ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the median perioperative blood loss (PBL) during minimally invasive surgical (MIS) myomectomy. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. SETTING: Large academic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients underwent laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy and completed a postoperative complete blood count (CBC) from November 2020 to August 2022. Patients had to have at least one fibroid greater than or equal to 3 cm on preoperative imaging. INTERVENTIONS: A CBC was collected preoperatively within 7 days of surgery. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was determined by the surgeon intraoperatively. A repeat CBC was drawn between postoperative days 2 through 4. PBL was calculated using the equation PBL = (patient weight in kg × 65 cc/kg) × (preoperative hematocrit - postoperative hematocrit)/preoperative hematocrit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Median PBL (536.3 cc [270.0, 909.3]) was greater than median EBL (200.0 cc [75.0, 500.0]). PBL ranged from a net gain of 191.5 cc to net loss of 2362.5 cc. Median size of the largest fibroid on preoperative imaging was 8.8 cm (6.6, 11.5), and median weight of fibroids removed was 321 g (115, 519). About half of patients (51.6%) had one fibroid removed, and 48.4% had 2 or more fibroids removed. Five patients were converted to laparotomy, 4 from robotic approaches. Two patients required a blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Calculated PBL was greater than intraoperative EBL. This suggests there is continued blood loss post myometrial bed closure. Blood loss should be evaluated both during and after myomectomy, as intraoperative EBL underestimates total PBL.
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Laparoscopy , Leiomyoma , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Uterine Myomectomy , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Pilot Projects , Uterine Myomectomy/methods , Uterine Myomectomy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Adult , Leiomyoma/surgery , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Hematocrit , Blood Cell CountABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone improve clinical pregnancy rates in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole? DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with letrozole paired with intrauterine insemination (IUI) or timed intercourse (TIC) from January 2018 to October 2021. The primary outcome of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was calculated for cycles with and without luteal phase progesterone support. Univariate logistic regressions were done to evaluate predictor variables for CPR. Clinically important covariates including age, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone concentration, diagnosis of ovulatory dysfunction and multifollicular development were included in a multivariate analysis evaluating the relationship between luteal progesterone use and odds of clinical pregnancy. Secondary outcomes including spontaneous abortion, biochemical pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were calculated. Live birth rates were calculated for cycles in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: A total of 492 letrozole ovarian stimulation cycles in 273 patients were included. Of these cycles, 387 (78.7%) used vaginal progesterone for luteal support and 105 (21.3%) did not. The unadjusted CPR per cycle was 11.6% (45/387) with progesterone and 13.3% (14/105) without progesterone (P = 0.645). After adjusting for significant covariates including age, BMI, diagnosis of ovulatory dysfunction and multifollicular development, the odds for clinical pregnancy were not significantly improved in cycles with exogenous progesterone (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-2.75, P = 0.762). A follow-up analysis demonstrated that live birth rate was 10.7% (41/384) with and 12.5% (13/104) without luteal progesterone, respectively (P = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS: Luteal support with vaginal progesterone does not significantly improve CPR in ovarian stimulation cycles using letrozole.