Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Int Nurs Rev ; 66(2): 209-223, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30378685

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments measuring Nursing-sensitive Outcomes in acute care hospitals. INTRODUCTION: Nursing-sensitive outcomes have been shown to play an active role in the quality of care and cost-effectiveness of health systems. Tools for assessing nursing-sensitive outcomes are necessary to evaluate the nurses' contributions to the health of patients. METHODS: Psychometric systematic review. The SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychoINFO, EMBASE, Science Direct and Web of Science databases were used. Searches were performed between March and May 2018. A search with screened titles and abstracts, assessment of methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist and risk of bias assessment using QUADAS-2 were carried out. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies validated 26 different instruments. The methodological quality, measured with the COSMIN checklist, showed that the studies which assessed fewer psychometric properties had poorer quality. The majority of studies had high quality, and optimally assessed the risk of bias evaluated with QUADAS-2. DISCUSSION: Concerning the focus of the scales, some of them focused on the patients while others focused on the nursing staff. The scales found assessed aspects such as nursing-care quality, complexity and personalization. CONCLUSION: The majority of studies had a high methodological strength and a thorough validation process. The Nurse Caring Behaviours Scale, the MISSCARE Survey, the Patient Advocacy Engagement Scale and the INICIARE scale were the tools which best combined structure, methodological quality and risk of bias. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: The instruments with the best psychometric properties should be implemented in acute care settings to improve the quality of care, assess the effectiveness of nursing interventions, reduce health expenditure and reduce the occurrence of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Nursing Care/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Psychometrics
2.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 41(1): 27-34, ene.-abr. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-173367

ABSTRACT

Fundamento: El virus del papiloma humano (VPH) es una de las enfermedades de transmisión sexual más comunes, pero su tasa de vacunación es de las más bajas en Andalucía. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer las opiniones de los profesionales sanitarios de Atención Primaria sobre la prevención en adolescentes de la infección por el VPH y la administración de su vacuna. Método: Investigación cualitativa mediante seis grupos focales con profesionales de centros de Atención Primaria de Sevilla, Granada y Jaén. Participaron 45 profesionales sanitarios. Se realizó un análisis de contenido de tipo semántico con categorización de respuestas en unidades temáticas. Resultados: Los profesionales reconocen las dificultades de llegar a la población adolescente en temas de prevención de conductas sexuales de riesgo, por falta de tiempo y poca preocupación de los adolescentes por las medidas preventivas. Aunque reconocen la sintomatología de la infección por el VPH, no todos tienen claro si el varón padece la enfermedad así como la asociación de la infección con canceres distintos al de cérvix. Dudan a la hora de recomendar la vacuna, dejando en manos de los progenitores la decisión de la vacunación de sus hijas. Conclusiones: Sería recomendable establecer estrategias que mejoren la información que tienen los profesionales acerca del VPH, así como de los beneficios de la vacuna, para que los trasmitan claramente y con asertividad a los padres; esto evitaría incertidumbre en los progenitores, mejoraría las tasas de vacunación y disminuiría las complicaciones de la infección (cáncer)


Background: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease, but its vaccination coverage is among the lowest in Andalusia. The aim of this study is to determine what primary health care professionals think and find out about the prevention of HPV infection among adolescents and the administration of the vaccine. Method: Qualitative study using six focus groups with professionals from Primary Health Care in Seville, Granada and Jaen. Fourty-five professionals participated. An analysis of the semantic content was made, and answers were categorized in thematic units. Results: Professionals recognize the difficulties in reaching the adolescent population concerning prevention of sexual risk behaviors, due to lack of time and little concern amongst adolescents about the preventive measures. Although the professionals recognize the symptoms of HPV infection, some did not know about the disease in men as well as the association with other cancers other than cervical cancer. They hesitate over whether to recommend the vaccine or not, leaving the decision to vaccinate their daughters in the hands of the parents. Conclusion: It would be advisable to establish strategies that improve the information that the professionals have about HPV as well as the benefits of the vaccine, so that they can transmit the benefits clearly and assertively to the parents. This would avoid parental uncertainty, improve vaccination rates, and decrease complications of infection (cancer)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Expert Testimony , Primary Health Care , Infection Control Practitioners/organization & administration , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Health Personnel , Qualitative Research , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/immunology
3.
An Sist Sanit Navar ; 41(1): 27-34, 2018 Apr 30.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29358785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease, but its vaccination coverage is among the lowest in Andalusia. The aim of this study is to determine what primary health care professionals think and find out about the prevention of HPV infection among adolescents and the administration of the vaccine Method. Qualitative study using six focus groups with professionals from Primary Health Care in Seville, Granada and Jaen. Fourty-five professionals participated. An analysis of the semantic content was made, and answers were categorized in thematic units. RESULTS: Professionals recognize the difficulties in reaching the adolescent population concerning prevention of sexual risk behaviors, due to lack of time and little concern amongst adolescents about the preventive measures. Although the professionals recognize the symptoms of HPV infection, some did not know about the disease in men as well as the association with other cancers other than cervical cancer. They hesitate over whether to recommend the vaccine or not, leaving the decision to vaccinate their daughters in the hands of the parents. CONCLUSION: It would be advisable to establish strategies that improve the information that the professionals have about HPV as well as the benefits of the vaccine, so that they can transmit the benefits clearly and assertively to the parents. This would avoid parental uncertainty, improve vaccination rates, and decrease complications of infection (cancer).


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Adolescent , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care , Self Report , Spain
4.
An Sist Sanit Navar ; 40(2): 221-236, 2017 Aug 31.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28765653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate five scales, based on a theoretical framework for the adoption of behaviours, designed to assess the determinants in binge drinking in adolescents, namely: attitude, social influence (model, norm and pressure) and self-efficacy. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and multicentre study. Through convenience sampling, 397 adolescents between 15 to 18 years old enrolled in secondary schools in Seville and Huelva were included. After translation and review of the original instrument by a panel of experts, a questionnaire was obtained in Spanish that was administered to a pilot sample to assess comprehensibility and, subsequently, the participants completed the five scales to check the structural validity (factor analysis and reliability) and construct validity. RESULTS: On the five scales, the first factor explained at least 28% of the variance and the total variance explained was always greater than 60%. After rotation, all items had weights >0.40 for the factor to which they belonged. Cronbach´s alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.91. Spearman's coefficient was lower than 0.7 when correlating the sub-dimensions of the scales, except on the self-efficacy scale, assuming multidimensionality with certain limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Five scales are presented with indications of reliability and validity, their items reflect the theoretical frame of reference and can evaluate the determinants of binge drinking. In the future, validation could be continued to determine its reproducibility, its criterion validity with a "gold standard" or objective measure. Key words. Adolescents. Health behaviour. Binge drinking. RISK FACTORS: Validation studies.


Subject(s)
Binge Drinking/psychology , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male
5.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 40(2): 221-236, mayo-ago. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-165872

ABSTRACT

Fundamento: Validar cinco escalas, basadas en un marco teórico para la adopción de comportamientos, que fueron diseñadas para evaluar los factores implicados en el consumo episódico excesivo de alcohol (CEEA) en adolescentes, concretamente: actitud, influencia social (Modelo, Norma y Presión) y autoeficacia. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal y multicéntrico. Mediante muestreo por conveniencia se incluyeron 397 adolescentes de 15 a 18 años escolarizados en institutos de Educación Secundaria de Sevilla y Huelva. Tras la traducción y revisión del instrumento por un panel de expertos se obtuvo un cuestionario en español que fue administrado a una muestra piloto para valorar la comprensibilidad y, posteriormente, los participantes completaron las cinco escalas para comprobar la validez estructural (análisis factorial y fiabilidad) y la validez de constructo. Resultados: En las cinco escalas, el primer factor explicó al menos el 28% de la varianza y la varianza total explicada fue siempre mayor que 60%. Tras la rotación, las cargas factoriales de los ítems fueron mayores a 0,40 para su factor de pertenencia. El alfa de Cronbach osciló desde 0,62 hasta 0,91. El coeficiente de Spearman fue menor a 0,7 al correlacionar las subdimensiones de las escalas, salvo en la escala de Autoeficacia, asumiendo multidimensionalidad con ciertas limitaciones. Conclusiones: Se presentan cinco escalas con indicios de fiabilidad y validez, cuyos ítems reflejan el marco teórico de referencia y que pueden evaluar los determinantes del CEEA. En el futuro se debería continuar con la validación para determinar su reproducibilidad, su validez de criterio con un 'gold estándar' o medida objetiva (AU)


Background: The aim of this study was to validate five scales, based on a theoretical framework for the adoption of behaviours, designed to assess the determinants in binge drinking in adolescents, namely: attitude, social influence (model, norm and pressure) and self-efficacy. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional and multicentre study. Through convenience sampling, 397 adolescents between 15 to 18 years old enrolled in secondary schools in Seville and Huelva were included. After translation and review of the original instrument by a panel of experts, a questionnaire was obtained in Spanish that was administered to a pilot sample to assess comprehensibility and, subsequently, the participants completed the five scales to check the structural validity (factor analysis and reliability) and construct validity. Results: On the five scales, the first factor explained at least 28% of the variance and the total variance explained was always greater than 60%. After rotation, all items had weights >0.40 for the factor to which they belonged. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.62 to 0.91. Spearman's coefficient was lower than 0.7 when correlating the sub-dimensions of the scales, except on the self-efficacy scale, assuming multidimensionality with certain limitations. Conclusions: Five scales are presented with indications of reliability and validity, their items reflect the theoretical frame of reference and can evaluate the determinants of binge drinking. In the future, validation could be continued to determine its reproducibility, its criterion validity with a 'gold standard' or objective measure (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Behavior Rating Scale/standards , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Risk Factors , Self Efficacy , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Cross-Cultural Comparison
6.
Trastor. adict. (Ed. impr.) ; 8(4): 243-250, oct. 2006. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-050307

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Conocer el discurso de las mujeres consumidoras de psicofármacos y comprender las dinámicas de género que favorecen el consumo. Material y método. Metodología cualitativa mediante grupos de discusión realizados con mujeres consumidoras de psicofármacos en tres Comunidades Autónomas. Estrategia de análisis en dos procesos diferenciados: análisis de contenido con categorías consensuadas y análisis del discurso desde la perspectiva de género. Resultados. Existen tres discursos diferentes con respecto al consumo de psicofármacos y éstos se relacionan con la edad. En todos ellos la utilización de psicofármacos se realiza cuando perciben «malestar» asociado a falta de modelos, sobrecarga de trabajo y/o sobrecarga emocional, pero también aparece como consecuencia del estrés ocasionado por la toma de decisiones. El consumo se lleva a cabo mediante dos estrategias diferentes: la prescripción y el autoconsumo. Conclusiones. Los diversos elementos que forman la construcción de género influyen en la forma de inicio y de continuar el consumo de sustancias psicofármacos, y tiene relación con la permisividad social de la sustancia. El contexto social favorece diferencias de género en la forma de consumir y en las expectativas sociales que los consumidores generan


Objetive. To know the discourses of women's who consume psychotropic for the understanding of the gender constructions that facilitated the consumptions between Spanish women. Material y methods. This is a qualitative research based on discussion groups with women from three Spanish Regions. The analysis was made using contend analysis and consensus categories from a gender perspective. Results. There are three different discourses in relation to psychotropic use and they are in relation with the women ages. In all of them the utilisation of psychotropic are in relation with what the call «malestar» in relation with suffering with the lack of models when they are young, too much work and emotional pressure. At the same time they feel stress in relation with decisions. Conclusions. Gender as a social construction is in relation with the way of initiation and to continuing psychotropic drug use and is connected with the social approval in the ways of using these kinds of drugs. Social context is facilitating gender differences in the way of using and in the social expectations generated by users


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Sex Factors , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data
7.
Aten Primaria ; 35(8): 402-7, 2005 May 15.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15882496

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To find the views of those filling out prescriptions on the factors that affect differential prescription of psychiatric medication, and on reducing the prescription; and to analyse their discourse for possible implicit gender bias. DESIGN: Qualitative methodology. Semi-structured interviews conducted in 2002-2003. SETTING: Urban and rural health centres. PARTICIPANTS: Family and community medicine and psychiatry professionals working in the public health services of Andalusia, the Community of Madrid, and the Basque Country. Segmentation criteria: community of residence, age, sex, medical speciality, and location of centre. METHODS: Structural sample. Interviews conducted by the research team. Strategy of analysis in two distinct processes: contents analysis with agreed categories and gender analysis of the discourse. RESULTS. The prescribers found that taking psychiatric medication was associated with sex, age, social and economic category, and social expectations. In the discourses we found consumer profiles emerging that were not found in the epidemiological literature. Discourse analysis showed implicit gender bias in the beliefs of some prescribers. CONCLUSIONS. To minimise the growing offer and demand for psychiatric medication, prescribers thought training in diagnosis and psychotherapy should be improved, case-loads should be reduced, co-ordination between services improved and alternative treatments favoured. To minimise gender bias in the diagnosis and prescription of psychiatric medication, we think training is needed on the influence of cultural and gender factors on the process of construction of identities.


Subject(s)
Physicians/psychology , Sex Factors , Adult , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Qualitative Research , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 35(8): 402-407, mayo 2005. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-039451

ABSTRACT

Objetivos. Conocer la opinión de los prescriptores en relación con los factores que influyen en la prescripción diferencial y sus propuestas para disminuir la prescripción de psicofármacos, así como analizar los discursos con el objeto de mostrar los posibles sesgos de género implícitos. Diseño. Metodología cualitativa. Entrevistas semiestructuradas realizadas durante los años 2002 y 2003. Emplazamiento. Centros de salud urbanos y rurales. Participantes. Profesionales de medicina familiar y comunitaria y psiquiatría que trabajan en los servicios públicos de salud de Andalucía, Comunidad de Madrid y País Vasco. Criterios de segmentación: comunidad de residencia, edad, sexo, especialidad médica y ubicación del centro. Métodos. Muestra estructural. Entrevistas realizadas por el equipo investigador. Estrategia de análisis en dos procesos diferenciados: análisis de contenido con categorías consensuadas y análisis del discurso desde la perspectiva de género. Resultados. En los prescriptores se observa una asociación entre el consumo de psicofármacos y el sexo, la edad, el nivel socioeconómico y las expectativas sociales. En los discursos encontramos perfiles emergentes de consumidores que no aparecen en la bibliografía epidemiológica. El análisis del discurso pone de manifiesto sesgos de género implícitos en las creencias de algunos prescriptores. Conclusiones. Para minimizar la creciente oferta y demanda de psicofármacos, los prescriptores consideran necesario mejorar la formación en diagnosis y psicoterapia, rebajar la presión asistencial, mejorar la coordinación entre servicios y favorecer tratamientos alternativos. Para minimizar los sesgos de género en el diagnóstico y la prescripción de psicofármacos consideramos necesaria la formación en cuestiones relacionadas con la influencia de los factores culturales y generalizadas en el proceso de construcción de las identidades


Objectives. To find the views of those filling out prescriptions on the factors that affect differential prescription of psychiatric medication, and on reducing the prescription; and to analyse their discourse for possible implicit gender bias. Design. Qualitative methodology. Semi-structured interviews conducted in 2002-2003. Setting. Urban and rural health centres. Participants. Family and community medicine and psychiatry professionals working in the public health services of Andalusia, the Community of Madrid, and the Basque Country. Segmentation criteria: community of residence, age, sex, medical speciality, and location of centre. Methods. Structural sample. Interviews conducted by the research team. Strategy of analysis in two distinct processes: contents analysis with agreed categories and gender analysis of the discourse. Results. The prescribers found that taking psychiatric medication was associated with sex, age, social and economic category, and social expectations. In the discourses we found consumer profiles emerging that were not found in the epidemiological literature. Discourse analysis showed implicit gender bias in the beliefs of some prescribers. Conclusions. To minimise the growing offer and demand for psychiatric medication, prescribers thought training in diagnosis and psychotherapy should be improved, case-loads should be reduced, co-ordination between services improved and alternative treatments favoured. To minimise gender bias in the diagnosis and prescription of psychiatric medication, we think training is needed on the influence of cultural and gender factors on the process of construction of identities


Subject(s)
Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Humans , Physicians/psychology , Sex Factors , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , Research Support as Topic , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Index enferm ; 11(36/37): 24-28, abr. 2002.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-29286

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este artículo es presentar un proceso de análisis del texto apoyado en un programa informático. Se proponen dos tipos de análisis: Análisis de Contenido y Análisis de Discurso. El Análisis de Contenido se desarrolla en tres niveles: a) Sintáctico: búsqueda de palabras o caracteres, b) Semántico: busca el sentido de las palabras y el análisis de las categorías propuestas. c) Pragmático: trata de descubrir las circunstancias en las que la comunicación tiene lugar. El Análisis de Discurso busca captar el sistema de creencias que subyace al lenguaje verbal y describir sentidos, significados e interacciones entre los entrevistados. Existen programas informáticos que facilitan la tarea de organización y análisis de la información textual, cumpliendo tres funciones básicas: 1) codificación del texto y capacidad de relacionar categorías y sujetos de forma automática; 2) elaboración de tipologías o perfiles con base en las variables sociodemográficas y de opinión; y, 3) posibilidad de trabajar con grandes cantidades de información de forma simultánea, (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Software , Research/methods , Socioeconomic Factors , Semantics , Terminology
11.
Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor ; 8(2): 93-101, mar. 2001. graf, tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-11777

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia analgésica en el periodo postoperatorio de cirugía traumatológica-ortopédica de tres pautas analgésicas con sistemas de analgesia controlada por el paciente (PCA) por vía intravenosa. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, randomizado, en 29 pacientes intervenidos de cirugía traumatológica y/u ortopédica de miembros inferiores (MMII) en nuestro hospital en un periodo de cuatro meses, que se programaron para artroplastia total de rodilla, artroplastia total de cadera uosteosíntesis de tobillo, y se randomizaron en tres grupos: 10 pacientes, metamizol (grupo I); 10 pacientes, tramadolmetamizol (grupo II) y 9 pacientes, ketorolaco (grupo III) con un periodo de seguimiento de 48 horas. En la Unidad de Recuperación, con el paciente consciente, hemodinámicamente estable y aún sin dolor, se administró la dosis carga correspondiente : Grupo I: metamizol, 30 mg.kg- 1. Grupo II: tramadol-metamizol, 0,75 mg.kg- 1-15 mg.kg- 1, respectivamente . Grupo III: ketorolaco, 0,5 mg.kg- 1. iniciándose perfusión intravenosa (iv) mediante PCA con infusión continua a 1 ml.h- 1, bolos de 1 ml y tiempo de cierre de 30 minutos, con bomba Deltec-PCA de Pharmacia modelo 5800. Los cassettes se prepararon con metamizol, 320 mg.ml- 1; tramadol-metamizol, 8 mg.ml- 1-160 mg.ml- 1 respectivamente, y ketorolaco, 4,8 mg.ml- 1. Para la analgesia de rescate se utilizó meperidina 0,75 m g . k g- 1 subcutánea (sc), cuando el dolor en reposo mediante la escala analógica-visual (EAV) era mayor de 5. Se analizó la eficacia analgésica mediante EAVs a las 8,12, 24 y 48 horas del postoperatorio en reposo y movimiento de la extremidad intervenida, los bolos intentados/conseguidos totales, dosis requeridas de analgesia de rescate y dosis totales de analgésico. La tolerancia se valoró mediante la aparición o no de efectos secundarios y la opinión analgésica del paciente. Resultados: No existieron diferencias intergrupo respecto a variables demográficas como la edad, peso, sexo, talla, ni en la duración quirúrgica . El dolor fue disminuyendo progresivamente y era superior con los movimientos de la extremidad intervenida. No se encontraron diferencias en la eficacia analgésica intergrupo; pero sí respecto al tipo de cirugía, siendo más dolorosas la artroplastia de rodilla y la osteosíntesis de tobillo. Tampoco se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas intergrupo en los bolos conseguidos e intentados. Las dosis de rescate (3 en el grupo I, 2 en el grupo II y 3 en el grupo III) utilizadas por los pacientes no alcanzaron diferencias significativas intergrupo aunque sí para el tipo de cirugía, siendo mayores en la cirugía de rodilla y tobillo. Aparecieron efectos secundarios en 14 pacientes siendo los más frecuentes las náuseas y/o vómitos, aunque en su mayoría fueron autolimitados o cedieron con tratamiento convencional. Sólo en dos casos obligaron a la retirada del sistema: por hipotensión y emesis. La opinión del paciente en cuanto a la analgesia se valoró como excelente, buena, regular o mala, siendo valorada por la mayoría de los pacientes como excelente-buena (90 por ciento para metamizol, 80 por ciento para tramadol-metamizol y 56 por ciento para ketorolaco) y sin diferencias entre grupos. Conclusiones: La analgesia postoperatoria es adecuada, reflejada por las EAVs y la escasa necesidad de medicación de rescate , con las tres pautas analgésicas; pero, en conjunto, es el metamizol el que consigue escalas de dolor clínicamente más bajas con efectos secundarios leves y dosis totales intragrupo homogéneas. En nuestro estudio, el dolor depende más del tipo de intervención, del estatus reposo/movimiento y del momento del periodo postoperatorio, que del fármaco analgésico empleado . Los efectos secundarios son escasos, sin diferencias intergrupo y autolimitados o ceden con tratamiento convencional . La sencillez y buen funcionamiento de la técnica de PCA iv la califican como segura en una planta de hospitalización quirúrgica (AU)


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Dipyrone/pharmacology , Tramadol/pharmacology , Ketorolac/pharmacology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Dipyrone/adverse effects , Tramadol/adverse effects , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Injections, Intravenous , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Meperidine/pharmacology , Ketorolac/adverse effects
12.
Rev Enferm ; 23(3): 236-8, 2000 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10797784

ABSTRACT

In this short article, the author relates, by means of a case report, a type of conflict which occurs as a result of the paradoxes derived from the current managerial model practiced in the Andalucian public hospitals. The limitations and the incompetence of a bureaucracy, rigid in compliance with its functions, and which is incapable of attending to the demands that belong to the hard core of the organization, place the supposed most important and most immediate objectives of an efficient managerial system in "danger". The basic hypothesis lies in the need to bear in mind, at the time of designing a hospital's organizational system, the "structures of the invisible interests", with their corresponding paradoxes and perversions, of each of the distinct component parts of this system. And how these invisible bureaucratic interests can hinder and pervert managerial and organizational designs which appear to be ideal and optimal in their objectives and principles.


Subject(s)
Conflict, Psychological , Decision Making, Organizational , Hospital Administration , Hospital Restructuring/organization & administration , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Models, Organizational , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...