Cardiac Cine MRI Using a Commercially Available 0.55-T Scanner.

Purpose To compare parameters of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function between a commercially available 0.55-T low-field-strength cardiac cine MRI scanner and a 1.5-T scanner. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, healthy volunteers (May 2022 to July 2022) underwent same-day cine imaging using both scanners (0.55 T, 1.5 T). Volumetric and functional parameters were assessed by two experts. After analyzing the results of a blinded crossover reader study of the healthy volunteers, 20 participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were prospectively included (November 2022 to February 2023). In a second blinded expert reading, parameters from clinical 1.5-T scans in these participants were compared with those same-day 0.55-T scans. Results are displayed as Bland-Altman plots. Results Eleven healthy volunteers (mean age: 33 years [95% CI: 27, 40]; four of 11 [36%] female, seven of 11 [64%] male) were included. Very strong mean correlation was observed (r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). Average deviation between MRI systems was 1.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 2.9) for both readers. Twenty participants with clinically indicated cardiac MRI were included (mean age: 55 years [95% CI: 48, 62], six of 20 [30%] female, 14 of 20 [70%] male). Mean correlation was very strong (r = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97, 0.98]). LV and RV parameters demonstrated an average deviation of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1, 2.1) between MRI systems. Conclusion Cardiac cine MRI at 0.55 T yielded comparable results for quantitative biventricular volumetric and functional parameters compared with routine imaging at 1.5 T, if acquisition time is doubled. Keywords: Cardiac, Comparative Studies, Heart, Cardiovascular MRI, Cine, Myocardium Supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2024.

Left ventricle diastolic vortex ring characterization in ischemic cardiomyopathy: insight into atrio-ventricular interplay.

Diastolic vortex ring (VR) plays a key role in the blood-pumping function exerted by the left ventricle (LV), with altered VR structures being associated with LV dysfunction. Herein, we sought to characterize the VR diastolic alterations in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients with systo-diastolic LV dysfunction, as compared to healthy controls, in order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of LV diastolic function. 4D Flow MRI data were acquired in ICM patients (n = 15) and healthy controls (n = 15). The λ2 method was used to extract VRs during early and late diastolic filling. Geometrical VR features, e.g., circularity index (CI), orientation (α), and inclination with respect to the LV outflow tract (ß), were extracted. Kinetic energy (KE), rate of viscous energy loss ( EL ˙ ), vorticity (W), and volume (V) were computed for each VR; the ratios with the respective quantities computed for the entire LV were derived. At peak E-wave, the VR was less circular (p = 0.032), formed a smaller α with the LV long-axis (p = 0.003) and a greater ß (p = 0.002) in ICM patients as compared to controls. At peak A-wave, CI was significantly increased (p = 0.034), while α was significantly smaller (p = 0.016) and ß was significantly increased (p = 0.036) in ICM as compared to controls. At both peak E-wave and peak A-wave, EL ˙ VR / EL ˙ LV , WVR/WLV, and VVR/VLV significantly decreased in ICM patients vs. healthy controls. KEVR/VVR showed a significant decrease in ICM patients with respect to controls at peak E-wave, while VVR remained comparable between normal and pathologic conditions. In the analyzed ICM patients, the diastolic VRs showed alterations in terms of geometry and energetics. These derangements might be attributed to both structural and functional alterations affecting the infarcted wall region and the remote myocardium.

Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using 2D multi-velocity encoding and 4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance.

