Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurosci Lett ; 462(2): 101-4, 2009 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19576957

ABSTRACT

Inhibiting inappropriate behavior and thoughts in the current context is an essential ability for humans, but the neural mechanisms for response inhibitory processing are a matter of continuous debate. The aim of this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was to evaluate the negative blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) effect on inhibitory processing during go/no-go paradigms. Fifteen subjects performed two different types of somatosensory go/no-go paradigm: (1) button press and (2) count. Go and no-go stimuli were presented with an even probability. We observed a common negative activation during Movement No-go and Count No-go trials in the right SFG, corresponding to BA 8. These findings suggest that the right SFG region was responsible for the negative BOLD effect on inhibitory processing, which was independent of the required response mode. We hypothesized several possible explanations for the deactivation of the SFG during no-go trials.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Brain/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Male , Young Adult
2.
Brain Res Bull ; 77(4): 197-205, 2008 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18722517

ABSTRACT

The aim of this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was to investigate and compare executive functions with different motor outputs in somatosensory Go/Nogo tasks: (1) Button press and (2) Count. Go and Nogo stimuli were presented with an even probability. We observed a common network for Movement and Count Go trials in several regions of the brain including the dorsolateral (DLPFC) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (VLPFC), supplementary motor area (SMA), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), Insula, and superior temporal gyrus (STG). Direct comparison revealed that primary sensorimotor area (SMI), premotor area (PM), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were more activated during Movement than Count Go trials. In contrast, the VLPFC was more activated during Count than Movement Go trials. Our results suggest that there were two neural networks for the supramodal executive function, common and uncommon, depending on the required response mode.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Executive Function/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Touch Perception/physiology , Adult , Brain Mapping , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time , Task Performance and Analysis , Young Adult
3.
Neuroimage ; 39(4): 1858-66, 2008 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18083602

ABSTRACT

Inhibiting inappropriate behavior and thoughts is an essential ability for humans, but the regions responsible for inhibitory processing are a matter of continuous debate. This is the first study of somatosensory go/nogo tasks using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Fifteen subjects preformed two different types of go/nogo task, i.e. (1) Movement and (2) Count, to compare with previous studies using visual go/nogo tasks, and confirm whether the inhibitory processing is dependent on sensory modalities. Go and nogo stimuli were presented with an even probability. Our data indicated that the response inhibition network involved the dorsolateral (DLPFC) and ventrolateral (VLPFC) prefrontal cortices, pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), insula, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ), which were consistent with previous results obtained using visual go/nogo tasks. These activities existed in both Movement and Count Nogo trials. Therefore, our results suggest that the network for inhibitory processing is not dependent on sensory modalities but reflects common neural activities. In addition, there were differences of activation intensity between Movement and Count Nogo trials in the prefrontal cortex, temporal lobe, and ACC. Thus, inhibitory processing would involve two neural networks, common and uncommon regions, depending on the required response mode.


Subject(s)
Inhibition, Psychological , Movement/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Adult , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL