How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.

Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative-intent resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis; however, the optimal extent of LN assessment and the interaction between LN assessment and adjuvant systemic therapy is poorly understood. METHODS: Resected non-metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma patients (n = 1743) were identified in the National Cancer Database (1998-2011). Logistic regression analysis identified covariates associated with LN metastasis. The influence of increasing LN cut-off points on overall survival (OS) was analysed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modelling. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and surgery alone cohorts were matched (1:1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of nodal metastasis or survival hazard on Cox modelling. OS in the matched cohort was compared by Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: LN metastases were present in 865 (49.6%) patients. Increasing LN assessment was associated with an increased likelihood of nodal involvement (P = 0.008). In node-negative patients, increasing LN assessment was associated with a decreased risk of death, with the largest actuarial survival differences observed for ≥15 LN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.82, P = 0.001). In the propensity score-matched cohort of node-negative patients, AC was associated with non-significant improvements in 5-year actuarial (66.1% versus 58.7%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.18, P = 0.249), and did not vary by adequacy of LN counts (<15 LNs: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.24, P = 0.305; ≥15 LNs: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.35-2.30, P = 0.900). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of LN identification has prognostic significance in resected node-negative duodenal adenocarcinoma, but cannot be implicated in the selection of node-negative patients for AC.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab (a human agonistic monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1) in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC (stratified by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) were randomized 1:1 to receive sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily per 21-day cycle) and either placebo (placebo-sorafenib arm) or mapatumumab (30 mg/kg on day 1 per 21-day cycle; mapatumumab-sorafenib arm). The primary end point was time to (radiologic) progression (TTP), assessed by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response. RESULTS: In total, 101 patients were randomized (placebo-sorafenib arm: N = 51; mapatumumab-sorafenib arm: N = 50). There was no significant difference in median TTP between both arms [5.6 versus 4.1 months, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio (one-sided 90% confidence interval) 1.192 (0-1.737)]. No mapatumumab-related benefit was identified when TTP was evaluated in the stratified subgroups. The addition of mapatumumab to sorafenib did not demonstrate improvement in the secondary efficacy end points. The reported frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was comparable in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of mapatumumab to sorafenib did not improve TTP or other efficacy end points, nor did it substantially change the toxicity profile of sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Based on these results, further development of the combination of mapatumumab and sorafenib in HCC is not planned.

Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine, irinotecan and panitumumab in advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Current data suggest that chemotherapy combinations may be superior to single agents in biliary tract cancer. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway appears to be associated with tumor stage, prognosis and response to therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the combination of panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function were treated with panitumumab (9 mg/kg) on day 1, and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was to evaluate the 5-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Mutational analyses of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were carried out when feasible. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received a median of 7 (0-30) cycles. The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (10 patients, 29%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 29%), skin rash (13 patients, 37%) and dehydration (9 patients, 26%). Two patients had CR, 9 had partial response (PR), and 15 had SD for a disease-control rate of 74% (by RECIST) in 28 assessable patients. Two patients went on to have surgical resection. The 5-month PFS was 69%. The median PFS was 9.7 months and the median OS was 12.9 months. In 17 testable samples, no EGFR or BRAF mutations were identified; there were 7 KRAS mutations, with no difference in OS by KRAS status. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed encouraging efficacy of this regimen with good tolerability. Further study in this area is warranted. Clinical Trials Number: The trial was registered with the National Cancer Institute (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00948935).

Effect of time interval between surgery and preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin on outcomes in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is now considered "standard of care." However, the optimal time interval for resection after neoadjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: Between 11/90 and 11/04, 107 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative chemo/RT at the University of Pennsylvania. Fifty-six percent had LAR and 40% had APR. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/oxaliplatin in 28% and 5-FU in 72% of patients. All patients received preoperative RT. RESULTS: A longer time interval between chemo/RT and surgery was associated with tumor downstaging (OR 1.24, P = 0.02). A longer time interval was not associated with: nodal downstaging (OR 1.00, P = 0.98); pathologic complete response (PCR) (OR 0.97, P = 0.80); likelihood of performing an LAR (OR 0.90, P = 0.47); improved disease free survival (DFS), local control, or distant control (HR 1.05, P = 0.49; HR 1.14, P = 0.22; HR 1.06, P = 0.52, respectively). The PCR rate was 34.5% in the 5-FU/oxaliplatin/radiation group, and 13.7% in the 5-FU/radiation group. If patients with microscopic CR were excluded, then the PCR rate for 5FU/OX was 21.4% and for 5-FU was 12.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Time interval between surgery and chemo/RT appeared to have little effect on PCR or LAR rates. Patients receiving 5 FU/oxaliplatin/RT had a high PCR rate. A prospective randomized trial to test superiority of 5 FU/oxaliplatin is warranted.

