Evaluating Prescriber Adherence to a Standardized Postoperative Opioid Prescription Protocol for Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Purpose: Concerns regarding the ongoing opioid epidemic have led to the implementation of standardized postoperative opioid-prescribing protocols for many common hand surgical procedures. This study investigated patient- and procedure-specific factors affecting adherence to a standardized postoperative opioid-prescribing protocol after cubital tunnel surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary cubital tunnel surgery within one academic medical system between October 1, 2016 (after the implementation of a standardized postoperative opioid-prescribing protocol) and March 1, 2020 was performed. Patients aged <18 years or with a history of revision surgery, prior traumatic ulnar nerve injury, additional concurrent surgical procedures, or a surgeon not participating in the protocol were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, prior opioid history, and surgical variables were recorded. The primary outcome was adherence to the standardized postoperative opioid-prescribing protocol. A bivariate statistical analysis was performed. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included. The median initial postoperative prescription amount was 75 morphine equivalent units (100% of protocol target) for 78 patients (80% of cohort) who underwent in situ decompression and 75 morphine equivalent units (50% of protocol target) for 20 patients (20% of cohort) who underwent decompression with ulnar nerve transposition. Forty-nine percent of initial opioid prescriptions adhered to protocol, compared with 26% below target and 26% above target. In the bivariate analysis, recent opioid prescriptions within 3 months preoperatively were associated with improved prescriber protocol adherence; longer tourniquet time and anterior transposition were associated with prescriptions below target, and in situ decompression was associated with prescriptions above target. Conclusions: Variation in postoperative opioid-prescribing patterns persists despite the implementation of a standardized postoperative opioid-prescribing protocol. Recent opioid prescriptions were associated with protocol adherence, possibly reflecting increased provider vigilance in this patient population. Differing target prescription amounts for in situ decompression versus decompression with anterior transposition may be unnecessary. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Using advanced imaging to measure bone density, compression fracture risk, and risk for construct failure after spine surgery.

Low bone mineral density (BMD) can predispose to vertebral body compression fractures and postoperative instrumentation failure. DEXA is considered the gold standard for measurement of BMD, however it is not obtained for all spine surgery patients preoperatively. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more routinely acquired spine imaging studies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be opportunistically used to measure BMD. Here we review available studies that assess the validity of opportunistic screening with CT-derived Hounsfield Units (HU) and MRI-derived vertebral vone quality (VBQ) to measure BMD of the spine as well the utility of these measures in predicting post-operative outcomes. Additionally, we provide screening thresholds based on HU and VBQ for prediction of osteopenia/ osteoporosis and post-operative outcomes such as cage subsidence, screw loosening, proximal junctional kyphosis, and implant failure.

Risk Factors for Rescue Opioid Prescription After Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding the ongoing opioid epidemic have led to heightened scrutiny of postoperative opioid prescribing patterns for common orthopedic surgical procedures. This study investigated patient- and procedure-specific risk factors for additional postoperative opioid rescue prescriptions following ambulatory cubital tunnel surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery at 2 academic medical centers between June 1, 2015 and March 1, 2020. Patient demographics, comorbidities, prior opioid history, and surgical variables were recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative rescue opioid prescription. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four patients were included, of whom 171 (62%) underwent in situ ulnar nerve decompression and 103 (38%) underwent ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition. The median postoperative opioid prescription amount was 90 morphine equivalent units (MEU) for the total cohort, 77.5 MEU for in situ ulnar nerve decompression, and 112.5 MEU for ulnar nerve decompression with transposition. Twenty-two patients (8%) required additional rescue opioid prescriptions postoperatively. Female sex, fibromyalgia, chronic opioid use, chronic pain diagnosis, and recent opioid were associated with the need for additional postoperative rescue opioid prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: While most patients do not require additional rescue opioid prescriptions after cubital tunnel surgery, chronic pain patients and patients with pain sensitivity syndromes are at risk for requiring additional rescue opioid prescriptions. For these high-risk patients, preoperative collaboration of a multidisciplinary team may be beneficial for developing a perioperative pain management plan that is both safe and effective.

