets.

Tug of War between Condensate Phases in a Minimal Macromolecular System.

Membraneless organelles, comprising dozens to hundreds of macromolecular components, form heterogeneous phases in space and evolve over time in material properties. Here, using four macromolecules, we demonstrate a range of phase behaviors associated with membraneless organelles and uncover the underlying physicochemical rules. The macromolecules are SH35 (S) and PRM5 (P), two pentameric, oppositely charged protein constructs; heparin (H), an anionic polymer; and lysozyme (L), a cationic single-domain protein. The S:P, S:L, and P:H binaries form droplets, but the H:L binary forms network-like precipitates, therefore setting up a tug of war between different condensate phases within the S:P:H:L quaternary. The H:L exception can partly be attributed to the compactness of L, as supported by ThT binding data. Increasing amounts of P alone or both S and P, but not S alone, can dissolve H:L precipitates into droplets. These differential effects can be explained by the order of the strengths of pairwise attraction: H:L > P:H > S:P > S:L, deduced from the shapes of ternary phase boundaries. When S and P are at subdissolution concentrations, S:P:H:L precipitates change over time to become droplet-like in appearance, although not completely fluidic according to fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. In fact, confocal microscopy reveals separated S:L-rich and P:H-rich foci inside the droplet-like condensates. Therefore, complex phase behaviors of membraneless organelles, including rescue of aberrant phase transitions, demixing of condensates, and time evolution of material properties, can all be reconstituted and understood via a minimal macromolecular system.

Three archetypical classes of macromolecular regulators of protein liquid-liquid phase separation.

Membraneless organelles, corresponding to the droplet phase upon liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of protein or protein-RNA mixtures, mediate myriad cellular functions. Cells use a variety of biochemical signals such as expression level and posttranslational modification to regulate droplet formation and dissolution, but the physical basis of the regulatory mechanisms remains ill-defined and quantitative assessment of the effects is largely lacking. Our computational study predicted that the strength of attraction by droplet-forming proteins dictates whether and how macromolecular regulators promote or suppress LLPS. We experimentally tested this prediction, using the pentamers of SH3 domains and proline-rich motifs (SH35 and PRM5) as droplet-forming proteins. Determination of the changes in phase boundary and the partition coefficients in the droplet phase over a wide range of regulator concentrations yielded both a quantitative measure and a mechanistic understanding of the regulatory effects. Three archetypical classes of regulatory effects were observed. Ficoll 70 at high concentrations indirectly promoted SH35-PRM5 LLPS, by taking up volume in the bulk phase and thereby displacing SH35 and PRM5 into the droplet phase. Lysozyme had a moderate partition coefficient and suppressed LLPS by substituting weaker attraction with SH35 for the stronger SH35-PRM5 attraction in the droplet phase. By forming even stronger attraction with PRM5, heparin at low concentrations partitioned heavily into the droplet phase and promoted LLPS. These characteristics were recapitulated by computational results of patchy particle models, validating the identification of the 3 classes of macromolecular regulators as volume-exclusion promotors, weak-attraction suppressors, and strong-attraction promotors.

Both Ligands and Macromolecular Crowders Preferentially Bind to Closed Conformations of Maltose Binding Protein.

In cellular environments, proteins not only interact with their specific partners but also encounter a high concentration of bystander macromolecules, or crowders. Nonspecific interactions with macromolecular crowders modulate the activities of proteins, but our knowledge about the rules of nonspecific interactions is still very limited. In previous work, we presented experimental evidence that macromolecular crowders acted competitively in inhibiting the binding of maltose binding protein (MBP) with its ligand maltose. Competition between a ligand and an inhibitor may result from binding to either the same site or different conformations of the protein. Maltose binds to the cleft between two lobes of MBP, and in a series of mutants, the affinities increased with an increase in the extent of lobe closure. Here we investigated whether macromolecular crowders also have a conformational or site preference when binding to MBP. The affinities of a polymer crowder, Ficoll70, measured by monitoring tryptophan fluorescence were 3-6-fold higher for closure mutants than for wild-type MBP. Competition between the ligand and crowder, as indicated by fitting of titration data and directly by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and their similar preferences for closed MBP conformations further suggest the scenario in which the crowder, like maltose, preferentially binds to the interlobe cleft of MBP. Similar observations were made for bovine serum albumin as a protein crowder. Conformational and site preferences in MBP-crowder binding allude to the paradigm that nonspecific interactions can possess hallmarks of molecular recognition, which may be essential for intracellular organizations including colocalization of proteins and liquid-liquid phase separation.