A phase II study of high-dose bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, as initial therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E2200.

AIM: Patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to this single arm phase II multi-center cooperative group trial of bevacizumab combined with IFL. The first 20 patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) weekly for four of six weeks and high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every other week. Following a toxicity review of other trials using IFL, subsequent patients were enrolled at reduced doses of irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of the 92 patients accrued to the study, toxicity data are available for 87 patients and efficacy data for 81 patients. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months, median overall survival is 26.3 months, median progression free survival is 10.7 months and 1-year survival is 85%. The overall response rate is 49.4% (6.2% complete responses). A reduction in the starting doses of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil decreased the occurrence of vomiting, diarrhea and neutropenia related complications. Bleeding occurred in 37 patients; all events but two were grade 1 or grade 2. There were nine reports of grade 3 or grade 4 thrombo-embolic events. Hypertension of any grade occurred in 13% of patients and proteinuria was infrequent. CONCLUSION: High-dose bevacizumab added to IFL is a well-tolerated and highly active regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

A phase II trial of gefitinib with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer.

Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling contributes to the therapy of colorectal cancer. Gefitinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows supra-additive growth inhibition with irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines in xenograft models. We designed a study to determine the tolerability and efficacy of gefitinib in combination with irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), on a 2-week schedule. Among 13 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, 10 required dose reductions of irinotecan and 5-FU because of dehydration, diarrhoea, and neutropenia, seven of whom required hospitalisation, three with neutropenic fever. One patient achieved partial response and seven had disease stabilisation. The combination of this standard chemotherapy regimen with gefitinib is associated with excessive toxicity, suggesting an interaction at a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic level.

Phase I trial of UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer.

UFT (BMS-200604, Uftoral) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that combines uracil and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, ftorafur, in a 4:1 molar ratio with single-agent activity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers. In vitro studies have shown that irinotecan downregulates thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumour cells, leading to synergy between irinotecan and 5-FU that is maximal when irinotecan is given 24 h prior to 5-FU. Given this observed synergy and the confirmatory clinical activity of combination therapy with 5-FU, leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, we performed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of UFT, LV, and irinotecan. Treatment consisted of irinotecan administered as a 90-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 followed by twice daily oral UFT/LV on days 2-15, repeated every 21 days. Initial doses were irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) and UFT 200 mg/m(2)/day, with LV dose fixed at 60 mg/day. 31 patients received a total of 130 cycles of UFT/LV and irinotecan. 3 of 9 patients experienced grade 3/4 diarrhoea at the highest dose level of irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included neutropenia, anaemia, alopecia, nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Further dose escalation was not pursued since this level of toxicity was appropriate for future phase II study. One patient with colorectal cancer experienced a partial response and 9 patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas had disease stabilisation lasting 4-26 (median 6) cycles. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype was analysed in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNs) obtained from 24 patients. 2 patients had the homozygous TT polymorphism and 1 of them had grade 3 diarrhoea at the first dose level. Irinotecan on day 1 followed by a 14-day course of oral UFT/LV beginning on day 2 is well tolerated, and suitable for testing in several tumour types. Doses recommended for further study on this schedule are irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day, with LV 60 mg/day.

Phase I clinical and pharmacogenetic trial of irinotecan and raltitrexed administered every 21 days to patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan and raltitrexed display schedule-dependent synergy in vitro, which supports the clinical investigation of the combination. Functional polymorphisms of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene result in intracellular redistribution of folate derivatives, which may affect raltitrexed-associated cytotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a range of solid cancers and good performance status received irinotecan as a 90-minute infusion on day 1 and raltitrexed as a 15-minute infusion on day 2, repeated every 21 days. Samples were collected for MTHFR C677T genotyping and fasting plasma homocysteine during the first cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-nine assessable patients received 127 cycles of therapy. Irinotecan doses ranged from 100 to 350 mg/m(2), and raltitrexed, 1.0 to 4.0 mg/m(2). Raltitrexed doses of more than 3.0 mg/m(2) were not tolerated and were associated with dose-limiting asthenia, diarrhea, and AST/ALT elevation. Irinotecan/raltitrexed doses of 350/3.0 mg/m(2) were well-tolerated; principal toxicities included neutropenia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Two partial responses were observed in patients with pretreated gastroesophageal cancers. Homozygotes with the MTHFR 677 TT polymorphism incurred significantly less raltitrexed-associated toxicity than those with either wild-type or heterozygous genotypes (P = .05). No significant differences were noted in plasma homocysteine values between the genotypic subtypes, and plasma homocysteine levels did not predict the risk of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan and raltitrexed doses of 350 and 3.0 mg/m(2) are recommended for further study on a day 1, 2 schedule every 21 days. Efficacy results suggest that trials in upper and lower gastrointestinal malignancies are warranted. MTHFR C677T genotypes may be predictive of clinical raltitrexed toxicity.

