Zibotentan Can Be Co-administered with Contraceptives Containing Ethinyl Estradiol and Levonorgestrel: A Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, is being investigated for the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria. To allow women of childbearing potential access to this treatment, highly effective contraception is required and drug interactions compromising contraception reliability must be avoided. This study investigated the risk of pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between zibotentan and the contraceptives ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. A single-sequence, within-participant comparison study was conducted in 24 healthy women of non-childbearing potential, comparing the PK of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel alone and with zibotentan. Single oral doses of 0.06 mg ethinyl estradiol/0.3 mg levonorgestrel were administered on Days 1 and 15; zibotentan 10 mg was dosed orally, once-daily through Days 6-19. PK profiles were determined and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel PK was compared between Day 1 and 15 based on geometric least-squares mean ratios of PK parameters, including maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf). Co-administration with zibotentan did not affect ethinyl estradiol PK (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] Cmax 1.05 [0.99-1.11], AUCinf 1.00 [0.96-1.05]), while a weak interaction (increased exposure) was observed for levonorgestrel (Cmax 1.12 [1.02-1.23], AUCinf 1.30 [1.21-1.39]), which was regarded as without clinical relevance. Plasma exposure of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel was not reduced by multiple-dose zibotentan. In conclusion, contraception containing ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel is regarded possible under zibotentan-containing treatments. This expands choices for women of childbearing potential, supporting diversity in the ZENITH High Proteinuria trial.

Relative bioavailability of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate triple therapy delivered using next generation propellants with low global warming potential.

INTRODUCTION: The climate crisis poses an immediate threat to human health and well-being, demanding urgent adaptions across sectors, including healthcare. The development of pressurized metered dose inhalers (MDIs) with greater sensitivity to the climate emergency using novel propellants with lower global warming potentials (GWPs), but comparable pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters to currently marketed MDIs, is a vital step toward reducing the impact of healthcare for respiratory disorders on climate change. This study evaluated the relative bioavailabilities of the individual components of a fixed-dose combination of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) 160/9/4.8 µg per actuation between three different propellant formulations. METHODS: Healthy male participants (aged 18-60 years) were randomized into a single-blind, three-period, single-dose, single-center, crossover study (NCT04600505). The PK and safety and tolerability profiles of BGF MDI formulated with two novel propellants with low GWP (hydrofluoroolefin-1234ze [HFO]; hydrofluorocarbon-152a [HFC]) were compared with BGF MDI formulated with the propellant used in the currently marketed reference product (hydrofluoroalkane-134a [HFA]). The study included a screening period, three treatment periods (with 3- to 7-day washout periods between each dose), and a follow-up. The primary PK parameters assessed were maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), and AUC from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable analyte concentration (AUClast). The study was not powered to statistically demonstrate bioequivalence. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants completed the study, and 24 participants were evaluable for PK assessments. Systemic exposure, based on geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval), to each BGF component from the test propellants delivered in a standard MDI was comparable with the reference propellant for AUClast (HFO vs. HFA: budesonide, 107.30 [94.53, 121.90]; glycopyrrolate, 106.10 [86.18, 130.60]; formoterol, 98.13 [86.44, 111.40]; HFC vs. HFA: budesonide, 98.80 [84.59, 115.40]; glycopyrrolate, 99.71 [80.84, 123.00]; formoterol, 107.00 [88.82, 128.90]); AUCinf (where evaluable) and Cmax followed the same trend. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic BGF component exposure was similar for both test propellants (HFO and HFC) compared with the HFA reference propellant, with an acceptable safety profile in the studied population. Therefore, both novel low GWP propellants show strong potential as candidates for development of MDIs with greater sensitivity to the climate crisis, a vital step toward ameliorating the detrimental impact of healthcare on the environment. Further investigation in larger studies is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of verinurad with and without allopurinol in healthy Asian, Chinese, and non-Asian participants.

Verinurad is a selective inhibitor of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Here, we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of verinurad + allopurinol and verinurad monotherapy in healthy participants. Studies 1 (NCT03836599) and 2 (NCT02608710) were randomized Phase 1 studies. In Study 1, 12 healthy Asian participants received 24 mg verinurad + 300 mg allopurinol or placebo, and 9 healthy Chinese participants received 12 mg verinurad + 300 mg allopurinol. In Study 2, 24 healthy non-Asian male participants received 12 mg verinurad. Safety analyses included assessment of adverse events (AEs). Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 h (AUCτ ). Pharmacodynamic parameters included percentage change from baseline (day -1) in serum uric acid (sUA) and urinary uric acid (uUA). There were no serious AEs or deaths in either study. In Study 1, steady-state geometric mean (gCV%) Cmax and AUCτ values of verinurad after 7 days' dosing were 73.6 (29.0) ng/mL and 478 (18.4) ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy Asian participants, and 42.0 (40.1) ng/mL and 264 (36.1) ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy Chinese participants; in Study 2, gCV% values were 36.3 (36.5) ng/mL and 271 (31.0) ng·h/mL, respectively. sUA decreased and uUA excretion increased compared with baseline following verinurad + allopurinol (Study 1) or verinurad (Study 2). When accounting for dose, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of verinurad following multiple dosing were comparable between healthy Asian and Chinese participants and healthy non-Asian participants. Verinurad treatments were well tolerated, including at higher verinurad exposures than previously evaluated after repeated dosing.

An Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Aclidinium/Formoterol Fixed-Dose Combination Administered in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate in patients from China with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: In this open-label, repeat-dose, 5-day pharmacokinetic study (NCT03276078) of inhaled aclidinium bromide/formoterol fumarate 400/12 µg twice daily, plasma concentrations of aclidinium, formoterol, and two aclidinium metabolites (LAS34823, LAS34850) were assessed (days 1 and 5). Adverse event (AE) data were collected. RESULTS: Twenty patients (15 [75%] males) with a mean age of 59.2 years were included. Median (range) time to maximum concentration on days 1 and 5 was 0.08 (0.08-0.50) and 0.08 (0.08-0.50) h, respectively, for aclidinium; and 1.00 (0.08-3.00) and 0.08 (0.08-1.50) h, respectively, for formoterol. Mean elimination half-life and accumulation ratio for area under the concentration-time curve during a dosage interval (AUCτ) was 19.42 h and 2.0, respectively, for aclidinium; and 14.06 h and 1.4, respectively, for formoterol. Steady-state maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) and AUCτ on day 5 were 60.86 pg/mL and 168.80 h·pg/mL, respectively, for aclidinium; and 6.47 pg/mL and 31.98 h·pg/mL, respectively, for formoterol. Aclidinium produced high coefficients of variation (day 1: AUCτ 79.0%, Cmax 84.5%; day 5: AUCτ 82.2%, Cmax 150.0%). Few AEs were reported, typically one per patient. One patient discontinued due to a serious AE (considered possibly unrelated to treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 µg twice daily was well-tolerated in patients from China with moderate-to-severe COPD. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03276078.

Dose-Ranging and Cumulative Dose Studies of Albuterol Sulfate MDI in Co-Suspension Delivery™ Technology (AS MDI; PT007) in Patients with Asthma: the ASPEN and ANTORA Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Co-suspension Delivery™ Technology has been developed for the administration of albuterol sulfate pressurised inhalation suspension via metered-dose inhaler (AS MDI, PT007). We assessed the efficacy and safety of AS MDI versus Proventil® in order to determine the optimal dose of AS MDI to take to Phase III clinical trials. METHODS: ASPEN (NCT03371459) and ANTORA (NCT03364608) were Phase II, randomised, crossover, multicentre studies of AS MDI versus Proventil® in patients with persistent asthma. In ASPEN, 46 patients received cumulative-dose treatments (90 µg/inhalation using 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 inhalations at 30-minute intervals) in 1 of 2 possible sequences: AS MDI/Proventil or Proventil/AS MDI. In ANTORA, 86 patients were randomised to one of 10 treatment sequences of AS MDI (90 µg or 180 µg), placebo MDI, or Proventil (90 µg or 180 µg). The primary endpoints were baseline-adjusted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 30 minutes after each cumulative dose (ASPEN) and change from baseline in FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 6 h (ANTORA). Safety was assessed in both studies. RESULTS: In ASPEN, AS MDI was equivalent to Proventil (within pre-specified bounds of ± 200 mL) following cumulative doses of albuterol up to 1440 µg for the primary endpoint. In ANTORA, 90 µg and 180 µg doses of AS MDI and Proventil were significantly superior to placebo MDI (p < 0.0001), and AS MDI was non-inferior to Proventil at both doses, based on a margin of 100 mL. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: The effects of albuterol delivered via AS MDI and Proventil on bronchodilation were equivalent, supporting the selection of AS MDI 180 µg to be taken into Phase III clinical trials, either alone or in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ASPEN (NCT03371459); Date of registration: 29/12/2017. ANTORA (NCT03364608); Date of registration: 15/12/2017.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Glycopyrronium in Patients With Renal Impairment.

