Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Tob Control ; 25(1): 21-6, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25037155

ABSTRACT

AIM: To examine the effects of tobacco control television advertisements with positive and negative emotional content on adult smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption. DESIGN: Analysis of monthly cross-sectional surveys using generalised additive models. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: 60 000 adults aged 18 years or over living in England and interviewed in the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey from 2004 to 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Current smoking status, daily cigarette consumption, tobacco control gross rating points (GRPs-a measure of per capita advertising exposure), cigarette costliness, concurrent tobacco control policies, sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: After adjusting for cigarette costliness, other tobacco control policies and individual characteristics, we found that a 400-point increase in positive emotive GRPs was associated with 7% lower odds of smoking (odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.98) 1 month later and a similar increase in negative emotive GRPs was significantly associated with 4% lower odds of smoking (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.999) 2 months later. An increase in negative emotive GRPs from 0 to 400 was also associated with a significant 3.3% (95% CI 1.1 to 5.6) decrease in average cigarette consumption. There was no evidence that the association between positive emotive GRPs and the outcomes differed depending on the intensity of negative emotive GRPs (and vice versa). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to explore the effects of campaigns with different types of emotive content on adult smoking prevalence and consumption. It suggests that both types of campaign (positive and negative) are effective in reducing smoking prevalence, whereas consumption among smokers was only affected by campaigns evoking negative emotions.


Subject(s)
Advertising , Emotions , Smoking Prevention , Television , Cross-Sectional Studies , England , Humans , Smoking/epidemiology , Time Factors
2.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 869, 2015 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that tobacco control mass media campaigns can change smoking behaviour. In the UK, campaigns over the last decade have contributed to declines in smoking prevalence and been associated with falls in cigarette consumption among continuing smokers. However, it is less evident whether such campaigns can also play a role in changing smokers' behaviour in relation to protecting others from the harmful effects of their smoking in the home. We investigated whether exposure to English televised tobacco control campaigns, and specifically campaigns targeting second hand smoking, is associated with smokers having a smoke-free home. METHODS: We used repeated cross-sectional national survey data on 9872 households which participated in the Health Survey for England between 2004 and 2010, with at least one adult current smoker living in the household. Exposure to all government-funded televised tobacco control campaigns, and to those specifically with a second hand smoking theme, was quantified in Gross Rating Points (GRPs), an average per capita measure of advert exposure where 100 GRPs indicates 100 % of adults exposed once or 50 % twice. Our outcome was self-reported presence of a smoke-free home (where no one smokes in the home on most days). Analysis used generalised additive models, controlling for individual factors and temporal trends. RESULTS: There was no association between monthly televised campaigns overall and the probability of having a smoke-free home. However, exposure to campaigns specifically targeting second hand smoke was associated with increased odds of a smoke-free home in the following month (odds ratio per additional 100 GRPs, 1.07, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.13), though this association was not seen at other lags. These effects were not modified by socio-economic status or by presence of a child in the home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide tentative evidence that mass media campaigns specifically focussing on second hand smoke may be effective in reducing smoking in the home, and further evaluation of campaigns of this type is needed. General tobacco control campaigns in England, which largely focus on promoting smoking cessation, do not impact on smoke-free homes over and above their direct effect at reducing smoking.


Subject(s)
Advertising/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Prevention , Television , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , England/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Smoke , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Class , Nicotiana , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data
3.
Tob Control ; 24(e2): e168-77, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25472733

