Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(5): 1073-1080, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34628510

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of bone bruising with isolated medial collateral ligament injury and to assess whether the presence of bone bruising is related to the injury grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who sustained an acute isolated medial collateral ligament injury demonstrated on knee MRI between 2016 and 2020 were included in this study. Patient's characteristics and injury classification (clinical and radiological) were reviewed from clinical notes and imaging. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence of bone bruising. Fisher's exact test was used for dichotomous variables and odds ratios were computed in areas of clinical significance. RESULTS: Sixty patients with a median age of 37.6 ± 13.8 were included. Twenty-eight (46.7%) had bone bruising demonstrated on MRI scan. The bone bruising group were 7 times (95% CI [1.4;36.5]) more likely to have a complete disruption of the superficial medial collateral ligament and MRI grade III injury. Injury to the deep medial collateral ligament was more often observed in this group (p < 0.05). The most common location of bone bruising was the lateral femoral condyle (57.1%, 16/28) and/or the medial femoral condyle (57.1%, 16/28). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bone bruising with isolated medial collateral ligament injury is significant and is more common with radiologically higher grade injuries. There was no statistically significant difference between the anatomical location of bone bruise and the grade of MCL injury. Bone bruising patterns can help determine the mechanism of injury, with a valgus impact or avulsion type injury most commonly seen.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Contusions , Knee Injuries , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/complications , Contusions/diagnostic imaging , Femur , Humans , Knee Injuries/complications , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/injuries
2.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(6): 1225-1233, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748072

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of correlation between MRI and clinical gradings of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries and assess for associated structures on MRI which may influence the clinical perception of MCL laxity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All knee MRIs with acute MCL injuries between 2016 and 2020 at our centre were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists. The clinic notes were reviewed for clinical gradings. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen MRIs included. Forty-eight percent (57/119) agreement between MRI and clinical gradings (κ = 0.21, standard error (SE) 0.07). MRI grades: I 29% (34/119), II 50% (60/119), III 21% (25/119). Clinical grades: I 67% (80/119), II 26% (31/119), III 7% (8/119). In patients with clinical grade III MCL injury, there was waviness of the superficial MCL on MRI in 100% (8/8), deep meniscofemoral ligament tear in 75% (6/8), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) partial or complete tear in 75% (6/8) and posteromedial corner (PMC) injury in 100% (8/8); compared with 0% (0/111), 34% (38/111), 44% (49/111) and 41% (46/111) respectively in clinical grade I or II injuries (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Agreement between MRI and clinical gradings of MCL injuries was only 'fair', with MRI almost always overestimating the grade of the injury when there was a mismatch. Waviness of the superficial MCL and injuries to the deep MCL, ACL and PMC correlate with clinical instability.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Collateral Ligaments , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Rupture
3.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(3): 1005-1012, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184207

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has been recognized as the unprecedented global health crisis in modern times. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on treatment of neck of femur fractures (NOFF) against the current guidelines and meeting best practice key performance indicators (KPIs) according to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) in two large central London hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center, longitudinal, retrospective, observational study of NOFF patients was performed for the first 'golden' month following the lockdown measures introduced in mid-March 2020. This was compared to the same time period in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 78 cases were observed. NOFFs accounted for 11% more of all acute referrals during the COVID era. There were fewer overall breaches in KPIs in time to theatre in 2020 and also for those awaiting an orthogeriatric review. Time to discharge from the trust during the pandemic was improved by 54% (p < 0.00001) but patients were 51% less likely to return to their usual residence (p = 0.007). The odds ratio was significantly higher for consultant surgeon-led operations and consultant orthogeriatric-led review in the post-COVID era. There was no significant difference in using aerosol-generating anaesthetic procedures or immortality rates between both years. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected the KPIs for the treatment of NOFF patients with significant improvement in numerous care domains. These findings may represent the efforts to ensure that these vulnerable patients are treated promptly to minimize their risks from the coronavirus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hip Fractures , Orthopedics , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Cough , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , London/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
4.
Chin J Traumatol ; 25(3): 161-165, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794857

