Stillbirth and fetal anomalies: secondary analysis of a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of stillbirths are attributed to fetal anomalies, but anomalies are also common in live births. We aimed to assess the relationship between anomalies, by system and stillbirth. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, case-control study. SETTING: Multicentre, 59 hospitals in five regional catchment areas in the USA. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: All stillbirths and representative live birth controls. METHODS: Standardised postmortem examinations performed in stillbirths, medical record abstraction for stillbirths and live births. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of major anomalies, by type, compared between stillbirths and live births with univariable and multivariable analyses using weighted analysis to account for study design and differential consent. RESULTS: Of 465 singleton stillbirths included, 23.4% had one or more major anomalies compared with 4.3% of 1871 live births. Having an anomaly increased the odds of stillbirth; an increasing number of anomalies was more highly associated with stillbirth. Regardless of organ system affected, the presence of an anomaly increased the odds of stillbirth. These relationships remained significant if stillbirths with known genetic abnormalities were excluded. After multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of stillbirth for any anomaly was 4.33 (95% CI 2.80-6.70) and the systems most strongly associated with stillbirth were cystic hygroma (aOR 29.97, 95% CI 5.85-153.57), and thoracic (aOR16.18, 95% CI 4.30-60.94) and craniofacial (aOR 35.25, 95% CI 9.22-134.68) systems. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnancies affected by anomalies, the odds of stillbirth are higher with increasing numbers of anomalies. Anomalies of nearly any organ system increased the odds of stillbirth even when adjusting for gestational age and maternal race. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Stillbirth risk increases with anomalies of nearly any organ system and with number of anomalies seen.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in women with severe preeclampsia and placental insufficiency: a case-control study.

Objective Preterm delivery for preeclampsia or placental insufficiency (PREPI) is a clinical criterion for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but no prior prospective studies have used the international classification criteria for APS. Our objective is to determine the proportion of women with PREPI who test positive for aPL using international criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) assays. Methods We conducted a prospective, case-control study of 148 women delivered < 36 weeks because of PREPI compared to 148 controls. PREPI cases delivered < 36 weeks were compared to matched controls. Cases and controls were tested for aPL. Demographic variables were compared with chi-squared and Wilcoxon-rank-sum statistics. Rates of + aPL were compared using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for maternal body mass index (BMI) and Caucasian race. Positive aPL (+aPL) was defined as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin G (IgG) (GPL) or immunoglobulin M (IgM) (MPL) ≥ 40, or anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) IgG (SGU) or IgM (SMU) ≥ 40. Results Controls were more likely to be Caucasian (87% vs 70%, p = 0.006) and had lower BMIs (BMI 26 vs 33, p < 0.001). Positive aPL were found more commonly in cases than controls (11.5% vs 1.4%, aOR 8.9 (95% CI 1.9-41.4)). In + aPL cases, 76% had + LA, 41% had + aCL, and 24% had + aß2GPI. Conclusion Women requiring early delivery for PREPI are more likely to have aPL (and thus APS) than controls. This is the first prospective study using both obstetric definitions and laboratory criteria in accordance with APS international criteria.

Preconception antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of subsequent early pregnancy loss.

Objectives To prospectively estimate the association of preconception antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with subsequent pregnancy loss using a cohort design. aPL have been associated with recurrent early pregnancy loss (EPL) prior to 10 weeks in previous case-control studies. Prospective ascertainment of pregnancy loss is challenging, as most women do not seek care prior to EPL. Methods Secondary analysis of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial of preconception low-dose aspirin. Preconception anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I (a-ß2-I) were assessed in 1208 women with one or two prior pregnancy losses and no more than two prior live births. Comparison cohorts were defined by positive aPL (+aPL) or negative aPL (-aPL) status. All women were followed for six menstrual cycles while trying to conceive; if successful, they underwent an ultrasound at 6-7 weeks' gestation. EPL was defined as loss prior to 10 weeks' gestation; embryonic loss was loss after visualization of an embryo but prior to 10 weeks; clinical loss was any loss after visualization of an embryo (with or without fetal cardiac activity detected). Results In total, 14/1208 (1%) tested positive for +aPL. 786/1208 (65%) women had positive human chorionic gonadotropin during the study period, of which 9/786 (1%) had +aPL. Of the 786 pregnant women, 589 (75%) had live births and 24% had pregnancy losses. Women with +aPL experienced EPL at similar rates as women with -aPL, 44% vs 21% (aRR 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-10.9). Embryonic loss was more common in women with +aCL IgM (aRR 4.8, 95% CI 1.0-23.0) and in women with two positive aPL. Clinical pregnancy loss was more common in women with positive a-ß2-I IgM (50% vs 16.5%, aRR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.8). Conclusion Positive levels of aPL are rare in women with one or two prior pregnancy losses and are not clearly associated with an increased rate of subsequent loss. Clinical trial registration The original source study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT00467363).

Pre-eclampsia as a manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome: assessing the current status.

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is considered a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. Two meta-analyses and a number of case-control and cohort studies have found associations between pre-eclampsia and lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and/or anti-ß2 glycoprotein I. However, existing literature is inconsistent, with varying severity of pre-eclampsia phenotype examined, differing aPL titer cutoffs used to define positive status, and an overwhelming lack of repeat confirmatory aPL testing. This calls into question the link between aPLs and pre-eclampsia, or at least makes it less well defined. There is evidence for a mechanistic pathway between aPLs and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) including pre-eclampsia via the complement pathway. Complement appears to be overactive in pregnancies affected by APOs. A mouse model has show that the fetal wastage caused by treatment with human aPLs can be salvaged by either creating genetic knockouts along the complement, TNF-alpha, and tissue factor pathways or be treating mice with monoclonal antibodies blocking key complement factors. Thus, this is worth further investigation to clarify the likely association of aPLs and pre-eclampsia in humans, as well is to further evaluate the interaction with complement in human pregnancies.