Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(13): e7442, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949180

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Distress during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak affected also cancer patients' well-being. Aim of this study was to investigate patient' reactions and behavior (flexible-adaptive vs. inflexible-maladaptive) during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed with a self-report questionnaire, "the ImpACT questionnaire," developed for the study. Regression analysis was performed on data. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty five cancer patients from 17 Italian regions participated in the study. 79.8% of participants were female (mean age of 58 years). 92.6% of participants reported feeling vulnerable to COVID-19 contagion; 75.6% reported helpless, 62.7% sad, 60.4% anxious, and 52.0% anger. Avoidance of thinking about coronavirus is the principal maladaptive behavior that emerged. Participants who reported feeling anxious were more likely to have fear of staff being infected with COVID-19 (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.49-6.30) and to have disrupted sleep due to worry (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.23-4.83). Younger participants reported more anxiety (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.94-1.00); men reported feeling calm more than women (OR = 2.60; 95% CI = 1.27-5.43). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of cancer patients reported serious concerns regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection; reliable information and psychological support must be offers to respond to these needs.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety , COVID-19 , Neoplasms , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Italy/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Emotions , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Fear/psychology
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33466374

ABSTRACT

Psychological distress imposed by the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak particularly affects patients with pre-existing medical conditions, and the progression of their diseases. Patients who fail to keep scheduled medical appointments experience a negative impact on care. The aim of this study is to investigate the psychosocial factors contributing to the cancellation of medical appointments during the pandemic by patients with pre-existing health conditions. Data were collected in eleven Italian hospitals during the last week of lockdown, and one month later. In order to assess the emotional impact of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and the subject's degree of psychological flexibility, we developed an ad hoc questionnaire (ImpACT), referring to the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) model. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) and the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) were also used. Pervasive dysfunctional use of experiential avoidance behaviours (used with the function to avoid thought, emotions, sensations), feelings of loneliness and high post-traumatic stress scores were found to correlate with the fear of COVID-19, increasing the likelihood of cancelling medical appointments. Responding promptly to the information and psychological needs of patients who cancel medical appointments can have positive effects in terms of psychological and physical health.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , COVID-19/psychology , Patients/psychology , Psychological Distress , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(9)2020 09 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32911799

ABSTRACT

This explorative cross-sectional study aims at exploring emotional distress, psychological profiles, and the attitude towards receiving psychological support in eighty-seven patients with chronic migraine (CM) undergoing OnabotulinumtoxinA prophylactic treatment (OBT-A, n = 40) or withdrawal treatment (WT, n = 47). The outcomes were explored through a specific battery of questionnaires. 25% of patients undergoing OBT-A and almost half of the patients undergoing WT reported psychological distress of at least moderate-severe level, respectively. Coping strategies, self-efficacy, and perceived social support were similar in the two groups. Patients undergoing OBT-A presented lower psychological inflexibility than patients undergoing WT. Predictors of higher psychological distress were low perceived social support by friends, low self-efficacy, and higher avoidance strategies. In both groups, most of the patients evaluated receiving psychological support to be useful (79%). The potential beneficial effects of OBT-A on the severity of symptoms and psychological distress might further support its role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with CM. Identifying patients with psychological vulnerabilities who may benefit from psychological support is relevant in patients with CM.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Pain Management , Psychological Distress , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Neurological Rehabilitation , Self Efficacy , Severity of Illness Index , Social Support , Treatment Outcome
4.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; 34(2 Suppl B): B23-8, 2012.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23326936

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Psychologist's task at the hospital is to take care, from a psychological standpoint, not only of the patient but also of those working at his side, in order to maintain the best possible bio-psycho-social balance and to prevent stress related diseases. The purpose of this study is therefore to assess the stress levels and the coping solutions implemented by doctors and nurses who work closely to severe and difficult diseases such as cancer. METHODS: As evaluation tool has been used the Stress and Coping Scale Health Professions (HPSCS). The group used for the research consists of 10 doctors and 34 nurses who work daily at the Hematology Department of Pescara Hospital. RESULTS: According to the answers of the questionnaire it has been possible to highlight that for both doctors and nurses, the most stressful event is the difficult relations with patients. As for the solving attempts, doctors tend to use most frequently the request of social support, while among the nurses also emerge the emotional distress and the avoidance of the problem. CONCLUSIONS: The use by the latter of impractical coping strategies, suggests the usefulness of future training programs designed to assist individuals in managing situations that are adverse to the empirical practice.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Hematology , Medical Oncology , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Adult , Female , Health Status , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Social Perception , Social Support , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...