Glycopyrronium bromide, a synthetic anticholinergic agent used to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is eliminated from the body by renal excretion and therefore systemic exposure is expected to be increased in patients with decreasing renal function. Despite enrollment of patients with decreasing renal function to evaluate the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of glycopyrronium in clinical studies, no patients with severe renal impairment were included. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed in patients with COPD with normal renal function and used to predict systemic exposure of glycopyrronium in patients with severe renal impairment. The model accurately predicted plasma concentration-time profiles in patients with normal renal function, and mild and moderate renal impairment; the predicted and observed AUC and Cmax in these populations were similar. Compared to patients with normal renal function, a 1.20-, 1.45-, and 1.59-fold increase AUC was predicted in patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, suggesting dose adjustment is not necessary in patients with renal impairment. In conclusion, PBPK models, verified with clinical study data from patients with normal renal function, can potentially be used to predict the pharmacokinetics and recommended dose adjustment for patients with renal impairment.

Ethnic pharmacokinetic comparison of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI) between Asian and Western healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The Phase III KRONOS study (NCT02497001) found the fixed-dose combination triple therapy budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI) to be efficacious and well tolerated versus corresponding dual therapies in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD from North America, China and Japan. However, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of other drugs have shown that ethnic factors (e.g. genetic factors affecting drug metabolism) can affect the bioavailability of drugs which may impact upon efficacy and safety outcomes. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from four randomised, double-blind Phase I studies of BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg and 160/18/9.6 µg in Chinese (NCT03075267), Japanese (NCT02197975) and Western (NCT01980615, NCT02189304) healthy subjects. PK properties (area under the plasma concentration-time curve 0-12 h post-dose [AUC0-12] and maximum plasma concentration, [Cmax]) were recorded following single and repeated dosing of BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg or 160/18/9.6 µg. Potential ethnic differences in the PK properties of budesonide, glycopyrrolate and formoterol in Chinese, Japanese and Western healthy subjects were derived by non-compartmental analysis, and ethnic insensitivity factors evaluated based on criteria from the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Guideline E5 Ethnic Factors in the Acceptability of Foreign Clinical Data. RESULTS: The analyses included data from 64 Chinese, 31 Japanese and 169 Western subjects. Overall, PK properties following single or repeated dosing of BGF MDI were similar across Chinese, Japanese and Western subjects. After single dosing at either dose level, AUC0-12 and Cmax for budesonide, glycopyrrolate and formoterol appeared generally similar for Asian (Chinese and Japanese) versus Western subjects, with most geometric least squares mean ratios within the range of 0.92-1.22. The exception was that Cmax for glycopyrrolate was slightly lower in Asian versus Western subjects (0.6-0.7). Of the 10 ethnic insensitivity factors evaluated, six were met for budesonide, nine for glycopyrrolate and nine for formoterol, suggesting that BGF MDI can be classified as an ethnically insensitive drug. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these analyses suggest no appreciable ethnic differences in the PK of BGF MDI across Chinese, Japanese and Western healthy subjects.

