ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thrombin generation (TG) assessed by Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT-I) reflects the overall capacity of plasma to generate thrombin, thus evaluating the balance between the anti- and procoagulant processes. However, with this method the calibrator curve is usually not measured until completion which has a severe impact on the calculation of the TG parameters, especially under conditions where almost all substrate is consumed. In addition, direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) cannot be present in the calibration sample due to inhibition of the calibrator. We have developed a modified TG assay (CAT-II) and performed head-to-head comparison with the CAT-I method using the same fluorometer. Furthermore, we have compared our CAT-II method to a new automated TG instrument (ST®-Genesia) using the same calibration method. METHODS: TG was assessed with CAT-I and CAT-II using the same fulorometer and with ST®-Genesia in control plasma and plasma containing different anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) and plasmas to which common interfering substances, bilirubin, hemoglobin and lipids were added. In CAT-I, calibration was against the same plasma containing calibrator in the presence of fluorogenic substrate (Z-GGR-AMC). In contrast, CAT-II method and ST®-Genesia used a standard concentration of thrombin in buffer and 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) in a separate plasma sample for calibration. RESULTS: TG obtained from CAT-I using anticoagulant-free plasmas was lower compared with TG from CAT-II but both methods demonstrated an intra-assay variation less than 5% on all measured parameters. When comparing the two different calibration methods in the presence of different anticoagulants, a high correlation was seen in the presence of rivaroxaban and apixaban (R2 > 0.97), but not with dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor. CAT-II method showed dose-dependent inhibition of TG in the presence of dabigatran, while CAT-I was not able to detect it. Both methods were able to correct for the interfering substances. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed high similarity between the results of CAT-I and CAT-II method when it is applied in control plasmas and plasmas not inhibited with a direct thrombin inhibitor. Furthermore, both the CAT-II method and ST-Genesia using the same calibration method were able to detect the effect of all oral anticoagulants. Taken together, applying a new calibration method is a significant improvement for monitoring patients on direct thrombin inhibitors while not introducing any bias to results obtained on other types of samples.
ABSTRACT
The hemostatic activity of plasma is determined by platelet activation and coagulation, which processes are mutually stimulatory. We studied this interaction by measuring the cleavage of fluorescent thrombin substrate in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), using the calibrated thrombogram method. In freshly isolated human plasma, thrombin formation triggered by tissue factor was fully dependent on the presence of platelets. It was abolished by annexin A5, indicating dependence on phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure at activated platelets. Comparison of plasmas from various subjects showed considerable interindividual variation in total amount of thrombin generation, regardless of whether platelets or PS-containing phospholipids were present. Integrin alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists and ADP receptor blockage, but not aspirin, decreased the rate of thrombin generation (thrombin peak level) and extended the time of onset. Platelet inhibition with cAMP-elevating agents decreased the thrombin-forming rate, but surprisingly shortened the onset time. Stimulation of platelets with agonists of Gi/q-coupled receptors and, to a larger extent, with collagen or Ca2+-ionophore increased the rate of thrombin generation and shortened its onset. In PRP from donors with low and high generation, platelet inhibitors and activators were similarly effective. Taken together, these results indicate that, in tissue factor-triggered PRP, PS exposure on activated platelets regulates both onset and rate of thrombin generation. However, coagulant activity rather than platelet activation determines the total amount of thrombin formed, i.e. the endogenous thrombin potential. Thus, kinetics of thrombin generation in PRP are controlled by platelet inhibitors and agonists, but the process is restricted in amount by the subject-dependent variation in coagulation.