Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(3): ofad687, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38434614

ABSTRACT

Keeping abreast of the antimicrobial stewardship-related articles published each year is challenging. The Southeastern Research Group Endeavor identified antimicrobial stewardship-related, peer-reviewed literature that detailed an actionable intervention during 2022. The top 13 publications were selected using a modified Delphi technique. These manuscripts were reviewed to highlight actionable interventions used by antimicrobial stewardship programs to capture potentially effective strategies for local implementation.

2.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 24(2): 118-121, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37870590

ABSTRACT

Background: Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) is a rare mosquito-borne illness exhibiting rapid neurological deterioration and permanent damage. Despite its >30% mortality and >60% long-term neurological damage, EEEV has no approved antiviral medication or vaccination. This report uniquely aims to describe a rare case of EEEV and provide a current literature review of therapeutic and preventative options from the clinical perspective to guide clinicians and public health workers, along with informing them about its impact and current knowledge gaps. Methods: A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record was performed for a patient's 10-day hospital admission in July 2021. In addition, PubMed was searched using relevant keywords for a literature review of EEEV. Results: A 61-year-old woman presented with dysarthria and right-sided facial droop. Acute ischemic stroke was ruled out, and empiric intravenous (IV) antibiotics were initiated for possible infectious etiology. The patient developed worsening mental status and fever and was intubated, with antibiotics broadened with concern for meningitis along with tick-borne illness. The patient remained encephalopathic and febrile, and lumbar serologies were consistent with viral meningoencephalitis or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Several days after collection, quantitative antibody testing returned positive for EEEV. The patient was pronounced dead on hospital day 10. On review of the literature regarding EEEV, supportive care and prevention remain the cornerstone of management. Although early IV immunoglobulin and high-dose steroids have shown potential as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality, no vaccines have been approved to date. Conclusion: Prospective trials and further investigations into treatment and preventative options may be useful in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with EEEV.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis Virus, Eastern Equine , Encephalomyelitis, Equine , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Female , Horses , Animals , Middle Aged , Ischemic Stroke/veterinary , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Encephalomyelitis, Equine/veterinary , Anti-Bacterial Agents
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(5): ofad186, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37180599

ABSTRACT

Background: The modified Dundee classification has recently been validated in various studies for nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infections. This has yet to be applied in the United States and within community hospital settings to optimize antimicrobial stewardship and ultimately patient care. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis was performed of 120 adult patients admitted to St. Joseph's/Candler Health System for nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infections between January 2020 and September 2021. Patients were classified into their modified Dundee classes, and frequencies of concordance of their empiric antimicrobial regimens with this classification scheme in the emergency department and inpatient settings were compared, along with possible effect modifiers and possible exploratory measures associated with concordance. Results: Concordance with the modified Dundee classification for the emergency department and inpatient regimens was 10% and 15%, respectively, with broad-spectrum antibiotic use and concordance positively associated with illness severity. Due to substantial broad-spectrum antibiotic use, possible effect modifiers associated with concordance were unable to be validated, and overall no statistically significant differences among exploratory analyses across classification status were observed. Conclusions: The modified Dundee classification can help identify gaps in antimicrobial stewardship and excessive broad-spectrum antimicrobial usage toward optimizing patient care.

4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(6): 688-693, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504376

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of adjusting antibiotic use (AU) by prevalence of bacterial isolates as an alternative method for risk adjustment beyond hospital characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Hospitals in the southeastern United States. METHODS: AU in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days and microbiologic data from 2015 and 2016 were collected from 26 hospitals. The prevalences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were calculated and compared to the average prevalence of all hospitals in the network. This proportion was used to calculate the adjusted AU (a-AU) for various categories of antimicrobials. For example, a-AU of antipseudomonal ß-lactams (APBL) was the AU of APBL divided by (prevalence of P. aeruginosa at that hospital divided by the average prevalence of P. aeruginosa). Hospitals were categorized by bed size and ranked by AU and a-AU, and the rankings were compared. RESULTS: Most hospitals in 2015 and 2016, respectively, moved ≥2 positions in the ranking using a-AU of APBL (15 of 24, 63%; 22 of 26, 85%), carbapenems (14 of 23, 61%; 22 of 25; 88%), anti-MRSA agents (13 of 23, 57%; 18 of 26, 69%), and anti-VRE agents (18 of 24, 75%; 15 of 26, 58%). Use of a-AU resulted in a shift in quartile of hospital ranking for 50% of APBL agents, 57% of carbapenems, 35% of anti-MRSA agents, and 75% of anti-VRE agents in 2015 and 50% of APBL agents, 28% of carbapenems, 50% of anti-MRSA agents, and 58% of anti-VRE agents in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The a-AU considerably changes how hospitals compare among each other within a network. Adjusting AU by microbiological burden allows for a more balanced comparison among hospitals with variable baseline rates of resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy
5.
Ann Pharmacother ; 54(6): 594-610, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31771337

ABSTRACT

Objective: To review the use of antibiotic stewardship interventions in the adult oncology and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) populations. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed was performed from inception to October 31, 2019. The general search terms used were oncology, cancer, hematologic malignancy, antimicrobial stewardship, antibiotic stewardship, febrile neutropenia, neutropenic fever, de-escalation, discontinuation, prophylaxis, practice guidelines, clinical pathway, rapid diagnostics, Filmarray, Verigene, MALDI-TOF, antibiotic allergy, and antimicrobial resistance. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant English-language studies describing interventions supported by the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines on "Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program" were included. Data Synthesis: Antibiotic stewardship publications in the oncology population have increased in recent years. Studies have described the impact of stewardship interventions, including preauthorization, prospective audit and feedback, implementation of clinical pathways, de-escalation of empirical antibiotics for febrile neutropenia (FN) prior to neutrophil recovery, allergy assessments, and use of rapid diagnostic testing. Many of these interventions have been shown to decrease antibiotic use without increased negative consequences, such as affecting length of stay or mortality. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review synthesizes available evidence for implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions, particularly de-escalation of antibiotics for FN and implementation of clinical pathways for FN and sepsis, in oncology patients and HCT recipients. Summary tables highlight studies and specific research needs for clinicians. Conclusions: Immunocompromised populations, including oncology patients, have often been excluded from stewardship studies. Antibiotic stewardship is effective in reducing antibiotic consumption and improving outcomes in this patient population, although more quality data are needed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Immunocompromised Host/drug effects , Sepsis/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Inpatients , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Young Adult
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323051

ABSTRACT

Multiplex PCR combined with a pharmacist-driven reporting protocol was compared to the standard of care within a community hospital to evaluate initial changes after notification of a positive blood culture. The intervention group demonstrated decreased times to changes in antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.0081), increased changes to optimal antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.013), and decreased vancomycin use for coagulase-negative staphylococcus contaminants (P < 0.01) with multiplex PCR implementation and pharmacist intervention.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship/statistics & numerical data , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Blood Culture/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacists/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...