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) submitted evidence to the 2012 UK Consultation on standardised packaging (SP) to argue the policy will have detrimental economic impacts and increase illicit tobacco trade. METHODS: A content analysis of the four TTC submissions to the consultation assessed the relevance and quality of evidence TTCs cited to support their arguments. Investigative research was used to determine whether the cited evidence was industry connected. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the relevance and quality of industry-connected and independent from the industry evidence. The extent to which TTCs disclosed financial conflicts of interest (COI) when citing evidence was examined. RESULTS: We obtained 74 pieces of TTC-cited evidence. The quality of the evidence was poor. TTCs cited no independent, peer-reviewed evidence that supported their arguments. Nearly half of the evidence was industry-connected (47%, 35/74). None of this industry-connected evidence was published in peer-reviewed journals (0/35) and 66% (23/35) of it was opinion only. Industry-connected evidence was of significantly poorer quality than independent evidence (p<0.001). COIs were not disclosed by TTCs in 91% (32/35) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of peer-reviewed research to support their arguments, TTCs relied on evidence they commissioned and the opinions of TTC-connected third-parties. Such connections were not disclosed by TTCs when citing this evidence and were time consuming to uncover. In line with Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and broader transparency initiatives, TTCs should be required to disclose their funding of all third-parties and any COIs when citing evidence.


Subject(s)
Commerce/economics , Conflict of Interest , Health Policy , Product Packaging , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/ethics , Tobacco Products/economics , Crime , Humans , Internationality , Marketing/economics , Marketing/ethics , Product Packaging/economics , Product Packaging/legislation & jurisprudence , Reference Standards , Tobacco Industry/economics , United Kingdom
4.
Tob Control ; 23(e1): e35-43, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24614041

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the UK, transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) have been arguing that levels of illicit trade are high and increasing and will rise further if standardised packaging is implemented. This paper examines trends in and accuracy of media reporting of, and industry data on, illicit tobacco in the UK. METHODS: Quantification of the volume, nature and quality of press articles citing industry data on illicit tobacco in UK newspapers from March 2008 to March 2013. Examination of published TTC data on illicit, including a comparison with independent data and of TTC reporting of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs data on illicit. RESULTS: Media stories citing industry data on illicit tobacco began in June 2011, 2 months after the Tobacco Control Plan for England, which heralded standardised packaging, was published. The majority of data cited are based on industry Empty Pack Surveys for which no methodology is available. For almost all parts of the country where repeat data were cited in press stories, they indicated an increase, often substantial, in non-domestic/illicit cigarettes that is not supported by independent data. Similarly, national data from two published industry sources show a sudden large increase in non-domestic product between 2011 and 2012. Yet the methodology of one report changes over this period and the other provides no published methodology. In contrast, independent data show steady declines in non-domestic and illicit cigarette penetration from 2006 to 2012 and either a continued decline or small increase to 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Industry claims that use of Non-UK Duty Paid/illicit cigarettes in the UK is sharply increasing are inconsistent with historical trends and recent independent data. TTCs are exaggerating the threat of illicit tobacco by commissioning surveys whose methodology and validity remain uncertain, planting misleading stories and misquoting government data. Industry data on levels of illicit should be treated with extreme caution.


Subject(s)
Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Crime/trends , Tobacco Industry/standards , Tobacco Products/supply & distribution , Commerce/trends , Humans , International Cooperation , Mass Media/standards , Product Packaging/standards , United Kingdom
6.
Glob Public Health ; 3(1): 1-25, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19288356

ABSTRACT

British American Tobacco (BAT) has made concerted efforts since the late 1980s to establish a major presence in Vietnam, among the world's 10 fastest growing tobacco markets. Until 2000, Vietnam's tight regulation of the industry has been largely driven by trade and investment policy, resulting in a stronger domestic industry but increased production and consumption of tobacco products. BAT gained market access, and achieved a dominant market share among TTCs, through leaf development, licensed manufacturing, and the contraband trade. With impending trade liberalization in Vietnam, the company is now well placed to further expand sales. The ambitious National Tobacco Control Policy, adopted in 2000, signals a shift in political priority towards the protection of public health. Effective implementation and enforcement of its comprehensive measures will depend on the public health community's ability to draw support from regional and global experience, notably the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC).