Safety and efficacy of exisulind for treatment of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of exisulind for delaying disease progression in men with increasing prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 men with increasing PSA after radical prostatectomy were randomized to receive placebo (49) or 250 mg. exisulind twice daily (47) for 12 months. The primary efficacy parameter was the difference in change from baseline PSA between the placebo and exisulind groups. The PSA doubling time was also evaluated before and during study. A subgroup analysis classified patients based on the risk of developing metastatic disease. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, exisulind significantly suppressed the increase in PSA in all patients (p = 0.017). The results were also statistically significant in men at high risk for metastasis (p = 0.0003) and those who could not be classified according to risk (p = 0.0009). In addition, median PSA doubling time was lengthened in high risk patients on exisulind (2.12 month increase) compared with those on placebo (3.37 month decrease, p = 0.048). Exisulind was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Exisulind inhibited the increase in PSA overall and prolonged PSA doubling time in high risk patients compared with placebo. These results suggest that Exisulind has the potential to extend the time from biochemical recurrence to the need for androgen deprivation therapy. Exisulind was well tolerated in this patient population. Our results support further study of Exisulind in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

A phase I trial of topotecan and gemcitabine administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks to patients with advanced tumors.

BACKGROUND: The complementary action of gemcitabine and topotecan on DNA metabolism suggested the potential for their use in combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine, a synthetic cytidine analogue chain terminator, and topotecan, a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, have been reported to have broad antitumor activity and are approved for clinical use. METHODS: The cytotoxicity of the combination in various models in vitro was additive. In the current study, the authors conducted a Phase I study to determine the recommended Phase II doses and toxicity profile of gemcitabine and topotecan when administered weekly in combination. Gemcitabine (400--1000 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously over 30 minutes followed by a 15-minute infusion of topotecan (0.75--2.5 mg/m(2)) weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week treatment cycle. Thirty-eight patients with advanced refractory solid tumors and good performance status were treated. RESULTS: Myelosuppression in the form of granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Other toxic effects included anemia, nausea, and elevated hepatic transaminases. Partial responses were observed in two patients (one with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and one with pancreatic carcinoma). Disease stabilization occurred in five patients (three with pancreatic carcinoma, one with rectal carcinoma, and one with metastatic carcinoma of an unknown primary site). Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m(2), and topotecan, 2.5 mg/m(2), were the maximum tolerated doses for this combination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study showed that the combination of weekly gemcitabine and topotecan for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle schedule appeared to be well tolerated and was associated with clinical activity. Therefore, this combination is recommended for a further Phase II evaluation.

Toxicity and response evaluation of the interferon inducer poly ICLC administered at low dose in advanced renal carcinoma and relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a report of two clinical trials of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Phase II studies were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the interferon inducer Poly ICLC at low doses in advanced renal cancer and relapsed or refractory lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced renal carcinoma and eleven patients with lymphoma were treated with poly ICLC. Patients received 0.25 mg/m2 of poly ICLC intravenously twice weekly three days apart until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were no objective responses. Six patients with renal carcinoma had stable disease as best response with one patient receiving 62 weeks of therapy. Toxicity included grade 3 anemia in 8 patients and grade 4 anemia in one patient. All patients were anemic prior to entry with a median grade 2 anemia at baseline. Grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and injection site pain occurred in one patient each. Grade 3 fever, chills or fatigue occurred in four, three, and three patients respectively. Any grade fever occurred in 10 patients (25.6%) and any grade chills occurred in 9 patients (23.1%). CONCLUSION: Poly ICLC at this dose and schedule is well tolerated in both patient populations and is inactive in renal carcinoma.

Follow-up of stage B and C colorectal cancer in the United States and France.

The optimal postoperative follow-up strategy for patients with resected Dukes' Stage B and C colorectal cancer is controversial. Recently published guidelines support a minimal regimen of carcinoembryonic antigen measurements every 2 to 3 months for at least 2 years, history and physical examination every 3 to 6 months for 3 years, then annually, and colonoscopy every 3 to 5 years. Based on documented practice on the part of surgeons, this regimen would be regarded as intensive. Analyses of relapses following adjuvant therapy support an even more aggressive schedule, with the goal of maximizing the proportion of patients who may be operated on with curative intent (currently about 20% of those who relapse). Additional considerations that may influence the approach to such patients include the identification of second primary tumors (2% over 7 years observation), and the known improvement in quality of life and survival associated with early versus delayed initiation of chemotherapy. However, with the annual investment of resources estimated to be as high as 175 million dollars in the United States alone, a systematic study of such interventions is needed to provide support survival, quality of life, and economic evidence.

