One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PreserFlo MicroShunt glaucoma device in a multicentre cohort study. METHODS: All consecutive patients who received the microshunt with mitomycin-C (MMC) 0.4 mg/mL from May 2019 to September 2020 in three UK tertiary centres. Primary outcome at 1 year was a complete success, with failure defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mmHg or <20% reduction, IOP≤5 mmHg with any decreased vision on two consecutive visits, reoperation or loss of light perception vision. Secondary outcomes were IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, medications, complications, interventions and reoperations. We also performed subgroup analyses for severe glaucoma and assessed risk factors for failure. RESULTS: 104 eyes had 1-year follow-up. Complete and qualified success at 1 year were achieved in 51.9% (N=54) and 16.4% (N=17), respectively, and failure occurred in 31.7% (N=33). There was a significant reduction in IOP (mmHg) from preoperatively (23.4±0.8, N=104) to 12 months (14.7±0.6, N=104) (p<0.0001). Antiglaucoma medications also decreased from preoperatively (3.4±0.1, N=104) to 12 months (0.7±0.1, N=104) (p<0.0001). Multivariate analyses showed an association between higher mean deviation and failure (HR 1.055, 95% CI 1.0075 to 1.11, p=0.0227). Complications were hypotony (19.2%; N=20), choroidal detachments (10.6%; N=11), hyphaema (5.8%; N=6) and bleb leak (5.8%; N=6). Needling and 5-fluorouracil injections were performed in 12.5% (N=13) and 33.7% (N=35), respectively, and 11.5% (N=12) required revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The PreserFlo MicroShunt with MMC 0.4 mg/mL showed an overall success rate of 68.3% at 1 year, and led to significant IOP and medication reduction with a low rate of adverse effects.

Defining stable glaucoma: a Delphi consensus survey of UK optometrists with a specialist interest in Glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Increasing demand on hospital services has led to the development of alternative community-based services, often run by optometrists for monitoring 'stable' and low-risk glaucoma patients. METHODS: An online Delphi exercise was undertaken to derive a consensus definition of 'stable glaucoma' amongst optometrists with a special interest in glaucoma. Participants were asked to score their agreement for various clinical parameters. Results from each round were used to inform subsequent rounds. RESULTS: 31 optometrists participated in the study. 100%, 77%, and 68% completion rates were achieved over three rounds respectively. Consensus was reached for 7 parameters: Stability should be defined over a period of 36-48 months, summary measure Visual Field (VF), and/or Trend Analysis should be used to assess VF stability. Two or more decibel (dB) of change of VF mean deviation (MD) is considered unstable. Intraocular pressure (IOP) should be below a target defined by the patient's clinician or a fixed-percentage reduction compared to the presenting IOP. No treatment change during the stability assessment period is considered stable. Imaging with Ocular Coherence Topography Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (OCT RNFL) assessment should be used to define glaucoma stability. Overview by a glaucoma consultant was considered important for glaucoma monitoring schemes. CONCLUSION: This Delphi exercise has generated a consensus definition for glaucoma stability by UK Optometrists with a specialist interest in glaucoma. This consensus definition can be used to inform the selection of suitable patients from hospital services for transfer to monitoring in community-based 'stable' optometry run glaucoma clinics.

Natural course of adult-onset vitelliform lesions in eyes with and without comorbid subretinal drusenoid deposits.

PURPOSE: Adult vitelliform lesions (AVL) are associated with age related macular degeneration (AMD) and subretinal drusenoid deposits (SRDD). We evaluated the natural course of AVL, assessing the influence of SRDD on disease progression, visual function and incidence of macular atrophy (MA) and choroidal neovascular membranes (CNVM). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2011 and March 2016. Demographic, clinical and imaging data from 26 consecutive AVL patients were analysed following case note review. Optical coherence tomography images were graded for SRDD and patients divided into those with/without SRDD. Outcomes included presenting/changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and incidence of MA/CNVM. RESULTS: Mean age was 78.6 ± 7.6 years. Mean follow-up was 51.5 ± 25.6 months. Twelve patients (46.2%) had SRDD at presentation with 3 more (11.5%) developing them. Subjects with SRDD were older (mean 81.7 ± 6.1 years vs 74.3 ± 7.6 years, p = 0.010). Mean presenting BCVA was worse in SRDD eyes (0.39 ± 0.31 logMAR vs 0.19 ± 0.18 logMAR, p = 0.017). Eight of 15 patients with SRDD (53.3%) developed incident MA or CNVM; higher than those with no SRDD (1/11, 9.1%; p = 0.036). Two patients (7.7%) developed full thickness macular holes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AVL and SRDD likely represent an advanced pathological stage or phenotype with worse visual outcome and higher risk of MA/CNVM. Possible overlap with AMD exists. Follow-up, counselling and provisions for early detection/treatment of complications should be made. Better classification including improved understanding of phenotypic and genetic variations with reference to comorbid diseases including AMD is required. Presence of SRDD in AVL offers a dichotomous classification, indicating risk of future MA/CNVM formation.