Subject(s)
Commerce , Economic Competition , Marketing/organization & administration , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom , United States , Vietnam
7.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 28(2): 104-10, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16497788

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine knowledge, attitudes and experiences of London casino workers regarding exposure to second hand smoke (SHS) in the workplace. DESIGN: Postal survey of 1568 London casino workers in 25 casinos who were members of the TGWU or GMB Trade Unions. MAIN RESULTS: Of the workers, 559 responded to the survey (36% response), 22% of whom were current smokers. Of the respondents, 71% report being nearly always exposed to heavy levels of SHS at work, and most (65%) want all working areas in their casino to be smoke-free. The majority (78%) are bothered by SHS at work, while 91% have wanted to move away from where they are working because of it. Fifty-seven per cent believe their health has suffered as a result of SHS. Of the workers who smoke at work, 59% believe that they would try to quit smoking if no one was allowed to smoke in the casino. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of responders are bothered by SHS, and many are concerned about the health impacts. Most want all working areas in their casino to be smoke-free. Despite difficulties in generalizing from this limited sample, these findings add weight to the argument that the legislation on smoking in public places in England should encompass all workplaces, without exemption.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Gambling , Occupational Exposure , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Adult , Female , Humans , London , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Tob Control ; 14(1): 13-21, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15735295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco is the single largest cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world; in the former socialist bloc tobacco kills twice as many men as in the west. Although evidence shows that liberalisation of the cigarette trade through the elimination of import barriers leads to significant increases in consumption, far less is known about the impact of foreign direct investment on cigarette consumption. This paper seeks to explore the impact that the substantial transnational tobacco company investments have had on patterns of tobacco trade and consumption in the former Soviet Union. DESIGN: Routine data were used to explore trends in cigarette trade and consumption in the 15 countries of the former Soviet Union from the 1960s to the present day. Comparisons were made between trends in countries that have received substantial investment from the tobacco transnationals and countries that have not. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2000 cigarette production increased by 96% in countries receiving industry investment and by 11% in countries that did not. Over the same period cigarette consumption increased by 40%; the increase was concentrated in countries receiving investments. Despite these investments, cigarette imports still outweigh exports and no trade surplus has yet to result. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that liberalisation of inward investment has a significant and positive impact on cigarette consumption and that without appropriate safeguards, market liberalisation may have long term negative impacts on health. Specific trade rules are needed to govern trade and investment in this uniquely harmful product. Implementation of effective tobacco control policies should precede tobacco industry privatisation. International financial organisations pressing for privatisation should ensure this occurs.


Subject(s)
Investments , Smoking/economics , Tobacco Industry/economics , Commerce/economics , Commerce/trends , Economic Competition/economics , Economic Competition/trends , Europe, Eastern , Humans , Male , Public Policy , Smoking/trends , Nicotiana , Tobacco Industry/methods
9.
Tob Control ; 13 Suppl 2: ii88-95, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15564226

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the strategy used by British American Tobacco (BAT) to re-enter the Chinese market from 1979 to 2000 after historically dominating the market before the 1950s. DESIGN: Analysis of tobacco industry document files to date available only on-site at the Guildford Depository operated by BAT. An additional search of recent documents related to BAT, placed in the Minnesota Depository, was also carried out. RESULTS: BAT has been committed to regaining its historically dominant position in China since the country reopened to foreign companies in 1979. Initially, BAT remained cautious relative to competitors in seeking joint ventures, finding market access hindered by bureaucratic complexity, restrictions on foreign investment and imports quotas, and later an advertising ban. Instead, the documents suggest BAT strongly relied on illegal imports to expand market presence of State Express 555 and other key brands. It was only when risks to contraband sales increased that the company made greater efforts to establish a legal presence in the country. Attempts to stress the long history of BAT in China and a proclaimed commitment to corporate social responsibility have been used to facilitate later negotiations. CONCLUSION: China has remained relatively closed to transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) during its transition to a market economy, maintaining a firm grip over foreign investment and imports. Nonetheless, BAT has circumvented such restrictions through illegal imports and exploitation of inconsistencies in the local enforcement of advertising bans. Governments need to understand and address the full range of market entry tactics by TTCs in order to ensure effective tobacco control.