Risk Factors for Failure of Nonsurgical Management of Ulnar Shaft Fractures.

PURPOSE: Isolated ulnar shaft fractures are frequently managed nonsurgically. However, rates of nonsurgical treatment failure remain substantial, and risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management are not well described. This study investigated radiographic and patient-specific risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management of isolated ulnar shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ulnar shaft fractures initially treated nonsurgically was performed at two tertiary referral centers over a 19-year period from 2001 to 2020. Patient- and injury-related variables, surgical interventions, and plain radiographic measurements were recorded. The outcome of interest was failure of nonsurgical management, defined as failure to achieve fracture union nonsurgically within 3 months of injury. RESULTS: One hundred fifty four patients initially treated nonsurgically for isolated ulnar shaft fractures were included. Twenty six patients (17%) experienced failure of nonsurgical management; these included five nonunions, 16 delayed unions, and 10 conversions to surgical management. Patients who experienced failure of nonsurgical management had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a higher employment rate, and fractures with higher initial median posteroanterior and lateral translations, fracture gap, and angulation; 83% of the patients with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm and 41% of the patients with an initial fracture angulation of >10° failed nonsurgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Although most ulnar shaft fractures heal successfully with nonsurgical management, a substantial percentage of these fractures do not. Patients who are currently working, have diabetes mellitus, or have fractures with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm or an initial fracture angulation of > 10° may be more likely to fail nonsurgical treatment, although additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these associations. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Projected Lifetime Cancer Risk Associated With Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Lumbar Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine the incremental increase in intraoperative ionizing radiation conferred by computed tomography (CT) as compared with conventional radiography; and (2) to model different lifetime cancer risks contextualized by the intersection between age, sex, and intraoperative imaging modality. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Emerging technologies in spine surgery, like navigation, automation, and augmented reality, commonly utilize intraoperative CT. Although much has been written about the benefits of such imaging modalities, the inherent risk profile of increasing intraoperative CT has not been well evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effective doses of intraoperative ionizing radiation were extracted from 610 adult patients who underwent single-level instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis from January 2015 through January 2022. Patients were divided into those who received intraoperative CT (n=138) and those who underwent conventional intraoperative radiography (n=472). Generalized linear modeling was utilized with intraoperative CT use as a primary predictor and patient demographics, disease characteristics, and preference-sensitive intraoperative considerations ( e.g. surgical approach and surgical invasiveness) as covariates. The adjusted risk difference in radiation dose calculated from our regression analysis was used to prognosticate the associated cancer risk across age and sex strata. RESULTS: (1) After adjusting for covariates, intraoperative CT was associated with 7.6 mSv (interquartile range: 6.8-8.4 mSv; P <0.001) more radiation than conventional radiography. (2) For the median patient in our population (a 62-year-old female), intraoperative CT use increased lifetime cancer risk by 2.3 incidents (interquartile range: 2.1-2.6) per 10,000. Similar projections for other age and sex strata were also appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative CT use significantly increases cancer risk compared with conventional intraoperative radiography for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusions. As emerging technologies in spine surgery continue to proliferate and leverage intraoperative CT for cross-sectional imaging data, strategies must be developed by surgeons, institutions, and medical technology companies to mitigate long-term cancer risks.

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Systems: The Importance of Concepts and Language in the Move Toward Standardization.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of acute traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) injury classification systems; to promote standardization of concepts and vocabulary with respect to TL injuries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over the past century, numerous TL classification systems have been proposed and implemented, each influenced by the thought, imaging modalities, and surgical techniques available at the time. While much progress has been made in our understanding and management of these injuries, concepts, and terms are often intermixed, leading to potential confusion and miscommunication. METHODS: We present a narrative review of the current state of the literature regarding classification systems for TL trauma. RESULTS: The evolution of TL classification systems has broadly been characterized by a transition away from descriptive categorizations of fracture patterns to schema incorporating morphology, stability, and neurological function. In addition to these features, more recent systems have demonstrated the importance of predictive/prognostic capability, reliability, validity, and generalizability. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesenfragen Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System/Thoracolumbar Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesenfragen Spine Injury Score represents the most modern and recently updated system, retiring past concepts and terminology in favor of clear, internationally agreed upon descriptors. CONCLUSIONS: Advancements in our understanding of blunt TL trauma injuries have led to changes in management. Such advances are reflected in modern, dedicated classification systems. Over time, various key factors have been acknowledged and incorporated. In an effort to promote standardization of thought and language, past ideas and terminology should be retired.