Superantigen-targeted therapy: phase I escalating repeat dose trial of the fusion protein PNU-214565 in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Antibody-directed, superantigen-induced cytotoxicity has been shown to have potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects in preclinical models. In the present study, PNU-214565, a recombinant fusion protein consisting of the Fab of the monoclonal antibody C242 and staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA), was used in an escalating repeat dose Phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. A prior single-dose Phase I clinical trial had demonstrated safety at doses of 1.5 ng/kg with toxicities of fever and hypotension that were not dose related. Twenty-seven patients (age range, 36-75 years; median, 62; 14 males and 13 females; 23 colorectal and 4 pancreatic) were treated in the present study with one cycle of four consecutive daily 3-h infusions of PNU-214565 at doses of 0.15 ng/kg (n = 3); 0.5 ng/kg (n = 3), 1.5 ng/kg (n = 4), 2.75 ng/kg (n = 12), and 3.5 ng/kg (n = 5). All patients had a good performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: PS = 0 (n = 15), PS = 1 (n = 12)]. As in the single-dose trial, fever and hypotension were the most common toxicities. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), consisting of transient hypotension responsive to dopamine, was experienced by one patient treated at the 2.75 ng/kg dose level. One patient with pancreatic cancer metastatic to the liver experienced a partial response of hepatic metastases with stable pancreatic head abnormalities by computed tomography scan. Further dose escalation was suspended when two patients treated in a companion repeat dose Phase I study experienced DLT at the 4 ng/kg dose level. Multiparameter analyses on all patients treated in the two companion single-dose and two-repeated-dose Phase I trials revealed that the levels of patients' pretreatment anti-SEA antibodies protected against toxicity at a given drug dose. By jointly considering weight and the baseline anti-SEA concentration in a patient, it is possible to assign a PNU-214565 dose that will induce systemic cytokine release (a surrogate test to assess for the presence of uncomplexed drug and its ability to induce systemic cellular activation) without DLT. This pharmacodynamically based dosing scheme will be tested in future repeated-dose clinical trials and will define maximally tolerated doses of this powerful new immunotherapy approach.

Phase II trial of 96-hour paclitaxel plus oral estramustine phosphate in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity of 96-hour paclitaxel and daily oral estramustine phosphate (EMP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate that progressed after one or more hormonal therapies and a trial of antiandrogen withdrawal were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 by 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 through 4 of each 21-day cycle, together with daily oral EMP 600 mg/m2/d, continuously. RESULTS: Four of nine patients with measurable disease had objective responses (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) in liver (two patients) or nodes (two patients) of 2, 6, 8, and 20 months' duration. Of 25 assessable patients with metastases limited to bone, 14 had a > or = 50% decline in pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level sustained for at least 6 weeks and seven had a > or = 80% decline. Overall, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with elevated pretreatment PSA levels had a > or = 50% decline of PSA and nine (28.1%) had a > or = 80% decrease. The main toxicities (> or = grade 2) were nausea, fluid retention, and fatigue, which occurred in 33%, 33%, and 24.2% of patients. Median time to progression, based on increasing PSA level and other clinical criteria, was 22.5 weeks. The estimated median overall survival time is 69 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of EMP and 96-hour paclitaxel is an active regimen for patients with HRPC. These results further support the therapeutic strategy of combining agents that impair microtubule function by complementary mechanisms.

