Alternative incision sutureless aortic valve replacement: propensity matched comparison between partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have the potential to augment the adoption of alternative incision approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Still, we lack the evidence on which surgical approach is best associated with sutureless AVR. METHODS: Data on 483 patients undergoing sutureless small incision AVR between 2010-2014 in two European institutions (207 with ministernotomy [MS] and 276 via right anterior minithoracotomy [RAMT]) have been retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score matching, 160 pairs of patients have been selected. RESULTS: No significant difference for in-hospital mortality was observed between MS and RAMT (P=0.12). Both perfusion and aortic cross-clamping times were longer in RAMT group (P<0.0005). Lower incidence of third degree atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation (P=0.04), shorter ventilation times (P<0.0005) and less requirement for pleural drainage/thoracentesis (P=0.007) have been registered in the RAMT group. Follow-up was shorter for RAMT group (14.6 vs. 21.7 months, P<0.0005). Survival by Kaplan-Meier was comparable both for unmatched (P=0.79) and matched (P=0.90) cohorts. Cox regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference for mid-term survival between the two approaches (P=0.95 for intercohort comparison [MS vs. RAMT]). Mid-term survival by Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was associated with two independent predictors: preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.021) and prolonged (>24 h) assisted ventilation (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Small incision sutureless AVR through both partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy provides excellent clinical outcomes. Right anterior minithoracotomy, though associated with longer operative times compared to partial sternotomy, may result in less perioperative morbidity, with no difference in early and mid-term survival.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes and mid-term survival of high-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RT) with sutureless valves versus patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: From October 2008 to March 2013, 269 patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent either RT with perceval S sutureless valves (n = 178 patients, 66.2%) or TAVI (n = 91, 33.8%: 44 transapical and 47 trans-femoral). Of these, 37 patients undergoing RT with the perceval S valve were matched to a TAVI group by the propensity score. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups (mean age 79 ± 6 years) and the median logistic EuroSCORE was 14% (range 9-20%). In the matched group, the in-hospital mortality rate was 8.1% (n = 3) in the TAVI group and 0% in the RT group (P = 0.25). The incidence rate of stroke was 5.4% (n = 2) versus 0% in the TAVI and RT groups (P = 0.3). In the TAVI group, 37.8% (n = 14) had mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) and 27% (n = 10) had moderate PVL, whereas 2.7% (n = 1) had mild PVL in the RT group (P < 0.001). One- and 2-year survival rates were 91.6 vs 78.6% and 91.6 vs 66.2% in patients undergoing RT with the perceval S sutureless valve compared with those undergoing TAVI, respectively (P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with perceval S sutureless valves through an RT is associated with a trend of better early outcomes and mid-term survival compared with TAVI.

Early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right minithoracotomy: a 10-year experience in 1604 patients.

BACKGROUND: To report early and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) through right mini-thoracotomy (RT) over a 10-year period. METHODS: From September 2003 to December 2013, a total of 1604 consecutive patients underwent MIMVS through RT. RESULTS: The mean age was 63 ± 13 years, 770 (48 %) patients were female and 218 (13.6 %) had previous cardiac operations. The most predominant pathology was degenerative disease (70 %), followed by functional mitral valve regurgitation (12 %), rheumatic disease (9.4 %), endocarditis (5 %) and prosthetic dysfunction (3.2 %). Mitral valve repair was performed in 1137 (71 %) patients and 476 (29 %) had mitral valve replacement. Direct aortic cannulation was achieved in 1325 (83 %) patients. Among patients with degenerative disease candidate for repair (n = 958), rate of mitral valve repair was 95 %. Repair techniques included annuloplasty (95 %), leafleat resection (63 %), neochordae implantation (16 %) and sliding plasty (11 %). Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve repair (14.6 %), atrial fibrillation ablation (9.5 %) and atrial septal defect closure (3.2 %). Overall in-hospital mortality was 1.1 %. Thirty-four patients (2.1 %) had conversion to sternotomy. Incidence of stroke was 2 %. Overall survival at 10 years was 88 ± 2 %. Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 94 ± 2 % for repair and 80 ± 6 % for replacement. Freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation >3+ at 10 years was 90 ± 3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a safe and reproducible approach associated with low mortality and morbidity, high rate of mitral valve repair and excellent late results.

Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis Sizing: Estimation and Prediction Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The sutureless prostheses may facilitate minimally invasive aortic valve replacement because of easy and fast deployment. However, correct device sizing remains a crucial step of this procedure, which may be difficult and time consuming in minimal invasive approaches. We sought to analyze the accuracy of contrast-enhanced preoperative multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in predicting the size of the prosthesis to be implanted in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement through a right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT). METHODS: From January 2011 to September 2013, 235 patients underwent aortic valve surgery as sole procedure with implantation (Sorin Perceval S) in RAMT. Inclusion criterion for this study was presence of preoperative multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) with contrast enhancement and Doppler echocardiography. A preoperative MDCT was used to measure the aortic annulus as the diameter derived from either the area (aD) or the circumference (cD) of the virtual basal ring, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter derived either from the area (aLVOT) or the circumference (cLVOT). Multidetector-row CT was reviewed by a single operator who was blind to implanted valve size. The operator measured the aortic annulus and LVOT in multiplanar reconstruction modality. Aortic annular diameter and LVOT diameter were retrieved from echocardiographic records. Predictive models were built based on logistic regression; outcome variable was the sutureless valve size, and covariates (annular and LVOT measurements) were used as single and multivariate predictors. A classification tree was built and then pruned with limited nodes to be able to obtain better predictive performance. RESULTS: We identified 54 patients who had preoperative contrast-enhanced MDCT. Seven patients received a size S, 21 received a size M, and 26 received a size L prosthesis. The mean age of the patients at the time of intervention was 76.3 ± 6.8 years, and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 10.4% ± 8.7%. Echocardiographic measurements showed lower accuracy compared to MDCT measurements. Echocardiographic LVOT measurement was 61.11% to predict the valve size, whereas annulus measurement was 53.7%. The aLVOT from MDCT had an accuracy of approximately 62.96%, and cLVOT had 64.81% predictive accuracy. Aortic annulus perimeter cD had the highest accuracy to predict the valve size [62.96%, under the curve, 0.61] followed by aortic annular surface aD having an accuracy of approximately 70.37% (under the curve, 0.75). Classification tree models, after pruning with 4 nodes, increased their accuracy (83.33%), and it was easy to interpret and possibly to implement for clinical use. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector-row CT-derived estimates seem to have higher predictive value for valve size determination in patients undergoing RAMT with the Perceval S prosthesis, thus facilitating this delicate procedure and preventing the selection of wrong candidates. Possibly for precise aortic annulus measurement, contrast-enhanced MDCT is preferable.

Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been associated with several better outcomes over the standard full sternotomy approach. We revised our 10-year experience with right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) for AVR. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2014, a total of 593 patients (310 men; median age: 73.8 years) underwent AVR via RAMT. Preoperatively, a mixed valve lesion was diagnosed in 55 (9.3%) patients; and pure aortic regurgitation in 86 (14.5%). Mean logistic EuroSCORE I (European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation) was 7.4 (median: 5.76). RESULTS: In 302 (50.9%) patients, a sutureless or rapidly implantable biological prosthesis was used; in 23 (3.9%), a mechanical prosthesis; and in the remainder, a conventional biological prosthesis. A total of 113 (19.1%) patients had a small aortic annulus (≤21 mm). Operative times averaged 80 (median: 74) minutes of crossclamping time, and 117 (107) minutes of perfusion time; these were significantly shorter with a sutureless prostheses, compared with a sutured prostheses: perfusion 99 versus 134 minutes, P < .0005; aortic crossclamping time: 64 versus 97 minutes, P < .0005. The mean (median) assisted ventilation time was 9.8 (6) hours; intensive care unit stay was 1.5 (1) days; hospital length of stay was 6.6 (6) days. Overall in-hospital mortality was 9 deaths (1.5%). At 31.5 months mean follow-up time (1531 cumulative patient-years), 94.8% survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive AVR is a safe procedure, with low perioperative morbidity, and low rates of reoperation and death at late follow-up. Excellent outcomes can be achieved with minimally invasive AVR via right anterior minithoracotomy. Sutureless prostheses facilitate minimally invasive AVR and are associated with reduced operative times.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the single center experience on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), performed through a right anterior minithoracotomy or ministernotomy (MS). METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-three patients, who underwent MIAVR from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was developed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality. RESULTS: Median age was 73.8, and 405 (47.5%) of patients were female. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Four hundred and forty-three (51.9%) and 368 (43.1%) patients received biological and sutureless prostheses, respectively. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 108 and 75 minutes, respectively. Nineteen (2.2%) cases required conversion to full median sternotomy. Thirty-seven (4.3%) patients required re-exploration for bleeding. Perioperative stroke occurred in 15 (1.8%) patients, while transient ischemic attack occurred postoperative in 11 (1.3%). New onset atrial fibrillation was reported for 243 (28.5%) patients. After a median follow-up of 29.1 months (2,676.0 patient-years), survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 96%±1% and 80%±3%, respectively. Cox multivariable analysis showed that advanced age, history of cardiac arrhythmia, preoperative chronic renal failure, MS approach, prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as wound revision were associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: MIAVR via both approaches is safe and feasible with excellent outcomes, and is associated with low conversion rate and low perioperative morbidity. Long term survival is at least comparable to that reported for conventional sternotomy AVR.

Minimally invasive septal myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and intrinsic mitral valve disease.

OBJECTIVE: Transaortic left ventricular septal myectomy described by Morrow is a classical procedure for the treatment of systolic anterior motion of the mitral apparatus associated with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We aimed to review our results of transmitral septal myectomy and mitral valve repair/replacement in patients with intrinsic mitral valve disease associated with HOCM, operated on through a minimally invasive approach. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2014, 19 patients [7 men (37%); mean (SD) age, 69.4 (14.5) years] were treated with minimally invasive approach for degenerative mitral regurgitation and HOCM. Preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient was 66 (24) mm Hg. Severe mitral regurgitation was diagnosed in 16 cases (84%). New York Heart Association functional class III to IV heart failure was present in 13 patients (68%). RESULTS: Fifteen patients (79%) underwent mitral valve replacement, and four patients (21%) underwent mitral valve repair. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was corrected directly in all patients via the mitral valve with septal myectomy/myotomy, avoiding aortotomy in majority of the patients. No significant prolongation of extracorporeal circulation/aortic cross-clamping times was observed (P = 0.41 and P = 0.67, respectively) when compared with a similar population without HOCM. No iatrogenic ventricular septal defect developed in treated patients. No hospital mortality occurred. Resting LVOT gradient reduced at discharge to 13 (22) mm Hg (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Transmitral left ventricular septal myectomy in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease is quite a simple, feasible, and effective technique and does not require aortotomy in most cases. It can be performed with low early mortality and satisfactory resolution of LVOT obstruction in a minimally invasive setting.

Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is increasingly performed in elderly patients with good perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, resulting in significant health-related quality-of-life benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients aged ≥ 80 years undergoing isolated AVR through a right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) and compare it with a full sternotomy (FS). METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-three elderly patients aged 80 years or more underwent isolated AVR between February 2001 and September 2013. With propensity score matching (1 : 1), the outcomes of patients having minimally invasive surgery (RAMT) were compared with those in whom the FS approach had been employed (100 vs 100 patients). TAVRs and partial sternotomy cases were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: There were two conversions in the RAMT group. Operative times did not significantly differ in the two groups. Patients in the RAMT group received a larger-sized prosthesis (P < 0.001) and were more likely to receive sutureless valves (P < 0.001). Shorter time for extubation (P < 0.001) and shorter hospital length of stay (P = 0.005) were observed in the RAMT group. Zero vs 4 (4.0%) (P = 0.043) patients had postoperative stroke and 2 (2.0%) vs zero (P = 0.16) had a transient ischaemic attack in the RAMT versus FS group, respectively. We registered the same rate of permanent pacemaker implant (P = 0.47) and that of new-onset atrial fibrillation (P = 0.28) for both groups. Six patients died, with no significant difference for in-hospital mortality (P = 0.68). No variable had a statistically significant predictive value for in-hospital mortality. RAMT patients were more likely to be discharged home directly or via rehabilitation (P = 0.031). FS, along with four other factors, independently predicted longer hospital stay. Though the median follow-up duration was longer in the FS group (59 vs 24 months, P < 0.001), the two groups had similar survival rates at 5 years (80 vs 81%, P = 0.37). Ten factors were associated with long-term survival by Cox regression analysis, and RAMT had no statistical impact (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive AVR through right anterior minithoracotomy can be safely performed in patients aged ≥80 years with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. It is an expeditious and effective alternative to full sternotomy AVR and might be associated with lower postoperative stroke incidence, earlier extubation and shorter hospital stay.

Sutureless aortic valve replacement for aortic incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: Sutureless prostheses for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are usually used in degenerative calcified aortic stenosis. Less is known on the application of sutureless prostheses for pure aortic incompetence. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2014, 442 patients were operated on with the Perceval aortic sutureless valve implant. We identified 11 patients (10 female, mean age 70.5) who underwent sutureless AVR for pure aortic incompetence (off-label use). Three patients had a left ventricle ejection fraction of 30% or less. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 15.2 (range 2.2-45.2). In five patients associated mitral procedures (three [60%] repair and two [40%] replacement) were performed. Four procedures were performed through a minimally invasive approach (three right minithoracotomies and one partial sternotomy). RESULTS: Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 130.2 min and aortic cross clamp time was 82.2 min. Mean implanted prosthesis size was 24.5 ± 1.3 (median 25) mm (insignificant correlation with preoperative aortic valve annulus measurement by transthoracic echocardiography: 21.6 ± 1.5 [median 21] mm, Pearson's r = 0.373, p = 0.259). One patient died on 24th day after AVR associated with aortic arch replacement and hypothermic circulatory arrest (10 years after correction for type A aortic dissection). No residual para- or intravalvular leakage was present on discharge and 12-month follow-up. No migration of the prosthesis occurred. CONCLUSION: Sutureless AVR is an option in selected patients with aortic incompetence. Preoperative aortic annulus measurement by echocardiography has poor predictive value for estimation of prosthetic valve size.

Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The impact of sutureless prosthesis on the clinical outcome in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is still unclear. We assessed mid-term outcomes of the sutureless and conventional valves implanted through right anterior minithoracotomy. METHODS: Five hundred fifteen patients undergoing primary aortic valve replacement through a right anterior minithoracotomy (269 conventional versus 246 sutureless prostheses) between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. The most common sutured prostheses were Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and Medtronic Mosaic, and the Sorin Perceval S mainly composed the sutureless prosthesis group. One hundred thirty-three pairs of patients were propensity matched and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass (p<0.0001) and cross-clamping (p<0.0001) times were shorter in the sutureless group (S group). We observed the same in-hospital mortality (1 versus 2; p=0.62) and incidence of postoperative stroke and pacemaker implant between the groups, but shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (6 versus 7 hours; p=0.001) in the S group. Generally, larger prostheses were implanted in the S group (p<0.0001). Follow-up was longer (p<0.0001) for sutured valves: 52 versus 15 months (overall median, 21 months). Overall Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 87.2% versus 97.0% (p=0.33) and 50% versus 100% (p=0.02) in elderly patients for sutured versus sutureless prostheses, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at follow-up (p=0.64) and transaortic gradients (12 versus 11 mm Hg; p=0.78) did not differ in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the present limited cohort of patients, sutureless prostheses reduced operative times for aortic valve replacement and the duration of mechanically assisted ventilation and might have influenced early and mid-term survival. Larger studies are needed to confirm our data and compare long-term outcomes.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the early outcomes and 1-year survival of patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S sutureless valve for severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: From March 2010 to March 2013, 281 high-risk patients underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S sutureless valve through either right anterior minithoracotomy (n = 164) or upper ministernotomy (n = 117) at 2 cardiac centers. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.7% (2 patients). The overall median cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp time was 81 minutes (interquartile range, 68-98) and 48 minutes (interquartile range, 37-60), respectively. Postoperative stroke occurred in 5 patients (1.8%). The incidence of paravalvular leak greater than 1 of 4 and atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation was 1.8% (5 patients) and 4.2% (12 patients), respectively. No migration occurred, and the mean postoperative gradient was 13 ± 4 mm Hg. At a median follow-up of 8 months (interquartile range, 4-14), the overall survival was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S sutureless valve in high-risk patients is a safe and reproducible procedure associated with excellent hemodynamic results, postoperative outcomes, and 1-year survival.

Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with ischaemic mitral regurgitation and depressed ejection fraction: risk factors for early and mid-term mortality†.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve (MV) surgery for ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with poor outcomes. The optimal surgical strategy for IMR in these patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the early mortality and mid-term survival of MV repair versus MV replacement in patients with IMR and depressed LVEF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A retrospective, observational, cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected data on 126 consecutive CABG patients with IMR and LVEF <40% undergoing either MV repair (n = 98, 78%) or MV replacement (n = 28, 22%) between July 2002 and February 2011. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 7.9% (n = 10). MV replacement was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of death compared with MV repair [17.9%, n = 5 vs 5.1%, n = 5; odds ratio (OR) 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-15.1, P = 0.04]. However, after adjusting for preoperative risk factors, the type of surgical procedure was not an independent risk factor for early mortality (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-31, P = 0.7). Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative LVEF (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9, P = 0.018), preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1-1.02, P = 0.025), preoperative left ventricle end-systolic diameter (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, P = 0.05) and preoperative left atrial diameter (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors of early mortality. At the median follow-up of 45 months (interquartile range 20-68 months), the mid-term survival rate was 74% in the MV repair group and 70% in the MV replacement group (P = 0.08). At follow-up, predictors of worse survival were BNP levels [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.01, P = 0.047], preoperative renal failure (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-20.3, P = 0.039) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-10, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: MV repair in CABG patients with IMR and depressed LVEF is not superior to MV replacement with regard to operative early mortality and mid-term survival.

