Effect of alfuzosin on female primary bladder neck obstruction.

Our objective was to assess the effect of the selective alpha(1)-blocker alfuzosin on urodynamic parameters and quality of life in female patients with primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO). Twenty-five women identified as having PBNO were included in the study. After the initial assessment of urodynamic parameters and bother score index, all patients were treated with alfuzosin 5 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. After this period of time, the patients were reassessed with the same methodology as pretreatment. Symptoms subjectively improved, and patients' satisfaction significantly increased in 64% of the patients (16 out of 25). Most urodynamic parameters were also significantly improved after treatment with alfuzosin. Alfuzosin significantly improved urodynamic parameters and alleviated bother score in almost two thirds of patients with PBNO and can be an effective first-line treatment of this situation.

The relationship between the perineal length measurements and the urodynamic stress incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the length of perineal body, the anal position index, the total fourchette-coccyx distance and the anal-coccyx length and female urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (USUI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 57 women with USUI (group A) and 45 women without USUI as control (group B). All patients underwent a urodynamic evaluation and measurement of the length of perineal body (PB) and the distance between the fourchette and the inferior margin of coccyx (FC). PB is the distance between the fourchette and the center of anal orifice. The ratio PB/FC is the anal position index. Subtracting the PB length from FC distance equals the anal-coccyx (AC) length. RESULTS: The student's t-test showed no significant statistical difference between any of the measured lengths in the two groups. Moreover, in the USUI group, ANOVA did not show any significant relationship between the urodynamic parameters and the measured lengths. Regarding to the investigated urodynamic parameters only the maximum urethral pressure (Pura max) presented a significant statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Theoretically, a differentiation of perineal distances probably brings to the surface a laxity of the pelvic floor, a factor predisposing to USUI. Furthermore, the anterior position of anus can be a cause of constipation which also contributes to USUI. However, our study did not reveal any relationship between the perineal length measurements and USUI. Further investigation with longer series of patients is needed to show if this simple, inexpensive and non-invasive test could be added in the armamentarium of the diagnostic and prognostic investigation of USUI. Regarding to the urodynamic parameters, our results emphasize the importance of the Pura max parameter in the urodynamic evaluation of USUI.

Comparison of the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in different urodynamic severity grades of idiopathic detrusor overactivity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in the treatment of specific, according to their urodynamic grade of severity, populations with overactive detrusor. METHODS: In this open, randomized, two-way crossover study 128 women with urodynamically confirmed, idiopathic detrusor overactivity were recruited. Patients were categorized in 4 grades of severity groups, according to the characteristics of the first overactive detrusor contraction during filling cystometrogram: high volume-low pressure (grade-group I), high volume-high pressure (grade-group II), low volume-low pressure (grade-group III) and low volume-high pressure (grade-group IV). The primary outcome measure was average volume of voided urine per micturition. RESULTS: 107 patients successfully completed the study protocol and were included in the analyses: 40 in group IV, 36 in III, 25 in II and 6 in group I. In groups IV and III both oxybutynin and tolterodine significantly increased the average volume of voided urine per micturition but the differences between the drugs were not significant (p > 0.05). In group II neither of the drugs achieved significant changes in the outcome measure (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tolterodine and oxybutynin are clinically equipotent in treating detrusor overactivity in specific severity groups of patients, although urodynamic effects are somewhat different.

Efficacy of apomorphine and sildenafil in men with nonarteriogenic erectile dysfunction. A comparative crossover study.

To compare the efficacy of apomorphine and sildenafil in men with nonarteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED), 40 men were studied. Post-injection penile peak systolic velocity was greater than 25 cm s(-1). Twenty men started on apomorphine 2 mg and 20 on sildenafil 50 mg, the doses titrated up to 3 and 100 mg, respectively, if necessary. After a 1-week washout period each group switched to the other treatment mode. Efficacy was the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse, based on an event log data. The majority (85%) of the men had concomitant diseases, risk factors for ED and 95% were heavy smokers. The overall success rate of apomorphine was 62.7%, compared with 73.1% of sildenafil (Yates-corrected chi-square, P < 0.0004). The response to apomorphine 2 mg and sildenafil 50 mg was age related. Sildenafil was statistically more effective than apomorphine in impotent men with normal penile Doppler. Given the contraindication of sildenafil in men taking nitrates and the quick time of action of apomorphine, the two drugs are satisfactory first line therapeutic tools in such individuals and the choice should be based on patient's needs and preferences.

