End-to-end test for lung SBRT: An Italian multicentric pilot experience.

PURPOSE: Set up a lung SBRT end-to-end (e2e) test and perform a multicentre validation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of medical physicists from four hospitals and the Italian Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology designed the present e2e test. One sub-group set up the test, while another tested its feasibility and ease of use. A satisfaction questionnaire was used to collect user feedback. Each participating centre (PC) received the ADAM breathing phantom, a microDiamond detector and radiochromic films. Following the e2e protocol, each PC performed its standard internal procedure for simulating, planning, and irradiating the phantom. Each PC uploaded its planning and treatment delivery data in a shared Google Drive. A single centre analyzed all the data. RESULTS: The e2e test was successfully performed by all PCs. Participants' comments indicated that ADAM was well suited to the purpose and the protocol well described. All PCs performed the test in static and dynamic modes. The ratio between measured and planned point dose obtained by PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4 was: 0.99, 0.96, 1.01 and 1.01 (static track) and 0.99, 1.02, 1.01 and 0.94 (dynamic track). The gamma passing rates (3 % global, 3 mm) between planned and measured dose maps were 98.5 %, 94.0 %, 99.1 % and 94.0 % (static track) and 99.5 %, 96.5 %, 86.0 % and 94.5 % (dynamic track) for PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An e2e test for lung SBRT has been proposed and tested in a multicentre framework. The results and user feedback prove the validity of the proposed e2e test.

Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purposes of this multicentric study are (a) the evaluation of four different commercially available treatment planning systems (TPSs) and (b) to verify whether the dosimetric results are comparable, also when considering the inter-observer variabilities and the different scanning protocols used. This work is to be considered a first step to test the value of multicentric studies based on dosimetric evaluation of the quality of the implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four different TPSs were used and the following tests were performed:Comparison of the parameters and mathematical algorithms used; comparison of the dose distributions generated by three different geometries of sources based on 32 dose-points on each source geometry. An octagonal geometric phantom was used to compare volume algorithms and dose-volume histogram (DVH) calculations (V150(Gy), V100(Gy), V50(Gy) and V25(Gy)). Comparison of the post-plan source distribution performed on a prostate-phantom implanted with (125)I seeds. A CT scan of the phantom was obtained at each participating center. Both the geometrical coordinates (with respect to the most caudal one), and the spread of the geometrical distribution, were calculated. The volumes included within different isodoses were also collected. Comparison of the post-plan source distribution performed on an actual patient. Post-plan V100% and D90(Gy) derived from seed distributions obtained by different operators were calculated, using the same target delineation. RESULTS: All the considered TPSs satisfied the AAPM dosimetric parameter recommendations. Point-dose examinations revealed differences smaller than 5%, except for one of the systems. Although the volume algorithm was not the same for all systems, no statistically significant difference was found in the volume measurements. The DVHs also presented differences smaller than 5%, except for one TPS. The distances between the seeds, based on the same CT images, showed a mean SD of 0.13 mm. The mean maximum difference of the position of each seed was 0.36 mm. The most significant errors were made in the cranio-caudal direction (mean maximal difference: 0.44 mm); here the size of the step between slices played an important role. The algorithm of source positioning of the different TPSs may also help explain this difference. The compiled DVHs showed differences smaller than 5%. Post-plans derived from different seed distributions showed a mild dependence upon operators. We obtained a mean value of 97.8 and 152.7 with a percentage of SD of 0.43 and 1.7, respectively, for V100% and D90(Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional (3D) geometric reconstructions of seed distributions are slightly dependent upon the operators and the scanning protocols have little effect on the dosimetric evaluation. Some relevant discrepancies were found between one of the TPSs and the other three if few sources were used; increasing the number of seeds those differences became less pronounced. Multicentric studies on the quality of prostate implants based on post-implant dosimetry are feasible, provided an accurate step-wise evaluation of the procedure be performed.

CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The objective of this study was to assess the utility of CT-MRI image fusion software and compare both prostate volume and localization with CT and MRI studies. We evaluated the differences in clinical volumes in patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. After several tests performed to ensure the quality of image fusion software, eight patients suffering from prostate adenocarcinoma were submitted to CT and MRI studies in the treatment position within an immobilization device before the start of radiotherapy. The clinical target volume (CTV) (prostate plus seminal vesicles) was delineated on CT and MRI studies and image fusion was obtained from the superimposition of anatomical fiducial markers. A comparison of dose-volume histograms relative to CTV, rectum, bladder and femoral heads was performed for both studies. Image fusion showed a mean overestimation of CTV of 34% with CT compared with MRI. Along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior direction, CTV was a mean 5 mm larger with CT study compared with MRI. The dose-volume histograms resulting from CT and MRI comparison showed that it is possible to spare a mean 10% of rectal volume and approximately 5% of bladder and femoral heads, respectively. This study confirmed an overestimation of CTV with CT images compared with MRI. Because this finding only allows a minimal sparing of organs at risk, considering the organ motion during each radiotherapy session and the excellent outcomes of prostate cancer treatment with CT based target identification, we are still reluctant to reduce the CTV to that identified by MRI.

[Characterization of a diode system for in vivo dosimetry with electron beams]. / Caratterizzazione di un sistema a diodi per la dosimetria in vivo con fasci di elettroni.

PURPOSE: Current quality assurance regulation stresses the basic role of in vivo dosimetry. Our study evaluates the usefulness and reliability of semiconductor diodes in determining the electron absorbed dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: P-type EDE semiconductor detectors were irradiated with electron beams of different energies produced by a CGR Saturn Therac 20. The diode and ionization chamber response were compared, and effect of energy value, collimator opening, source skin distance and gantry angle on diode response was studied. RESULTS: Measurements show a maximum increment of about 20% in diode response increasing the beam energy (6-20 MeV). The response also increases with: collimator opening, reaching 5% with field sizes larger than 10x10 cm2 (with the exception of 20 MeV energy); SSD increase (with a maximum of 8% for 20 MeV); transversal gantry incidence, compared with the diode longitudinal axis; it does not affect the response in the interval of +/- 45 degrees. Absorbed dose attenuation at dmax, due to the presence of diode on the axis of the beam as a function of electron energy was also determined : the maximum attenuation value is 15% in 6 MeV electron beams. A dose calculation algorithm, taking into account diode response dependence was outlined. In vivo dosimetry was performed in 92 fields for 80 patients, with an agreement of +/-4 % (1 SD) between prescribed and measured dose. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to use the EDE semiconductor detectors on a quality control program of dose delivery for electron beam therapy, but particular attention should be paid to the beam incidence angle and diode dose attenuation.

Performance assessment of coupled tests: the effects of statistical non-independence.

Limited to two-test associations (series and parallel schemes), the effects of statistical non-independence were studied through a mathematical approach and an experimentally-based evaluation. Both procedures were applied to results for total hormones and free fractions in euthyroid and dysthyroid subjects. Assuming independence, the sensitivity of combined tests was found to increase in parallel coupling, and to decrease, symmetrically, in series coupling, depending critically on the degree of between-test correlation and on the value of single test sensitivity (the opposite modifications obviously occur for specificity). A more complicated situation resulted for the predictive value of test associations, where a prediction based on a mathematical model was found not to be generally valid; in this case, calculations using the correct values of conditional probabilities of coupled tests seemingly remain the safest procedure.

DECIDE: a software for computer-assisted evaluation of diagnostic test performance.

The evaluation of the performance of clinical tests is a complex problem involving different steps and many statistical tools, not always structured in an organic and rational system. This paper presents a software which provides an organic system of statistical tools helping evaluation of clinical test performance. The program allows (a) the building and the organization of a working database, (b) the selection of the minimal set of tests with the maximum information content, (c) the search of the model best fitting the distribution of the test values, (d) the selection of optimal diagnostic cut-off value of the test for every positive/negative situation, (e) the evaluation of performance of the combinations of correlated and uncorrelated tests. The uncertainty associated with all the variables involved is evaluated. The program works in a MS-DOS environment with EGA or higher performing graphic card.

The imprecision profile in immunoassay. A study using a resampling technique.

A resampling ('bootstrap') technique was applied to assess the reliability of the calculated imprecision profile (IP), as obtained from the dose/response curve and the response/error relationship (RER) using the cumulative data relative to two assays, i.e. a T4 radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a TSH immunofluorometric assay (IFMA), both run in duplicate. Mean values and the related uncertainty of the estimated dose errors were compared for different RER fitting conditions and different sizes of the duplicate response sets. The following observations were made: (a) compared to the maximum-likelihood procedure, the least-square fit proved to be unsuitable for estimating the parameters in the general RER equation variance(R) = aRb (where R indicates the response), (b) the simplifying assumption of a within-method constancy of the exponent in the RER equation, while acceptable for the T4 RIA, did not hold in the case of the TSH IFMA implying a much wider response range, (c) for both assays, response sets of ca. 100 duplicates were apparently compatible with an acceptable definition of the IP (+/- 10 to +/- 20% uncertainty).