Winning during a pandemic: epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 during EURO2020 in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: EURO2020 generated a growing media and population interest across the month period, that peaked with large spontaneous celebrations across the country upon winning the tournament. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from the national surveillance system (indicator-based) and from event-based surveillance to assess how the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) changed in June-July 2021 and to describe cases and clusters linked with EURO2020. RESULTS: Widespread increases in transmission and case numbers, mainly among younger males, were documented in Italy, none were linked with stadium attendance. Vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 was longer among cases linked to EURO2020 than among the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission increased across the country, mainly due to gatherings outside the stadium, where, conversely, strict infection control measures were enforced. These informal 'side' gatherings were dispersed across the entire country and difficult to control. Targeted communication and control strategies to limit the impact of informal gatherings occurring outside official sites of mass gathering events should be further developed.

[Food-borne illnesses: a survey of regional reference laboratories in Italy.]. / Malattie trasmesse attraverso gli alimenti: indagine sui laboratori regionali di riferimento in Italia.

Many problems exist in the surveillance of human food-borne illnesses, and one of the most important is identifying the responsible microorganisms. For this reason, a survey was carried out to identify regional reference laboratories and laboratories with the capacities necessary for identification of pathogenic microorganisms in Italy. All 21 Italian regions and autonomous provinces completed the survey except three (Basilicata, Tuscany and Sardinia).Only 6% of the identified laboratories were found to have been formally designated as regional reference laboratories. Seventy-one percent of all laboratories reported having the capacity to diagnose over half (>7/13) of the listed bacteria, 69% over half of the listed parasites (> 4/8) and 51% over half of the listed viruses (>2/4). No differences were found in the capability to diagnose bacterial and parasitic infections, between laboratories in northern, central and southern Italy, while a significant difference was found in the capability to diagnose viral infections between laboratories in the three geographical areas (p <0.01). This study clearly shows that there is a need to improve diagnostic capacities of regional reference laboratories and laboratories involved in the surveillance of food-borne illnesses in Italy.