Return to Play After Shoulder Surgery in Professional Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The current literature lacks an updated review examining return to play (RTP) and return to prior performance (RTPP) after shoulder surgery in professional baseball players. Purpose: To summarize the RTP rate, RTPP rate, and baseball-specific performance metrics among professional baseball players who underwent shoulder surgery. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed utilizing the PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases and according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting on postoperative RTP and/or RTPP in professional baseball players who underwent shoulder surgery between 1976 and 2016. RTP rates, RTPP rates, and baseball-specific performance metrics were extracted from qualifying studies. A total of 2034 articles were identified after the initial search. Meta-analysis was performed where applicable, yielding weighted averages of RTP and RTPP rates and comparisons between pitchers and nonpitchers for each type of surgery. Baseball-specific performance metrics were reported as a narrative summary. Results: Overall, 26 studies featuring 1228 professional baseball players were included. Patient-level outcome data were available for 529 players. Surgical interventions included rotator cuff debridement (n = 197), rotator cuff repair (RCR; n = 43), superior labrum from anterior to posterior repair (n = 124), labral repair (n = 103), latissimus dorsi/teres major (LD/TM) repair (n = 21), biceps tenodesis (n = 17), coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (n = 15), anterior capsular repair (n = 5), and scapulothoracic bursectomy (n = 4). Rotator cuff debridement was the most common surgical procedure, while scapulothoracic bursectomy was the least common (37.2% and 0.8% of interventions, respectively). Meta-analysis revealed that the RTP rate was highest for LD/TM repair (84.5%) and lowest for RCR (53.5%), while the RTPP rate was highest for LD/TM repair (100.0%) and lowest for RCR (27.9%). RTP and RTPP rates were generally higher for position players than for pitchers. Nonvolume performance metrics were unaffected by shoulder surgery, while volume statistics decreased or remained similar. Conclusion: RTP and RTPP rates among professional baseball players were modest after most types of shoulder surgery. Among surgical procedures commonly performed on professional baseball players, RTP and RTPP rates were highest for LD/TM repair and lowest for RCR.

C-reactive Protein-to-albumin Ratio in Spinal Epidural Abscess: Association with Post-treatment Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a complex medical condition with high morbidity and healthcare costs. Clinical presentation and laboratory data may have prognostic value in forecasting morbidity and mortality. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) demonstrates promise for the prediction of adverse events in multiple orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic surgical conditions. We investigated the relationship between CAR and outcomes after treatment of SEA. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated adult patients treated within a single healthcare system for a diagnosis of SEA (2005 to 2017). Laboratory and clinical data included age at diagnosis, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, history of intravenous drug use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and CAR. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication; mortality and readmissions were considered secondarily. We used logistic regression to determine the association between baseline CAR and outcomes, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: We included 362 patients with a 90-day mortality rate of 13.3% and a 90-day complication rate of 47.8%. A reduced complication rate was observed in the lowest decile of CAR values compared with the remaining 90% of patients, a threshold value of 2.5 (27.0% versus 50.2%; odds ratio [OR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 5.81). CAR values in the highest two deciles experienced significantly increased odds of complications compared with the lowest decile (80th: OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.25 to 9.42; 90th: OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.19 to 9.04). DISCUSSION: We found elevated CAR to be associated with an increased likelihood of major morbidity in SEA. We suggest using a CAR value of 2.5 as a threshold for enhanced surveillance and recognizing patients with values above 73.7 as being at exceptional risk of morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III observational cohort study.

