Contribution of 15 Years (2007-2022) of Indo-US Training Partnerships to the Emergency Physician Workforce Capacity in India.

BACKGROUND: Indo-US Masters in Emergency Medicine (MEM) certification courses are rigorous three-year emergency medicine (EM) training courses that operate as a partnership between affiliate hospitals or universities in the United States with established EM training programs and local partner sites in India. Throughout their 15 years of operation, these global training partnerships have contributed to the EM workforce in India. Our objective in this study was to describe Indo-US MEM program graduates, their work environments, and their contribution to the growth of academic EM and to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response. METHODS: An electronic survey was created by US and Indian MEM course stakeholders and distributed to 714 US-affiliated MEM program graduates. The survey questions investigated where graduates were working, their work environments and involvement in teaching and research, and their involvement in the COVID-19 response. We consolidated the results into three domains: work environment and clinical contribution; academic contribution; and contribution to the COVID-19 response. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 46.9% (335 responses). Most graduates reported working within India (210, 62.7%) and in an emergency department (ED) setting (304, 91.0%). The most common reason for practicing outside of India was difficulty with formal MEM certificate recognition within India (97, 79.5%). Over half of graduates reported dedicating over 25% of their work hours to teaching others about EM (223, 66.6%), about half reported presenting research projects at conferences on the regional, national, or international level (168, 50.5%), and almost all graduates were engaged in treating COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (333, 99.4%). Most graduates agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their overall MEM training (296, 88.4%) and confident in their ability to practice EM (306, 91.6%). CONCLUSION: Indo-US MEM graduates have made a notable contribution to EM in India through clinical service delivery, teaching, and research, even more essential in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The roles of these graduates should be acknowledged and can contribute further to expand EM specialty and systems development across India.

Sustaining capacity building and practical skills training during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from India.

Background: The scale and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic posed a threat to provide the required support needed by emergency medicine (EM) trainees in India participating in the masters in EM program, a global partnership between the Ronald Reagan Institute for Emergency Medicine at the George Washington University and 14 institutions in India. While some of this support has been filled by remote education through thrice-weekly online video conferencing and webinars, the gap in procedural teaching posed a different challenge. Methods: We developed a two-part innovation to teach suture skills, a required procedure for EM trainees. The innovation consisted of a hands-on procedure lab with the opportunity for live feedback followed by an independent competitive skill demonstration. Trainees were notified in advance of materials needed for the procedure lab to encourage attendance and participation. Results: A total of 160 trainees attended the virtual suture skills lab; 74 trainees (46% of attendees) submitted feedback back of whom 94% were able to practice skills in real time. Written feedback was overwhelmingly positive and included requests to implement this method for other procedural skills. Twenty-one residents participated in the Innovative Suture Challenge, with the top three submissions receiving accolades in the following grand rounds-style session. Conclusions: The combination of virtual teaching with the opportunity for real-time feedback and an integrated project to independently showcase skills learned is a way to continue procedural skills teaching in a remote environment. The aim of this innovation was to test the feasibility, acceptability, and level of engagement of conducting virtual, live supervised suturing remotely across multiple geographical locations. Our next step would be to gather pre and post data to measure the impact. Additionally, we believe this provides a proof-of-concept model to further explore sustainable, cost-effective, and scalable models for remote procedure-based teaching.

Effectiveness of remote practical boards and telesimulation for the evaluation of emergency medicine trainees in India.

PURPOSE: Travel restrictions during the pandemic created a barrier to the traditional in-person, observed assessment final examination of our emergency medicine (EM) training programs in India. We conducted remote practical boards and telesimulation bringing examiners and learners from different geographical locations together using an online video conferencing platform. The goal of this paper is to describe the process of implementing a large-scale, international remote practical boards and telesimulation event. We aim to describe the evaluations of the feasibility and effectiveness of remote practical boards and telesimulation in an examination scenario and the feedback regarding the perception of fairness and attitudes from both examiners and examinees. METHODS: A total of 104 residents from 14 separate hospitals in eight cities across India were evaluated individually for practical board cases and in pairs for telesimulation. For practical boards, each examinee was evaluated twice, by two independent examiners. For telesimulation, each pair was evaluated by a local facilitator and a remote examiner via an online platform. There were 27 practical examiners and 14 local facilitators and 10 remote examiners for telesimulation. We obtained feedback in the form of a survey from local and remote examiners and examinees. RESULTS: We implemented a large-scale, international remote practical boards and telesimulation event, connecting examinees and local examiners in eight cities in India with examiners in the United States and United Kingdom. Feedback was obtained from 24 examiners and 103 examinees. A total of 96.7% examiners and 96.9% of examinees felt that this examination was fair. All respondents agreed that this format saved time and costs. CONCLUSION: This remote practical boards and telesimulation experience was a feasible and effective way to evaluate EM examinees medical knowledge, communication, and procedural skills. Technology issues was a limitation of our telesimulation experience. Future studies on telesimulation use in global EM training would be useful.

