[Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcer: a cost-benefit study]. / Tratamiento de la infección por Helicobacter pylori en pacientes con úlcera duodenal: estudio de costo-beneficio.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological differences suggest that treatments for H. pylori eradication should be locally validated. AIM: To perform a cost benefit study of different treatment options for H. pylori infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection who completed a 2-week treatment with one of the following regimens were included: famotidine plus amoxycillin plus metronidazole (FAM), omeprazole plus amoxycillin plus tinidazole (OAT) or lansoprazole plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin in 3 (LAC1) or 2 (LAC2) daily doses. We compared efficacy, adverse effects and cost. RESULTS: Eradication rate was 74.6, 72.9, 96.4 y 91.7% for FAM, OAT, LAC1 and LAC2 respectively (p < 0.05). Direct cost ranged from US$ 50 for FAM to US$ 220 for LAC1. A decision analysis was carried out in a model including direct and indirect costs and considering retreatment with antibiotics after the first treatment failure and one-year treatment with H2-blockers in case of a second failure. FAM was selected as the most cost-effective option, with an estimated cost of about US$ 300 +/- 148 per patient. However, cost associated to LAC2 was very similar (US$ 320 +/- 58) and the lower standard deviation suggests less variation. Sensitivity analyses, considering reasonable fluctuation in parameters such as eradication rate, cost and follow-up period suggest that a regimen containing a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxycillin may be the most cost-effective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be confirmed in other settings, specially in ordinary clinical practice, far from clinical research.

The long-term reinfection rate and the course of duodenal ulcer disease after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a developing country.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication on the natural history of duodenal ulcer disease and the reinfection rate after treatment in a developing country. METHODS: A total of 111 H. pylori-infected patients with duodenal ulcer were treated with either omeprazole or famotidine plus two antibiotics for 2 wk. Those failed to respond to treatment were retreated with bismuth-based triple therapy. RESULTS: The radication rate was 76% (95% CI: 67-83%). Eventually, H. pylori was eradicated in 96 of the 111 patients (86%), who were followed-up clinically and endoscopically for a mean of 37.2 months. The cumulative reinfection rate after eradication (Kaplan-Meier) was 8%+/-3% in yr 1, 11%+/-4% in yr 2, and 13%+/-4% in yr 3. Nine of the 12 reinfections occurred during yr 1. Recurrence of duodenal ulcer was detected in five patients (5.2%), all of them during yr 1 of follow-up. Histologically, gastritis scores (according to the Sydney system) improved significantly after eradication. CONCLUSIONS: In a high prevalence setting, H. pylori eradication and early reinfection rates after treatment are similar to rates observed in a low prevalence environment, whereas the late reinfection rate seems to be higher. However, up to 3 yr after treatment, most treated patients are free of H. pylori infection and/or ulcer activity. Even longer follow-up studies are necessary to determine whether specific retreatment policies are necessary to maintain long term eradication in developing countries.

Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection after antibiotic treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the most widely available tests for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection after antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A total of 59 H. pylori-positive, duodenal ulcer patients (mean age, 40.7 +/- 11.7 yr; 40 male and 19 female) were treated for 2 wk with either amoxicillin-metronidazole (n = 36) or omeprazole-amoxicillin-tinidazole (n = 23), and after 4 wk, were tested for H. pylori infection by [14C]urea breath test (UBT), serum IgG antibody level, and multiple antral biopsies for rapid urease testing, histology, Warthin-Starry stain, and polymerase chain reaction to detect H. pylori DNA. Infection status was established by a concordance of test results. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 47 patients (80%). UBT and rapid urease testing had the best sensitivity and specificity, although not statistically different to Warthin-Starry stain and polymerase chain reaction. Serology and histology had little diagnostic value in this setting due to high proportion of false-positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive UBT is as accurate in predicting H. pylori status after antibiotic treatment as rapid urease testing and Warthin-Starry stain. Especially for duodenal ulcer patients, UBT could be considered the gold standard to confirm eradication of H. pylori.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in patients with acute pancreatitis.

We have shown that patients with previous acute pancreatitis (AP) may have an abnormal catabolism of chylomicron remnants (CMR). Because apoprotein E (Apo E) genetic polymorphism has an important influence on CMR clearance, we compared frequency distribution of Apo E phenotypes in 52 patients with AP, 109 patients with gallstones, and 110 control subjects. Apo E phenotypes were detected by isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting. After adjusting for differences in age and gender, fasting triglyceride level was comparable between the study groups. The frequency distribution of Apo E phenotypes was not different between the three study groups and it was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The gene frequency for Apo E2 was 0.212, 0.273, and 0.243 in AP, gallstone, and control group, respectively. For Apo E3 it was 0.701, 0.627, and 0.674, and for Apo E4 0.090, 0.100, and 0.083 in the same groups, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant (chi 2). In conclusion, the abnormal catabolism of CMR in patients with AP is not attributable to Apo E polymorphism. An alternative explanation may be sought in the activity of the recently identified hepatocytic Apo E receptor [LDL-related receptor protein (LRP)].