Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Caries Res ; 44(4): 349-57, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20616552

ABSTRACT

Enamel specimens need to be disinfected before being used in intraoral appliances and the disinfection method must not affect the integrity of the tooth. This study evaluated the effectiveness of microwave bovine enamel disinfection and its effect on the surface microhardness (SMH) and cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) of sound, demineralized and remineralized enamel. Forty enamel specimens were divided into two groups (n = 20): control (nonirradiated) and microwave. Microwave specimens were immersed in water and irradiated (650 W/3 min). Specimens were incubated at 37 degrees C for 7 days under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. An aliquot was removed for counting, plated at serial dilutions on blood agar plates, which were incubated aerobically and anaerobically. The colony-forming units were calculated. Other 20 enamel specimens (4 x 4 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin, polished and sliced into two halves: one of the fragments was reserved as control while the other was microwaved. SMH and CSMH of sound enamel were analyzed for both groups. The CSMH was further evaluated after demineralization and remineralization cycles. The Knoop integral (DeltaKI) was also calculated. Data were analyzed statistically by paired Student's t test (alpha = 0.05). While control specimens showed microbial growth, those microwaved were disinfected. There were no significant differences in SMH, CSMH and DeltaKI between the control and microwave groups. Microwave irradiation for 3 min at 650 W was effective for the complete disinfection of bovine enamel specimens without affecting the SMH and CSMH of sound, demineralized and remineralized enamel.


Subject(s)
Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Disinfection/methods , Microwaves/therapeutic use , Tooth Demineralization/etiology , Tooth Remineralization , Animals , Cattle , Colony Count, Microbial , Dental Enamel/microbiology , Hardness/radiation effects , Microwaves/adverse effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Temperature
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 34(3): 222-7, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17302951

ABSTRACT

Prosthodontics should be one of the means of establishing conditions for the maintenance of periodontal health. The forces applied to the abutment teeth and their effects are very important considerations in the design and construction of the removable partial dentures. This 6-month follow-up clinical study evaluated the degree of mobility of abutment teeth of distal extension and tooth supported removable partial dentures by using Periotest. Two types of clasp design were selected for evaluation. In cases with unilateral and bilateral distal-extension, a clasp design including a T clasp of Roach retentive arm, a rigid reciprocal arm and a mesial rest were used. For the abutments of tooth-supported removable partial dentures, a second clasp design with a cast circumferential buccal retentive arm, a rigid reciprocal clasp arm and a rest adjacent to the edentulous ridges was selected. A total of 68 abutment teeth was analysed. Periotest values were made at the time of denture placement (control) and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the denture placement. The statistical analysis was performed using Friedman test. All analysis was performed at a 0.05 level of significance. The results revelled that no significant changes in tooth mobility were observed during the 6-months follow-up (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our findings suggest that adequate oral hygiene instructions, careful prosthetic treatment planning and regular recall appointments play an important role in preventing changes in abutment tooth mobility caused by removable partial denture placement.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Denture, Partial, Removable , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Dental Clasps , Equipment Design , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Periodontium/physiopathology , Stress, Mechanical , Tooth Mobility/physiopathology
3.
Biomed Chromatogr ; 20(4): 369-76, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16177959

ABSTRACT

Two high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for determination of residual monomer in dental acrylic resins are described. Monomers were detected by their UV absorbance at 230 nm, on a Nucleosil C18 (5 microm particle size, 100 A pore size, 15 x 0.46 cm i.d.) column. The separation was performed using acetonitrile-water (55:45 v/v) containing 0.01% triethylamine (TEA) for methyl methacrylate and butyl methacrylate, and acetonitrile-water (60:40 v/v) containing 0.01% TEA for isobutyl methacrylate and 1,6-hexanediol dimethacrylate as mobile phases, at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Good linear relationships were obtained in the concentration range 5.0-80.0 microg/mL for methyl methacrylate, 10.0-160.0 microg/mL for butyl methacrylate, 50.0-500.0 microg/mL for isobutyl methacrylate and 2.5-180.0 microg/mL for 1,6-hexanediol dimethacrylate. Adequate assay for intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy was observed during the validation process. An extraction procedure to remove residual monomer from the acrylic resins was also established. Residual monomer was obtained from broken specimens of acrylic disks using methanol as extraction solvent for 2 h in an ice-bath. The developed methods and the extraction procedure were applied to dental acrylic resins, tested with or without post-polymerization treatments, and proved to be accurate and precise for the determination of residual monomer content of the materials evaluated.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Dental Materials/chemistry , Methacrylates/analysis , Methylmethacrylate/analysis , Calibration , Chemical Fractionation/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
4.
J Oral Rehabil ; 30(11): 1085-9, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14641673