Global health and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine: a cross-sectional survey of members and fellows.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in global health participation among emergency care doctors in the UK. The aim of this paper was to describe the demographics of members and fellows of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine involved in global health, the work they are involved in, as well as the benefits and barriers of this work. METHODS: We conducted a survey to include members and fellows of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine describing the context of their global health work, funding arrangements for global health work and perceived barriers to, and benefits of, global health work. RESULTS: The survey collected 1134 responses of which 439 (38.7%) were excluded. The analysis was performed with the remaining 695 (61.3%) responses. Global health involvement concentrated around South Asia and Africa. Work contexts were mainly direct clinical service (267, 38%), curriculum development (203, 29%) and teaching short courses (198, 28%). Activity was largely self-funded, both international (539, 78%) and from UK (516, 74%). Global health work was not reported to contribute to appraisal by many participants (294, 42.3%). Funding (443, 64%) and protected time (431, 62%) were reported as key barriers to global health productivity. DISCUSSION: Participants largely targeted specialty development and educational activities. Lack of training, funding and supported time were identified as barriers to development. Galvanising support for global health through regional networks and College support for attracting funding and job plan recognition will help UK-based emergency care clinicians contribute more productively to this field.

Postgraduate Diploma in Emergency Medicine in India.

BACKGROUND: In India, and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the majority of emergency care is provided by frontline providers without specialty training in emergency medicine. In order to fill this need, we developed the Indian Postgraduate Diploma in Emergency Medicine (PGDEM), a 1-year skills-focused course for practicing doctors. This article describes the curriculum development and implementation as well as the follow-up survey conducted to gauge the impact of the course. METHODS: Programme graduates were surveyed via e-mail. All participation was voluntary and survey data remained anonymous. RESULTS: A total of 98.1% of graduates reported that the skills and knowledge they gained during the programme were important to their current job; 94.7% reported using their training from the course on a regular basis. Graduates reported an improvement in confidence performing all procedures taught during the course. Respondents work in a variety of medical specialties, including emergency medicine (50.0%), cardiology (5.8%), internal medicine (11.5%) and family medicine (23.1%). DISCUSSION: PGDEM graduates overwhelmingly view the knowledge and skills they learned as essential training that they use on a regular basis and practice in a variety of medical specialties after completing the course. The PGDEM represents a unique model to provide training in emergency medicine and acute care to the frontline doctors who are frequently responsible for providing emergency care in LMICs. The PGDEM training model can be scaled up rapidly, with the potential to increase capacity in developing emergency care systems.

Seasonal dengue surge: Providers⬨tm) perceptions about the impact of dengue on patient volume, staffing and use of point of care testing in Indian emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Global health emergencies, such as from diseases like dengue fever, can lead to rapid surges in visits to emergency departments. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of dengue on factors that could impact emergency department flow, including patient volume and staffing, on Indian emergency departments. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of Indian emergency providers. Respondents were queried via online survey about a number of domains including practice environment, use of rapid testing, changes in ED volume and ED staffing adjustments occurring during dengue season. Data was analyzed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We had a total of 210 respondents to our online survey. Less than half of respondents reported that their institutions used rapid point of care testing. When asked how dengue impacted ED flow, the most common response was that dengue increased the total number of ED visits (84%). Despite this increase, only about 32% of respondents reported that their institutions increased hospital staffing. In multivariate analysis, respondents at hospitals that experienced ED visit surges over 40% of baseline were more likely to also report that their institutions also increased staffing during this time (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.44-7.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that despite increases in visits during dengue season, ED providers noted that their EDs did not respond with staffing increases. More research is needed to better understand how emergency departments can adjust to dengue to provide optimal care for patients in India.

Postgraduate Emergency Medicine Training in India: An Educational Partnership with the Private Sector.

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) is a recently recognized specialty in India, still in its infancy. Local training programs are developing, but remain very limited. Private, for-profit hospitals are an important provider of graduate medical education (GME) in India, and are partnering with United States (US) universities in EM to expand training opportunities. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe current private-sector programs affiliated with a US university providing postgraduate EM training in India, the evolution and structure of these programs, and successes and challenges of program implementation. DISCUSSION: Programs have been established in seven cities in India in partnership with a US academic institution. Full-time trainees have required didactics, clinical rotations, research, and annual examinations. Faculty members affiliated with the US institution visit each program monthly. Regular evaluations have informed program modifications, and a local faculty development program has been implemented. Currently, 240 trainees are enrolled in the EM postgraduate program, and 141 physicians have graduated. A pilot survey conducted in 2012 revealed that 93% of graduates are currently practicing EM, 82% of those in India; 71% are involved in teaching, and 32% in research. Further investigation into programmatic impacts is necessary. Challenges include issues of formal program recognition both in India and abroad. CONCLUSIONS: This unique partnership is playing a major early role in EM GME in India. Future steps include official program recognition, expanded numbers of training sites, and a gradual transition of training and education to local faculty. Similar partnership programs may be effective in other settings outside of India.