AIMS: To compare the novel 2D multi-velocity encoding (venc) and 4D flow acquisitions with the standard 2D flow acquisition for the assessment of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived regurgitant fraction (RF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, patients underwent CMR 1 month after TAVR for the assessment of PVR, for which 2D multi-venc and 4D flow were used, in addition to standard 2D flow. Scatterplots and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess correlation and visualize agreement between techniques. Reproducibility of measurements was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients. The study included 21 patients (mean age ± SD 80 ± 5 years, 9 men). The mean RF was 11.7 ± 10.0% when standard 2D flow was used, 10.6 ± 7.0% when 2D multi-venc flow was used, and 9.6 ± 7.3% when 4D flow was used. There was a very strong correlation between the RFs assessed with 2D multi-venc and standard 2D flow (r = 0.88, P < 0.001), and a strong correlation between the RFs assessed with 4D flow and standard 2D flow (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed no substantial bias between the RFs (2D multi-venc: 1.3%; 4D flow: 0.3%). Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility for 2D multi-venc flow were 0.98 and 0.97, respectively, and 0.92 and 0.90 for 4D flow, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two-dimensional multi-venc and 4D flow produce an accurate quantification of PVR after TAVR. The fast acquisition of the 2D multi-venc sequence and the free-breathing acquisition with retrospective plane selection of the 4D flow sequence provide useful advantages in clinical practice, especially in the frail TAVR population.

Highly accelerated, Dixon-based non-contrast MR angiography versus high-pitch CT angiography.

OBJECTIVES: To compare a novel, non-contrast, flow-independent, 3D isotropic magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence that combines respiration compensation, electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering, undersampling, and Dixon water-fat separation with an ECG-triggered aortic high-pitch computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with recent CTA were scheduled for non-contrast MRA on a 3 T MRI. Aortic diameters and cross-sectional areas were measured on MRA and CTA using semiautomatic measurement tools at 11 aortic levels. Image quality was assessed independently by two radiologists on predefined aortic levels, including myocardium, proximal aortic branches, pulmonary veins and arteries, and the inferior (IVC) and superior vena cava (SVC). Image quality was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: All datasets showed diagnostic image quality. Visual grading was similar for MRA and CTA regarding overall image quality (0.71), systemic arterial image quality (p = 0.07-0.91) and pulmonary artery image quality (p = 0.05). Both readers favored MRA for SVC and IVC, while CTA was preferred for pulmonary veins (all p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in aortic diameters or cross-sectional areas between native MRA and contrast-enhanced CTA (p = 0.08-0.94). CONCLUSION: The proposed non-contrast MRA enables robust imaging of the aorta, its proximal branches and the pulmonary arteries and great veins with image quality and aortic diameters and cross-sectional areas comparable to that of CTA. Moreover, this technique represents a suitable free-breathing alternative, without the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation. Therefore, it is especially suitable for patients requiring repetitive imaging.

Highly accelerated free-breathing real-time 2D flow imaging using compressed sensing and shared velocity encoding.

OBJECTIVES: 2D real-time (RT) phase-contrast (PC) MRI is a promising alternative to conventional PC MRI, which overcomes problems due to irregular heartbeats or poor respiratory control. This study aims to evaluate a prototype compressed sensing (CS)-accelerated 2D RT-PC MRI technique with shared velocity encoding (SVE) for accurate beat-to-beat flow measurements. METHODS: The CS RT-PC technique was implemented using a single-shot fast RF-spoiled gradient echo with SVE by symmetric velocity encoding, and acquired with a temporal resolution of 51-56.5 ms in 1-5 heartbeats. Both aortic dissection phantom (n = 8) and volunteer (n = 7) studies were conducted using the prototype CS RT (CS, R = 8), the conventional (GRAPPA, R = 2), and the fully sampled PC sequences on a 3T clinical system. Flow parameters including peak velocity, peak flow rate, net flow rate, and maximum velocity were calculated to compare the performance between different methods using linear regression, intraclass correlation (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Comparisons of the flow measurements at all locations in the phantoms demonstrated an excellent correlation (all R2 ≥ 0.93) and agreement (all ICC ≥ 0.97) with negligible means of differences. In healthy volunteers, a similarly good correlation (all R2 ≥ 0.80) and agreement (all ICC ≥ 0.90) were observed; however, CS RT slightly underestimated the maximum velocities and flow rates (~ 12%). CONCLUSION: The highly accelerated CS RT-PC technique is feasible for the evaluation of flow patterns without requiring breath-holding, and it allows for rapid flow assessment in patients with arrhythmia or poor breath-hold capacity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The free-breathing real-time flow MRI technique offers improved spatial and temporal resolutions, as well as the ability to image individual cardiac cycles, resulting in superior image quality compared to the conventional PC technique when imaging patients with arrhythmias, especially those with atrial fibrillation. KEY POINTS: • The highly accelerated prototype CS RT-PC MRI technique with improved temporal resolution by the concept of SVE is feasible for beat-to-beat flow evaluation without requiring breath-holding. • The results of the phantom and in vivo quantitative flow evaluation show the ability of the prototype CS RT-PC technique to obtain reliable flow measurements similarly to the conventional PC MRI. • With less than 12% underestimation, excellent agreements between the two techniques were shown for the measurements of peak velocities and flow rates.

