Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Biol Med ; 136: 104721, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34371320

ABSTRACT

The automated and accurate carotid plaque segmentation in B-mode ultrasound (US) is an essential part of stroke risk stratification. Previous segmented methods used AtheroEdge™ 2.0 (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA) for the common carotid artery (CCA). This study focuses on automated plaque segmentation in the internal carotid artery (ICA) using solo deep learning (SDL) and hybrid deep learning (HDL) models. The methodology consists of a novel design of 10 types of SDL/HDL models (AtheroEdge™ 3.0 systems (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA) with a depth of four layers each. Five of the models use cross-entropy (CE)-loss, and the other five models use Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)-loss functions derived from UNet, UNet+, SegNet, SegNet-UNet, and SegNet-UNet+. The K10 protocol (Train:Test:90%:10%) was applied for all 10 models for training and predicting (segmenting) the plaque region, which was then quantified to compute the plaque area in mm2. Further, the data augmentation effect was analyzed. The database consisted of 970 ICA B-mode US scans taken from 99 moderate to high-risk patients. Using the difference area threshold of 10 mm2 between ground truth (GT) and artificial intelligence (AI), the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.91, 0.911, 0.908, 0.905, and 0.898, all with a p-value of <0.001 (for CE-loss models) and 0.883, 0.889, 0.905, 0.889, and 0.907, all with a p-value of <0.001 (for DSC-loss models). The correlations between the AI-based plaque area and GT plaque area were 0.98, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97, all with a p-value of <0.001 (for CE-loss models) and 0.98, 0.98, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.98 (for DSC-loss models). Overall, the online system performs plaque segmentation in less than 1 s. We validate our hypothesis that HDL and SDL models demonstrate comparable performance. SegNet-UNet was the best-performing hybrid architecture.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Artificial Intelligence , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
2.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 21(2): 7, 2019 01 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684090

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease which may result in a higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and stroke. Tissue characterization and risk stratification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are a challenging problem. Risk stratification of RA patients using traditional risk factor-based calculators either underestimates or overestimates the CV risk. Advancements in medical imaging have facilitated early and accurate CV risk stratification compared to conventional cardiovascular risk calculators. RECENT FINDING: In recent years, a link between carotid atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis has been widely discussed by multiple studies. Imaging the carotid artery using 2-D ultrasound is a noninvasive, economic, and efficient imaging approach that provides an atherosclerotic plaque tissue-specific image. Such images can help to morphologically characterize the plaque type and accurately measure vital phenotypes such as media wall thickness and wall variability. Intelligence-based paradigms such as machine learning- and deep learning-based techniques not only automate the risk characterization process but also provide an accurate CV risk stratification for better management of RA patients. This review provides a brief understanding of the pathogenesis of RA and its association with carotid atherosclerosis imaged using the B-mode ultrasound technique. Lacunas in traditional risk scores and the role of machine learning-based tissue characterization algorithms are discussed and could facilitate cardiovascular risk assessment in RA patients. The key takeaway points from this review are the following: (i) inflammation is a common link between RA and atherosclerotic plaque buildup, (ii) carotid ultrasound is a better choice to characterize the atherosclerotic plaque tissues in RA patients, and (iii) intelligence-based paradigms are useful for accurate tissue characterization and risk stratification of RA patients.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Atherosclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Atherosclerosis/etiology , Carotid Artery Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery Diseases/etiology , Deep Learning , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/pathology , Carotid Arteries/pathology , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Inflammation/metabolism , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/etiology , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Ultrasonography
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 143: 322-331, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059757

ABSTRACT

AIM: The study investigated the association of carotid ultrasound echolucent plaque-based biomarker with HbA1c, measured as age-adjusted grayscale median (AAGSM) as a function of chronological age, total plaque area, and conventional grayscale median (GSMconv). METHODS: Two stages were developed: (a) automated measurement of carotid parameters such as total plaque area (TPA); (b) computing the AAGSM as a function of GSMconv, age, and TPA. Intra-operator (novice and experienced) analysis was conducted. RESULTS: IRB approved, 204 patients' left/right CCA (408 images) ultrasound scans were collected: mean age: 69 ±â€¯11 years; mean HbA1c: 6.12 ±â€¯1.47%. A moderate inverse correlation was observed between AAGSM and HbA1c (CC of -0.13, P = 0.01), compared to GSM (CC of -0.06, P = 0.24). The RCCA and LCCA showed CC of -0.18, P < 0.01 and -0.08; P < 0.24. Female and males showed CC of -0.29, P < 0.01 and -0.10, P = 0.09. Using the threshold for AAGSM and HbA1c as: low-risk (AAGSM > 100; HbA1c < 5.7%), moderate-risk (40 < AAGSM < 100; 5.7% < HbA1c < 6.5%) and high-risk (AAGSM < 40; HbA1c > 6.5%), the area under the curve showed a better performance of AAGSM over GSMconv. A paired t-test between operators and expert (P < 0.0001); inter-operator CC of 0.85 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Echolucent plaque in patients with diabetes can be more accurately characterized for risk stratification using AAGSM compared to GSMconv.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Phenotype , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...