ABSTRACT
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. In clinical practice, there are two different routes to repair inguinal hernias: laparoscopic mesh repair and open. Reducing the hernia and preventing recurrence remains the mainstay treatment option of both procedures. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes and recurrence rates for patients who had primary, non-recurrent, laparoscopic, or open hernia repair in a single tertiary hospital. A retrospective cohort study was done on 468 patients. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) between 2013 and 2022. The distribution of our study population was divided into open hernia repair 378 participants (80.8%) while the rest did laparoscopic hernia repair 90 (19.2%). Operation duration in minutes was 107.158 ± 41.402 in the open hernia repair group and was noted to be significantly higher in the laparoscopic hernia repair group, with 142.811 ± 52.102 minutes p-value (0.000). The hospital length of stay was shown to be shorter in laparoscopic hernia repair (1.58 ±1.27) compared to open hernia repair (2.05±5.33). The most common postoperative complication was scrotal swelling, commonly associated with laparoscopic (5.55%) compared to 2.11% in open hernia repair. Open repair showed a risk of scrotal hematoma with a percentage of 0.52% compared to 0% in the laparoscopic method with a p-value (0.033). Hernia recurrence was non-related with any specific group, although noted to be higher in the laparoscopic group (7.77%), while in the open group (3.4%) with a p-value (0.081). The study conducted showed no alarming percentages for recurrence in either technique, open or laparoscopic, yet the open approach had a better outcome when it comes to scrotal pain and swelling post-operatively, chronic groin pain, and readmission rate as compared to laparoscopic technique, despite having a longer hospital stay. Future larger studies should be conducted to provide equal population inclusivity.
ABSTRACT
The video shows, step-by-step, the hybrid laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with a robotic-assisted hand-sewn technique (HST) for gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA).
Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastroplasty/methods , Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , ReoperationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the impact of the absence of band fixation on the reoperation rate and to identify other risk factors for long-term complications. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been demonstrated to permit important weight loss and comorbidity improvement, but some bands will have to be removed mainly for failure or in case of planned 2-step surgery. Then, the absence of a gastro-gastric suture (GGS) would allow easier band removal. There are insufficient data to conclude that GGS should be abandoned, as the associated risk of band slippage has not been prospectively assessed. METHODS: The ANOSEAN study was a randomized controlled single-blind trial (CPP 2009-A00346-51). Primary outcome was reintervention rate for band removal or repositioning at 3 years. It included 706 patients in 17 bariatric centers. Patients in group 1 received a gastric band with GGS. Inclusion criteria were adapted from National Institutes of Health recommendations. Surgical technique was standardized among all surgeons. RESULTS: At 3 years, the reintervention rate for band retrieval or repositioning was significantly higher in the absence of band fixation (19.4% vs11.3%; P = 0.013), partly because of the slippage rate (10.3% vs 3.6%; P = 0.005). Body mass index <40âkg/m at baseline was also an independent risk factor of slippage (odds ratio 2.769, 95% confidence interval 1.373, 5.581). CONCLUSIONS: GGS prevents band slippage and lower reintervention rate at 3 years. Fixation could be discussed for patients with high BMI who are scheduled to undergo 2-step surgery, but it needs to be specifically assessed.