Subject(s)
Marketing/methods , Tobacco Industry/methods , Advertising , China , Commerce , Crime , Government , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Politics , Public Health , Public Policy , Social Responsibility
10.
Tob Control ; 13(4): 375-8, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15564621

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the involvement of Philip Morris in Living Tomorrow 2 and determine the rationale behind its involvement. DESIGN: Research was conducted through a web based search of internal tobacco industry documents made publicly available through litigation. MAIN RESULTS: For approximately 1,000,000 euros Philip Morris (now Altria) became a co-initiator of Living Tomorrow 2, a tourist complex in Belgium that aims to demonstrate how we will be living in the future. In addition to promoting the company and its grocery products, Philip Morris is using the complex and its website to promote ventilation as a means of accommodating smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. Particular emphasis was placed on the bar and restaurant areas. Despite the rationale for its involvement, Philip Morris fails to acknowledge its role as a cigarette manufacturer. As a form of corporate sponsorship Philip Morris thought its involvement could evade any European tobacco advertising ban. CONCLUSIONS: Philip Morris is using a tourist attraction to promote its views on control of second hand smoke (SHS) and accommodation of smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. However, ventilation does not deal with the health effects of SHS. Policymakers must be cognisant of the devious tactics the industry employs to promote its own agenda, especially in relation to indoor air quality and smoking in public places. Tobacco control legislation should be continually modified and strengthened in response to the changing activities of the tobacco industry as it strives to evade existing legislation and deter the advent of new legislation.


Subject(s)
Tobacco Industry/methods , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Ventilation/methods , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Belgium , Environment Design , Financial Support , Health Policy , Humans , Leisure Activities , Marketing/methods , Motivation , Restaurants , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence
11.
Tob Control ; 13(2): 136-42, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15175530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the contribution the tobacco industry has made to foreign direct investment (FDI) in the former Soviet Union (FSU) as an indicator of its political and economic leverage; to explore the impact this has had on production capacity and tobacco control in the region. DESIGN: Data on industry investment and its impact on cigarette production capacity were collated from industry journals, reports, and websites. Data on total FDI were obtained from the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development. RESULTS: By the end of 2000, transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) had invested over 2.7 billion US dollars in 10 countries of the FSU. Tobacco money as a proportion of FDI varies from 1% to over 30% in Uzbekistan. Cigarette production capacity in the factories receiving investments tripled from 146 to 416 billion cigarettes per annum and the TTCs' market share has increased from nothing to between 50-100% in the markets in which they invested. Findings suggest that the effectiveness of national tobacco control measures corresponds broadly to the nature of the political and economic transition in each country and the size of industry investment, which is determined in part by the political context. Thus more effective measures tend to be seen in democratic states with smaller or no industry investments while the least effective measures are seen in highly centralised, one party states with high levels of industry investment or those with limited governmental capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The entry of the TTCs at a time of major political and economic change left the FSU particularly vulnerable to industry influence. This influence was enhanced by the industry's significant contribution to FDI, their ability to take over existing state monopolies in all but the largest countries, and the lack of democratic opposition.