Relative Bioavailability of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Administered With and Without a Spacer: Results of a Phase I, Randomized, Crossover Trial in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: The triple combination therapy budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate in a metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI), formulated by using innovative co-suspension delivery technology, is a new inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist fixed-dose combination for the maintenance treatment of COPD. For some patients, the use of an MDI may be optimized with a spacer. This Phase I study assessed the effect of a spacer on lung exposure, total systemic exposure, and safety of BGF MDI 320/36/9.6 µg in healthy subjects. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, crossover study assessed the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of BGF MDI in healthy adult subjects who received a single dose of BGF MDI 320/36/9.6 µg (administered as 2 inhalations with 160/18/4.8 µg per actuation) in 4 regimens: without spacer and no charcoal; with spacer and no charcoal; without spacer and with charcoal; and with spacer and with charcoal. Primary objectives were to assess total systemic exposure (without charcoal) and lung exposure (with charcoal) of budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol administered as BGF MDI with and without a spacer. Safety was also assessed. FINDINGS: In total, 56 subjects were randomized (mean age, 29.9 years; 60.7% male, 17.9% former smokers). For systemic exposure (without charcoal), the spacer/without spacer ratio, expressed as a percentage (intrasubject %CV) of Cmax and AUC0-tlast, respectively, was 152.0 (47.5) and 132.8 (43.6) for budesonide, 240.6 (80.2) and 154.7 (73.4) for glycopyrronium, and 165.6 (50.7) and 98.6 (53.8) for formoterol. For lung exposure (with charcoal), the spacer/without spacer ratio percentage (%CV) of Cmax and AUC0-tlast, respectively, was 183.6 (65.9) and 198.4 (71.5) for budesonide, 262.0 (91.8) and 373.9 (120.7) for glycopyrronium, and 222.9 (56.3) and 385.2 (147.0) for formoterol. Subjects who were judged to have suboptimal inhalation technique without a spacer (those in the lowest drug exposure quartile based on AUC0-tlast) had the greatest increase in both total systemic and lung exposure when a spacer was used versus no spacer. Subjects in the highest quartile had a minimal change in both total systemic and lung exposure when the spacer was used. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (all mild/moderate) reported by >1 subject per regimen were headache, cough, and dizziness. One subject withdrew because of TEAEs of headache and presyncope (neither considered treatment-related). IMPLICATIONS: Drug delivery can be improved for subjects with suboptimal MDI inhalation technique when using a spacer device with BGF MDI triple therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03311373.

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler formulated using co-suspension delivery technology after single and chronic dosing in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (BGF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is a triple fixed-dose combination in late-stage clinical development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We conducted two studies to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BGF MDI in patients with COPD: (i) a phase I, open-label, single and chronic (7-day) dosing study (NCT03250182) with one treatment arm (BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg); and (ii) a PK sub-study of KRONOS (NCT02497001), a phase III, randomized, double-blind study in which patients received 24 weeks' treatment with BGF MDI 320/18/9.6 µg, glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) MDI 18/9.6 µg, budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF) MDI 320/9.6 µg, or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler (BUD/FORM DPI) 320/9 µg. PK parameters in both studies included maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12h (AUC0-12). RESULTS: In the phase I PK study (30 patients), budesonide and glycopyrronium Cmax were comparable after single and chronic dosing of BGF MDI (accumulation ratio [RAC] 95% and 107%, respectively) whereas Cmax for formoterol was slightly higher after chronic dosing (RAC 116%). AUC0-12 for budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol were higher following chronic versus single dosing, with an RAC of 126%, 179%, and 143%, respectively. After 7 days' dosing, AUC0-12 and Cmax for all three components of BGF MDI were similar to those in the KRONOS PK sub-study (202 patients) at Week 24. In the latter sub-study, Cmax and AUC0-12 at Week 24 were generally comparable across treatments for budesonide (geometric mean ratios [GMR] of 96%-109% for BGF MDI vs BFF MDI or BUD/FORM DPI), glycopyrronium (GMR of 88%-100% for BGF MDI vs GFF MDI), and formoterol (GMR of 80%-113% for BGF MDI vs GFF MDI or BFF MDI). CONCLUSIONS: Steady-state PK parameters of budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol were similar after 7 days' dosing in the phase I PK study and after 24 weeks in the KRONOS PK sub-study. Systemic exposure to budesonide, glycopyrronium, and formoterol was generally comparable across treatments in the KRONOS PK sub-study, suggesting no meaningful drug-drug or within-formulation PK interactions.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate and Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate Metered Dose Inhalers in Healthy Chinese Adults: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fixed-dose combinations in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate metered-dose inhaler (BGF MDI; triple combination) and glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF MDI; dual combination). The PK and safety profiles of BGF MDI and GFF MDI were assessed for the first time in healthy Chinese adults after single and repeated (7-day) dosing. METHODS: This Phase I, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at a single site in Shanghai, China. Male or female Chinese subjects, 18-45 years of age and in good general health, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive BGF MDI 320/14.4/10 µg, BGF MDI 160/14.4/10 µg, or GFF MDI 14.4/10 µg. PK parameters were assessed after a single dose (day 1) and at steady state (day 8), and included AUC0-12, Cmax, and Tmax. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination findings, adverse events reporting, 12-lead ECG, vital signs, and clinical laboratory values. FINDINGS: Ninety-six subjects (mean age, 25.6 years; 83.3% male) were randomized and received treatment. All randomized subjects were included in the safety and PK populations. After single and repeated dosing, budesonide AUC0-12 and Cmax were increased dose proportionally from BGF MDI 160/14.4/10 µg to BGF MDI 320/14.4/10 µg, respectively (single dose: AUC0-12, 811.8 vs 1748 h · pg/mL; Cmax, 224.3 vs 459.3 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC0-12, 1250 vs 2510 h · pg/mL; Cmax, 315.4 vs 626.4 pg/mL). After single and repeated dosing, glycopyrronium AUC0-12 and Cmax were similar across all treatments (single dose: AUC0-12, 27.20-29.40 h · pg/mL; Cmax, 4.884-5.674 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC0-12, 69.49-77.08 h · pg/mL; Cmax, 11.30-13.12 pg/mL) and formoterol (single dose: AUC0-12, 46.49-53.58 h · pg/mL; Cmax 9.651-10.62 pg/mL; repeated dosing: AUC0-12, 81.94-85.32 h · pg/mL; Cmax, 16.13-17.71 pg/mL), suggesting that the addition of budesonide did not appreciably alter the PK properties of GFF MDI. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild in severity and rates were similar across groups (range, 50.0%-56.3%). There were no new or unexpected findings on tolerability. IMPLICATIONS: Overall, all treatments were well tolerated and PK parameters were generally comparable to those previously reported in Western and Japanese healthy subjects, suggesting that the doses of BGF MDI and GFF MDI in development globally for COPD are also appropriate for Chinese patients with COPD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03075267.