Fully automated AI-based cardiac motion parameter extraction - application to mitral and tricuspid valves on long-axis cine MR images.

PURPOSE: In cardiac MRI, valve motion parameters can be useful for the diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction. In this study, a fully automated AI-based valve tracking system was developed and evaluated on 2- or 4-chamber view cine series on a large cardiac MR dataset. Automatically derived motion parameters include atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD), velocities (AVPV), mitral or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE, TAPSE), or longitudinal shortening (LS). METHOD: Two sequential neural networks with an intermediate processing step are applied to localize the target and track the landmarks throughout the cardiac cycle. Initially, a localisation network is used to perform heatmap regression of the target landmarks, such as mitral, tricuspid valve annulus as well as apex points. Then, a registration network is applied to track these landmarks using deformation fields. Based on these outputs, motion parameters were derived. RESULTS: The accuracy of the system resulted in deviations of 1.44 ± 1.32 mm, 1.51 ± 1.46 cm/s, 2.21 ± 1.81 mm, 2.40 ± 1.97 mm, 2.50 ± 2.06 mm for AVPD, AVPV, MAPSE, TAPSE and LS, respectively. Application on a large patient database (N = 5289) revealed a mean MAPSE and LS of 9.5 ± 3.0 mm and 15.9 ± 3.9 % on 2-chamber and 4-chamber views, respectively. A mean TAPSE and LS of 13.4 ± 4.7 mm and 21.4 ± 6.9 % was measured. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the versatility of the proposed system for automatic extraction of various valve-related motion parameters.

Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for the Evaluation of Aortic Endovascular Graft: A Pilot Study.

We aimed to explore the feasibility of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients undergoing thoracic aorta endovascular repair (TEVAR). We retrospectively evaluated ten patients (two female), with a mean (±standard deviation) age of 61 ± 20 years, undergoing MRI for a follow-up after TEVAR. All 4D flow examinations were performed using a 1.5-T system (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). In addition to the standard examination protocol, a 4D flow-sensitive 3D spatial-encoding, time-resolved, phase-contrast prototype sequence was acquired. Among our cases, flow evaluation was feasible in all patients, although we observed some artifacts in 3 out of 10 patients. Three individuals displayed a reduced signal within the vessel lumen where the endograft was placed, while others presented with turbulent or increased flow. An aortic endograft did not necessarily hinder the visualization of blood flow through 4D flow sequences, although the graft could generate flow artifacts in some cases. A 4D Flow MRI may represent the ideal tool to follow up on both healthy subjects deemed to be at an increased risk based on their anatomical characteristics or patients submitted to TEVAR for whom a surveillance protocol with computed tomography angiography would be cumbersome and unjustified.

