Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 404, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004751

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the validity of consumer grade step counter devices during the early recovery period after knee replacement surgery. METHODS: Twenty-three participants wore a Fitbit Charge or Apple Watch Series 4 smart watch and performed a walking test along a 50-metre hallway. There were 9 males and 14 females included in the study with an average age of 68.5 years and BMI of 32. Each patient wore both the Fitbit Charge and Apple Watch while completing the walking test and an observer counted the ground truth value using a thumb-push tally counter. This test was repeated pre-operatively with no gait aid, immediately post operatively with a walker, at 6 weeks follow up with a cane and at 6 months with no gait aid. Bland-Altman plots were performed for all walking tests to compare the agreement between measurement techniques. RESULTS: Mean overall agreement of step count for pre-operative and at 6 months for subjects walking without gait aids was excellent for both the Apple Watch vs. actual and Fitbit vs. actual with bias values ranging from - 0.87 to 1.36 with limits of agreement (LOA) ranging between - 10.82 and 15.91. While using a walker both devices showed extremely little agreement with the actual step count with bias values between 22.5 and 24.37 with LOA between 11.7 and 33.3. At 6 weeks post-op while using a cane, both the Apple Watch and Fitbit devices had a range of bias values between - 2.8 and 5.73 with LOA between - 13.51 and 24.97. CONCLUSIONS: These devices show poor validity in the early post operative setting, especially with the use of gait aids, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Middle Aged , Gait/physiology , Canes , Walking/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Walkers , Fitness Trackers , Aged, 80 and over
2.
Microbiology (Reading) ; 166(2): 96-119, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31799915

ABSTRACT

The human gut microbiota controls factors that relate to human metabolism with a reach far greater than originally expected. Microbial communities and human (or animal) hosts entertain reciprocal exchanges between various inputs that are largely controlled by the host via its genetic make-up, nutrition and lifestyle. The composition of these microbial communities is fundamental to supply metabolic capabilities beyond those encoded in the host genome, and contributes to hormone and cellular signalling that support the dynamic adaptation to changes in food availability, environment and organismal development. Poor functional exchange between the microbial communities and their human host is associated with dysbiosis, metabolic dysfunction and disease. This review examines the biology of the dynamic relationship between the reciprocal metabolic state of the microbiota-host entity in balance with its environment (i.e. in healthy states), the enzymatic and metabolic changes associated with its imbalance in three well-studied diseases states such as obesity, diabetes and atherosclerosis, and the effects of bariatric surgery and exercise.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome/physiology , Metabolic Networks and Pathways , Animals , Atherosclerosis/metabolism , Atherosclerosis/microbiology , Atherosclerosis/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/microbiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Dysbiosis/metabolism , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Dysbiosis/therapy , Fatty Acids, Volatile/metabolism , Host Microbial Interactions , Humans , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/microbiology , Obesity/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...