A comparative, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with evidence of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

The aim of the study was to establish and compare the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). In all, 43 men with ED and postinjection max penile systolic velocity <25 cm/s in repeated Doppler ultrasonography were included. Of these, 24 men started on apomorphine 2 mg and 19 on sildenafil 50 mg, the doses titrated up to 3 and 100 mg according to effectiveness and tolerability. Safety was evaluated according to adverse events (AEs) and patient withdrawal. Efficacy was the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse, based on event log data. The incidence of AEs with apomorphine 3 mg was higher than with sildenafil 100 mg. Two men on apomorphine 3 mg discontinued treatment due to AEs. The overall success rate of sildenafil was 63.7% compared to 32.1% of apomorphine (Pearson chi(2), P<0.01). Of all men, 25 (58.1%) responded to sildenafil 50 mg without the need for dose increase, while only one responded to apomorphine 2 mg. The response to sildenafil 50 mg was age related (analysis of variance, p=0.04). Satisfaction was reported by 76.75 and 13.95% of patients for sildenafil and apomorphine, respectively, but 20.9% were not satisfied with any of the two drugs. In conclusion, this study provides clear evidence that sildenafil, even at 50 mg dose, is more effective than apomorphine 3 mg in men with arteriogenic ED. The fact that one out of five patients is not satisfied with the above-studied drugs shows that new oral agents need to be evaluated for the treatment of this disorder.

Combination treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the effect of tolterodine combined with tamsulosin on quality of life in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and concomitant detrusor instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 50 consecutive patients with urodynamically proven mild or moderate bladder outlet obstruction and concomitant detrusor instability. All patients were initially treated with 0.4 mg. tamsulosin orally once a day. A week later the patients were randomly allocated into group 1-25 who continued treatment with tamsulosin only and, group 2-25 who also received 2 mg. tolterodine orally twice daily. Reevaluation with a quality of life questionnaire and urodynamic study was performed after 3 months. RESULTS: Two patients from group 2 stopped tolterodine while 1 patient from each group stopped tamsulosin because of hypotension. Analysis revealed statistically significant improvement in quality of life scores only in group 2 patients (mean score 525.0 and 628.4 before and after treatment, respectively, 2-sided t test p = 0.0003). A significant difference was noted in both groups after treatment for maximum flow rate and volume at first contraction. Additionally, in group 2, a statistically significant difference was observed for maximum detrusor pressure and maximum unstable contraction pressure after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with an alpha-blocker (tamsulosin) plus an anticholinergic (tolterodine) improves quality of life in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and concomitant detrusor instability. Interestingly, no acute urinary retention was observed and tolterodine did not affect the quality of urine flow or residual urine volume. The proposed combination appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment option in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and detrusor instability.

Switching from long-term treatment with self-injections to oral sildenafil in diabetic patients with severe erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of oral sildenafil in diabetic men with severe erectile dysfunction (ED), who are successfully treated with intracavernous injections of vasoactive drugs. METHODS: 81 impotent diabetic men (29 with type 1 and 52 with type 2) were treated for 1-7 years with self-injections. 13 men were treated with 10 microg and 15 with 20 microg of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), and 53 with a mixture of PGE1 20 microg and papaverine 7.5-40 mg (MIX). After a 1-week washout period, they changed to oral sildenafil in titrating doses up to 100mg. The change was successful if the man achieved an erection and penetration even once. RESULTS: Sildenafil was discontinued in 23 men because of insufficiency. Eleven men (13.6%), all with type 2 diabetes, responded to sildenafil (10 previously treated with 10 microg and 1 with 20 microg of PGE1, none treated with MIX). Thus, 39.2% of the treated with PGE1 responded to oral sildenafil. The response was influenced by the age, the type of diabetes (type 2) and the kind of the previously injected drug (PGE1 10 microg); it was not influenced by the duration of diabetes, ED and treatment with self-injections. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well documented efficacy of sildenafil, self-injections continue to be the solely effective therapeutic modality in many diabetic men afflicted by severe ED. Only the younger men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes, treated with low doses of PGE1 are more likely to respond to oral sildenafil and change treatment. Men with insulin-dependent diabetes or treated with mixtures of vasoactive drugs are not likely to respond to oral sildenafil.