Can ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of the knee, be performed without locating corresponding arterial pulsations-a cadaveric study.

INTRODUCTION: Given the rising prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFA) has emerged as a promising treatment option for knee pain. The knee has an extremely complex and variable innervation with nearly 13 genicular nerves described. The frequently ablated genicular nerves are the superomedial (SMGN), the superolateral (SLGN), and the inferomedial (IMGN) genicular nerves. Conventionally, under ultrasound guidance, these nerves are ablated near the corresponding arterial pulsations, but due to the rich vascular anastomosis around the knee joint, identifying the arteries corresponding to these constant genicular nerves can be tedious unless guided by some bony landmarks. In this study, we have evaluated whether it is possible to accurately target these three genicular nerves by just locating bony landmarks under ultrasound in human cadaveric knee specimens. METHODS: Fifteen formalin-fixed cadaveric knee specimens were studied. SMGN was targeted 1 cm anterior to the adductor tubercle in the axial view. For SLGN, in the coronal view, the junction of the lateral femoral condyle and shaft was identified, and at the same level in the axial view, the crest between the lateral and posterior femoral cortex was targeted. For IMGN in the coronal view, the midpoint between the most prominent part of the medial tibial condyle and the insertion of the deep fibers of the medial collateral ligament was marked. The medial end of the medial tibial cortex was then targeted at the same level in the axial view. The needle was inserted from anterior to posterior, with an in-plane approach for all nerves. Eosin, 2% W/V, in 0.1 ml was injected. Microdissection was done while keeping the needle in situ. Staining of the nerve was considered a positive outcome, and the percentage was calculated. The nerve-to-needle distance was measured, and the mean with an interquartile range was calculated. RESULT: The accuracies of ultrasound-guided bony landmarks of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN were 100% in terms of staining, with average nerve-to-needle distances of 1.67, 3.2, and 1.8 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: It is with 100% accuracy, that we can perform RFA of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN under ultrasound guidance, by locating the aforementioned bony landmarks.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Particulate Versus Nonparticulate Steroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Open-Label Randomized Control Trial.

Introduction Perineural corticosteroid injection is an extensively used and accepted treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, to this date, there is no guideline as to which corticosteroid has to be used as the standard treatment for CTS. Triamcinolone acetonide is a commonly used particulate steroid that can cause permanent nerve injury if it is accidentally injected into the nerve. Conversely, dexamethasone sodium phosphate is a nonparticulate steroid that would not cause permanent nerve damage following accidental injection. Methods Mild to moderate cases of CTS, confirmed by nerve conduction studies (NCS), with symptoms greater than three months were recruited. The participants received one session of ultrasound-guided perineural injection by the in-plane axial ulnar-sided approach with 4 mL of either dexamethasone (dexamethasone sodium phosphate 8 mg (2 mL) + 2 mL 0.5% bupivacaine) or triamcinolone (triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/mL (1 mL) + 2 mL 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mL normal saline) solution. The parameters assessed were Phalen's test time (in seconds), visual analog scale (VAS), and Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ) scores at baseline and two and four months, and NCS changes in sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and distal motor latency (DML) of the median nerve at baseline and four months. Statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Independent samples t-test was used for comparison between groups and the paired t-test for improvement within each group. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The mean age was 42.64 ± 10.99 in the dexamethasone and 45.22 ± 10.602 in the triamcinolone group cases (P = 0.324).There were 58 females (84.06%) and 11 males (15.94%). Each of Phalen's test time, VAS, and BCTQ scores significantly improved within both dexamethasone and triamcinolone groups at the second and fourth months after injection (P < 0.05). The NCS parameters (SNCV and DML) also significantly improved in both groups at the fourth month after the injection (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the improvement of Phalen's test time between the two groups (P = 0.745), VAS score (P = 0.319), BCTQ score (P = 0.137), SNCV (P = 0.511), or DML (P = 0.753). Postprocedural pain lasted significantly longer in the triamcinolone group (P < 0.05). No major complications were noted in either of the two groups. Conclusion Dexamethasone is as effective as triamcinolone in improving the symptoms of CTS and can be used as a safer and more effective alternative in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS cases.

Assessment of Physical Disability After Three Months in Patients Recovered From COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: This study was done to assess the extent of disability in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with convenient sampling. Institutional ethical clearance was taken. Informed consent was taken from all patients. Disability assessment was done using WHODAS 2.0. All patients were initial reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive for COVID-19. Patients with neuromuscular deficits or who were taking medication for psychiatric illness before getting infected with COVID-19 were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Fatigue followed by dyspnea was the most common reported symptom after three months of COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 survivors with fatigue or dyspnea had a more significant disability as compared to other patients. Females had a more significant disability when compared to males. We did not find any significant disability in COVID-19 survivors after three months of disease based on body mass index, hospitalization, diabetes, and oxygen requirements. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 survivors suffered from significant disability after three months of disease especially females and survivors with fatigue or dyspnea. Recognizing post-COVID-19 sequelae and the availability of rehabilitation services will be critical in preventing another public health crisis after acute COVID-19 infection.