Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(1): 506-508, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34838496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite government restrictions during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, cosmetic tourism continued to occur. The authors present the impact of cosmetic tourism on their plastic surgery unit. METHODS: Retrospective case note review of two cohorts was performed: COVID-19 (March 2020-April 2021) and a pre COVID-19 comparator (January 2019-February 2020). Patients presenting with complications from cosmetic tourism were included and their hospital notes were reviewed. RESULTS: Seven patients were identified in the COVID-19 cohort compared with four patients in the comparator. In the COVID-19 patient group, six underwent their procedure overseas. The final patient was operated on in the UK by a visiting surgeon. Cases consisted of two abdominoplasties, two breast augmentations, two gluteal augmentations, and the final patient had a hernia repair. The most common presenting complaint in the COVID-19 cohort was a post-operative wound infection (n = 5), of which two had deeper associated collections, with two further wound dehiscences. In the pre-pandemic group, four patients underwent their procedure overseas. Cases consisted of an abdominoplasty, a blepharoplasty, a breast augmentation and a gluteal augmentation. Two patients presented with a wound infection, and two with simple wound dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Cosmetic surgery tourism is a growing industry with an increasing number of patients presenting with complications to NHS services. These patients are a potentially vulnerable group who exhibit risk-taking behaviours, such as going abroad amidst a pandemic and acceptance of not having appropriate follow up care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Medical Tourism , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(5): 1071-1076, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248936

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The 22 major trauma centres (MTCs) in England were appointed in 2012 to provide care to severely injured patients despite variation in existing infrastructure, resources, culture and skillset. Six MTCs remain unsupported by a co-located plastic surgery department. We describe the plastic surgical major trauma workload in England, the plastic surgical workforce and skillset available in each centre, and suggest what plastic surgical skills are required in an MTC. METHODS: A multi-centre, prospective cohort study was performed to collect operative workload data. Eleven MTCs in England submitted complete datasets. Workforce data were provided by the British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS). RESULTS: Fifty-three percent (n = 1582) of Trauma and Audit Research Network (TARN)-eligible patients admitted during the study period underwent at least one operation during their index admission. Of these, 14% (n = 227) required plastic surgery. The majority of plastic surgical operative work involved the extremities: 62% of index procedures involved the lower limb and 38% involved the upper limb. The number of full-time plastic surgical consultants per MTC ranged from 1 to 22. Only 10 MTCs had at least one plastic surgeon with a primary interest in lower limb trauma. CONCLUSION: Plastic surgery contributes substantially to major trauma care and the majority of this workload relates to extremity trauma. However, there is significant variability in the size, accessibility and skillset of the workforce available. On the basis of these data, we suggest a plastic surgical skillset which should be represented in plastic surgical departments supporting an MTC.


Subject(s)
Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Trauma Centers , United Kingdom , Workload/statistics & numerical data
4.
Injury ; 49(10): 1922-1926, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30082111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent national (NICE) guidelines in England recommend that initial debridement and wound excision of open tibial fractures take place within 12 h of the time of injury, a change from the previous target of 24 h. This study aims to assess the effect of timing of the initial debridement and wound excision on major infective complications, the impact of the new guidance, and the feasibility of adhering to the 12 h target within the infrastructure currently existing in four major trauma centres in England. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of Gustilo-Anderson grade 3B open tibial fractures presenting acutely to four Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) in England with co-located plastic surgery services over a ten-month period. The incidence of deep infective complications was compared between patients who underwent initial surgery according to the new NICE guidance and those who did not. Patients warranting emergency surgery for severely contaminated injury, concomitant life-threatening injury and neurovascular compromise were excluded. Multi-variable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of timing of surgical debridement on development of deep infective complications. RESULTS: 112 patients with 116 fractures were included. Six fractures (5.2%) developed deep infective complications. 38% (n = 44) underwent primary debridement within 12 h and 90% within 24 h. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major infective complications if debrided in less than or greater than 12 h (4.5% vs 5.6%, p = 1.00). Logistic regression found no significant relationship between timing of wound excision and development of deep infection. There was no significant decrease in mean time to debridement following introduction of new national guidance (13.6 vs 16.1 h) in these four MTCs. CONCLUSION: Overall, the rate of deep infection in high energy open tibial fractures managed within the four major trauma centes is low. Achieving surgical debridement within 12 h is challenging within the current infrastructure, and it is unclear whether adhering to this target will significantly affect the incidence of severe infective complications. Debridement within 24 h appears achievable. If a 12-h target is to be met, it is vital to ensure dedicated orthoplastic capacity is adequately resourced.


Subject(s)
Debridement , Fractures, Open/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Trauma Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Debridement/methods , England , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Wound Closure Techniques , Young Adult
5.
Burns ; 34(7): 1006-7, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18468800

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This article describes a technique to create a novel Biobrane glove to treat superficial circumferential paediatrics hand scalds. It includes step by step instructions and illustrations to demonstrate the application of two sheets of Biobrane to cover the entire hand. CONCLUSION: This method seems to be more cost-effective than the Biobrane glove distributed by Smith & Nephew.


Subject(s)
Burns/therapy , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Gloves, Protective , Hand Injuries/therapy , Occlusive Dressings , Child , Equipment Design , Humans , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...