Effects of Food and Antacids on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lesinurad, a Selective Urate Reabsorption Inhibitor.

Two clinical studies were performed in healthy volunteers to investigate food and antacid effects on lesinurad, a novel selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved for treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Study 1 evaluated a high-fat, high-calorie meal or high doses of antacids (3000 mg calcium carbonate or 1600 mg magnesium hydroxide/1600 mg aluminum hydroxide) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of 400 mg oral lesinurad. Study 2 evaluated low doses of antacids (1250 mg calcium carbonate or 800 mg magnesium hydroxide/800 mg aluminum hydroxide) on the PK and PD of 400 mg lesinurad. Food did not alter the plasma AUC of lesinurad and only reduced its Cmax by 18%. In the fasted conditions, high-dose calcium carbonate reduced the Cmax and AUC of lesinurad by 54% and 38%, respectively, whereas high-dose magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide reduced Cmax and AUC by 36% and 31%, respectively. Food enhanced the maximum serum urate (sUA)-lowering effect of lesinurad by approximately 20% despite reducing the Cmax of lesinurad. High-dose calcium carbonate decreased the urate-lowering effect approximately 20% in the first 6 hours, whereas high-dose magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide reduced the effect by 26%. Low-dose calcium carbonate or magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide in the presence of food did not significantly affect plasma lesinurad Cmax and AUC or the sUA lowering and renal handling of uric acid. In summary, study results suggest food did not meaningfully alter lesinurad PK and PD. High doses of antacids reduced lesinurad AUC up to 40% and reduced the lesinurad uric acid-lowering effect.

Lesinurad: Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions With Warfarin in Healthy Volunteers.

Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved for use in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors for the treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout. In vitro, lesinurad was shown to be a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and a weak inducer of CYP3A4. Warfarin is a widely prescribed oral coumarin-based anticoagulant commonly prescribed in gout patients. In an open-label clinical study in healthy adult male subjects, the effects of multiple daily doses of 400 mg lesinurad on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of 25 mg warfarin (racemic mixture of R- and S- enantiomers) were evaluated. Lesinurad had no effect on the absorption or the exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] and peak concentration) of the more active S-warfarin enantiomer. A slight reduction (19%) in overall plasma exposure (AUC) was observed for the R-warfarin enantiomer. Lesinurad had no meaningful clinical impact on anticoagulation activity as measured by prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio of prothrombin time and Factor VII clotting activity. Overall, the administration of warfarin in the presence of multiple-dose lesinurad was devoid of clinically significant drug-drug interaction.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Concomitant Administration of Verinurad and Febuxostat in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in development for treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This phase 1, single-blind, multiple-dose, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and safety/tolerability of verinurad in combination with febuxostat in healthy male volunteers. Twenty-three subjects were randomized and received once-daily doses of verinurad (or placebo) or febuxostat alone (days 1-7 and days 15-21), or verinurad + febuxostat on days 8-14. For combinations, subjects received verinurad 10 mg + febuxostat 40 mg or verinurad 2.5 mg + febuxostat 80 mg. Plasma/serum and urine samples were analyzed for verinurad, febuxostat, and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory tests. Febuxostat 40 mg had no effect on plasma exposure of verinurad 10 mg, whereas febuxostat 80 mg increased the maximum observed plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of verinurad 2.5 mg by 25% and 33%, respectively. Verinurad had no effect on febuxostat PK. Maximal reduction in serum urate was 76% with verinurad 10 mg + febuxostat 40 mg versus verinurad 10 mg (56%) or febuxostat 40 mg (49%) alone and was 67% with verinurad 2.5 mg + febuxostat 80 mg versus verinurad 2.5 mg (38%) or febuxostat 80 mg (57%) alone. Verinurad increased, whereas febuxostat decreased, 24-hour fractional excretion and renal clearance of uric acid. There was no clinically significant drug-drug interaction between verinurad and febuxostat PK. The combination resulted in greater reductions of serum urate than either drug alone and was well tolerated at the studied doses.

Metabolism and disposition of lesinurad, a uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, in humans.

The objectives of this study were to determine the absolute bioavailability of lesinurad and to characterized its disposition in humans. The oral bioavailability assessment was performed using a clinical design of simultaneous dosing of a therapeutic oral dose of lesinurad with an intravenous infusion of [14C]lesinurad microdose. The bioavailability of lesinurad was determined to be 100%. The disposition of lesinurad in humans involves hepatic oxidation and renal elimination following administration of oral [14C]lesinurad dose. Metabolism of lesinurad occurred post-systemically with low circulating levels of metabolites <3% of total radioactivity as 74.2% of total radioactivity was attributed to lesinurad. In vitro metabolism studies identified CYP2C9 as the predominant isoform, and summation of metabolites indicated that it was responsible for ∼50% of metabolism.

Effect of a spacer on total systemic and lung bioavailability in healthy volunteers and in vitro performance of the Symbicort® (budesonide/formoterol) pressurized metered dose inhaler.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma experience difficulties in coordinating inhalation with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) actuation. The use of a spacer device can improve drug delivery in these patients. The aim of this study was to establish the relative bioavailability of single doses of Symbicort® (budesonide/formoterol) pMDI 160/4.5 µg/actuation (2 actuations) used with and without a spacer device. In addition, an in vitro study was conducted to characterize performance of the inhaler when used in conjunction with a spacer device. METHODS: A Phase I, randomized, open-label, single-dose, single-center, crossover study in 50 healthy volunteers (NCT02934607) assessed the relative bioavailability of single-dose Symbicort® pMDI 160/4.5 µg/actuation (2 actuations) with and without a spacer (AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu®). Inhaled doses were administered without or with activated charcoal (taken orally) to estimate total systemic exposure and exposure through the lung, respectively. The in vitro study characterized the effect of the spacer with respect to delivered dose, fine particle dose, and dose during simulated breathing of budesonide and formoterol. RESULTS: In terms of total systemic exposure, use of the spacer increased the relative bioavailability determined by AUC(0-last) and Cmax by 68% (spacer:no spacer treatment ratio, 167.9%; 90% CI, 144.1 to 195.6) and 99% (ratio, 198.7%; 90% CI, 164.4 to 240.2) for budesonide, and 77% (ratio, 176.6%; 90% CI, 145.1 to 215.0) and 124% (ratio, 223.6%; 90% CI, 189.9 to 263.3) for formoterol, respectively, compared with pMDI alone. Similarly, the lung exposure of budesonide and formoterol increased (AUC(0-last) and Cmax by 146% [ratio, 246.0%; 90% CI, 200.7 to 301.6] and 127% [ratio, 226.5%; 90% CI, 186.4 to 275.4] for budesonide, and 173% [ratio, 272.8%; 90% CI, 202.5 to 367.4] and 136% [ratio, 236.2%; 90% CI, 192.6 to 289.6] for formoterol, respectively) when the pMDI was administered through the spacer. When assessed by AUC(0-last) quartile without spacer, subjects in the lowest exposure quartile (indicating poor inhalation technique) with Symbicort® pMDI 160/4.5 µg/actuation (2 actuations) had markedly increased total systemic and lung exposure when the same dose was administered with the spacer. In contrast, for subjects in the highest exposure quartile with pMDI alone, total systemic and lung exposure of formoterol and budesonide was similar with and without the spacer. In the in vitro study, the fine particle dose (<5 µm) of both budesonide and formoterol from the spacer at delay time (i.e. pause period after actuation) = 0 s (instantaneous) after actuation was similar to the fine particle dose when not using the spacer. The delivered doses of budesonide and formoterol from the spacer were both lower compared with the doses administered without the spacer. There was also a decrease in delivered dose with increasing delay time. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical study demonstrated that in subjects with poor inhalation technique the use of the AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu® spacer increased the bioavailability of Symbicort® pMDI to a level observed in subjects with good inhalation technique without a spacer. The findings from the in vitro study support the fine particle dose characteristics of Symbicort® pMDI with the AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu® spacer.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of verinurad, a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, in healthy Japanese and non-Asian male subjects.