ABSTRACT

The disinfection of dental prostheses by immersion in a chemical solution should be capable of rapid inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms, without causing any adverse effect on the denture base resins. This study evaluated the effect of disinfection immersion on the transverse strength of two heat-cured resins. The denture base resins (Lucitone 550 and QC 20) were polymerized according to the manufacturers' instructions. After polymerization, the specimens were polished, and then stored in water at 37 degrees C for 50 +/- 2 h prior immersion in one of the following solutions for 10 min: 4% chlorhexidine, 1% sodium hypochlorite and 3.78% sodium perborate. The specimens were submitted to disinfection twice, simulating when dentures come from the patient and before being returned to the patient. Ten specimens were made for each group. The transverse strength was evaluated by a 3-point bend test. The flexural strength of the two denture base acrylic resins evaluated remained unaffected after immersion in the three solutions evaluated. In general, the QC 20 resin specimens exhibited lower transverse strength than the Lucitone 550 resin specimens, regardless of immersion solutions.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Denture Bases , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Dentures , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hot Temperature , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Macromolecular Substances , Materials Testing/methods , Stress, Mechanical
5.
J Oral Rehabil ; 30(7): 749-52, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12791163

ABSTRACT

This investigation studied the effects of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. The occlusal surfaces of 64 resin denture teeth were ground flat with abrasives up to 400-grit silicon carbide paper. Measurements were made after polishing and after the specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 48 h. The specimens were then divided into four groups and immersed in chemical disinfectants (4% chlorhexidine; 1% sodium hypochlorite and sodium perborate) for 10 min. The disinfection methods were performed twice to simulate clinical conditions and hardness measurements were made. Specimens tested as controls were immersed in water during the same disinfection time. Eight specimens were produced for each group. After desinfection procedures, testing of hardness was also performed after the samples were stored at 37 degrees C for 7, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance (anova) and Tukey's test at 95% confidence level. According to the results, no significant differences were found between materials and immersion solutions (P > 0.05). However, a continuous decrease in hardness was noticed after ageing (P < 0.05). It was conclude that the surfaces of both acrylic resin denture teeth softened upon immersion in water regardless the disinfecting solution.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Materials/chemistry , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Analysis of Variance , Borates/pharmacology , Carbon Compounds, Inorganic/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Dental Porcelain/pharmacology , Hardness/drug effects , Humans , Materials Testing , Silicon Compounds/pharmacology , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Surface Properties/drug effects , Tooth Bleaching
6.
J Oral Rehabil ; 30(5): 532-6, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12752936

ABSTRACT

This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of an infection control protocol for cleansing and disinfecting removable dental prostheses. Sixty-four dentures were rubbed with sterile cotton swab immediately after they had been taken from patients' mouths. Samples were individually placed in the culture medium and immediately incubated at 37 +/- 2 degrees C. The dentures were scrubbed for 1 min with 4% chlorhexidine, rinsed for 1 min in sterile water and placed for 10 min in one of the following immersion solutions: 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1% sodium hypochlorite, Biocide (iodophors) and Amosan (alkaline peroxide). After the disinfection procedures, the dentures were immersed in sterile water for 3 min, reswabbed and the samples were incubated. All samples obtained in the initial culture were contaminated with micro-organisms. All the lower dentures immersed in Biocide showed positive growth, and the upper dentures were positive for growth in six of eight dentures. The 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1% sodium hypochlorite and Amosan solutions have been proved effective to reduce the growth of the micro-organisms in the 10 min immersion period. The protocol evaluated in this study seems to be a viable method to prevent cross-contamination between dental personnel and patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Dental Prosthesis , Denture Cleansers , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Sodium Hypochlorite/analysis
7.
J. oral rehabil ; 30(5): 532-6, May 2003. tab
Article in Portuguese | BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-851373

