Biomechanical comparison of metatarsal head designs in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Arthritis of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is characterized by loss of MTP joint range of motion (ROM) and pain. Joint arthroplasty is one treatment option, and while results can be satisfactory, there is still room for improvement. The aim was to use cadaveric model to compare the sagittal kinematics and articulating contact properties of 4 different first metatarsal head designs of an MTP joint implant. METHODS: Six cadaveric feet were each prepared with a single modular first MTP joint total arthroplasty. A standard cyclic load, which induced hallux dorsiflexion, was applied and motion measured from high resolution images. Contact behavior was collected simultaneously using a pressure transducer. Data collected compared the native joint with 4 different reconstructed cases. Each reconstructed joint used a different metatarsal-head-component while reusing the same phalangeal component to compare the 4 alternative metatarsal head designs. RESULTS: All reconstructed joints displayed greater ROM compared with the intact joint. Of the 4 metatarsal head components, the grooved, anatomical design demonstrated the greatest dorsiflexion when compared to the standard design, 31.6 degrees (SD ± 8.6 degrees), P < .05. All reconstructed joints displayed contact areas lower than the intact (~50%, P < .001). The grooved metatarsal-head-component experienced the least contact force (P < .015), and the eccentric component underwent the greatest contact pressure (P < .05) when compared to the intact case. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of a first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement design, ROM was shown to be better for the more anatomically designed metatarsal head, while contact properties did not vary across different designs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information may be useful in the development of new metatarsal components.

A comparison of the thermal properties of 2- and 3-fluted drills and the effects on bone cell viability and screw pull-out strength in an ovine model.

BACKGROUND: Drilling of bone is associated with an increase in temperature of the surrounding bone which may result in osteonecrosis. METHODS: In this study, cutting efficiency and thermal properties of one 2-fluted drill and two 3-fluted drills were determined in vitro using a porcine model. Drills were then used to create pilot holes in an in vivo ovine model to facilitate implantation of pedicle screws. The effect of the characteristic thermal profiles of each drill on cortical bone cell viability and screw pull-out strength was then assessed. FINDINGS: Cutting efficiencies of both 3-fluted designs were found to be greater than that of the 2-fluted drill, but this did not translate into a decrease in the maximum temperatures during drilling for both drills. Histologically, no empty osteocyte lacunae were seen at 2 or 4 weeks, suggesting that temperatures were not sufficiently high enough to induce thermonecrosis in the ovine tibia. No differences were found in the pull-out strength of the screws. INTERPRETATION: Both 2- and 3-fluted drills are currently in clinical use. Despite the theoretical advantage that 3-fluted drills possess over their 2-fluted counterparts, there is a lack of evidence in the literature in support of their use. In this study the observed increases in cutting efficiency of the 3-fluted drills tested did not translate into a reduction in heat generation or improvement in bone healing or screw fixation.

Suture strength and angle of load application in a suture anchor eyelet.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of suture material, anchor orientation, and anchor eyelet design on the static loading properties of suture anchors. TYPE OF STUDY: Biomechanical bench study. METHODS: Two metallic suture anchors, Mitek GII (Mitek, Westwood, MA) and Corkscrew (Arthrex, Naples, FL) and a bioabsorbable anchor (Biocorkscrew; Arthrex) were tested with single strand of No. 2 Ethibond (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) or No. 2 FiberWire (Arthrex) suture. Suture pull angle was varied through 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees with the anchor rotation angle in either a sagittal or coronal plane. Constructs were tested to failure using an MTS 858 Bionix testing machine (Material Testing Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). Peak loads, stiffness, energy to peak load, and failure modes were determined for all samples. RESULTS: FiberWire showed superior static mechanical properties when compared with single-strand Ethibond over all testing conditions (P < .05). Suture pull angle had a significant effect on load to failure with both metallic anchors but not on the bioabsorbable anchor (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Suture pull angle and anchor rotation angle play an important role in the failure load of suture when placed in an eyelet. The polyaxial nature of the Biocorkscrew eyelet allows for increased degrees of freedom but introduces failure of the suture eyelet as a new failure mode. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The loading direction and placement of the suture anchor plays a role in the performance of the suture anchor-suture complex.