PURPOSE: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This study evaluated verinurad pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in healthy Japanese and non-Asian adult male subjects. METHODS: This was a Phase I, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Panels of 8 Japanese subjects were randomized to receive oral verinurad (2.5-15 mg) or placebo administered as a single dose in a fasted and fed state and as once-daily doses for 7 days in a fed state. Eight non-Asian subjects received verinurad 10 mg as a single dose (fasted and fed) and multiple doses in the fed state. Serial plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory data. RESULTS: Of 48 randomized subjects, 46 (Japanese, 39; non-Asian, 7) completed the study. Following single or multiple doses in Japanese subjects, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased in a near dose-proportional manner. Time to Cmax (Tmax) was ~1.25-2.0 hours with fasting. A moderate-fat meal delayed Tmax (range 3.0-5.0 hours) and had a variable effect on AUC (0%-97% increase) and Cmax (0%-26% increase) across the dose groups. Following multiple verinurad 10 mg doses, Cmax and AUC were 38% and 23% higher, respectively, in Japanese vs non-Asian subjects, largely due to body weight differences. Mean reduction of serum urate following multiple verinurad 10 mg doses was 46% and 44% after 24 hours in Japanese and non-Asian subjects, respectively. Verinurad was well tolerated at all doses. CONCLUSION: Verinurad monotherapy lowered serum urate and was well tolerated in both healthy Japanese and non-Asian males, while small differences in plasma pharmacokinetics were observed. These data support further evaluation of once-daily verinurad as a treatment for gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Verinurad, a Selective Uric Acid Reabsorption Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity, selective URAT1 transporter inhibitor in development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This Phase I, single-dose study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of verinurad in adults with renal impairment and controls with normal renal function. METHODS: Males aged 18-85 years were enrolled with serum urate (sUA) 4.5-10 mg/dl and creatinine clearance 60- < 90, 30- < 60, 15- < 30, or ≥ 90 ml/min (mild, moderate, severe renal impairment and controls, respectively; n = 7/8). Verinurad 15 mg was administered orally under fasted conditions. Serial plasma/serum and urine samplings were 30 min pre-dose to 72 h post-dose. RESULTS: Compared to controls, verinurad maximum observed plasma concentration increased by 53, 73, and 128% and area under the concentration-time curve increased by 24, 148, and 130%, in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively; renal clearance decreased by 5, 42, and 79%. Exposures of major verinurad metabolites also increased with increasing renal impairment. Verinurad decreased sUA in all groups, with greater maximal changes in control and mild renal impairment than moderate and severe impairment groups (- 38.3, - 36.9, - 20.5, - 12.6%, respectively). There were no adverse event-related withdrawals or clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values. CONCLUSION: Exposures of verinurad and metabolites increased with decreasing renal function. Consistent with the renal-dependent mechanism of action of verinurad, increasing severity of renal impairment was associated with decreased sUA lowering. Verinurad safety assessments were similar regardless of renal impairment. Continued investigation of verinurad is warranted in patients with gout and renal impairment. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02219516.

Verinurad combined with febuxostat in Japanese adults with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a phase 2a, open-label study.