Impact of compressed sensing (CS) acceleration of two-dimensional (2D) flow sequences in clinical paediatric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

OBJECTIVES: Two-dimensional (2D) through-plane phase-contrast (PC) cine flow imaging assesses shunts and valve regurgitations in paediatric CMR and is considered the reference standard for Clinical quantification of blood Flow (COF). However, longer breath-holds (BH) can reduce compliance with possibly large respiratory manoeuvres altering flow. We hypothesize that reduced BH time by application of CS (Short BH quantification of Flow) (SBOF) retains accuracy while enabling faster, potentially more reliable flows. We investigate the variance between COF and SBOF cine flows. METHODS: Main pulmonary artery (MPA) and sinotubular junction (STJ) planes were acquired at 1.5 T in paediatric patients by COF and SBOF. RESULTS: 21 patients (mean age 13.9, 10-17y) were enrolled. The BH times were COF mean 11.7 s (range 8.4-20.9 s) vs SBOF mean 6.5 s (min 3.6-9.1 s). The differences and 95% CI between the COF and SBOF flows were LVSV -1.43 ± 13.6(ml/beat), LVCO 0.16 ± 1.35(l/min) and RVSV 2.95 ± 12.3(ml/beat), RVCO 0.27 ± 0.96(l/min), QP/QS were SV 0.04 ± 0.19, CO 0.02 ± 0.23. Variability between COF and SBOF did not exceed intrasession variation of COF. CONCLUSION: SBOF reduces breath-hold duration to 56% of COF. RV flow by SBOF was biased compared to COF. The variation (95% CI) between COF and SBOF was similar to the COF intrasession test-retest 95% CI.

Building a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance exam on a commercial 0.55 T system: A pictorial essay on potential applications.

Background: Contemporary advances in low-field magnetic resonance imaging systems can potentially widen access to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. We present our initial experience in building a comprehensive CMR protocol on a commercial 0.55 T system with a gradient performance of 26 mT/m amplitude and 45 T/m/s slew rate. To achieve sufficient image quality, we adapted standard imaging techniques when possible, and implemented compressed-sensing (CS) based techniques when needed in an effort to compensate for the inherently low signal-to-noise ratio at lower field strength. Methods: A prototype CMR exam was built on an 80 cm, ultra-wide bore commercial 0.55 T MR system. Implementation of all components aimed to overcome the inherently lower signal of low-field and the relatively longer echo and repetition times owing to the slower gradients. CS-based breath-held and real-time cine imaging was built utilizing high acceleration rates to meet nominal spatial and temporal resolution recommendations. Similarly, CS 2D phase-contrast cine was implemented for flow. Dark-blood turbo spin echo sequences with deep learning based denoising were implemented for morphology assessment. Magnetization-prepared single-shot myocardial mapping techniques incorporated additional source images. CS-based dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging was implemented for myocardial perfusion and 3D MR angiography. Non-contrast 3D MR angiography was built with electrocardiogram-triggered, navigator-gated magnetization-prepared methods. Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) tissue characterization methods included breath-held segmented and free-breathing single-shot imaging with motion correction and averaging using an increased number of source images. Proof-of-concept was demonstrated through porcine infarct model, healthy volunteer, and patient scans. Results: Reasonable image quality was demonstrated for cardiovascular structure, function, flow, and LGE assessment. Low-field afforded utilization of higher flip angles for cine and MR angiography. CS-based techniques were able to overcome gradient speed limitations and meet spatial and temporal resolution recommendations with imaging times comparable to higher performance scanners. Tissue mapping and perfusion imaging require further development. Conclusion: We implemented cardiac applications demonstrating the potential for comprehensive CMR on a novel commercial 0.55 T system. Further development and validation studies are needed before this technology can be applied clinically.

Hemodynamic Evaluation of Type B Aortic Dissection Using Compressed Sensing Accelerated 4D Flow MRI.

