Transmitral Septal Myectomy and Mitral Valve Surgery via Right Mini-Thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Transmitral myectomy for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is possible with existence of substantial mitral valve disease. We present herein our experience of minimally invasive transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve surgery through right anterior mini-thoracotomy in the past 4 years at our institution. METHODS: Between March 2017 and October 2020, 14 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and mitral valve disease required minimally invasive transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve reconstruction or replacement at our institution. Mean age of patients was 54.2 ± 11.4 and 42.9% (n = 6) were female. Twelve patients (85.1%) were in New York Heart Association class III to IV and 6 patients (42.9%) presented with persistent atrial fibrillation. Clinical data were prospectively entered into our institutional database. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time accounted for 140.2 ± 32.6 minutes and the myocardial ischemic time was 78.5 ± 12.4 minutes. Thirty-day mortality and overall mortality were zero. Peak ventricular outflow gradient decreased from 75.2 ± 12.7 to 9.4 ± 2.3 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Simultaneously, mitral valve reconstruction and replacement were performed in 11 (78.6%) and 3 (21.4%) patients, respectively. No systolic anterior motion was seen in patients with mitral valve repair. No conversion to full sternotomy and/or rethoracotomy was noted. During a mean follow-up period of 24 ± 13 months, no patient required reoperation, no recurrence mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. CONCLUSION: Transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve surgery through right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be performed safely with excellent surgical outcomes.

Clinical performance of a novel bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve in a German high-volume center.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is increasingly adopted in younger patients. We aimed to analyze mid-term follow-up data after SAVR to assess the performance of the prosthesis. METHODS: Data were collected from a single-center series of 154 patients, who underwent SAVR with a bioprosthetic heart valve with the RESILIA tissue at our Heart Centre in Siegburg. All procedural and midterm patient outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 56.8 ± 9.9 years, 35.7% were female, and the mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) was 3.4 ± 3.6%. Diabetes (12.3%), atrial fibrillation (10.4%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5.8%) were common comorbidities. The mean surgery duration was 163.8 ± 73.4 min, with the 23 mm (34.4%) and 25 mm (33.8%) heart valves being most frequently implanted. At 3-year follow-up, mean pressure gradient was 13.9 ± 5.9 mmHg, peak gradient was 23.6 ± 7.7 mmHg, and effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.9 ± 0.4 cm². No patient died during the operation, 3 (2.1%) patients within 30 days, and 4 (2.7%) thereafter with an overall mortality of n = 7. Of the surviving patients, 97.8% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I/II and none had structural valve deterioration (SVD). CONCLUSION: Results of our single-center study indicate favorable procedural outcomes. The safety outcomes confirm preliminary earlier results of this novel bioprosthesis but include more patients and a longer midterm follow-up.