Erlotinib plus either pazopanib or placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial with correlated serum proteomic signatures.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with progressive-stage IV NSCLC after either 1 or 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive erlotinib (150 mg by mouth daily) with either pazopanib (600 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. During treatment, patients were evaluated every 8 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a study amendment, pretreatment serum specimens for the VeriStrat assay were collected. The predictive value of the VeriStrat score (good vs poor) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the overall population and in each treatment group. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two eligible patients were randomized between February 2010 and February 2011. PFS was prolonged with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo (median, 2.6 vs 1.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .001). There was no difference in the OS of the 2 groups. A good VeriStrat score predicted longer PFS and OS in the entire group and predicted longer PFS in the subgroup receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib. The addition of pazopanib increased toxicity, and this was consistent with the known toxicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pazopanib to erlotinib in an unselected group of patients with previously treated NSCLC improved PFS and increased treatment-related toxicity, but it had no influence on OS. The efficacy of both regimens was modest. Patients receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib had longer PFS if they had a good VeriStrat score versus a poor one. Cancer 2018;124:2355-64. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Sorafenib and continued erlotinib or sorafenib alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing on erlotinib: A randomized phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, continued after tumor progression, plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously benefitted from single-agent erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive refractory NSCLC who had previously benefitted from erlotinib (objective response or stable disease >8weeks) were randomized to receive treatment with either erlotinib and sorafenib (400mg orally twice daily) or sorafenib alone. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks, and continued treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were randomized (erlotinib/sorafenib, 25; sorafenib, 28) and 52 patients received study treatment. Patients in both groups received a median of 8weeks of treatment. The median PFS was 3.1months for erlotinib/sorafenib versus 1.7months for sorafenib alone; response rates were 8% and 4%, respectively. Both regimens were tolerable, but toxicity was more frequent with erlotinib/sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not suggest any benefit in continuing erlotinib after tumor progression in patients with refractory metastatic NSCLC. Both regimens tested had limited efficacy, consistent with results from other studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT00609804.

Paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomized phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute.

This trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of standard first-line treatment with paclitaxel/carboplatin versus paclitaxel/carboplatin plus sorafenib in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Patients with stage 3 or 4 epithelial ovarian cancer with residual measurable disease or elevated CA-125 levels after maximal surgical cytoreduction were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) , 3 h infusion, day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 6.0, IV, day 1) with or without sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily (PO BID). Patients were reevaluated for response after completing 6 weeks of treatment (two cycles); responding or stable patients received six cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin. Patients receiving the sorafenib-containing regimen continued sorafenib (400 PO BID) for a total of 52 weeks. Eighty-five patients were randomized and received treatment.Efficacy was similar for patients receiving paclitaxel/carboplatin/sorafenib versus paclitaxel/carboplatin: overall response rates 69% versus 74%; median progression-free survival 15.4 versus 16.3 months; 2 year survival 76% versus 81%. The addition of sorafenib added substantially to the toxicity of the regimen; rash, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, and hypertension were significantly more common in patients treated with sorafenib. The addition of sorafenib to standard paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve efficacy and substantially increased toxicity in the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Based on evidence from this study and other completed trials, sorafenib is unlikely to have a role in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Phase II trial of ixabepilone and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epothilones, a new class of cytotoxic agents, have demonstrated activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II study examined ixabepilone/carboplatin (cohort A) and ixabepilone/carboplatin/bevacizumab (cohort B) as first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. METHOD: Patients were enrolled to either cohort A or B at physician discretion and when eligibility met. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed stage III/IV NSCLC, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, no active CNS metastases, and, in cohort B, bevacizumab treatment criteria. Both cohorts received ixabepilone 30 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC=6 IV day 1 every 3-weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients assigned to cohort B also received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV day 1 of each cycle, and could continue single-agent bevacizumab for 6 additional cycles. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (median age, 63 years; majority stage IV and former smokers) were enrolled from 11/08 to 10/09 (A-42, B-40) and received medians of 4 and 6 cycles, respectively. The ORRs were 29% and 50%. After median follow up of 17.5 months (A) and 15.7 months (B), median progression free survivals were A-5.3 months (95% CI 2.8-8.6) and B-6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.4), with median overall survivals of 9.3 months (95% CI 6.4-16.6) 13.2 months (95% CI 8.9-upper limit not reached), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicity included: anemia (A-10%, B-27%), neutropenia (A-31%, B-48%), thrombocytopenia (A-19%, B-20%), fatigue (A-10%, B-23%), infection (A-5%, B-20%), and hypersensitivity reaction (A-2%, B-5%). There was one treatment-related death, due to hemoptysis in a cohort B patient with squamous histology. CONCLUSIONS: Ixabepilone can be safely combined with carboplatin in newly diagnosed patients with advanced NSCLC. The benefits of treatment appear consistent with those achieved with other modern platinum-doublet regimens. The addition of bevacizumab increases toxicities, however, these are largely expected and reversible. The high ORR and OS observed in the bevacizumab-cohort are encouraging, but would require validation in a larger randomized trial of cohort A versus B.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and weekly topotecan in the first-line treatment of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin and topotecan are commonly used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, there are no data for this combination in the first-line setting using weekly topotecan. In this multicenter, community-based phase II trial, we evaluated carboplatin and weekly topotecan in the previously untreated patients with extensive stage SCLC. METHODS: This trial was designed to achieve an objective response rate (ORR) of 70% (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.20); secondary aims were to assess time to progression, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were eligible. TREATMENT: carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve = 5 (intravenous) on day 1 and topotecan 4 mg/m(2) (intravenous) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for up to six cycles, with restaging every 6 weeks (per RECIST). RESULTS: Between June 2006 and November 2008, 61 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 40 weeks (range 27-109 weeks). Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 67 years (range 40-84 years); male, 53%; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 28%. Complete responses were seen in two patients and partial responses in 33 patients; ORR was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-70). Stable disease was seen in 12 patients (20%), and progressive disease was seen in two patients (3%). The median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.0-6.3 months). The median OS was 8.5 months (95% CI 7.2-11.4 months). One-year OS was 29%. Grade 3/4 toxicity in >5%: neutropenia (66%), thrombocytopenia (48%), leukopenia (40%), anemia (30%), fatigue (13%), dehydration (8%), infection (8%), and pain (7%). CONCLUSIONS: The ORR achieved with carboplatin and weekly topotecan was less than the anticipated rate of 70%; however, it was comparable with historical rates seen with other platinum doublets in the first-line extensive stage SCLC setting. This regimen was generally well tolerated, with myelosuppression as its primary toxicity.