BACKGROUND: 4D Flow MRI is a quantitative imaging technique to evaluate blood flow patterns; however, it is unclear how compressed sensing (CS) acceleration would impact aortic hemodynamic quantification in type B aortic dissection (TBAD). PURPOSE: To investigate CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI performance compared to GRAPP-accelerated 4D Flow MRI (GRAPPA) to evaluate aortic hemodynamics in TBAD. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Twelve TBAD patients, two volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, 3D time-resolved cine phase-contrast gradient echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: GRAPPA (acceleration factor [R] = 2) and two CS-accelerated (R = 7.7 [CS7.7] and 10.2 [CS10.2]) 4D Flow MRI scans were acquired twice for interscan reproducibility assessment. Voxelwise kinetic energy (KE), peak velocity (PV), forward flow (FF), reverse flow (RF), and stasis were calculated. Plane-based mid-lumen flows were quantified. Imaging times were recorded. TESTS: Repeated measures analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: The KE and FF in true lumen (TL) and PV in false lumen (FL) did not show difference among three acquisition types (P = 0.818, 0.065, 0.284 respectively). The PV and stasis in TL were higher, KE, FF, and RF in FL were lower, and stasis was higher in GRAPPA compared to CS7.7 and CS10.2. The RF was lower in GRAPPA compared to CS10.2. The correlation coefficients were strong in TL (r = [0.781-0.986]), and low to strong in FL (r = [0.347-0.948]). The ICC levels demonstrated moderate to excellent interscan reproducibility (0.732-0.989). The FF and net flow in mid-descending aorta TL were significantly different between CS7.7 and CS10.2. CONCLUSION: CS-accelerated 4D Flow MRI has potential for clinical utilization with shorter scan times in TBAD. Our results suggest similar hemodynamic trends between acceleration types, but CS-acceleration impacts KE, FF, RF, and stasis more in FL. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Correlation between Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Vortex Duration Determined by 4D Flow MRI in Main Pulmonary Artery in Patients with Suspicion of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH).

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is one of the causes of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and requires invasive measurement of the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) during right heart catheterisation (RHC) for the diagnosis. 4D flow MRI could provide non-invasive parameters to estimate the mPAP. Twenty-five patients with suspected CTEPH underwent cardiac MRI. Mean vortex duration (%), pulmonary distensibility, right ventricular volumes and function were measured using 4D flow MRI and cine sequences, and compared with the mPAP measured by RHC. The mPAP measured during RHC was 33 ± 16 mmHg (10−66 mmHg). PH (defined as mPAP > 20 mmHg) was present in 19 of 25 patients (76%). A vortical flow was observed in all but two patients (92%) on 4D flow images, and vortex duration showed good correlation with the mPAP (r = 0.805; p < 0.0001). Youden index analysis showed that a vortex duration of 8.6% of the cardiac cycle provided a 95% sensitivity and an 83% specificity to detect PH. Reliability for the measurement of vortex duration was excellent for both intra-observer ICC = 0.823 and inter-observer ICC = 0.788. Vortex duration could be a useful parameter to non-invasively estimate mPAP in patients with suspected CTEPH.

Fully automated background phase correction using M-estimate SAmple consensus (MSAC)-Application to 2D and 4D flow.

PURPOSE: Flow quantification by phase-contrast MRI is hampered by spatially varying background phase offsets. Correction performance by polynomial regression on stationary tissue may be affected by outliers such as wrap-around or constant flow. Therefore, we propose an alternative, M-estimate SAmple Consensus (MSAC) to reject outliers, and improve and fully automate background phase correction. METHODS: The MSAC technique fits polynomials to randomly drawn small samples from the image. Over several trials, it aims to find the best consensus set of valid pixels by rejecting outliers to the fit and minimizing the residuals of the remaining pixels. The robustness of MSAC to its few parameters was investigated and verified using third-order polynomial correction fits on a total of 118 2D flow (97 with wrap-around) and 18 4D flow data sets (14 with wrap-around), acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T. Background phase was compared with standard stationary correction and phantom correction. Pulmonary/systemic flow ratios in 2D flow were derived, and exemplary 4D flow analysis was performed. RESULTS: The MSAC technique is robust over a range of parameter choices, and a unique set of parameters is suitable for both 2D and 4D flow. In 2D flow, phase errors were significantly reduced by MSAC compared with stationary correction (p = 0.005), and stationary correction shows larger errors in pulmonary/systemic flow ratios compared with MSAC. In 4D flow, MSAC shows similar performance as stationary correction. CONCLUSIONS: The MSAC method provides fully automated background phase correction to 2D and 4D flow data and shows improved robustness over stationary correction, especially with outliers present.

Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: A comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate hemodynamic markers obtained by accelerated GRAPPA (R = 2, 3, 4) and compressed sensing (R = 7.6) 4D flow MRI sequences under complex flow conditions. METHODS: The accelerated 4D flow MRI scans were performed on a pulsatile flow phantom, along with a nonaccelerated fully sampled k-space acquisition. Computational fluid dynamics simulations based on the experimentally measured flow fields were conducted for additional comparison. Voxel-wise comparisons (Bland-Altman analysis, L 2 $$ {L}_2 $$ -norm metric), as well as nonderived quantities (velocity profiles, flow rates, and peak velocities), were used to compare the velocity fields obtained from the different modalities. RESULTS: 4D flow acquisitions and computational fluid dynamics depicted similar hemodynamic patterns. Voxel-wise comparisons between the MRI scans highlighted larger discrepancies at the voxels located near the phantom's boundary walls. A trend for all MR scans to overestimate velocity profiles and peak velocities as compared to computational fluid dynamics was noticed in regions associated with high velocity or acceleration. However, good agreement for the flow rates was observed, and eddy-current correction appeared essential for consistency of the flow rates measurements with respect to the principle of mass conservation. CONCLUSION: GRAPPA (R = 2, 3) and highly accelerated compressed sensing showed good agreement with the fully sampled acquisition. Yet, all 4D flow MRI scans were hampered by artifacts inherent to the phase-contrast acquisition procedure. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are an interesting tool to assess these differences but are sensitive to modeling parameters.

In vitro four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance analysis of the effect of pericardial valve design on aortic flow.

We investigated the effect of the design of bioprosthetic pericardial valves on the downstream fluid flow pattern through four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow). A dedicated in vitro test bench, including a paradigmatic aortic root phantom, was used to compare, under steady flow conditions, three commercially used pericardial bioprostheses (TrifectaTM, Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna, Crown PRT®), selecting the two smallest and comparable valve sizes. In-house 4D Flow post-processing provided the downstream flow pattern of velocity, the velocity profile at vena contracta, its effective orifice area (EOA) and the corresponding hydraulic diameter (DH). Trifecta reported the lowest peak of velocity for both the tested sizes, with vena contracta position being the most proximal to the free margin of leaflets. Conversely, in both Crown and Magna, jet flow continued to increase its downstream velocity, resulting in a farther position of vena contracta. EOA shape was trilobal for Magna, triangular for Crown and circular for Trifecta, the last one maximising EOA. The percentage of nominal luminal area effectively exploited by the flow was largely above 80% in Trifecta, below 75% in Crown and below 70% in Magna. Hence, the design of pericardial bioprostheses directly impacts on the downstream flow field pattern and its fluid dynamic performance.

Comparison of Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Left Ventricular Fluid Dynamics and Energetics in Ischemic and Restrictive Cardiomyopathies.

BACKGROUND: Time-resolved three-directional velocity-encoded (4D flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables the quantification of left ventricular (LV) intracavitary fluid dynamics and energetics, providing mechanistic insight into LV dysfunctions. Before becoming a support to diagnosis and patient stratification, this analysis should prove capable of discriminating between clearly different LV derangements. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of 4D flow in identifying fluid dynamic and energetics derangements in ischemic and restrictive LV cardiomyopathies. STUDY TYPE: Prospective observational study. POPULATION: Ten patients with post-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), 10 patients with cardiac light-chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA), and 10 healthy controls were included. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T/balanced steady-state free precession cine and 4D flow sequences. ASSESSMENT: Flow was divided into four components: direct flow (DF), retained inflow, delayed ejection flow, and residual volume (RV). Demographics, LV morphology, flow components, global and regional energetics (volume-normalized kinetic energy [KEV ] and viscous energy loss [ELV ]), and pressure-derived hemodynamic force (HDF) were compared between the three groups. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intergroup differences in flow components were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); differences in energetic variables and peak HDF were tested by two-way ANOVA. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: ICM patients exhibited the following statistically significant alterations vs. controls: reduced KEV , mostly in the basal region, in systole (-44%) and in diastole (-37%); altered flow components, with reduced DF (-33%) and increased RV (+26%); and reduced basal-apical HDF component on average by 63% at peak systole. AL-CA patients exhibited the following alterations vs. controls: significantly reduced KEV at the E-wave peak in the basal segment (-34%); albeit nonstatistically significant, increased peaks and altered time-course of the HDF basal-apical component in diastole and slightly reduced HDF components in systole. DATA CONCLUSION: The analysis of multiple 4D flow-derived parameters highlighted fluid dynamic alterations associated with systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in ICM and AL-CA patients, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