Burden of Injury and Illness in the Road Race Medical Tent: A Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the literature relating to prehospital care at 5 km through marathon distance road races and present the epidemiology of common medical encounters, significant medical complications, and medical outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for the published literature pertaining to road race medical tent encounters at 5 km through marathon distance road races from 2000 to 2018. We included English-language, original articles reporting on injury and illness incidence. MAIN RESULTS: Standard medical encounter definitions have recently been formulated in response to the previous lack of uniform definitions. The incidence of medical complications at road races may be influenced by environmental conditions and race distance. Minor and moderate medical encounters, such as dermatologic injuries, musculoskeletal injuries, and exercise-associated collapse, are common. Serious and life-threatening medical complications, including exertional heat stroke, exercise-associated hyponatremia, and cardiac arrest, are less frequent. Fatalities are also rare, with rates of 0.3 to 5 per 100 000 participants reported at marathons. The ratio of hospital transports to medical encounters is low. CONCLUSIONS: On-site medical services play a key role in the safety of both runners and the community. Future research and care initiatives in this field should focus on optimizing treatment protocols, promoting injury prevention efforts and reducing host community costs.

Functional Outcomes After Sauve-Kapandji Arthrodesis.

PURPOSE: The Sauve-Kapandji procedure (SK) combines a distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthrodesis with the creation of an ulnar pseudarthrosis for the salvage of DRUJ instability or arthritis. Despite several published case series, there are limited data on postoperative functional outcomes. This study evaluates patient-reported outcomes of SK using a validated functional outcomes scale. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent SK in 2 health care systems over 10 years (2008-2018). Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, and wrist plain film radiographic measurements were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes analyses and subgroup comparisons were performed. RESULTS: We included 57 patients in the study. Surgical indications included posttraumatic DRUJ arthritis (n = 35), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10), degenerative DRUJ arthritis (n = 7), Madelung deformity (n = 3), psoriatic arthritis (n = 1), and giant cell tumor of bone (n = 1). During the first postoperative year, QuickDASH scores decreased from a mean of 52 before surgery to 28 at 12 months. The QuickDASH scores at final follow-up demonstrated significant improvement in patients with osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. Supination significantly improved after surgery, from 48° to 74°, whereas wrist flexion, wrist extension, and pronation remained unchanged. Radiographically, significant postoperative decreases were seen in ulnar variance and McMurtry's translation index. The postoperative complication rate was 21%, including revision osteotomy in 4 patients (7.0%) and hardware removal in 4 patients (7.0%). No DRUJ nonunions were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The Sauve-Kapandji procedure for DRUJ salvage significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 1 year and significantly improved supination. Similar functional improvements after SK were seen in both osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Adhering to Radiographic Clinical Practice Guidelines for Distal Radial Fracture Management Is Associated with Improved Outcomes and Lower Costs.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures has not been evaluated in clinical practice. We hypothesized that adhering to the distal radial fracture radiographic clinical practice guideline (CPG) improves outcomes and reduces costs. METHODS: We reviewed 266 patients with distal radial fractures treated at 1 institution. Based on CPG radiographic parameters (Recommendation 3), care was rated as "appropriate" or "inappropriate." QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire) scores were collected. The direct costs of distal radial fracture care were determined. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate demographic characteristics and outcomes across groups. QuickDASH scores, grouped by postoperative time interval, were analyzed using linear mixed effect models to predict outcome trends. RESULTS: In this study, 145 patients in the operative treatment group and 121 patients in the nonoperative treatment group were included. Of the 145 patients in the operative treatment group, 6 underwent an inappropriate surgical procedure, limiting any analyses of that group. Of the 121 patients in the nonoperative treatment group, 68 were treated inappropriately. For the patients in the nonoperative treatment group, appropriate care provided a significant outcome benefit by 1 year; the median QuickDASH score was 10.1 points for the appropriate treatment group and 19.5 points for the inappropriate treatment group (p = 0.05). The total direct costs for inappropriate nonoperative treatment were, on average, 60% higher than appropriate nonoperative treatment. In predictive models, patients with appropriate care in the operative treatment group and the nonoperative treatment group had better outcomes than patients with inappropriate nonoperative treatment at all time points after 29 days. CONCLUSIONS: When nonoperative distal radial fracture management was aligned with radiographic CPG criteria, patients in our cohort had improved patient-reported outcomes with lower costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.