ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aging of the population has changed some of the approaches to the organ donation and transplant (ODT) process, such as considering elderly people as potential donors. We aimed to assess social and family discussions among the elderly about ODT and its effect on their attitude toward organ donation. METHODS: A study was carried out at 2 publicly-funded social centers for the elderly. Contact was made with individuals >65 years of age (n = 120) to seek their participation in the study. A questionnaire was distributed to them with questions about ODT. A descriptive assessment was performed with the Student t test and χ2 test used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The completion rate was 87% (n = 104). Of the respondents with a partner and children, 48% had discussed the topic of ODT. It was found that talking about the subject with one's partner, children, or friends had a favorable influence on attitude compared with when this was not done (93%, 86%, and 83% vs 19%, 30%, and 31%, respectively; P < .001). In addition, the opinion of one's partner and children toward ODT also had an influence; if favorable, the respondent's attitude was more favorable, compared with when they did not know their opinion (92% to 88% vs 58% to 37%, respectively; P < .001). Other ODT-related variables did not affect their attitude (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the elderly people had discussed ODT socially or with their family. This discourse has a favorable influence on their attitude toward organ donation and, therefore, it is important to encourage social and family dialog among this group.
Subject(s)
Aged/psychology , Family/psychology , Organ Transplantation/psychology , Tissue Donors/psychology , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Spain , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Fixed drug eruption (FDE) caused by oxicams is very rare. There are few reports of FDE induced by piroxicam, and this explains why cross-sensitivity among oxicams (piroxicam, tenoxicam, and droxicam) has been studied in only one patient. The patch test on residual lesions has lately been used by some authors in FDE diagnosis with variable results. We describe two cases of piroxicam-caused FDE and demonstrate cross-sensitivity among piroxicam, tenoxicam, and droxicam in both of them. One patient had residual lesions and the patch test was useful for diagnosis and cross-sensitization studies. The second patient had no residual lesions, and the patch test was negative on normal but previously affected skin; therefore, the study was performed by single-blind controlled oral challenge.
