Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 59(4): 183-9, 2010 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20709314

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Previous studies have shown that smokers with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated by thrombolysis have lower mortality rates than nonsmokers, a phenomenon often termed "smoker's paradox". This "smoker's paradox" has been rarely studied in case of primary angioplasty. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the impact of smoking status on the early mortality of patients admitted with AMI with regard to the strategy of reperfusion (intravenous thrombolysis versus primary angioplasty). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study undertaken from the Monsatir registry of ST elevation MI including 688 patients having had either a hospital or a prehospital thrombolysis (n=397) or a primary angioplasty (n=291). Among those patients, 482 (70.1%) were active smokers. RESULTS: In the thrombolysis group, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and anterior location of MI was significantly less among smokers. In the group primary angioplasty, only diabetes and hypertension were less frequent. The immediate mortality was significantly less among smokers in case of thrombolysis comparatively to non-smokers (5.3 vs 13%; p=0.008). By multivariate analysis, cardiogenic shock (p<0.0001), anterior MI (p=0.03) and active smoking (p=0.03) were independent predictive factors of mortality in case of thrombolysis. A trend toward a lower mortality among smokers was observed in the primary angioplasty group (10 vs 17.6%; p=0.07). CONCLUSION: "The smoker's paradox" seems to be observed mainly among patients having had thrombolysis.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion/methods , Smoking , Thrombolytic Therapy , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Reperfusion/mortality , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Tunisia/epidemiology
2.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 58(5): 293-8, 2009 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793577

ABSTRACT

AIM: Acute main left coronary artery occlusion is rarely observed during primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction. This retrospective study reports the results of six patients treated by angioplasty in a hospital without cardiac surgery department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2009, 746 patients were treated by primary angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes with ST elevation. Among those patients, six (0,7%) had acute non protected main left coronary occlusion. We report clinical, angiographical data and follow-up. RESULTS: The population was composed of six patients (five males) with an average age of 64+/-7 years. Five patients were admitted with cardiogenic shock and four were mechanically ventilated. Distal occlusion of main left coronary artery and dominant right coronary artery were noted in all cases. Sub-occluded lesion of right coronary artery was noted in one case. Successful procedure with bare metal stent was achieved in five cases. Mortality rate was 66% (n=4): three patients died in hospital and another 1 or 2 months later of congestive heart failure. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed at 4 and 12 months later for two patients. They are alive after 12 and 72 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility of percutaneous coronary intervention of acute main left coronary occlusion. Inspite successful procedure, intrahospital mortality rate is still high and prognosis is related to cardiogenic shock.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Acute Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 58(5): 304-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19819418

ABSTRACT

Left heart disease is the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension. Increased left-sided filling pressure leads to passive postcapillary venous hypertension. In some patients, pulmonary vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling may lead to a further increase in pulmonary pressure. When precapillary hypertension component is associated to left heart failure, the elevation of pulmonary pressure is out of proportion with left atrial pressure: transpulmonary gradient greater than 12 mmHg (mean pulmonary pressure -- mean capillary pressure) and pulmonary vascular resistance greater than three Wood units. Precapillary pulmonary hypertension is common in severe systolic heart failure. Before cardiac transplantation, increased pulmonary vascular resistance greater than 3,5 Wood units are reported in 19 to 35% of patients. In those patients vasoreactivity tests are performed with inotropic and/or systemic and/or pulmonary agents to determine the risk of right heart failure after transplantation. There is no pulmonary vascular resistance level above which transplantation is contraindicated. Cardiac assistance may be used before and after transplantation when pulmonary hypertension is severe and not reversible with conventional treatment and/or pulmonary vasodilators. The contribution of precapillary PH in diastolic heart failure is not known but can be significant and lead to disproportionate PH particularly in elderly. The precapillary component of pulmonary hypertension could be a therapeutic target for specific pulmonary vasodilators. Until now pharmacological trials has been disappointing and those medications can be dangerous because of increasing blood flow to the pulmonary capillaries with a risk of pulmonary edema when left sided pressure are still elevated.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/complications , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Vascular Resistance
4.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 58(5): 265-71, 2009 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19833318

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients referred for pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator implantation isn't consensual. Our objective was to evaluate, in a large cohort, hemorrhagic complications in patients having implantation or replacement of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, and to assess perioperative anticoagulation effect on hemorrhagic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 461 consecutive patients having implantation or replacement of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator has been analyzed. Thirty patients (6,5%) had oral anticoagulants (OAC) switched to heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin, while 76 (16,5%) had their oral anticoagulation disrupted habitually for 48 hours. A total of six over 30 (20%) and two over 76 (2.6%) patients in the bridge and OAC, respectively experienced a pocket hematoma (bridge vs. OAC, p<0.05), while ten over 355 (2.8%) had a pocket hematoma in the control group (bridge vs. control p=0.006). Duration of the hospital stay was longer in the bridge group in comparison with OAC and control groups (9 vs. 7 vs. 6 days, respectively, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulation bridging with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a higher risk of pocket hematoma and a longer duration of hospitalization, in comparison with a strategy allowing a temporary disruption of OAC adapted to the thromboembolic risk.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...