Subject(s)
Investments/trends , Tobacco Industry/trends , Advertising/economics , Commonwealth of Independent States , Humans , International Cooperation , Investments/economics , Marketing/economics , Organizational Objectives , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Industry/economics
12.
Tob Control ; 13(2): 143-50, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15175531

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify British American Tobacco's (BAT) reasons for targeting the former Soviet Union following its collapse in 1991 and the initial strategies BAT used to enter the region. DESIGN: Analysis of tobacco industry documents held at the Guildford BAT archive. RESULTS: Desire to expand to new markets was based in part on the decline in old markets. The large population, proximity to China, scope to expand sales to women and, in Central Asia, a young population with high growth rates made the former Soviet Union particularly attractive. High consumption rates and unfilled demand caused by previous shortages offered potential for rapid returns on investment. A series of steps were taken to penetrate the markets with the initial focus on establishing imports. The documents suggest that BAT encouraged the use of aid money and barter trade to fund imports and directed the smuggling of cigarettes which graduated from an opportunistic strategy to a highly organised operation. In establishing a market presence, promotion of BAT's brands and corporate image were paramount, and used synonymously to promote both the cigarettes and the company. The tobacco industry targeted young people and women. It used the allure of western products to promote its brands and brand stretching and corporate imagery to pre-empt future marketing restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: BAT used the chaotic conditions in the immediate post-transition period in the former Soviet Union to exploit legislative loopholes and ensure illegal cigarette imports. Governments of countries targeted by the tobacco industry need to be aware of industry tactics and develop adequate tobacco control policies in order to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable populations. Marketing restrictions that focus on advertising without restricting the use of brand or company promotions will have a limited impact.


Subject(s)
Marketing/organization & administration , Smoking/trends , Tobacco Industry/economics , Advertising/methods , Commerce/economics , Commerce/trends , Commonwealth of Independent States , Economic Competition/economics , Economic Competition/trends , Humans , Marketing/economics , Marketing/trends , Smoking/economics
13.
Tob Control ; 13(2): 151-60, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15175532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore how British American Tobacco (BAT), having established cigarette imports, responded to the opportunities for investment in cigarette manufacturing in the former Soviet Union (FSU). DESIGN: Analysis of documents held at the BAT archive in Guildford, UK. RESULTS: Considerable priority was attached to investing in the FSU. This led BAT to undertake a major organisational change and to intense competition to acquire assets. BAT used flawed economic arguments to persuade cash starved governments that its investment would reap economic rewards. It offered excise advice that disadvantaged governments while benefiting BAT, confused issues over pricing, and avoided competitive tendering. BAT targeted agriculture ministries, using its expertise in leaf production to differentiate itself from other potential investors. It subverted the principles of corporate social responsibility to promote itself as a business partner. BAT's task was made easier by the naivety of post-Soviet governments and by the international financial organisations' support for rapid economic reform. The latter permitted tobacco transnationals to penetrate markets before effective competitive tendering processes had been established, giving them the opportunity to minimise prices and establish monopolies. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the arguments employed when penetrating post-Soviet markets were highly misleading but governments lacked expertise to realise this. There is a need to build tobacco control capacity in transition economies, within and outside government, to ensure that governments are better informed of the true economic and health impacts of tobacco. Rapid transition from socialist to market economies without establishing regulatory institutional structures may be dangerous when investing companies use business practices that fall short of international standards.


Subject(s)
Marketing/organization & administration , Smoking/trends , Tobacco Industry/economics , Advertising/methods , Commerce/economics , Commerce/trends , Commonwealth of Independent States , Economic Competition/economics , Economic Competition/trends , Humans , Marketing/economics , Marketing/trends , Private Sector , Smoking/economics
14.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 17(3): 245-53, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11680543