Superantigen-based immunotherapy: a phase I trial of PNU-214565, a monoclonal antibody-staphylococcal enterotoxin A recombinant fusion protein, in advanced pancreatic and colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and define the toxicities of a single-dose infusion of PNU-214565, a recombinant Escherichia coli-derived fusion protein of Staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) and the Fab-fragment of the C242 monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced colorectal and pancreatic carcinomas. To investigate the capability of PNU-214565 to induce a superantigen (SAg) response resulting in cytokine production and tumor regression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (age range, 39 to 76 years; median, 64; 12 men, nine women; 18 colorectal, three pancreatic cancers) were treated with a single 3-hour infusion of PNU-214565, with doses ranging from 0.01 to 1.5 ng/kg. All patients had prior chemotherapy and a good performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS] = 0 [n = 10]; PS = 1 [n = 11]), 10 had prior radiation, and 18 had prior surgery. RESULTS: Fever and hypotension were the most common toxicities. Fever of any grade occurred in 16 of 21 patients (76%): four of 21 (19%) with grade 2 and two of 21 (9.5%) with grade 3. Hypotension of any grade occurred in 13 of 21 (62%): four of 21 with grade 2 and one of 21 (5%) with grade 3. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) induction correlated with toxicity. In the two patients with grade 3 fever, peak IL-2 and TNF alpha levels were 2.9 IU/mL and 165 pg/mL, and 8.3 IU/mL and 245 pg/mL, respectively. Transient, > or = 50% decreases in circulating monocytes were observed in 17 of 21 patients as early as 0.5 hours (median time, 2 hours) from the start of infusion. Decreases (mean 33%) in circulating lymphocytes were observed in seven of 21 patients. All three patients with grade 3 toxicity were treated at the 0.5-ng/kg dose. The significance of baseline anti-SEA, human antimouse antibody (HAMA), CA242-soluble antigen levels, and T-cell receptor variable beta region (TCR V beta) subsets and histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) genotypes was assessed as possible predictors of toxicity. All toxicities were transient and easily managed. No grade 3 toxicity occurred at the higher dose levels. CONCLUSION: PNU-214565, a SAg-based tumor targeted therapy, is safe when given as a single 3-hour infusion at doses up to 1.5 ng/kg. The MTD for a single dose was not determined. The safety of a repeated dose schedule is currently under investigation, beginning with doses determined to be safe in this trial.

Initial report on intravesical administration of N-trifluoroacetyladriamycin-14-valerate (AD 32) to patients with refractory superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of intravesically administered AD 32, a novel anthracycline, in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. METHODS: Six weekly doses of AD 32 (200 to 900 mg) were administered to 32 patients with superficial TCC who were candidates for intravesical treatment. Serum drug levels were measured during the 6-hour period after administration of the first, third, and sixth doses. Patients underwent bladder evaluations at 3-month intervals to determine responses to treatment. RESULTS: Very low levels of unmetabolized AD 32 and its two primary metabolites were measured in serum. The lack of systemic exposure was confirmed by the finding of only a few minor systemic adverse events. Local bladder irritation, the main toxicity associated with intravesical administration of AD 32, persisted for several days after each instillation. The maximum tolerated dose was 800 mg. Thirteen patients had complete responses to treatment, including 8 who remained disease free for 12.1 to 38.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: AD 32 is an active drug for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. Further studies of intravesical administration of AD 32 are warranted.

Phase I trial of the thymidylate synthase inhibitor AG331 as a 5-day continuous infusion.

AG331 (N6-[4-(morpholinosulfonyl)benzyl]-N6-methyl-2, 6-diaminobenz-[c,d]-indole glucuronate) is a lipophilic thymidylate synthase inhibitor with activity in solid tumor models. On the basis of preclinical data supporting regimens of frequent drug administration, we performed a Phase I trial of AG331 as a 5-day continuous infusion repeated every 3 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were entered at doses ranging from 25 to 1000 mg/m2/day. The major side effects were mild to moderate fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever. At doses >/=400 mg/m2, acute reversible elevation of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase was observed. All patients who received >/=600 mg/m2/day experienced elevated alanine aminotransferase. Elevated liver function tests were evident by day 3 of the infusion and had resolved by day 8 in the majority. This toxicity was dose limiting at 1000 mg/m2/day, at which dose two of two patients developed grade 4 reversible hyperbilirubinemia in addition to the enzyme elevations. Serum and urine samples were analyzed by a novel high-pressure liquid chromatography method for the determination of the pharmacokinetics of AG331. Over the 50-1000 mg/m2/day dose range, mean total clearance ranged from 11.6 to 30.0 liters/h/m2, and volume of distribution at steady state ranged from 279.5 to 758.7 liters/m2. These parameters were dose independent over the dose range tested. The harmonic mean terminal half-life of AG331 was 20.2 h. Less than 5% of an AG331 dose is eliminated unchanged in the urine. Both the administered dose and exposure to the drug were related to the changes in bilirubin and aminotransferase blood levels. Evidence for inhibition of thymidylate synthase was obtained at doses ranging from 100 to 1000 mg/m2 in seven patients; plasma deoxyuridine concentrations at end-infusion were 1.8-3.8-fold higher than pretreatment values. Because of the nature of toxicity on this schedule, more extensive Phase II evaluation is not recommended, although an AG331 dose of 800 mg/m2/day for 5 days is tolerable. Exploration of less frequent dose administration is under way.