ABSTRACT

This investigation evaluated the effectiveness of an infection control protocol for cleansing and disinfecting removable dental prostheses. Sixty-four dentures were rubbed with sterile cotton swab immediately after they had been taken from patients` mouths. Samples were individually placed in the culture medium and immediately incubated at 37 ± 2ºC. The dentures were scrubbed for 1 min with 4 percent chlorhexidine, rinsed for 1 min in sterile water and placed for 10 min in one of the following immersion solutions: 4 percent chlorhexidine gluconate, 1 percent sodium hypochlorite, Biocide (iodophors) and Amosan (alkaline peroxide). After the disinfection procedures, the dentures were immersed in sterile water for 3 min, reswabbed and the samples were incubated. All samples obtained in the initial culture were contaminated with micro-organisms. All the lower dentures immersed in Biocide showed positive growth, and the upper dentures were positive for growth in six of eight dentures. The 4 percent chlorhexidine gluconate, 1 percent sodium hypochlorite and Amosan solutions have been proved effective to reduce the growth of the micro-organisms in the 10 min immersion period. The protocol evaluated in this study seems to be a viable method to prevent cross-contamination between dental personnel and patients


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Infection Control, Dental , Dental Prosthesis/microbiology
8.
J Prosthet Dent ; 86(6): 574-7, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11753305

ABSTRACT

The orofacial characteristics of ectodermal dysplasia include anodontia or hypodontia, hypoplastic conical teeth, underdevelopment of the alveolar ridges, frontal bossing, a depressed nasal bridge, protuberant lips, and hypotrichosis. Patients with this disease often need complex prosthetic treatment. The options for a definitive treatment plan may include fixed, removable, or implant-supported prostheses, singly or in combination. However, financial constraints and other priorities can prevent patients from choosing the most desirable treatment. This clinical report describes the diagnosis and treatment of ectodermal dysplasia in an 18-year-old man. The treatment included interim removable partial dentures fabricated to establish an acceptable therapeutic occlusal vertical dimension, followed by definitive overlay removable partial dentures and composite restorations.


Subject(s)
Anodontia/therapy , Dental Care for Chronically Ill , Denture, Overlay , Denture, Partial, Removable , Ectodermal Dysplasia/complications , Adolescent , Anodontia/etiology , Denture, Partial, Temporary , Ectodermal Dysplasia/therapy , Humans , Male , Mandible , Maxilla
9.
J Oral Rehabil ; 28(12): 1153-7, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11874516

ABSTRACT

Direct relining of dentures made with hard chairside reline resins is faster than laboratory-processed reline systems and the patient is not without the prosthesis for the time necessary to perform the laboratory procedures. However, a weak bond between the autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins and the denture base material has been observed. This study evaluated the effect of six different surface treatments on the bond strength between a hard chairside reline acrylic resin and a heat-cured acrylic resin. Specimens of the heat-cured acrylic resin were divided into seven groups. One of these groups remained intact. In the other groups, a 10-mm square section was removed from the centre of each specimen. The bonding surfaces were then treated with (i) methyl methacrylate monomer, (ii) isobutyl methacrylate monomer, (iii) chloroform, (iv) acetone, (v) experimental adhesive and (vi) no surface treatment -- control group. Kooliner acrylic resin was packed into the square sections and polymerized. The bonding strength was evaluated by a three-point loading test. The results were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey multiple range test at a 5% level of significance. No significant difference was found between the surface treatment with Lucitone 550 monomer or chloroform, but both were stronger than the majority of the other groups. The bond strength provided by all the surface treatments was lower than that of the intact heat-cured resin.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Denture Bases , Denture Liners , Denture Rebasing , Acetone/chemistry , Adhesives/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Chloroform/chemistry , Hot Temperature , Humans , Materials Testing , Methylmethacrylate/chemistry , Polymethacrylic Acids/chemistry , Solvents/chemistry , Statistics as Topic , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties
10.
Int J Prosthodont ; 13(5): 383-6, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11203658