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection. Typically, death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms, but this period can extend up to 8 weeks. This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8% of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April, 2020 was performed. Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for "fragility hip fractures" were included in the study. Patients' 120-day mortality was assessed relative to their peri-operative COVID-19 status. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. RESULTS: A total of 746 patients were included in this study, of which 87 (11.7%) were COVID-19 positive. Mortality rates at 30- and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients (p < 0.001). However, mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different (p = 0.107), 16.1% and 9.4% respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients, odds ratio 1.855 (95% CI 0.865-3.978). CONCLUSION: Hip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection, provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury, have no significant difference in 120-day mortality. Despite the growing awareness and concern of "long-COVID" and its widespread prevalence, this does not appear to increase medium-term mortality rates after a hip fracture.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hip Fractures , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 80(9): 537-540, 2019 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction of the best practice tariff criteria for primary hip and knee replacement enables on average an additional £560 of reimbursement per case. The Getting it Right First Time report highlighted poor awareness of these criteria among orthopaedic departments. METHODS: The authors investigated the reasons for non-compliance with the best practice tariff criteria at their trust and implemented a quality improvement approach to ensure successful adherence to the standards (a minimum National Joint Registry compliance rate of 85%, a National Joint Registry unknown consent rate below 15%, a patient-reported outcome measure participation rate of ≥50%, and an average health gain not significantly below the national average). This was investigated using quarterly online reports from the National Joint Registry and NHS Digital. RESULTS: Initially, the trust had a 31% patient-reported outcome measures participation rate arising from a systematic error in the submission of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores. Re-audit following the resubmission of patient-reported outcome measure data under the trust's correct organization data service code confirmed an improvement in patient-reported outcome measure compliance to 90% and satisfaction of all criteria resulting in over £450 000 of additional reimbursement to the trust. CONCLUSIONS: The authors would urge others to review their compliance with these four best practice tariff criteria to ensure that they too are not missing out on this significant reimbursement sum.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Guideline Adherence , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Reimbursement, Incentive , Humans , Orthopedics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Improvement , State Medicine , United Kingdom
6.
Injury ; 48(2): 243-252, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early readmission to hospital after hip fracture is associated with increased mortality and significant costs to the healthcare system. There is growing interest in the use of 30-day readmission rates as a metric of hospital performance. Identifying patients at increased risk of readmission after hip fracture may enable pre-emptive action to mitigate this risk and the development of effective methods of risk-adjustment to allow readmission to be used as a reliable measure of hospital performance. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of bibliographic databases and reference lists up to July 2016 to identify primary research papers assessing the effect of patient- and hospital-related risk factors for 30-day readmission to hospital after hip fracture. RESULTS: 495 papers were found through electronic and reference search. 65 full papers were assessed for eligibility. 22 met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Medical causes of readmission were significantly more common than surgical causes, with pneumonia consistently being cited as the most common readmission diagnosis. Age, pre-existing pulmonary disease and neurological disorders were strong independent predictors of readmission. ASA grade and functional status were more robust predictors of readmission than the Charlson score or individual co-morbidities. Hospital-related risk factors including initial length of stay, hospital size and volume, time to surgery and type of anaesthesia did not have a consistent effect on readmission risk. Discharge location and the strength of hospital-discharge facility linkage were important determinants of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-related risk factors such as age, co-morbidities and functional status are stronger predictors of 30-day readmission risk after hip fracture than hospital-related factors. Rates of 30-day readmission may not be a valid reflection of hospital performance unless a clear distinction can be made between modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. We identify a number of deficiencies in the existing literature and highlight key areas for future research.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Age Factors , Comorbidity , Hip Fractures/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Risk Factors , State Medicine/economics , Time Factors , United Kingdom
8.
World J Orthop ; 6(4): 380-6, 2015 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25992315

ABSTRACT

Achilles tendon rupture has been on the rise over recent years due to a variety of reasons. It is a debilitating injury with a protracted and sometimes incomplete recovery. Management strategy is a controversial topic and evidence supporting a definite approach is limited. Opinion is divided between surgical repair and conservative immobilisation in conjunction with functional orthoses. A systematic search of the literature was performed. Pubmed, Medline and EmBase databases were searched for Achilles tendon and a variety of synonymous terms. A recent wealth of reporting suggests that conservative regimens with early weight bearing or mobilisation have equivalent or improved rates of re-rupture to operative regimes. The application of dynamic ultrasound assessment of tendon gap may prove crucial in minimising re-rupture and improving outcomes. Studies employing functional assessments have found equivalent function between operative and conservative treatments. However, no specific tests in peak power, push off strength or athletic performance have been reported and whether an advantage in operative treatment exists remains undetermined.

9.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 21(1): 122-4, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23630005

ABSTRACT

We report on a 79-year-old woman who underwent salvage of the knee and lower leg using a Whichita Fusion Nail for knee arthrodesis, combined with a medial gastrocnemius muscle flap for a 3% contact burn that resulted in loss of the extensor mechanism. This provided an alternative to above-knee amputation when extensor mechanism reconstruction was not feasible.


Subject(s)
Burns/surgery , Limb Salvage , Lower Extremity/injuries , Lower Extremity/surgery , Aged , Bone Nails , Female , Humans , Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps
10.
Orthop Rev (Pavia) ; 2(1): e5, 2010 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21808700

ABSTRACT

We present a case report of a 45-year old man who sustained a central dislocation of the hip secondary to an insufficiency fracture of the acetabulum. At the time of presentation he was on alendronate therapy for osteoporosis which had been previously investigated. CT scanning of the pelvis was useful for pre-operative planning which confirmed collapse of the femoral head but no discontinuity of the pelvis. The femoral head was morcellized and used as bone graft for the acetabular defect and an uncemented total hip replacement was performed.

11.
Orthop Rev (Pavia) ; 1(1): e1, 2009 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21808663

ABSTRACT

Spinal epidural abscess is a rare but potentially fatal condition if left untreated. We report the case of a 67-year old man who presented to the Accident and Emergency department complaining of acute onset of inter-scapular back pain, left leg weakness and loss of sensation in the left foot. On examination he was found to be pyrexial with long tract signs in the left lower leg. In addition he had a left sided olecranon bursitis of three weeks duration. Blood tests revealed raised inflammatory markers and a staphylococcal bacteremia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess and he subsequently underwent a three level laminectomy with good resolution of his back pain and neurological symptoms. He has made a complete recovery with a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotics.

12.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 89(8): W9-11, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17999812

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a patient who sustained a blunt head injury resulting in a delayed diagnosis of a carotid-cavernous sinus fistula. Although rare in occurrence, a high index of suspicion is paramount with a history of head injury and developing signs in the eyes and face. Prompt referral to senior ophthalmic and neurosurgical teams is indicated to prevent the possibility of permanent visual loss with this condition.


Subject(s)
Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/diagnosis , Craniocerebral Trauma/complications , Accidents, Traffic , Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/etiology , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...