Sutureless implantation of the perceval s aortic valve prosthesis through right anterior minithoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Many new, less invasive strategies are proposed for aortic valve operation in elderly patients. Rapid deployment sutureless aortic valve prosthesis has been recently introduced. We analyzed our experience with a sutureless valve implanted through a minimally invasive approach. METHODS: A retrospective observational study with prospectively registered data was conducted on 137 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement through a right anterior minithoracotomy. Between April 2011 and January 2013, 137 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a recently introduced, rapid deployment, sutureless pericardial valve in minithoracotomy access (47 men; mean age, 76.6 ± 7.1 years). There were 35 obese patients with a body mass index of more than 30 kg/m(2). Mean logistic EuroSCORE I was 10.0; 74 (54%) patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and IV. In all, 19 (13.9%), 45 (32.8%), and 73 (53.3%) patients received 21-, 23-, and 25-mm valve prostheses, respectively. RESULTS: The mean aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 59.3 ± 19 min and 92.3 ± 27 min, respectively. No operative mortality occurred. Median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day, with assisted ventilation necessary for a median of 6 hours. Three cases of postoperative ischemic stroke were observed (1 patient with a previous history of an ischemic cerebral event). Median hospital length of stay was 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: A sutureless valve for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is a feasible, effective, and safe tool. Ultimately amplifying indications for less invasive aortic valve replacement in a high surgical risk subset of patients, it can become a valid alternative for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the short-term results of aortic valve replacement through minimally invasive and sternotomy approaches. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, cohort study of prospectively collected data on 709 patients undergoing isolated primary aortic valve replacement between 2004 and 2011. Of these, 338 were performed through either right anterior minithoracotomy or upper ministernotomy. With propensity score matching, 182 patients (minimally invasive group) were compared with 182 patients in conventional sternotomy (control group). RESULTS: After propensity matching, the 2 groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (117.5 vs 104.1 min, p<0.0001) and aortic cross-clamping time (83.8 vs 71.3 min, p<0.0001) were longer in the minimally invasive group, with no difference in length of stay (median 6 vs 5 days, p=0.43), but shorter assisted ventilation time (median 8 vs 7 hours, p=0.022). Overall in-hospital mortality was identical between the groups (1.64 vs 1.64%, p=1.0). No difference in the incidence of major and minor postoperative complications and related morbidity was observed. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower incidence of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (21% vs 31%, p=0.04). Reduction of the complication rate was observed. Median transfusion pack per patient was higher in the control group (2 vs 1 units, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that mini-access isolated aortic valve surgery is a reproducible, safe, and effective procedure and reduces assisted ventilation duration, the need for blood product transfusion, and incidence of post-surgery atrial fibrillation.

Early bioprosthetic mitral valve degeneration due to subchordal apparatus impingement.

We present a case of early degeneration of a bioprosthesis in the mitral position three years after implantation. Valve explantation revealed complete neo-intima formation and complete fusion of one commissure due to papillary muscle and chordae tendineae embedding in the bioprosthetic leaflets.

Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery by way of a right anterior minithoracotomy has shown excellent results in terms of mortality, morbidities, and patient satisfaction. The aim of the present study was to compare minimally invasive aortic valve surgery by way of a right anterior minithoracotomy with conventional full sternotomy on early outcomes and midterm survival. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected data from 637 consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery from January 2005 to July 2010. Of the 637 patients, 192 (30%) underwent minimally invasive aortic valve surgery by way of a right anterior minithoracotomy. Of these, 138 patients (right anterior minithoracotomy group) were matched to a control group (full sternotomy group) using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.7% (2/276), with no difference between the 2 groups. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery by way of a right anterior minithoracotomy was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (25 [18.1%] vs 41 [29.7%]; P = .003) and blood transfusions (26 [18.8%] vs 47 [34.1%]; P = .0006). In addition, patients in the right anterior minithoracotomy group had a shorter mechanical ventilation time (median, 6 vs 8 hours; P = .004) and postoperative length of stay (median, 5 vs 6 days; P = .02). The occurrence of stroke, renal failure, reexploration for bleeding, and wound infection was similar in both groups. At a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 17-54 months), survival was 96% ± 2% vs 88% ± 4% (P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: Right anterior minithoracotomy in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and blood transfusion and shorter ventilation time and hospital length of stay. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm our data.

Severe mitral regurgitation in patients with postinfarction interventricular septal defect: a simple way of simultaneous valve repair.

Ventricular septal defect, a potentially deadly complication of transmural myocardial infarction, is often accompanied by ischaemic mitral regurgitation. It has been recognized that the presence and persistence of the latter negatively affect survival rates in patients after myocardial infarction. We present a simple endoventricular edge-to-edge technique of mitral repair using a single U-shaped stitch of polytetrafluoroethylene and a refined double-patch 'exclusion' technique of postinfarction interventricular septal defect (PVSD) closure in the treatment of two consecutive cases of PVSD and concomitant ischaemic mitral regurgitation. This technique is effective and reproducible to address mitral incompetence in patients undergoing surgical correction of PVSD.