A Phase I trial of protracted oral fixed-dose temozolomide.

BACKGROUND: The current Phase I trial was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, and recommended Phase II dose of oral fixed-dose temozolomide when administered for 5 of every 7 days on a continuous basis. METHODS: Patients received a fixed dose of temozolomide daily for 5 of every 7 days continuously. Four weeks of treatment were considered 1 treatment cycle. Patients were accrued at 7 different dose levels ranging from 100 mg/day to 360 mg/day. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received 111 cycles of therapy. DLT consisted of myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia. The primary nonhematologic toxicities were nausea and emesis, which were easily controlled with antiemetics. CONCLUSIONS: Protracted administration of temozolomide at a fixed dose of 300 mg/day for 5 of every 7 days continuously was well tolerated and allowed greater dose intensity compared with various other schedules. This regimen could potentially increase antitumor activity as protracted temozolomide schedules inhibit DNA repair by depletion of the repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase.

Gefitinib in the treatment of advanced, refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: results in 124 patients.

To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of oral gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa) in patients with refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated in a community-based setting. One hundred twenty-four patients with advanced, refractory NSCLC received treatment with gefitinib 250 mg orally each day. Ninety-six percent of patients had received >or= 1 previous chemotherapy regimens and 79% had received previous platinum and taxane therapy. Patients were evaluated for response after 6-12 weeks of daily gefitinib therapy; patients with objective response or stable disease continued gefitinib until disease progression occurred. Gefitinib was well-tolerated in these patients with advanced, refractory NSCLC. There were no grade 4 toxicities, and grade 3 skin toxicity and diarrhea were observed in only 4% and 2% of patients, respectively. Nine of 120 evaluable patients (8%) had partial responses to treatment; however, 54 patients (45%) had no evidence of progression at first reevaluation, and a total of 35 patients (29%) reported improvement in lung cancer-related symptoms while receiving gefitinib. Median survival for the entire group was 6.5 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 35%. Gefitinib is active and very well-tolerated in patients with advanced, refractory NSCLC. Although the major response rate was low, nearly 50% of patients derived substantial palliative benefit from gefitinib therapy. The median survival of 6.5 months achieved in this large group of relatively unselected patients is unprecedented in the third-line treatment setting, and compares favorably to other available second-line treatment including docetaxel. A therapeutic trial of gefitinib should be considered in all patients with refractory NSCLC.

Phase I. Trial of irinotecan and temozolomide in patients with solid tumors.

This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated doses, and recommended phase II doses of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and temozolomide (Temodar). Patients have received irinotecan and temozolomide on one of three different dosing schedules: (1) oral temozolomide on days 1-14 plus a single i.v. dose of irinotecan on day 8 every 28 days (arm 1); (2) weekly i.v. irinotecan on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 plus oral temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 42 days (arm 2); and (3) every-other-week i.v. irinotecan on days 1 and 15 plus oral temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28 days (arm 3). A total of 49 patients have received 112+ cycles of therapy on all three dosing schedules to date. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was encountered at a temozolomide dose of 125 mg/m2/d and an irinotecan dose of 250 mg/m2 on treatment arm 1. As a result, the protocol has been amended to explore lower doses of temozolomide in combination with higher doses of irinotecan, and patient accrual is currently continuing. Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were reported in 7/12 patients enrolled on the two dose levels explored on treatment arm 2, so this dosing regimen was considered intolerable. Patient accrual currently continues at dose level 1 of treatment arm 3, so it is too early to determine dose-limiting toxicities and recommended phase II doses for this treatment schedule. Two partial responses have been reported to date in patients with glioblastoma and head and neck cancer, respectively. One evaluable response has also been observed in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan weekly x 4 plus temozolomide on days 1-7 and 15-21 is intolerable due to the development of dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicities. The recommended phase II doses of irinotecan and temozolomide on treatment arms 1 and 3 remain to be determined as patient accrual is currently ongoing.