k-t accelerated multi-VENC 4D flow MRI improves vortex assessment in pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: 4D flow imaging can be used to evaluate vortex formation in the pulmonary artery seen in patients with pulmonary hypertension. We evaluated if a k-t accelerated multi-VENC (velocity encoding) 4D flow acquisition improves image quality, inter-reader agreement and correlation with hemodynamic parameters. METHODS: A total of 14 patients with pulmonary hypertension (5 females, 9 males; mean age 61 ± 16 years) underwent 4D flow MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and right heart catheterization. In addition to that, 13 healthy volunteers (2 females, 11 males, mean age 33 ± 12 years) also underwent 4D flow MRI. Multi- and single-VENC datasets were reconstructed and evaluated for vortex formation and vortex duration by two blinded readers and image quality was rated on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Both readers rated image quality as significantly higher on multi-VENC datasets (3.96 ± 0.71 vs. 2.56 ± 0.93, p < 0.001; 4.70 ± 0.61 vs. 4.07 ± 0.92, p = 0.003). Inter-reader correlation for vortex duration quantification was higher on multi-VENC datasets compared to single-VENC datasets (r = 0.63 vs. r = 0.44). No significant correlation was found between vortex duration and mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with PH. CONCLUSION: Multi-VENC 4D flow MRI significantly improves image quality and inter-reader agreement for the evaluation of vortex formation in the pulmonary artery.

Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of agreement between flow/velocity data obtained from 2D-phase-contrast (PC) and 4D-flow in patients scheduled for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Image acquisition was performed using a 1.5 T scanner. We compared mean flow rates, vessel areas, and peak velocities obtained during the acquisition with both techniques in 20 consecutive patients, 15 males and 5 females aged 69 ± 5 years (mean ± standard deviation). There was a good correlation between both techniques for the CCA flow (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), whereas for the ICA flow and ECA flow the correlation was only moderate (r = 0.4, p = 0.011 and r = 0.45, p = 0.003, respectively). Correlations of peak velocities between methods were good for CCA (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and moderate for ECA (r = 0.41, p = 0.008). There was no correlation for ICA (r = 0.04, p = 0.805). Cross-sectional area values between methods showed no significant correlations for CCA (r = 0.18, p = 0.269), ICA (r = 0.1, p = 0.543), and ECA (r = 0.05, p = 0.767). Conclusion: the 4D-flow imaging provided a good correlation of CCA and a moderate correlation of ICA flow rates against 2D-PC, underestimating peak velocities and overestimating cross-sectional areas in all carotid segments.

In vitro evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid velocity measurement in type I Chiari malformation: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement using 2D phase contrast and 4D flow MRI.

BACKGROUND: Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging, PC MRI, is a valuable tool allowing for non-invasive quantification of CSF dynamics, but has lacked adoption in clinical practice for Chiari malformation diagnostics. To improve these diagnostic practices, a better understanding of PC MRI based measurement agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of CSF dynamics is needed. METHODS: An anatomically realistic in vitro subject specific model of a Chiari malformation patient was scanned three times at five different scanning centers using 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow techniques to quantify intra-scanner repeatability, inter-scanner reproducibility, and agreement between imaging modalities. Peak systolic CSF velocities were measured at nine axial planes using 2D PC MRI, which were then compared to 4D Flow peak systolic velocity measurements extracted at those exact axial positions along the model. RESULTS: Comparison of measurement results showed good overall agreement of CSF velocity detection between 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow (p = 0.86), fair intra-scanner repeatability (confidence intervals ± 1.5 cm/s), and poor inter-scanner reproducibility. On average, 4D Flow measurements had a larger variability than 2D PC MRI measurements (standard deviations 1.83 and 1.04 cm/s, respectively). CONCLUSION: Agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow detection of peak CSF velocities was quantified using a patient-specific in vitro model of Chiari malformation. In combination, the greatest factor leading to measurement inconsistency was determined to be a lack of reproducibility between different MRI centers. Overall, these findings may help lead to better understanding for application of 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow techniques as diagnostic tools for CSF dynamics quantification in Chiari malformation and related diseases.