ABSTRACT

A clear, up-to-date picture of smoking prevalence and its determinants is needed to inform the development of effective tobacco control policy in Belarus and other parts of the former Soviet Union. It is particularly important in view of the way the tobacco industry has targeted this region since transition. A nationally representative household survey designed to explore smoking behaviour and its determinants was undertaken in Belarus in April 2000. Data were available on 1090 individuals aged 18 years and over (response rate 53.4%). Respondents were similar demographically to the population of Belarus. Fifty three percent of men and 9% of women are current smokers and an additional 18% and 7% respectively are ex-smokers. Differences in smoking habits between successive generations were identified. These included a ninefold higher rate of ever-smoking amongst 18-29 years old women compared with those aged over 60 years (p < 0.0001) and a higher proportion of current smokers starting in childhood amongst those aged 18-29 years compared with older smokers (p = 0.0005). Smoking in public places, particularly the workplace where 65% smoke, is common. Smokers are more likely than non-smokers to have positive beliefs about the health impact of active and passive smoking (p < 0.0001). Amongst women the odds of smoking is 13 times higher in those living in large cities compared with those living in villages. In men, disadvantage and a positive attitude to the west appear to increase the likelihood of smoking. To date policy responses have been inadequate. Unless effective tobacco control policies are introduced, tobacco will continue to make an increasingly large contribution to premature morbidity and mortality in Belarus.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Epidemiologic Studies , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Republic of Belarus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors
15.
Prev Med ; 33(5): 453-61, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11676587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A clear, up-to-date picture of smoking prevalence and its determinants is needed to inform the development of an effective tobacco control policy in Ukraine, particularly given the way in which the tobacco industry has targeted post-Soviet countries since transition. METHODS: A nationally representative household survey was undertaken in Ukraine in February 2000. RESULTS: Data were available on 1,590 individuals (response rate 72%). Fifty-seven percent of men and 10% of women were current smokers and an additional 21 and 7%, respectively, were ex-smokers. Smoking behavior has changed considerably over successive generations, with an increase in the proportion of women smoking and a reduction in the mean age at first smoking. Factors associated with smoking include young age, urban residence (among women), and material hardship, particularly unemployment. Involvement in social networks appears to reduce the probability of smoking. Smoking commonly occurs in public places and smokers differ from nonsmokers in their health beliefs about smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of smoking among men are already high and among young women are increasing rapidly. Unless an effective tobacco policy response is developed to address the issues identified, tobacco will continue to make an increasingly large contribution to premature morbidity and mortality in Ukraine.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Smoking Prevention , Ukraine/epidemiology
16.
Commun Dis Public Health ; 4(2): 102-5, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11524996

ABSTRACT

Based on new data on the risk of secondary meningococcal disease in health care workers, a review of published cases and an assessment of the available evidence, a change to the recommendations for giving chemoprophylaxis to health care workers in England and Wales is proposed. Previous guidance recommended prophylaxis only for those who had given mouth to mouth resuscitation. Chemoprophylaxis is now recommended for health care workers whose mouth or nose has been directly and heavily exposed to respiratory droplets/secretions from a case of meningococcal disease around the time of hospital admission. Wearing surgical face masks is encouraged to reduce risk of exposure.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Health Personnel , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Meningococcal Infections/transmission , England , Humans , Masks , Wales
17.
J Public Health Med ; 23(1): 5-6, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11315694

ABSTRACT

The UK Government has put the elimination of health inequalities and social exclusion at the heart of its agenda. Partnership working is clearly needed to tackle these issues and has been identified as the way forward in a series of policy initiatives. This paper explores whether, despite the rhetoric, joint working happens in reality. Using the example of the Social Exclusion Unit, a 'cross-cutting' unit developed to work across organizational boundaries, it suggests that centrally joint working is not working effectively. As a result, public health programmes are not being well co-ordinated with wider government initiatives and public health appears to be excluded from much of the work around social exclusion. Two potential reasons are identified: (1) poor co-ordination between the Department of Health and the Cabinet Office; (2) a lack of understanding in the wider community of public health and the role it can play in tackling inequalities and social exclusion. A House of Commons Health Committee is currently examining co-ordination between central government, local government and health authorities in delivering public health. Meanwhile, the public health community must attempt to clarify and, if necessary, market its role and strengths in this sphere. Unless directives from central government are better co-ordinated, local efforts to work in partnership could be undermined.


Subject(s)
Community Health Planning/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Interinstitutional Relations , Public Health Administration , Humans , Primary Health Care , Social Isolation , Social Justice , Socioeconomic Factors , State Medicine , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...