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This investigation studied the effects of 3 surface treatments on the shear bond strength of a light-activated composite resin bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal surfaces of 30 acrylic resin denture teeth were ground flat with up to 400-grit silicon carbide paper. Three different surface treatments were evaluated: (1) the flat ground surfaces were primed with methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer for 180 seconds; (2) light-cured adhesive resin was applied and light polymerized according to the manufacturer's instructions; and (3) treatment 1 followed by treatment 2. The composite resin was packed on the prepared surfaces using a split mold. The interface between tooth and composite was loaded at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. RESULTS: Analysis of variance indicated significant differences between the surface treatments. Results of mean comparisons using Tukey's test showed that significantly higher shear bond strengths were developed by bonding composite resin to the surfaces that were previously treated with MMA and then with the bonding agent when compared to the other treatments. CONCLUSION: Combined surface treatment of MMA monomer followed by application of light-cured adhesive resin provided the highest shear bond strength between composite resin and acrylic resin denture teeth.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Tooth, Artificial , Wetting Agents/chemistry , Adhesives/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Materials Testing , Methylmethacrylate/chemistry , Random Allocation , Resin Cements/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tensile Strength
11.
J Oral Rehabil ; 26(8): 631-4, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10447815

ABSTRACT

Due to gradual resorption of the edentulous ridge bone, removable prostheses often require denture base relines to improve fit and stability. This research evaluated the bond strength between one heat-cured acrylic resin (Lucitone 550(R)) and two hard chairside reline resins, after two different periods of storage in water (50 h and 30 days). The bond strength was evaluated using a tensile test. The mode of failure, adhesive or cohesive, was also recorded. The results submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that the highest tensile strengths were achieved with intact Lucitone 550(R) denture base resin in both periods of storage in water. After 50 h of storage in water, Duraliner II(R) reline material exhibited the highest bond strength to the denture base resin. After 30 days of storage in water, Duraliner II(R) reline resin demonstrated a significant reduction in adhesion, showing lower tensile bond strength than Kooliner(R) material. Both hard chairside reline materials failed adhesively across Lucitone 550(R) denture base resin, in both periods of time.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Denture Liners , Denture Rebasing , Water/chemistry , Adhesiveness , Dental Bonding , Denture Bases , Denture Retention , Humans , Materials Testing , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
12.
J Prosthet Dent ; 80(4): 434-8, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9791790

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Because water sorption of autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins is accompanied by volumetric change, it is a physical property of importance. As residual monomer leaches into the oral fluids and causes tissue irritation, low solubility of these resins is desired. Another requirement is a satisfactory bond between the autopolymerizing acrylic resins and the denture base acrylic resin. PURPOSE: This study compared the water sorption, solubility, and the transverse bond strength of 2 autopolymerizing acrylic resins (Duraliner II and Kooliner) and 1 heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (Lucitone 550). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The water sorption and solubility test was performed as per International Standards Organization Specification No. 1567 for denture base polymers. Bond strengths between the autopolymerizing acrylic resins and the heat-polymerizing acrylic resin were determine with a 3-point loading test made on specimens immersed in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 50 hours and for 30 days. Visual inspection determined whether failures were adhesive or cohesive. RESULTS: Duraliner II acrylic resin showed significantly lower water sorption than Kooliner and Lucitone 550 acrylic resins. No difference was noted in the solubility of all materials. Kooliner acrylic resin demonstrated significantly lower transverse bond strength to denture base acrylic resin and failed adhesively. The failures seen with Duraliner II acrylic resin were primarily cohesive in nature. CONCLUSIONS: Autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins met water sorption and solubility requirements. However, Kooliner acrylic resin demonstrated significantly lower bond strength to denture base acrylic resin.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Water/chemistry , Absorption , Adsorption , Analysis of Variance , Denture Bases , Denture Rebasing , Hot Temperature , Humans , Materials Testing , Solubility , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Time Factors
13.
J Prosthet Dent ; 77(3): 328-31, 1997 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9069091

ABSTRACT

Acrylic resin denture teeth often exhibit rapid occlusal wear, which may lead to a loss of chewing efficiency and a loss of vertical dimension of occlusion. The use of metal occlusal surfaces on the acrylic resin denture teeth will minimize occlusal wear. Several articles have described methods to construct metal occlusal surfaces; however, these methods are time-consuming, costly, and sometimes considered to be unesthetic. These methods also require that the patient be without the prosthesis for the time necessary to perform the laboratory procedures. This article presents a quick, simple, and relatively inexpensive procedure for construction of composite occlusal surfaces on complete and partial dentures.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Tooth, Artificial , Acrylic Resins , Denture Design , Humans , Technology, Dental/methods
14.
J Prosthet Dent ; 76(4): 414-7, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8897299