Velocity quantification in 44 healthy volunteers using accelerated multi-VENC 4D flow CMR.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of a k-t accelerated multi-VENC 4D phase contrast flow MRI acquisition of the main heart-surrounding vessels, its benefits over a traditional single-VENC acquisition and to present reference flow and velocity values in a large cohort of volunteers. METHODS: 44 healthy volunteers were examined on a 3 T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). 4D flow measurements were obtained with a FOV including the aorta and the pulmonary arteries. VENC values were set to 40, 100 and 200 cm/s and unfolded based on an MRI signal model. Unfolded multi-VENC data was compared to the single-VENC with VENC 200 cm/s. Flow and velocity quantification was performed in several regions of interest (ROI) placed in the ascending aorta and in the main pulmonary artery. Conservation of mass analysis was performed for single- and multi-VENC datasets. Values for mean and maximal flow velocity and stroke volume were calculated and compared to the literature. RESULTS: Mean scan time was 13.8 ± 4 min. Differences between stroke volumes between the ascending aorta and the main pulmonary artery were significantly lower in multi-VENC datasets compared to single-VENC datasets (9.6 ± 7.8 mL vs. 25.4 ± 26.4 mL, p < 0.001). This was also true for differences in stroke volume between up- and downstream ROIs in the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery. Values for mean and maximal velocities and stroke volume were in-line with previous studies. To highlight potential clinical applications two exemplary 4D flow measurements in patients with different pathologies are shown and compared to single-VENC datasets. CONCLUSIONS: k-t accelerated multi-VENC 4D phase contrast flow MRI acquisition of the great vessels is feasible in a clinically acceptable scan duration. It offers improvements over traditional single-VENC 4D flow, expectedly being valuable when vessels with different flow velocities or complex flow phenomena are evaluated.

4D flow evaluation of blood non-Newtonian behavior in left ventricle flow analysis.

Blood is generally modeled as a Newtonian fluid, assuming a standard and constant viscosity; however, this assumption may not hold for the highly pulsatile and recirculating intracavitary flow in the left ventricle (LV), hampering the quantification of fluid dynamic indices of potential clinical relevance. Herein, we investigated the effect of three viscosity models on the patient-specific quantification of LV blood energetics, namely on viscous energy loss (EL), from 4D Flow magnetic resonance imaging: I) Newtonian with standard viscosity (3.7 cP), II) Newtonian with subject-specific hematocrit-dependent viscosity, III) non-Newtonian accounting for the effect of hematocrit and shear rate. Analyses were performed on 5 controls and 5 patients with cardiac light-chain amyloidosis. In Model II, viscosity ranged between 3.0 (-19%) and 4.3 cP (+16%), mildly deviating from the standard value. In the non-Newtonian model, this effect was emphasized: viscosity ranged from 3.2 to 6.0 cP, deviating maximally from the standard value in low shear rate (i.e., <100 s-1) regions. This effect reflected on EL quantifications: in particular, as compared to Model I, Model III yielded markedly higher EL values (up to +40%) or markedly lower (down to -21%) for subjects with hematocrit higher than 39.5% and lower than 30%, respectively. Accounting for non-Newtonian blood behavior on a patient-specific basis may enhance the accuracy of intracardiac energetics assessment by 4D Flow, which may be explored as non-invasive index to discriminate between healthy and pathologic LV.