Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol ; 25(3): 433-440, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35936611

ABSTRACT

Background: EMPOwER, a 12-week, double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of erenumab in adult patients with episodic migraine (EM) from Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. This study analyzes the Indian experience for the use of erunumab for prevention of episodic migraine. Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of erenumab (70 mg and 140 mg) in EM patients from India. Methods: Randomized patients received monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo and erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg for 3 months. The primary endpoint was a change from the baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at month 3. Other endpoints included achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in MMD; a change in monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days; a change in patient-reported outcomes; and safety assessment. Results: Of the 539 patients screened, 351 patients were randomized (erenumab, 70 mg: n = 133 and 140 mg: n = 94; placebo: n = 124). The mean (±SD) age, disease duration, and MMD were 35.1 (±8.6) years, 6.77 (±6.01) years, and 7.82 (±2.89) days, respectively. The placebo-adjusted difference in mean MMD for erenumab 70 mg was -0.88 (95% CI, -2.16, 0.39; P = 0.174) days, and that for erenumab 140 mg was -1.01 (-2.42, 0.41; P = 0.164) days versus placebo. Secondary and exploratory endpoints demonstrated consistently better results in both erenumab dosage groups versus placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable across groups (erenumab, 70 mg: 22.7% and 140 mg: 24.5%; placebo: 25.2%). Conclusion: Both doses of erenumab showed numerical improvement for efficacy endpoints and were well-tolerated in the Indian population. No new safety signals were reported.

2.
Neurol Res ; 36(9): 841-6, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24601722

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is one of the most disabling complications of long-term pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease (PD). The objective of our study was to examine the clinical profile and determinants of severity of LID in Indian PD patients on levodopa therapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of records of PD patients with LID was performed. All patients were on levodopa and carbidopa combination. Records of subjects with complete information about disease profile, drug intake, and dyskinesia were analyzed. Characterization of LID was based on responses to part IV of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS). RESULTS: Records of 42 patients (M∶F  =  4·6∶1) were analyzed. The median Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage was 2·5 while median duration of levodopa therapy was 6·16 years (range: 1·91-14·58). Early morning dystonia was reported by 97·6% of the patients. Patients treated with ≧2 concomitant PD medication reported a significantly lower median UPDRS IV A score compared to patients treated with <2 number of concomitant drugs. A trend toward a lower UPDRS IV A score was associated with use of dopamine agonists (DA). Patients with H&Y score ≧3 had a significantly higher median total UPDRS IV A score than patients with H&Y score <3. DISCUSSION: Early morning dystonia might be more common among Indian patients of LID. Use of a higher number of concomitant PD medications alongside levodopa is associated with a reduced severity of dyskinesia, even on prolonged use. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia is not only a drug-related phenomenon but the stage of PD itself also affects the dyskinesia severity.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/physiopathology , Levodopa/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Periodicity , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Pain Pract ; 14(2): E51-62, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24304963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is of concern to health professionals, patients, society, and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). The present epidemiologic study identified point prevalence of chronic pain in India, impact on individual's QoL, unveiling current pain treatment practices, and levels of satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: This epidemiological telephonic survey consisted of two questionnaires: screening questionnaire that assessed prevalence of pain, its frequency during the past week, intensity during last episode, sites of pain, and main causes, and in-depth questionnaire that evaluated demography, frequency, duration, and intensity of pain; impact of pain on QoL; respondent's perception regarding the attitude of their family, friends, and doctors toward their pain. RESULTS: A total of 5004 respondents were included from eight cities across India. The overall point prevalence of chronic pain was 13%, and the mean intensity of pain on NRS scale was 6.93. Respondents with chronic moderate and chronic severe pain were 37% and 63%, respectively. Pain in knees (32%), legs (28%), and joints (22%) was most prevalent. Respondents with chronic pain were no longer able to exercise, sleep, maintain relationships with friends and family, and maintain an independent lifestyle. About 32% of patients lost ≥4 hours of work in the past 3 months. Majority (68%) of respondents were treated for pain with over the counter (OTC) drugs, and most were taking NSAIDs (95%). CONCLUSION: A significant population of India suffers from chronic pain, and their QoL is affected leading to disability. A proportion of respondents receiving pain treatment were taking nonprescription medications with a majority of respondents on NSAIDs. A very few were consulting pain management specialists.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Quality of Life , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Employment , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...