Dissociation and Subsequent Stable Malrotation of Femoral Stem Within Sleeve After Sivash-Range of Motion Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

CASE: A 78 year-old man fell 6 months after Sivash-range of motion (S-ROM) total hip arthroplasty (THA), after which he developed hip pain and external rotation deformity. Imaging showed stem malrotation in relative retroversion. Revision THA was delayed because of medical issues, occurring 1.5 years after the fall. No corrosion was observed intraoperatively at the stem-sleeve interface. His symptoms resolved after revision THA. CONCLUSION: We present a rare complication of S-ROM THA-dissociation of the femoral stem from the proximal sleeve, with subsequent re-engagement in static malrotation. No corrosion was observed, suggesting that the stem had stably reseated within the sleeve.

Preoperative Risk Factor Optimization Lowers Hospital Length of Stay and Postoperative Emergency Department Visits in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation and management of outcomes risk has become an essential element of a modern total joint replacement program. Our multidisciplinary team designed an evidence-based tool to address modifiable risk factors for adverse outcomes after primary hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. METHODS: Our protocols were designed to identify, intervene, and mitigate risk through evidence-based patient optimization. Nurse navigators screened patients preoperatively, identified and treated risk factors, and followed patients for 90 days postoperatively. We compared patients participating in our optimization program (N = 104) to both a historical cohort (N = 193) and a contemporary cohort (N = 166). RESULTS: Risk factor identification and optimization resulted in lower hospital length of stay (LOS) and postoperative emergency department (ED) visits. Patients in the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in mean LOS as compared to both the historical cohort (2.55 vs 1.81 days, P < .001) and contemporary cohort (2.56 vs 1.81 days, P < .001). Patients in the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in 30- and 90-day ED visits compared to the historical cohort (P30-day = .042, P90-day = .003). When compared with the contemporary cohort, the optimization cohort had a statistically significant decrease in 90-day ED visits (21.08% vs 10.58%, P = .025). The optimization cohort had a statistically significant increase in the percentage of patients discharged home. We noted nonsignificant reductions in readmission rate, transfusion rate, and surgical site infections. CONCLUSION: Optimization of patients before elective primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty reduced average LOS, ED visits, and drove telerehabilitation use. Our results add to the limited body of literature supporting this patient-centered approach.

Negative Pressure Incisional Therapy and Infection After Direct Anterior Approach Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

With the aging of the US population, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming an increasingly common procedure. A major concern after THA is reducing infection rates, as infections can cause devastating complications. Improved sterile technique, standardized infection control protocols, and novel dressings have been used to reduce postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs). The use of either silver-impregnated dry dressings or easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings is aimed at reducing the rates of SSIs after primary anterior THA. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 275 patients who underwent anterior THA at their institution during a 1-year period. Patients were separated into groups based on their surgical dressing. Rates of SSI were documented, and the effects of various factors, including age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities, were compared between the 2 cohorts. The authors also analyzed high-risk patients to determine whether easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings reduced infections. The use of easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings after primary anterior THA did not have a statistically significant impact on SSI rate (P=.42). There was also no difference in SSI, readmission, or reoperation in the high-risk group. The goal of using an incisional negative pressure wound therapy device is to help further decrease the risk of SSI. This study's findings suggest that the SSI rate in this group did not differ from that in the standard dressing group, such that the prophylactic use of a negative pressure wound therapy device is not indicated for either standard or high-risk patients undergoing primary anterior approach THA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):e539-e544.].