How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Traditionally, the efficacy of cancer treatment in patients with advance or metastatic disease in clinical studies has been studied using overall survival and more recently tumor-based end points such as progression-free survival, measurements of response to treatment. However, these seem not to be the relevant clinical end points in current situation if such end points were no validated as surrogate of overall survival to demonstrate the clinical efficacy. Appropriate, meaningful, primary patient-oriented and patient-reported end points that adequately measure the effects of new therapeutic interventions are then crucial for the advancement of clinical research in metastatic colorectal cancer to complement the results of tumor-based end points. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is effectively an evaluation of quality of life and its relationship with health over time. HRQoL includes the patient report at least of the way a disease or its treatment affects its physical, emotional and social well-being. Over the past few years, several phase III trials in a variety of solid cancers have assessed the incremental value of HRQoL in addition to the traditional end points of tumor response and survival results. HRQoL could provide not only complementary clinical data to the primary outcomes, but also more precise predictive and prognostic value. This end point is useful for both clinicians and patients in order to achieve the dogma of precision medicine. The present article examines the use of HRQoL in phase III metastatic colorectal cancer clinical trials, outlines the importance of HRQoL assessment methods, analysis, and results presentation. Moreover, it discusses the relevance of including HRQoL as a primary/co-primary end point to support the progression-free survival results and to assess efficacy of treatment in the advanced disease setting.

Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative-intent resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with poor prognosis; however, the optimal extent of LN assessment and the interaction between LN assessment and adjuvant systemic therapy is poorly understood. METHODS: Resected non-metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma patients (n = 1743) were identified in the National Cancer Database (1998-2011). Logistic regression analysis identified covariates associated with LN metastasis. The influence of increasing LN cut-off points on overall survival (OS) was analysed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards modelling. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and surgery alone cohorts were matched (1:1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of nodal metastasis or survival hazard on Cox modelling. OS in the matched cohort was compared by Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: LN metastases were present in 865 (49.6%) patients. Increasing LN assessment was associated with an increased likelihood of nodal involvement (P = 0.008). In node-negative patients, increasing LN assessment was associated with a decreased risk of death, with the largest actuarial survival differences observed for ≥15 LN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.82, P = 0.001). In the propensity score-matched cohort of node-negative patients, AC was associated with non-significant improvements in 5-year actuarial (66.1% versus 58.7%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.18, P = 0.249), and did not vary by adequacy of LN counts (<15 LNs: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51-1.24, P = 0.305; ≥15 LNs: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.35-2.30, P = 0.900). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of LN identification has prognostic significance in resected node-negative duodenal adenocarcinoma, but cannot be implicated in the selection of node-negative patients for AC.

Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine, irinotecan and panitumumab in advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Current data suggest that chemotherapy combinations may be superior to single agents in biliary tract cancer. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway appears to be associated with tumor stage, prognosis and response to therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the combination of panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function were treated with panitumumab (9 mg/kg) on day 1, and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was to evaluate the 5-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Mutational analyses of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were carried out when feasible. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received a median of 7 (0-30) cycles. The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (10 patients, 29%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 29%), skin rash (13 patients, 37%) and dehydration (9 patients, 26%). Two patients had CR, 9 had partial response (PR), and 15 had SD for a disease-control rate of 74% (by RECIST) in 28 assessable patients. Two patients went on to have surgical resection. The 5-month PFS was 69%. The median PFS was 9.7 months and the median OS was 12.9 months. In 17 testable samples, no EGFR or BRAF mutations were identified; there were 7 KRAS mutations, with no difference in OS by KRAS status. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed encouraging efficacy of this regimen with good tolerability. Further study in this area is warranted. Clinical Trials Number: The trial was registered with the National Cancer Institute (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00948935).

Effect of time interval between surgery and preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin on outcomes in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is now considered "standard of care." However, the optimal time interval for resection after neoadjuvant therapy is unknown. METHODS: Between 11/90 and 11/04, 107 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative chemo/RT at the University of Pennsylvania. Fifty-six percent had LAR and 40% had APR. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/oxaliplatin in 28% and 5-FU in 72% of patients. All patients received preoperative RT. RESULTS: A longer time interval between chemo/RT and surgery was associated with tumor downstaging (OR 1.24, P = 0.02). A longer time interval was not associated with: nodal downstaging (OR 1.00, P = 0.98); pathologic complete response (PCR) (OR 0.97, P = 0.80); likelihood of performing an LAR (OR 0.90, P = 0.47); improved disease free survival (DFS), local control, or distant control (HR 1.05, P = 0.49; HR 1.14, P = 0.22; HR 1.06, P = 0.52, respectively). The PCR rate was 34.5% in the 5-FU/oxaliplatin/radiation group, and 13.7% in the 5-FU/radiation group. If patients with microscopic CR were excluded, then the PCR rate for 5FU/OX was 21.4% and for 5-FU was 12.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Time interval between surgery and chemo/RT appeared to have little effect on PCR or LAR rates. Patients receiving 5 FU/oxaliplatin/RT had a high PCR rate. A prospective randomized trial to test superiority of 5 FU/oxaliplatin is warranted.

A phase II study of high-dose bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, as initial therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E2200.

AIM: Patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to this single arm phase II multi-center cooperative group trial of bevacizumab combined with IFL. The first 20 patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) weekly for four of six weeks and high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every other week. Following a toxicity review of other trials using IFL, subsequent patients were enrolled at reduced doses of irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Of the 92 patients accrued to the study, toxicity data are available for 87 patients and efficacy data for 81 patients. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months, median overall survival is 26.3 months, median progression free survival is 10.7 months and 1-year survival is 85%. The overall response rate is 49.4% (6.2% complete responses). A reduction in the starting doses of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil decreased the occurrence of vomiting, diarrhea and neutropenia related complications. Bleeding occurred in 37 patients; all events but two were grade 1 or grade 2. There were nine reports of grade 3 or grade 4 thrombo-embolic events. Hypertension of any grade occurred in 13% of patients and proteinuria was infrequent. CONCLUSION: High-dose bevacizumab added to IFL is a well-tolerated and highly active regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Toxicity and response evaluation of the interferon inducer poly ICLC administered at low dose in advanced renal carcinoma and relapsed or refractory lymphoma: a report of two clinical trials of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Phase II studies were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the interferon inducer Poly ICLC at low doses in advanced renal cancer and relapsed or refractory lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced renal carcinoma and eleven patients with lymphoma were treated with poly ICLC. Patients received 0.25 mg/m2 of poly ICLC intravenously twice weekly three days apart until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were no objective responses. Six patients with renal carcinoma had stable disease as best response with one patient receiving 62 weeks of therapy. Toxicity included grade 3 anemia in 8 patients and grade 4 anemia in one patient. All patients were anemic prior to entry with a median grade 2 anemia at baseline. Grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and injection site pain occurred in one patient each. Grade 3 fever, chills or fatigue occurred in four, three, and three patients respectively. Any grade fever occurred in 10 patients (25.6%) and any grade chills occurred in 9 patients (23.1%). CONCLUSION: Poly ICLC at this dose and schedule is well tolerated in both patient populations and is inactive in renal carcinoma.

Follow-up of stage B and C colorectal cancer in the United States and France.

The optimal postoperative follow-up strategy for patients with resected Dukes' Stage B and C colorectal cancer is controversial. Recently published guidelines support a minimal regimen of carcinoembryonic antigen measurements every 2 to 3 months for at least 2 years, history and physical examination every 3 to 6 months for 3 years, then annually, and colonoscopy every 3 to 5 years. Based on documented practice on the part of surgeons, this regimen would be regarded as intensive. Analyses of relapses following adjuvant therapy support an even more aggressive schedule, with the goal of maximizing the proportion of patients who may be operated on with curative intent (currently about 20% of those who relapse). Additional considerations that may influence the approach to such patients include the identification of second primary tumors (2% over 7 years observation), and the known improvement in quality of life and survival associated with early versus delayed initiation of chemotherapy. However, with the annual investment of resources estimated to be as high as 175 million dollars in the United States alone, a systematic study of such interventions is needed to provide support survival, quality of life, and economic evidence.

Superantigen-targeted therapy: phase I escalating repeat dose trial of the fusion protein PNU-214565 in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

Antibody-directed, superantigen-induced cytotoxicity has been shown to have potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects in preclinical models. In the present study, PNU-214565, a recombinant fusion protein consisting of the Fab of the monoclonal antibody C242 and staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA), was used in an escalating repeat dose Phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. A prior single-dose Phase I clinical trial had demonstrated safety at doses of 1.5 ng/kg with toxicities of fever and hypotension that were not dose related. Twenty-seven patients (age range, 36-75 years; median, 62; 14 males and 13 females; 23 colorectal and 4 pancreatic) were treated in the present study with one cycle of four consecutive daily 3-h infusions of PNU-214565 at doses of 0.15 ng/kg (n = 3); 0.5 ng/kg (n = 3), 1.5 ng/kg (n = 4), 2.75 ng/kg (n = 12), and 3.5 ng/kg (n = 5). All patients had a good performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: PS = 0 (n = 15), PS = 1 (n = 12)]. As in the single-dose trial, fever and hypotension were the most common toxicities. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), consisting of transient hypotension responsive to dopamine, was experienced by one patient treated at the 2.75 ng/kg dose level. One patient with pancreatic cancer metastatic to the liver experienced a partial response of hepatic metastases with stable pancreatic head abnormalities by computed tomography scan. Further dose escalation was suspended when two patients treated in a companion repeat dose Phase I study experienced DLT at the 4 ng/kg dose level. Multiparameter analyses on all patients treated in the two companion single-dose and two-repeated-dose Phase I trials revealed that the levels of patients' pretreatment anti-SEA antibodies protected against toxicity at a given drug dose. By jointly considering weight and the baseline anti-SEA concentration in a patient, it is possible to assign a PNU-214565 dose that will induce systemic cytokine release (a surrogate test to assess for the presence of uncomplexed drug and its ability to induce systemic cellular activation) without DLT. This pharmacodynamically based dosing scheme will be tested in future repeated-dose clinical trials and will define maximally tolerated doses of this powerful new immunotherapy approach.

Superantigen-based immunotherapy: a phase I trial of PNU-214565, a monoclonal antibody-staphylococcal enterotoxin A recombinant fusion protein, in advanced pancreatic and colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and define the toxicities of a single-dose infusion of PNU-214565, a recombinant Escherichia coli-derived fusion protein of Staphylococcal enterotoxin A (SEA) and the Fab-fragment of the C242 monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced colorectal and pancreatic carcinomas. To investigate the capability of PNU-214565 to induce a superantigen (SAg) response resulting in cytokine production and tumor regression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (age range, 39 to 76 years; median, 64; 12 men, nine women; 18 colorectal, three pancreatic cancers) were treated with a single 3-hour infusion of PNU-214565, with doses ranging from 0.01 to 1.5 ng/kg. All patients had prior chemotherapy and a good performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS] = 0 [n = 10]; PS = 1 [n = 11]), 10 had prior radiation, and 18 had prior surgery. RESULTS: Fever and hypotension were the most common toxicities. Fever of any grade occurred in 16 of 21 patients (76%): four of 21 (19%) with grade 2 and two of 21 (9.5%) with grade 3. Hypotension of any grade occurred in 13 of 21 (62%): four of 21 with grade 2 and one of 21 (5%) with grade 3. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) induction correlated with toxicity. In the two patients with grade 3 fever, peak IL-2 and TNF alpha levels were 2.9 IU/mL and 165 pg/mL, and 8.3 IU/mL and 245 pg/mL, respectively. Transient, > or = 50% decreases in circulating monocytes were observed in 17 of 21 patients as early as 0.5 hours (median time, 2 hours) from the start of infusion. Decreases (mean 33%) in circulating lymphocytes were observed in seven of 21 patients. All three patients with grade 3 toxicity were treated at the 0.5-ng/kg dose. The significance of baseline anti-SEA, human antimouse antibody (HAMA), CA242-soluble antigen levels, and T-cell receptor variable beta region (TCR V beta) subsets and histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) genotypes was assessed as possible predictors of toxicity. All toxicities were transient and easily managed. No grade 3 toxicity occurred at the higher dose levels. CONCLUSION: PNU-214565, a SAg-based tumor targeted therapy, is safe when given as a single 3-hour infusion at doses up to 1.5 ng/kg. The MTD for a single dose was not determined. The safety of a repeated dose schedule is currently under investigation, beginning with doses determined to be safe in this trial.

Phase I trial of ilmofosine as a 24 hour infusion weekly.

Ilmofosine, an ether lipid derivative of lysophosphatidylcholine has antineoplastic activity in vitro and in vivo. Maximum efficacy in preclinical models is associated with prolonged exposure to the drug. In a Phase I trial of a weekly 2 hour infusion schedule of ilmofosine, a syndrome of lethargy, diminished performance status, and mild hepatotoxicity was dose-limiting at 550 mg/m2. To avoid the higher drug concentrations associated with a brief infusion, a Phase I study of a weekly 24 hour infusional schedule was undertaken in an attempt to maximize dose-intensity. Doses were escalated from 550 to 800 mg/m2. Toxicities included nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and minor elevations of liver function tests. The dose limiting toxicity at 800 mg/m2 was a syndrome of severe abdominal pain. No neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was observed except in one patient who was found to have a myelodysplastic syndrome, thought not to be related to drug therapy. The more prolonged infusion schedule of ilmofosine did not result in a substantial increase in the tolerable dose.

Phase II study of topotecan in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Systemic chemotherapy with currently available agents has not improved survival for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), consequently, the evaluation of new agents is warranted. Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I with broad antitumor activity in preclinical studies. The purpose of this phase II trial was to determine the objective response rate of topotecan administered as a 30 minute infusion for five consecutive days in men with metastatic HRPC. Thirty-four evaluable patients were treated with topotecan 1.1-1.5 mg/m2 as a 30 minute infusion daily for five days, repeated every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed with a combination of standard solid tumor response criteria and the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) for patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, and by serial measurements of the PSA in patients with bone only (evaluable) disease. One of 13 patients (7.6%) with measurable soft tissue disease had a PR in nodal sites. Of 21 patients with only osseous metastases, 1 (4.7%) had improvement in bone scan. Six of the 34 evaluable patients (17.6%) had the serum PSA decrease by > or = 50% and 2 (5.8%) had PSA decreases of > or = 75%. Toxicity was chiefly hematologic with 66% of patients experiencing Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. Thirty-nine percent of cycles required a delay to allow for hematologic recovery and ten patients required red cell transfusions. Non-hematologic toxicity, mainly nausea and alopecia, was mild. Topotecan administered at this dose and schedule has limited activity in patients with HRPC. Further trials of topo I inhibition in HRPC should utilize alternative schedules of topotecan (e.g., prolonged infusion) or other camptothecin analogs with more potent topo I inhibitory activity.

Phase I clinical study of the recombinant oncotoxin TP40 in superficial bladder cancer.

Transforming growth factor alpha-Pseudomonas exotoxin-40 (TP40) is a hybrid fusion protein that selectively binds to cancer cells that express the epidermal growth factor receptor. TP40 is then internalized and kills these cells by virtue of its Pseudomonas exotoxin-derived domains. We studied the safety and short-term antitumor activity of intravesical TP40 in 43 patients with refractory superficial bladder cancer. These patients had resected Ta/T1 disease (n = 19), visible Ta or T1 lesions (n = 11), or carcinoma in situ (n = 13). Patients were treated with increasing dose levels of TP40 at 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, or 9.6 mg/week for 6 weeks and evaluated by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment cystoscopic examinations, cytology, and histopathology. All TP40 doses were well tolerated. No evidence of antitumor activity was seen in any of the patients with Ta or T1 lesions. However, 8 of 9 patients with evaluable carcinoma in situ were judged by histopathology of multiple biopsy specimens to exhibit clinical improvement following TP40 therapy. In most of these responsive patients, cystoscopic examination supported the histopathological findings, although cytology of urine and bladder washings persistently demonstrated malignant cells. Therefore, TP40 appears to be a well-tolerated biological agent that may prove to have utility in treating carcinoma in situ of the bladder.

Precursor CTL specific for retrovirus-induced T lymphoma are found at high frequency in unprimed syngeneic mice.

The retrovirus-induced RBL5 lymphoma can be rejected by adoptive transfer of noncytolytic CD4+ Th 1 lymphocytes in normal hosts, without a requirement for transfer of specific CD8+ CTL. Therefore, we hypothesized that host precursor CTL (pCTL) might cooperate with transferred CD4+ Th1 cells to mediate tumor rejection. To evaluate this hypothesis, lymphocytes from non-immunized mice were analyzed for cytolytic activity after short-term bulk lymphocyte tumor culture (BLTC) with rIL-2 (5U/ml). BLTC induced the differentiation of anti-RBL5 CTL distinct from non-MHC-restricted LAK. These effectors were CD8+, TCR alpha/beta+, and utilized the CD3-TCR complex for MHC class I-restricted lysis. The majority of pCTL were found within the CD44/PgP-1hi population of memory/activated lymphocytes. However, there was no serologic evidence for prior exposure to RBL5-related tumor or viral Ags. CTL activity was susceptible to partial blockade with mAbs directed against CD8 and MHC class I, suggesting a relatively low-affinity Ag-TCR interaction. These data are most consistent with the recruitment of a population of Ag-specific, but cross-reactive, pCTL during BLTC.