The influence of heatwave temperatures on fracture patient presentation to hospital.

INTRODUCTION: As global warming continues at its current rate, heatwaves are likely to become an increasing phenomenon. At present, knowledge of the influence of heatwave temperatures on fracture patient presentation to hospital remains limited. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive epidemiology study performed through hospital database review, linked to meteorological data. Emergency Department and Fracture Patient Presentation Data was obtained for the adult (16+) South Glasgow population (population count - 525,839) and the adult (16+) population covered by the West of Scotland Major Trauma Centre (population count - 2,218,326) from May 2021 to August 2021. This was combined with maximum temperature data, along with humidity and humidex data. Humidex is a measure which quantifies the temperature experienced by the patient, through a combined score incorporating both maximum temperature and humidity RESULTS: During the study period, there was one temperature heatwave (19th to 25th July), and four humidex heatwaves (27th June to 3rd July, 15th to 17th July, 19th to 27th July, 22nd to 26th August). During the temperature heatwave, there was a significantly higher incidence of orthopaedic polytrauma patient presentation (IRR 2.37: p < 0.027), as well as ED patient presentation (IRR 1.07: p < 0.036). The humidex heatwaves were associated with a significantly higher incidence of orthopaedic polytrauma patient presentation (IRR 2.31: p < 0.002) and overall fracture patient presentation (IRR 1.18: p < 0.002). Positive correlations were found between orthopaedic polytrauma patient presentation vs temperature (R=0.217: p < 0.016), ED patient presentation vs temperature (R=0.427: p < 0.001), fracture patient presentation vs temperature (R=0.394: p < 0.001), and distal radius fracture patient presentation vs temperature (R=0.246: p < 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study finds that heatwave temperatures result in a significantly increased number of orthopaedic polytrauma patients presenting to a Major Trauma Centre. Given the significant resources these patients require for care, Major Trauma Centres should be aware of such findings, and consider staff and resources profiles in response.

Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on orthopaedic trauma: a multicentre study across Scotland.

AIMS: The UK government declared a national lockdown on 23 March 2020 to reduce transmission of COVID-19. This study aims to identify the effect of lockdown on the rates, types, mechanisms, and mortality of musculoskeletal trauma across Scotland. METHODS: Data for all musculoskeletal trauma requiring operative treatment were collected prospectively from five key orthopaedic units across Scotland during lockdown (23 March 2020 to 28 May 2020). This was compared with data for the same timeframe in 2019 and 2018. Data collected included all cases requiring surgery, injury type, mechanism of injury, and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,315 patients received operative treatment from 23 March 2020 to 28 May 2020 compared with 1,791 in 2019 and 1,719 in 2018. The numbers of all injury types decreased, but the relative frequency of hip fractures increased (36.3% in 2020 vs 30.2% in 2019, p < 0.0001 and 30.7% in 2018, p < 0.0001). Significant increases were seen in the proportion of DIY-related injuries (3.1% in 2020 vs 1.7% in 2019, p = 0.012 and 1.6% in 2018, p < 0.005) and injuries caused by falls (65.6% in 2020 vs 62.6% in 2019, p = 0.082 and 61.9% in 2018, p = 0.047). Significant decreases were seen in the proportion of road traffic collisions (2.6% in 2020 vs 5.4% in 2019, p < 0.0001 and 4.2% in 2018, p = 0.016), occupational injuries (1.8% in 2020 vs 3.0% in 2019, p = 0.025 and 2.3% in 2018, p = 0.012) and infections (6.8% in 2020 vs 7.8% in 2019, p = 0.268 and 10.3% in 2018, p < 0.012). Cycling injuries increased (78 in 2020 vs 64 in 2019 vs 42 in 2018). A significant increase in the proportion of self-harm injuries was seen (1.7% in 2020 vs 1.1% in 2019, p = 0.185 and 0.5% in 2018, p < 0.0001). Mortality of trauma patients was significantly higher in 2020 (5.0%) than in 2019 (2.8%, p = 0.002) and 2018 (1.8%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The UK COVID-19 lockdown has resulted in a marked reduction in musculoskeletal trauma patients undergoing surgery in Scotland. There have been significant changes in types and mechanisms of injury and, concerningly, mortality of trauma patients has risen significantly.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:541-548.

The use and efficacy of intra-operative stress tests in supination-external rotation IV ankle fracture fixation.

This study examines stress radiograph use in SER IV ankle fracture fixation; the efficacy of external rotation (ERST) and lateral hook (LHST) stress tests with incidence of subsequent fixation failure secondary to syndesmotic diastasis. 154 skeletally mature patients were admitted to our unit with ankle fractures in 12 months. 42 non-SER fractures and 32 SER fractures treated without ORIF were excluded, as were 14 which featured a syndesmotic screw in the primary ORIF. The remaining 66 SER IV fixations were included in the final sample (17 men, 49 women; median age 49 years). No stress test was performed in 51.5% of cases without a single subsequent failure in these fixations. ERST was the more commonly performed test (incidence 30.3%); negative predictive value (NPV) 0.95. Incidence of LHST was 18.2%; NPV 0.83. Both tests were performed in 6.1% of cases; NPV 0.75. The incidence of failure secondary to syndesmotic diastasis was 6.1% (4/66). Notably, there were no failures in the cases where no stress test was performed. Use of either or both external rotation and lateral hook stress tests resulted in failures to detect syndesmotic diastasis with consequent failure of fixation. This study suggests that syndesmotic injuries are not missed due to an absence of a stress test but that stress tests are not sufficiently sensitive or correctly interpreted. Clinical judgement in cases where syndesmotic injury is not present appears accurate. If syndesmotic injury is clinically suspected, apply caution and insert a syndesmotic screw rather than relying on stress test results.