Recurrent atrial arrhythmia in a randomised controlled trial comparing contact force-guided and contact force-blinded ablation for typical atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Contact force (CF)-guided catheter ablation (CA) is a novel technology developed to improve efficacy and reduce complications. In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), we previously documented that after 3 months, rate of persistent conduction block was similar with and without using CF while performing CA for typical atrial flutter (AFL). Clinical effect of CF on recurrent arrhythmia is unknown. Our objective is to study recurrent atrial arrhythmia during 12-month follow-up in a RCT investigating whether CF-guided CA for typical AFL is superior to CF-blinded CA. METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to CA guided by CF (intervention group) or blinded to CF (control group). After 12 months, patients attended clinical check-up preceded by a 5-day ambulatory Holter monitor recording. Primary outcome was any recurrent atrial arrhythmia ≥ 30 s within 12 months and documented in 12-lead ECG or Holter monitor recording. RESULTS: We included 156 patients, four patients withdrew consent and two died during follow-up. Thus, 150 patients were included in final analysis. Recurrent arrhythmia was detected in 36 of 77 (47%) patients in the intervention group, and 32 of 73 patients (44%) in the control group (p = 0.51). Atrial fibrillation was detected in 23 (30%) and 29 (40%) patients in the intervention and control groups respectively. AFL was detected in 11 (14%) and 5 (7%) patients in the intervention and control groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Contact force-guided ablation for typical atrial flutter does not reduce recurrent atrial arrhythmia after 12-month follow-up as compared with ablation blinded for contact force.

Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation and risk of stroke and death after ablation for typical atrial flutter: A nation-wide Danish cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is indicated for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 for men and ≥3 for women. This is regardless of successful catheter ablation for their arrhythmia. Studies have mainly focused on AF, and little is known regarding use of OAC in AFL patients following catheter ablation. PURPOSE: To describe discontinuation of OAC in a national cohort of patients who have undergone first-time cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) for AFL. METHODS: We identified patients undergoing first-time CTIA during the period 2010-2016 using the Danish National Ablation Registry. Information on comorbidities and OAC use were gathered using the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients were followed until March 1st, 2018. RESULTS: We identified 2409 consecutive patients. Median age was 66 (IQR 58-72) years, and 1952 (81%) were men. During mean follow-up of 4 ± 1.7 years, 723 (30%) patients discontinued OAC. Patients discontinuing OAC were younger, had less comorbidity, and a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score. During follow-up, 252 (10%) patients died, and 112 (5%) patients had a stroke. Incidence of both these events increased with increasing age and CHA2DS2-VASc score. In adjusted analysis, we observed higher mortality (p < 0.0001) in patients discontinuing OAC, while stroke rate was not significantly higher (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of patients who have undergone first-time CTIA, patients discontinuing OAC treatment were younger and had less comorbidities. Patients remain at elevated risk of death and stroke/TIA, increasing with their age and CHA2DS2-VASc score.

A randomized trial of contact force in atrial flutter ablation.

AIMS: Contact force (CF) sensing has emerged as a tool to guide and improve outcomes for catheter ablation (CA) for cardiac arrhythmias. The clinical benefit on patient outcomes remains unknown. To study whether CF-guided CA for typical atrial flutter (AFL) is superior to CA not guided by CF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blinded controlled superiority trial, we randomized patients 1:1 to receive CA for typical AFL guided by CF (intervention group) or blinded to CF (control group). In the intervention group, a specific value of the lesion size index (LSI), estimating ablation lesions size was targeted for each ablation lesion. Patients underwent electrophysiological study (EPS) after 3 months to assess occurrence of the primary endpoint of re-conduction across the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI). We included 156 patients with typical AFL, median age was 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-74] years and 120 (77%) patients were male. At index procedure median LSI was higher in the intervention group [6.4 (IQR 5.1-7) vs. 5.6 (IQR 4.5-6.9), P < 0.0001]. After 3 months, 126 patients (58 in intervention group) underwent EPS for primary endpoint assessment. Thirty (24%) patients had CTI re-conduction, distributed with 15 patients in each treatment group (P = 0.62). We observed no difference between treatment groups with regard to fluoroscopy, ablation, or procedure times, nor peri-procedural complications. CONCLUSION: Contact force-guided ablation does not reduce re-conduction across the CTI after 3 months, nor does CF-guided ablation shorten fluoroscopy, ablation, or total procedure times.

Recurrent atrial flutter ablation and incidence of atrial fibrillation ablation after first-time ablation for typical atrial flutter: A nation-wide Danish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cavo tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) is considered an effective first-line treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFL). However, many patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful CTIA. Knowledge about recurrent arrhythmia after CTIA mainly comes from small cohort studies with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To describe incidences of re-ablation for AFL and ablation for AF after first-time CTIA in a nation-wide cohort. METHODS: In the Danish National Ablation Registry we identified patients undergoing first-time CTIA during 2010-2016. Subsequent CTIA and AF-ablation procedures were identified until March 1st, 2018. We collected information on patient comorbidities in the Danish National Patient Registry. RESULTS: We identified 2409 patients undergoing first-time CTIA. Median age was 66 (IQR 58-72) years, 1952 (81%) were men, and 78 (3%) patients had a history of previous ablation for AF. Acute procedural success was achieved in 2288 (95%) patients. During mean follow-up of 4.0 ±â€¯1.7 years, 242 (10%) patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 326 (13.5%) underwent ablation for AF. Baseline characteristics associated with CTI re-ablation included prolonged procedural time, unsuccessful index CTIA, age <75 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score <2. Hypertension, history of AF-ablation, age <65 years use of a contact force sensing catheter and CHA2DS2-VASc score <2 were associated with later ablation for AF. CONCLUSION: In a nation-wide cohort undergoing first-time CTIA for AFL, 10% of patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 13.5% ablation for AF during mean follow-up of 4.0 ±â€¯1.7 years. Probability of a second procedure was higher in younger patients with less comorbidities.

Outcome after catheter ablation for left atrial flutter.

Objectives. Left atrial flutter has been reported in up to 10% of patients following pulmonary vein isolation or cardiac surgery. Left atrial flutter is typically highly symptomatic, responds poorly to medical antiarrhythmic treatment, and is often treated by catheter ablation. We aimed to investigate midterm freedom from recurrent arrhythmia after catheter ablation for left atrial flutter. Design. In the National Danish Ablation Registry, we identified consecutive patients, who had undergone catheter ablation for left atrial flutter between 1 January 2014 and 1 April 2017 at our centre. Results. A total of 53 patients (median age 68 years (IQR 60-71) 37 (70%) male) were included. Forty-two patients had prior left atrial catheter ablation procedures (79%), one patient prior ablation for classic atrial flutter (2%), four patients had prior surgery for congenital heart disease (8%), and six patients (11%) had no previous cardiac intervention. Acute procedural success, defined as non-inducibility of any atrial arrhythmia, was achieved in 45 of 53 patients (85%). During midterm follow-up (mean 20 ± 12 months), 26 patients experienced an episode of recurrent atrial arrhythmia. Median EHRA-score was 3 (range 2-4) before catheter ablation and reduced to median 1 (range 1-3) evaluated at follow-up visits after three and twelve months (both p < .001, Wilcoxon rank test). Conclusion. Left atrial flutter is preceded by catheter ablation or cardiac surgery in 89% of patients. Acute procedural success is achieved in majority of patients and ablation reduces symptoms effectively. During midterm follow-up, almost half the patients experience recurrent atrial arrhythmia.