Objectives: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity inhibitor of the URAT1 transporter in clinical development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. The aim of this Phase 2a, randomized, open-label study was to investigate the multiple-dose pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of oral verinurad combined with febuxostat vs febuxostat alone and verinurad alone. Methods: Japanese male subjects aged 21-65 years with gout (n = 37) or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia (n = 35) and serum urate (sUA) ⩾8 mg/dl were randomized to febuxostat (10, 20, 40 mg) in combination with verinurad (2.5-10 mg), verinurad alone (2.5-15 mg), febuxostat alone (10, 20, 40 mg) or benzbromarone alone (50 mg). There were four treatment periods per cohort and each treatment period was 7 days. Study drugs were administered once-daily after breakfast. Plasma, serum and urine samples were measured at pre-set intervals on days -1, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Results: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA in dose-dependent manner, providing greater sUA lowering than febuxostat alone at the same dose (P < 0.001). Urinary uric acid excretion rate was increased by verinurad, reduced by febuxostat and comparable to baseline for verinurad combined with febuxostat. Verinurad from 2.5 mg to 15 mg was well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to adverse events. Laboratory assessments showed no clinically meaningful changes during combination treatment. Conclusion: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA dose-dependently while maintaining uric acid excretion similar to baseline. All dose combinations of verinurad and febuxostat were generally well tolerated. These data support continued investigation of oral verinurad in patients with gout. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02317861.

Randomized study of the effects of Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® on the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate metered dose inhaler in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of GFF MDI (Bevespi Aerosphere®), a fixed-dose combination of glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate dihydrate (14.4/10 µg) delivered by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) formulated using innovative co-suspension delivery technology, in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without the Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® valved holding chamber (VHC). METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, crossover, Phase III study (NCT02454959), patients were randomized to receive GFF MDI 14.4/10 µg (equivalent to glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate 18/9.6 µg) twice daily for 7 days with and without the VHC. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1 s area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (FEV1 AUC0-12) on Day 8. Steady state PK parameters for glycopyrronium and formoterol (AUC0-12, peak concentration [Cmax] and time to peak concentration [tmax]) were estimated from 12-h plasma concentration time data on Day 8. Safety and tolerability were also assessed throughout. RESULTS: Eighty patients were randomized. On Day 8, the ratio (90% confidence interval [CI]) of least squares mean (LSM) FEV1 AUC0-12 for GFF MDI with VHC (LSM = 1538 mL; n = 67) versus without VHC (LSM = 1516 mL; n = 68) was 101.4% (100.1, 102.7). PK parameters were comparable overall with a slightly higher exposure to glycopyrronium with the VHC. The AUC0-12 geometric LSM ratio (90% CI) for GFF MDI with versus without VHC was 115.99% (99.74, 134.89) for glycopyrronium and 96.66% (86.69, 107.78) for formoterol. GFF MDI with and without VHC were well tolerated with a similar adverse event profile. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of bronchodilatory effect was similar with and without a VHC following GFF MDI treatment. This, together with the PK and safety profiles, supports the use of the VHC with GFF MDI for the maintenance treatment of COPD, which could be particularly useful for patients who have difficulty with the coordination of an MDI.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Concomitant Multiple Dose Administration of Verinurad (RDEA3170) and Allopurinol in Adult Male Subjects With Gout.

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. This phase 1b, multiple-dose, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of verinurad in combination with allopurinol. Adult males with gout were randomized to receive once-daily oral doses of allopurinol 300 mg or verinurad 10 mg alone for 7 days, allopurinol 300 mg + verinurad 10 mg on days 8 to 14, and the alternative single agent on days 15 to 21. Colchicine 0.6 mg was taken prophylactically for gout flares. Plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad, allopurinol, oxypurinol (allopurinol active metabolite), colchicine (plasma only), and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Verinurad plasma exposure was unaffected by allopurinol. Verinurad increased the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) for allopurinol by 33%; the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was unaffected. Oxypurinol Cmax and AUC were reduced 32% and 38%, respectively, by verinurad. Colchicine plasma exposure was unaltered by verinurad. The maximum decrease in serum urate was greater with verinurad + allopurinol (65%) than with verinurad (51%) or allopurinol (43%) alone. Compared with the baseline rate, the maximum rate of uric acid excreted in urine was +56% with verinurad, -46% with allopurinol, and unchanged with verinurad + allopurinol. No serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were noted. Despite decreased systemic exposure of allopurinol and oxypurinol in the presence of verinurad, the combination resulted in greater serum urate reduction compared with either drug alone and was well tolerated at the studied doses.