Opinions on advanced practice among diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers: Survey results of an European congress of radiology study.

INTRODUCTION: The exploration of Advanced Practice (AP) in both diagnostic and therapeutic radiography has become a prominent topic of discussion within the radiographic community, prompting an investigation into radiographers' perceptions and the current global status of advanced roles. This study aimed collect data on radiography and radiation therapy AP career paths, and understand radiographers' perceptions of advanced practice at the European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2020. METHODS: A concise, 15-question web-based survey was distributed through the EFRS Research Hub during ECR 2020. Topics covered included respondents' demographics, educational background, current radiography skills, the landscape of AP in radiography, potential progression avenues in their countries, and key benefits linked to role advancement. RESULTS: The survey garnered responses from 83 radiographers, with a predominant 79.5% (n = 66) representing Europe. Information on the total number of participants approached during the ECR and thus the resulting response rate is not available. Among the findings, a meaningful portion (30%, n = 25) of participants indicated the absence of AP opportunities in their respective country. Notably, an overwhelming majority (97.5%, n = 81) expressed a personal willingness to embrace AP roles. Areas of particular interest to the respondents included radiography reporting (38.6%, n = 32), performing ultrasound examination (13.2%, n = 11), conducting interventional procedures (13.2%, n = 11) and engaging in radiography research (10.8%, n = 9). CONCLUSION: The study indicates a keen interest among surveyed radiographers in pursuing AP, emphasizing the necessity for role recognition. Education, research and job satisfaction emerged as pivotal for AP progression. Despite this, AP availability in Europe is limited. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: There is a need to recognize and address barriers, provide targeted education and training, and promote job satisfaction to facilitate the development of AP in radiography.

3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10-240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits.