Intravesical infusion of resiniferatoxin by a temporary in situ drug delivery system to treat interstitial cystitis: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Interstitial cystitis (IC), a syndrome characterized by motor and sensory dysfunction of the lower urinary tract, represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge even to highly skilled physicians. We investigated the technical feasibility and the clinical efficacy of a prolonged intravesical instillation of RTX by in situ drug delivery system in patients with IC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 5 female patients (mean age 48.7 years) received a prolonged infusion of a saline solution containing 10nM of resiniferatoxin at the flow rate 25microl/h by the MiniMed 407C Infusion Pump (MiniMed Sylmar, CA, USA), connected to sovrapubic 5Fr mono Pigtail catheter, for 10 days. All patients reported frequency, nocturia and urgency, and symptoms of pelvic pain for at least six months. They showed the absence of urinary tract infection within the last three months, the absence of functional disorders of lower urinary tract and no other vesical or urethral pathology. The pre-treatment (PT) frequency/volume (FV) chart and a pain score (VAS score) were recorded. Patients were evaluated after 30 days from the end of infusion (primary end point, PEP) and after three months (secondary end point, SEP). RESULTS: At PEP frequency reduced from 11.3+/-1.39 to 7.4+/-1.51 (p<0.01) and nocturia from 3.6+/-0.54 to 1.2+/-0.44 (p<0.01). A highly significant reduction of pain score was observed at PEP: it decreased to 2.4+/-0.54 from 6.7+/-0.83 (p<0.01). The pain score remained significantly lower at SEP (3.2+/-0.44 p<0.05). Nocturia was also statistically reduced at SEP (1.9+/-0.74) as well as frequency (8.7+/-1.76). No side effects were reported during the infusion as well as after the removal of the catheter. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that the prolonged intravesical instillation of a drug by in situ drug delivery system is a feasible procedure and seems to support the efficacy of RTX in the treatment of IC patients. However further studies are necessary and mandatory to confirm our results and to define the exact action mechanism of prolonged infusion of RTX, the dosage and the treatment schedule.

Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation.

PURPOSE: Chronic stimulation of the sacral nerves has now become one of the most accepted stimulation therapies for functional lower urinary tract symptoms refractory to conservative treatment. Despite the existence of a large amount of literature on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) showing a fairly high percent of significant improvement in clinical outcome there are few experimental studies of SNM stimulus parameters and/or neurophysiological monitoring. We evaluated the specific action of SNM on the primary sensory cortical area. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) of the pudendal and posterior tibial nerves were evaluated in patients implanted with a monolateral permanent quadripolar electrode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients underwent stage 1 monolateral sacral nerve implantation. Three SEP patterns were evaluated; namely before implantation, 1 month after stage 1 with stimulation set at 21 Hz and again with a pulse rate of 40 Hz. RESULTS: In all patients SNM produced a significant decrease in pudendal SEP latency of the first positive deflection between baseline SNM stimulation at different pulse rates at the ipsilateral and contralateral implant sites. This finding was evidence of the effect of S3 SNM on the cortical sensory area and the specificity of pudendal SEPs in measuring how SNM modulates the afferent pathway from the spinal nerve to the cortical sensory area. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previous observations that SNM acts by the afferent pathway at the cortical site level and it sheds light on so-called idiopathic lower urinary tract symptoms. A modification of SEPs induced by SNM seems to be a prognostic factor of clinical outcomes. The action of SNM on the afferent pathway from the sacral area to the somatosensory cortex is specific and neurophysiological evaluation via pudendal SEPs provides evidence to this effect.

Quality of life assessment in patients who undergo sacral neuromodulation implantation for urge incontinence: an additional tool for evaluating outcome.

PURPOSE: We investigated the impact of sacral neuromodulation on quality of life and assessed the importance of quality of life for determining the success of sacral neuromodulation in patients with detrusor hyperactivity, including instability and hyperreflexia. We also compared it with parameters documented in a voiding diary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1998 to December 2000, 82 female and 31 male patients 17 to 79 years old (mean age 51.1) with urge incontinence (63), urgency/frequency (5), voiding disturbance (41) and pelvic pain (4) resistant to conservative treatment were enrolled in a national prospective registry after showing a positive response to percutaneous nerve evaluation testing. Of the patients 47 who were 32 to 79 years old (mean age 59.2) with urge incontinence due to detrusor instability and 16 who were 27 to 51 years old (mean age 51.5) with hyperreflexia were asked to complete a validated self-reporting incontinence domain specific quality of life questionnaire before, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after implantation. RESULTS: Compared with baseline the quality of life index significantly improved at each followup, which strongly correlated with the decrease in the number of incontinence episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating quality of life may be an additional useful tool for assessing the results of sacral neuromodulation for urge incontinence. Our study confirms that sacral neuromodulation is effective therapy for urge incontinence that can have a positive effect on patient quality of life.

Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients: evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders.

PURPOSE: There are several options in the treatment of fecal incontinence; it is often difficult to choose the most appropriate, adequate treatment. The consolidated experience gained in the urologic field suggests that sacral nerve stimulation may be a further option in the choice of treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the preliminary results of the peripheral nerve evaluation test obtained in a multicenter collaborative study on patients with defecatory and urinary disturbances. METHODS: Forty patients (9 males; mean age, 50.2; range, 26-79 years) underwent the peripheral nerve evaluation test, 28 (70 percent) for fecal incontinence and 12 (30 percent) for chronic constipation. Fourteen (35 percent) patients also had urinary incontinence; six had urge incontinence, two had stress incontinence, and six had retention incontinence. Associated diseases were scleroderma (2 patients), spinal injuries (4 patients), and syringomyelia (1 patient). All the patients underwent preliminary investigations with anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing, anal ultrasound, defecography, and if required, urodynamic tests. The electrode for sacral nerve stimulation was positioned percutaneously under local anesthesia in the S2 (4), S3 (34), or S4 (1) foramen unilaterally (1 patient not accounted for because of no response to acute test), based on the best motor and subjective responses of paresthesia of the pelvic floor. Stimulation parameters were average amplitude, 2.8 (range, 1-6) V and average frequency, 15 to 25 Hz. RESULTS: The mean duration of the tests was 9.9 (range, 7-30) days; tests lasting fewer than seven days were not evaluated. There were four early displacements of the electrode. In 22 of the 25 evaluable patients with fecal incontinence, there was an improvement of symptoms (88 percent), and 11 (44 percent) were completely continent to liquid or solid stools, whereas in 7 symptoms were unchanged. Mean number of episodes of liquid or solid stool incontinence per week was 8.1 (range, 4-18) in the prestimulation period and 1.7 (range, 0-12) during the peripheral nerve evaluation test. (P = 0.001; Wilcoxon's signed-rank test). The most important manometric findings were: increase of maximum rest pressure (39.4 +/- 7.3 vs. 54.3 +/- 8.5 mmHg; P = 0.014, Wilcoxon's test) and maximum squeeze pressure (84.7 +/- 8.8 vs. 99.5 +/- 1.1 mmHg; P = 0.047), reduction of initial threshold (63.6 +/- 5.2 vs. 42.4 +/- 4.7 ml; P = 0.041) and urge sensation (123.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 78.3 +/- 8.9 ml; P = 0.05). An improvement was also found in patients with constipation, with reduction in difficulty emptying the rectum, with prestimulation at 7 (range, 2-21) episodes per week and end of peripheral nerve evaluation test at 2.1 (range, 0-6) episodes per week, P < 0.01) and in the number of unsuccessful visits to the toilet, which dropped from 29.2 (7-24) to 6.7 (0-28) per week (P = 0.01). The most important manometric findings in constipated patients were an increase in amplitude of maximum squeeze pressure during sacral nerve stimulation (prestimulation, 63 +/- 0 mm Hg; end of peripheral nerve evaluation test, 78 +/- 1 mm Hg; P = 0.009) and a reduction in rectal volume for urge threshold (prestimulation, 189 +/- 52 ml; end of peripheral nerve evaluation test, 139 +/- 45 ml; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In functional bowel disorders short-term sacral nerve stimulation seems to be a useful diagnostic tool to assess patients for a minor invasive therapy alternative to conventional surgical procedure.

Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: outcome in 16 patients with definitive implant. The initial Italian Sacral Neurostimulation Group (GINS) experience.

PURPOSE: Sacral nerve modulation appears to offer a valid treatment option for some patients with fecal incontinence and functional defects of the internal anal sphincter or of the striated muscle. METHODS: Sixteen patients with fecal incontinence (4 males; mean age, 51.4 (range, 27-79) years) with intact or surgically repaired (n = 1) anal sphincter underwent permanent sacral nerve stimulation implant. Cause was traumatic in two patients, and associated disorders included scleroderma (2 patients) and spastic paraparesis (1 patient); eight (50 percent) of the patients also had urinary incontinence, and two (12.5 percent) had nonobstructive urinary retention. All patients were selected on the basis of positive findings from at least one peripheral nerve evaluation. The stimulating electrode was positioned in the S2 (1 patient), S3 (14 patients), or S4 (1 patient) sacral foramen. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 15.5 (range, 3-45) months. Mean preimplant Williams score decreased from 4.1 +/- 0.9 (range, 2-5) to 1.25 +/- 0.5 (range, 1-2) (P = 0.01, Wilcoxon test), and the number of incontinence accidents for liquid or solid stool in 14 days decreased from 11.5 +/- 4.8 (range, 2-20) before implant to 0.6 +/- 0.9 (range, 0-2) at the last follow-up. Important manometric data were an increase in mean maximal pressure at rest of 37.7 +/- 14.9 mmHg (implantable pulse generator 49.1 +/- 18.7, P = 0.04) and in mean maximal pressure during squeeze (prestimulation 67.3 +/- 21.1 mmHg, implantable pulse generator 82.6 +/- 21.0, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation can be considered an option for fecal incontinence. However, an accurate clinical and instrumental evaluation and careful patient selection are required to optimize outcome.

Chronic sacral neuromodulation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a national register.

PURPOSE: The Italian Register was created in February 1997 to collect the national results of sacral neuromodulation. All Italian centers at which sacral neuromodulation is performed were invited to participate in our study. We present the results from retrospective and prospective registers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 196 patients underwent permanent implantation of sacral neuromodulation and were enrolled in the Italian register. There were 18 males and 75 females in the retrospective, and 28 males and 75 females in the prospective studies. Student's t test was used to compare paired values, and the Wilcoxon rank sum and nonparametric tests were used when necessary. RESULTS: Mean incontinent episodes daily plus or minus standard deviation for patients with detrusor instability went from 5.4 +/- 3.9 to 1.1 +/- 1.6 (median 5 and 0, respectively) at 12-month followup (p <0.001). For idiopathic retention average residual volume decreased from 277 to 108 cc (median 287 and 80, respectively), and 50% of patients stopped catheterization and another 13% catheterized once daily at 1-year after implantation. With neurogenic voiding disturbances, the results fluctuated with time from a minimum of 33% to a maximum 66% of patients who did not catheterize at 6-month followup and 12 months after implantation, respectively. At 12-month followup, 50% of patients with hyperreflexia had less than 1 incontinent episode daily. The problem was completely solved in 66% of patients in the retention group. Of patients in the urge incontinent population 39% were completely dry and 23% had less than 1 incontinent episode daily. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation is effective therapy for treating lower urinary tract symptoms resistant to less invasive therapy.