Iodine fortification is related to increased weight-for-age and birthweight in children in Asia.

Severe iodine deficiency causes stunting and mental retardation in utero, but the relation between mild deficiency and child growth is not well known. The use of iodated salt in relation to anthropometric data was examined from recent survey data. After potential confounding factors had been controlled for, significant associations were seen in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. The use of iodated salt was related to increased weight-for-age and mid-upper-arm circumference, most strongly in the second year of life, mainly affecting soft tissue (thinness). The relation with weight-for-age was greater among children of mothers with lower body mass index. The use of iodated salt was related to birthweight in Sri Lanka and in the Philippines, where iodized oil capsules given during pregnancy had a negative effect when used with high levels of iodine in salt. The associations generally were concentrated in large geographic areas, possibly because of interactions with other environmental factors (e.g., selenium and arsenic). The apparent growth response to iodine may reflect functional effects of mild deficiency, which is widespread, possibly including effects on brain development.

Cigarette smoking, N-acetyltransferase 2 genetic polymorphisms, and breast cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) polymorphisms result in decreased capacity to detoxify carcinogenic aromatic amines in cigarette smoke, thus making some women who smoke more susceptible to breast cancer. DESIGN: Case-control study with genetic analyses. DNA analyses were performed for 3 polymorphisms accounting for 90% to 95% of the slow acetylation phenotype among whites. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: White women with incident primary breast cancer (n=304) and community controls (n=327). RESULTS: Neither smoking nor NAT2 status was independently associated with breast cancer risk. There were no clear patterns of increased risk associated with smoking by NAT2 status among premenopausal women. In postmenopausal women, NAT2 strongly modified the association of smoking with risk. For slow acetylators, current smoking and smoking in the distant past increased breast cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals] for the highest quartile of cigarettes smoked 2 and 20 years previously, 4.4 [1.3-14.8] and 3.9 [1.4-10.8], respectively). Among rapid acetylators, smoking was not associated with increased breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that smoking may be an important risk factor for breast cancer among postmenopausal women who are slow acetylators, demonstrate heterogeneity in response to carcinogenic exposures, and may explain previous inconsistent findings for cigarette smoking as a breast cancer risk factor.

A cytochrome P4502E1 genetic polymorphism and tobacco smoking in breast cancer.

Known breast-cancer risk factors account for only part of the variability in breast-cancer incidence. Tobacco smoke is not commonly considered a breast carcinogen, but many of its constituents, such as N-nitrosamines, are carcinogenic in laboratory animal studies. Herein, we assessed a cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) genetic polymorphism (a Dral restriction enzyme site in intron 6) as a risk factor for breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Because N-nitrosamines are metabolically activated by CYP2E1, the risk among women smokers was investigated. Caucasian women were enrolled in a case-control study of breast cancer between 1986 and 1991. A subset of the women (219 premenopausal and 387 postmenopausal women) consented to phlebotomy. The allelic frequencies for the premenopausal women (D allele = 0.91 and C allele = 0.09) and postmenopausal women (D allele = 0.93 and C allele = 0.07) were similar to those previously reported. There was no statistically significant association between the CYP2E1 polymorphism and breast-cancer risk for premenopausal or postmenopausal women (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48, 2.24, and OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.55, 1.84, respectively). When the women were categorized as nonsmokers versus smokers (those who smoked more than one cigarette per week for more than 1 yr), premenopausal women with one or two C alleles who had a history of smoking were found to be at increased risk (unadjusted OR = 7.00, 95% CI = 0.75, 14.53, and adjusted OR = 11.09, 95% CI = 1.51, 81.41), although the number of study subjects with those genotypes was small. The small number of study subjects with a C allele precluded meaningful classification by level of smoking, but categorizing the smokers into two groups (above and below the median) also suggested an increased risk. Premenopausal women with the DD genotype and postmenopausal women with any genotype were not at increased risk. Breast-cancer risk was not related to the CYP2E1 genotype in either premenopausal nonsmokers or smokers (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.20, 2.17, and OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 0.60, 7.59, respectively) or postmenopausal nonsmokers or smokers (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.34, 2.35, and OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.46, 2.23, respectively), although the difference in the ORs for premenopausal nonsmokers and smokers suggests an increased risk for smokers. While there are limitations to this study, particularly related to the small number of subjects with the DC and CC genotypes, the study suggests that some women may be susceptible to tobacco smoke because of a CYP2E1 polymorphism. However, these results are preliminary and must be replicated.