Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 74(3): e84-8, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19446417

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate prevalence, reporting rates and clinical implications of incidental pulmonary nodules detected in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) abdominal studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal MDCT studies of 243 consecutive patients, 94 of whom had a history of cancer, were evaluated. Lung bases included in the scan were reviewed on a PACS workstation with different window settings and post-processing techniques. Nodules were classified according to their density (calcified, solid noncalcified, non-solid, part-solid) and size (<4mm; 4-6mm; 6-8mm; >8mm). The study findings were compared with the corresponding radiologic reports. Previous of following CT studies, when available from the PACS, were also reviewed to evaluate changes in number and size of the detected nodules. RESULTS: An average of 8.2 cm of lung parenchyma was imaged in each patient. 213 noncalcified nodules (NCNs) were identified in 95 patients (39.1%) but only 8 patients (8.4%) had it mentioned in the final report. Comparison CT studies were available for 44 out of the 95 positive patients showing disappearance of the nodules in 2 cases, no interval change in 26 and progression in size and/or number in 16 patients, in whom a final diagnosis of metastasis or primary lung cancers was achieved. CONCLUSION: Radiologists tend to overlook lung portions on abdominal CT studies. Underreporting may affect patient care and have medico-legal implications since images are permanently stored in digital format on PACS and CD-ROMs. Management of the discovered nodules should be tailored to the clinical situation of the patient, and particular care should be reserved to patients with oncologic history.


Subject(s)
Incidental Findings , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Radiography, Abdominal/statistics & numerical data , Radiology Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Radiol ; 69(3): 555-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18164889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients undergoing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the chest and/or abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 323 consecutive patients (196 males, 127 females) with a mean age of 62.6 years (range 20-88) who had undergone chest and/or abdominal MDCT were evaluated. Sagittal reformats of the spine obtained from thin section datasets were reviewed by two radiologists and assessed for vertebral fractures. Morphometric analysis using electronic calipers was performed on vertebral bodies which appeared abnormal upon visual inspection. A vertebral body height loss of 15% or more was considered a fracture and graded as mild (15-24%), moderate (25-49%) or severe (more than 50%). Official radiology reports were reviewed and whether the vertebral fractures had been reported or not was noted. RESULTS: 31 out of 323 patients (9.5%) had at least 1 vertebral fracture and 7 of those patients had multiple fractures for a total of 41 fractures. Morphometric grading revealed 10 mild, 16 moderate and 15 severe fractures. Prevalence was higher in women (14.1%) than men (6.6%) and increased with patients age with a 17.1% prevalence in post-menopausal women. Only 6 out 41 vertebral fractures (14.6%) had been noted in the radiology final report while the remaining 35 (85.45) had not. CONCLUSION: although vertebral fractures represent frequent incidental findings on multidetector CT studies and may be easily identified on sagittal reformats, they are often underreported by radiologists, most likely because of unawareness of their clinical importance.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prevalence , Professional Competence , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...