ABSTRACT

The selection and use of hard chairside reline resins must be made with regard to dimensional stability, which will influence the accuracy of fit of the denture base. This study compared the dimensional change of two hard chairside reline resins (Duraliner II and Kooliner) and one heat-curing denture base resin (Lucitone 550). A stainless steel mold with reference dimensions (AB, CD) was used to obtain the samples. The materials were processed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Measurements of the dimensions were made after processing and after the samples had been stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for eight different periods of time. The data were recorded and then analyzed with analysis of variance. All materials showed shrinkage immediately after processing (p < 0.05). The only resin that exhibited shrinkage after 60 days of storage in water was Duraliner II; these changes could be clinically significant in regard of tissue fit.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Denture Bases , Denture Liners , Denture Rebasing , Analysis of Variance , Humans , Polymers/chemistry , Water/chemistry
15.
Rev Odontol UNESP ; 19(1): 227-33, 1990.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2099552

ABSTRACT

The authors analysed the simultaneous effects of the dimensional and weight alteration of resins utilized for esthetic facets submitted to warehousing conditions and periods of time. The resins showed different behaviour and a neat correlation between dimensional alteration and weight. The condition of immersion promoted dimensional alteration 50% lower and an alteration of weight three times higher.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Veneers , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Resins, Synthetic/chemistry , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Esthetics, Dental , Polyurethanes , Time Factors
16.
Rev Odontol UNESP ; 19(1): 245-50, 1990.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2099554

ABSTRACT

The authors looked for the verification of the fatigue of retentive clasps utilized on the removable partial denture. According to this, it was idealized and built on assay machine, that through movements, simulate the insertion and removal of the clasp for a pattern tooth, manufactured on cobalt-chromium which has all the preparation normally utilized to the correct confection of this type of prosthesis. It was utilized three different commercial alloys based on cobalt-chromium: L1-Biosil; L2-Steldent; L3-Duracron. It was utilized the T clasp of Roach, with was tested upon three different proportions among width and thickness: E1-1.7;E2-2.0 and E3-2.3 and was casted through two casting techniques: F1-oxygen-gas and F2-oxygen-acetylene. The clasps were tested on the machine, which allowed the reading of the number of insertion and removal cycles made until fatigue appeared. The obtained results were submitted to the statistic analysis and the authors concluded that: a) L3 (Duracrom) obtained the best results followed by L1 (Biosil) and finally L3 (Steldent); b) among the analyzed thickness, the best results were obtained by E3, followed by E2 and after this E1; c) form the casting techniques, F2 gave us the best results.


Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys , Dental Casting Technique , Denture Retention , Denture, Partial, Removable , Bicuspid , Humans , Materials Testing
17.
Rev Odontol UNESP ; 19(1): 251-8, 1990.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2099555

ABSTRACT

The authors tested the T clasp of Roach in three differents proportions among width and thickness: E1-1.7; E2-2.0 and E3-2.3, with a constant length of 15 mm. These clasps were casted with three cobalt-chromium alloys (L1-Biosil; L2-Steldent and L3-Duracrom), through two casting techniques (F1-oxygen-gas and F2-oxygen-acetylene). The fatigue of the clasps were verified by using and assay machine, that through movements, simulate the insertion and removal of the clasps for a pattern which were obtained from a premolar, prepared in a surveyor. This machine detect the fatigue of the clasps and count the number of cycles of insertion and removal realized. The obtained results of the interaction between the analysed factors, were submitted to the statistic analysis and the authors concluded that: a) the interaction of factors, Alloy x Thickness, Alloy x Casting Technique and Thickness x Casting Technique did not change the order of effects that the factors showed separately but gave rise to effects of different magnitude for any observed sense; b) the simultaneous interaction of the factors Alloy x Thickness x Casting Technique confirmed the superiority of the L3 alloy, the thickness E3 and the F2 casting technique.


Subject(s)
Chromium Alloys , Dental Casting Technique , Denture Retention , Bicuspid , Humans , Materials Testing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...